[DISCUSS] Service-Center Docker images version numbering

2018-07-17 Thread Mohammad Asif Siddiqui
Hi All, There was an issue raised in github[1] of service-center regarding the images of SC in docker hub for which we need your feedback. Problem : Currently there are no docker images of service-center which reflects the current state of the service-center. We only make docker images when we

Re: [DISCUSS] Service-Center Docker images version numbering

2018-07-17 Thread wjm wjm
+1 2018-07-18 10:05 GMT+08:00 Yang Bo : > +1 for this. And I also suggest to run both the service-center and frontend > in the docker image. > > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 9:25 PM Mohammad Asif Siddiqui < > asifdxtr...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > There was an issue raised in github[1]

[DISCUSS]Simplify Dynamic Config (Apollo) Integration Test in Java Chassis

2018-07-17 Thread ??????
Hi all?? We had integration with Apollo for support dynamic config in Java Chassis, our CI will pull up apollo docker containers for test (nobodyiam/apollo-quick-start and lijasonvip/apollodb), this step is very slow and easy failed. I found that we are only use apollo openapi

Re: [DISCUSS]Simplify Dynamic Config (Apollo) Integration Test in Java Chassis

2018-07-17 Thread Yang Bo
For the purpose of testing this is OK. But the real problem here is that apollo is too complex a system for our use case. On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 11:01 AM 郑扬勇 wrote: > Hi all: >We had integration with Apollo for support dynamic config in Java > Chassis, our CI will pull up apollo docker

Re: [DISCUSS] Service-Center Docker images version numbering

2018-07-17 Thread Yang Bo
+1 for this. And I also suggest to run both the service-center and frontend in the docker image. On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 9:25 PM Mohammad Asif Siddiqui < asifdxtr...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi All, > > There was an issue raised in github[1] of service-center regarding the > images of SC in docker

Re: [DISCUSS] Service-Center Docker images version numbering

2018-07-17 Thread Zen Lin
+1 Best Regards, --- Zen Lin zenlintechnofr...@gmail.com Focused on Micro Service and Apache ServiceComb wjm wjm 于2018年7月18日周三 上午10:18写道: > +1 > > 2018-07-18 10:05 GMT+08:00 Yang Bo : > > > +1 for this. And I also suggest to run both the service-center and > frontend > > in the docker image.

答复: [DISCUSS] Service-Center Docker images version numbering

2018-07-17 Thread YangYongZheng
+1 Best Regards! YangYongZheng -邮件原件- 发件人: Kirin Wang [mailto:wangqilint...@gmail.com] 发送时间: 2018年7月18日 10:32 收件人: dev@servicecomb.apache.org 主题: Re: [DISCUSS] Service-Center Docker images version numbering +1 Good idea! Zen Lin 于2018年7月18日周三 上午10:23写道: > +1 > > Best Regards, > ---

答复: [DISCUSS]Simplify Dynamic Config (Apollo) Integration Test in Java Chassis

2018-07-17 Thread YangYongZheng
Yes, we only need test integration mechanism, not Apollo itself Best Regards! YangYongZheng -邮件原件- 发件人: Yang Bo [mailto:oaky...@gmail.com] 发送时间: 2018年7月18日 11:13 收件人: dev@servicecomb.apache.org 主题: Re: [DISCUSS]Simplify Dynamic Config (Apollo) Integration Test in Java Chassis For

Re: [DISCUSS] Service-Center Docker images version numbering

2018-07-17 Thread Kirin Wang
+1 Good idea! Zen Lin 于2018年7月18日周三 上午10:23写道: > +1 > > Best Regards, > --- > Zen Lin > zenlintechnofr...@gmail.com > Focused on Micro Service and Apache ServiceComb > > > wjm wjm 于2018年7月18日周三 上午10:18写道: > > > +1 > > > > 2018-07-18 10:05 GMT+08:00 Yang Bo : > > > > > +1 for this. And I also

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal for Re-Design of Service-Center Frontend

2018-07-17 Thread Mohammad Asif Siddiqui
Yes all the development and testing is done, we can merge all the features today and it can be a part of 1.0.0 release. Regards Asif On Tue, 17 Jul 2018, 11:55 am Zen Lin, wrote: > +1, to my opinion, agree with Asif. > And @Asif, do you mean all of the features you mentioned here can be >

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal for Re-Design of Service-Center Frontend

2018-07-17 Thread Willem Jiang
It‘s no harm if the development is down. We just need to get more feed back from the community and consider to merge the UI to the new UI. For the UI, there are some License stuff of java script library we need to care about. We may need to address this issue before CSE UI is open sourced.

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal for Re-Design of Service-Center Frontend

2018-07-17 Thread wjm wjm
ok but i think it's better raise proposal before start work on it. 2018-07-17 15:04 GMT+08:00 Willem Jiang : > It‘s no harm if the development is down. We just need to get more feed > back from the community and consider to merge the UI to the new UI. > For the UI, there are some License stuff

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal for Re-Design of Service-Center Frontend

2018-07-17 Thread Willem Jiang
I cannot agree with you more about it. We need to avoid this kind of situation in our further development. Before we start writing the code, it's quite important that we need to send a heads up or proposal to let others know about it. Willem Jiang Twitter: willemjiang Weibo: 姜宁willem On Tue,

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal for Re-Design of Service-Center Frontend

2018-07-17 Thread Zen Lin
+1, to my opinion, agree with Asif. And @Asif, do you mean all of the features you mentioned here can be concluded in release 1.0.0? As we known , Version 1.0.0 will be released in this end of month. Best Regards, --- Zen Lin zenlintechnofr...@gmail.com Focused on Micro Service and Apache

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal for Re-Design of Service-Center Frontend

2018-07-17 Thread Zen Lin
+1 Best Regards, --- Zen Lin zenlintechnofr...@gmail.com Focused on Micro Service and Apache ServiceComb Willem Jiang 于2018年7月17日周二 下午3:33写道: > I cannot agree with you more about it. > We need to avoid this kind of situation in our further development. > Before we start writing the code, it's