ok but i think it's better raise proposal before start work on it.
2018-07-17 15:04 GMT+08:00 Willem Jiang <[email protected]>: > It‘s no harm if the development is down. We just need to get more feed > back from the community and consider to merge the UI to the new UI. > For the UI, there are some License stuff of java script library we need to > care about. We may need to address this issue before CSE UI is open > sourced. > > > Willem Jiang > > Twitter: willemjiang > Weibo: 姜宁willem > > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 1:36 PM, Mohammad Asif Siddiqui < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Guyz, > > > > The development of these design was already done before and that's the > > reason we were able to show the snapshots of the new UI. The code is > ready > > to be merged but before merging we decided to come here and discuss about > > this UI for people opinion. Since most of the people are concerned about > > the effort needed to re-design this UI, so I would like to tell that > > development is already done. > > > > So in my opinion we can merge this change to make the UI better and > > whenever ServiceComb-UI gets opensourced then we can plan to merge some > of > > these designs to the ServiceComb-UI. > > > > Any thoughts? > > > > Regrds > > Asif > > > > On 2018/07/16 10:57:00, Zen Lin <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > As we known, CSE is a initial commercial product of servicecomb and we > > > have tried our best to ask CSE to open source ServiceComb-UI to > stronger > > > servicecomb and let servicecomb service users better. > > > But I think the discuss should focused on what's difference between > > > servicecenter UI positioning and servicecomb UI positioning. > > > > > > If we sure the functionality of servicecenter UI is a subset of of > > > servicecomb UI which will be opensourceed future, and Asif have willing > > to > > > keep on developing and maintaining a servicenter UI, will will have two > > UI > > > in future, I think that is allowed with a opensource project also. > > > > > > Therefore, to my opinion, I think we can focused on discussing > > > servicecenter-UI's position, something like, what functionality for > > > service-center UI is reasonable? > > > > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > --- > > > Zen Lin > > > [email protected] > > > Focused on Micro Service and Apache ServiceComb > > > > > > > > > wjm wjm <[email protected]> 于2018年7月16日周一 下午12:43写道： > > > > > > > maybe we can change our mind to: make sure new feathers all in > > > > ServiceComb-UI, not design a new one. > > > > > > > > 2018-07-16 12:41 GMT+08:00 wjm wjm <[email protected]>: > > > > > > > > > as i said that, Proposal of new SC frontend seems to be a subset of > > > > > ServiceComb-UI > > > > > if that's true, i think we no need to spend time to do one thing > > with two > > > > > way. > > > > > > > > > > 2018-07-16 11:58 GMT+08:00 Mohammad Asif Siddiqui < > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > : > > > > > > > > > >> Hi Sure, > > > > >> > > > > >> If this new ServiceComb-UI(as per your mail) is opensourced then > > will > > > > the > > > > >> exsisting service-center frontend deprecated?, If NO then I still > > > > believe > > > > >> it's a good thought to upgrade the exsisting Service-Center > > frontend. > > > > >> > > > > >> Regards > > > > >> Asif > > > > >> > > > > >> On 2018/07/16 00:51:06, "Sure" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >> > -1 > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > we will publish the cse-UI in servicecomb(named servicecomb-UI > may > > > > be), > > > > >> this’s the unified console of sc,cc and monitoring. So we just > need > > to > > > > cost > > > > >> a little of time to fix bugs of SC-UI. > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > The sericecomb-UI will be more valuable in the future > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > 发自我的iPhone > > > > >> > > > > > >> > ------------------ Original ------------------ > > > > >> > From: Mohammad Asif Siddiqui <[email protected]> > > > > >> > Date: Fri,Jul 13,2018 7:55 PM > > > > >> > To: dev <[email protected]> > > > > >> > Cc: krishna.m.kumar <[email protected]>, sanil.kumar < > > > > >> [email protected]>, vinaym <[email protected]> > > > > >> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal for Re-Design of Service-Center > > > > Frontend > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Hi All, > > > > >> > > > > > >> > As we have continously put an effort to improve the > > Service-Center UI > > > > to > > > > >> > make it more usable and user friendly, going forwards I would > > like to > > > > >> > propose some major changes in the Design of frontend. Some of > > those > > > > >> changes > > > > >> > will include : > > > > >> > > > > > >> > 1. Update Dashboard to have a more better snapshot of what > > > > >> > entities/resources are present in the Service-Center env. > > > > >> > 2. A place holder in Dashboard to contain the basic User > > Guide/FAQ for > > > > >> > ServiceComb. > > > > >> > 3. Add a new page for showing the list of instances which are > > > > currently > > > > >> > running and registered in service-center. > > > > >> > 4. Add a new page for showing the topology of Microservices, > this > > page > > > > >> will > > > > >> > describe the relationship between the different microservices > and > > some > > > > >> > metadata of the microservices. > > > > >> > 5. Advanced search criteria for Service and Instance List. > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Here is the Snapshot[1] of the changes we are planning to do. > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Most of the features development have been completed and we are > > > > >> planning to > > > > >> > put this change in the 1.0.0 release of Service-Center. > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Any thought on this? > > > > >> > > > > > >> > [1] > > > > >> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-servicecomb-service-cent > > > > >> er/wiki/Service-Center-UI-Re-design > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Regards > > > > >> > Asif > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
