On 8/4/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I like shale-goodies for the group id and shale.goodies for the package
name.
+1
Sean
Craig
On 8/4/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/4/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 8/4/06, Sean Schofield <[
I like shale-goodies for the group id and shale.goodies for the package name.
Sean
On 8/4/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/4/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 8/4/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > shale.goodies.petstore ?
> >
> > I like it
On 8/4/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/4/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > shale.goodies.petstore ?
>
> I like it except for one problem. What is the maven group id? If it
> starts with shale, people browsing ibiblio might get confused and
> wonder where the re
On 8/4/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> shale.goodies.petstore ?
I like it except for one problem. What is the maven group id? If it
starts with shale, people browsing ibiblio might get confused and
wonder where the rest of the stuff is?
The Maven groupId would probably be co
shale.goodies.petstore ?
I like it except for one problem. What is the maven group id? If it
starts with shale, people browsing ibiblio might get confused and
wonder where the rest of the stuff is?
Wendy
Sean
I'm cool with that too. It doesn't have to be a web address :-)
Greg
On Aug 4, 2006, at 2:47 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
On 8/4/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The only problem with com.google is if we move it from being
hosted on
google.com (a distinct possibility at this point.)
On 8/4/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The only problem with com.google is if we move it from being hosted on
google.com (a distinct possibility at this point.)
shale.goodies.petstore ?
--
Wendy
The only problem with com.google is if we move it from being hosted on
google.com (a distinct possibility at this point.)
Sean
On 8/4/06, Greg Reddin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think I prefer that too. shale.org doesn't appeal to me for some
reason I can't really put my finger on.
Greg
On
I think I prefer that too. shale.org doesn't appeal to me for some
reason I can't really put my finger on.
Greg
On Aug 4, 2006, at 2:03 PM, James Mitchell wrote:
I prefer com.google.shalegoodies
Your thoughts?
--
James Mitchell
678.910.8017
On Aug 4, 2006, at 11:30 AM, Sean Schofiel
I prefer com.google.shalegoodies
Your thoughts?
--
James Mitchell
678.910.8017
On Aug 4, 2006, at 11:30 AM, Sean Schofield wrote:
> Lets think on the package names a bit.
OK.
What about just org.shale? So for petstore we have org.shale.petstore
as the package name with org.shale as
> Lets think on the package names a bit.
OK.
What about just org.shale? So for petstore we have org.shale.petstore
as the package name with org.shale as the maven group name.
Craig
Sean
Yep. What we would need to know is the "from" address on the commit emails,
so we know what address to subscribe.
I changed the email from public to moderated so I could discover the sender:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You'd think Google would have figured this stuff out already :-).
Yes but its a wo
I also took the [shale-goodies] prefix off the emails. Users can just
the to address for filtering. We can save the [] notation for
subcategories - google code is already adding that for instance. Plus
then we can have [petstore], etc. to help sort the emails.
Sean
On 8/4/06, Sean Schofield <
On 8/3/06, Gary VanMatre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Humm, I would be willing to start a project in the shale sandbox that was
targeted at converting the tomahawk component examples into jsp/xml and clay
templates. Clay supports html namespaces too. This is a new feature and would
be a good m
14 matches
Mail list logo
