, and mentoring
http://www.JSFCentral.com - JavaServer Faces FAQ, news, and info
-Original Message-
From: samju [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 3:54 AM
To: dev@shale.apache.org
Subject: Re: Merging Shale into MyFaces
Hello!!
Where do we can get support for Shale
-mail to the Shale mailing list a week or so ago about the
possibility of merging Shale with MyFaces. Development of Shale has
become
somewhat stale, and I'd rather see MyFaces pickup the pieces than have
the
code base atrophy The overwhelming consensus for the Shale list is yes
(and Craig
That's a very good idea..
-Original Message-
From: Paul Spencer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2007 10:27 AM
To: dev@shale.apache.org
Subject: Re: Merging Shale into MyFaces
I use the Testing framework. So does Tomahawk.
I suggest creating a release based
-Original Message-
From: Martin Marinschek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 3:16 AM
To: MyFaces Development; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Merging Shale into MyFaces
For me, a merger makes sense.
Seems almost unanimous :-).
The question is who will do
on an project.
Mario
-Original Message-
From: Grant Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Monday, Okt 22, 2007 6:02 pm
Subject: Re: Merging Shale into MyFaces
To: Reply-MyFaces Development [EMAIL PROTECTED]To:
MyFaces
Development [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Conceptually, I
- ViewController/Dialog: I hope Orchestra can take in what makes sense
here (the notion of subflows which
I like Orchesta a lot, but I don't think the view controller/dialog features
should be tied to Spring
I see two configuration options - Spring and annotations. The managed
2007/10/22, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
* Tiles Integration
See Clay.
+0 I'll abstain here and since I don't know much about the Tiles side of
things. Let's just say that I think Tiles integration should just work
in
MyFaces and Shale.
Likely relevant for historical
Betreff: Re: Merging Shale into MyFaces
* Remoting
Unsure, as most of this can be done with PPR too.
+1 This is pretty useful and easy to use, and will affect JSF 2.0.
A secondary benefit is near-zero config for resource access,
particularly for resources provided in a jar file
On 10/21/07, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
big-snip/
* Dialog Manager
* Dialog Manager (Basic Implementation)
* Dialog Manager (SCXML Implementation)
The Dialog Manager might be a next step for MyFaces Orchestra. Anyway,
I
hope that one of the original
On 10/20/07, Kito D. Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I sent out an e-mail to the Shale mailing list a week or so ago about the
possibility of merging Shale with MyFaces. Development of Shale has become
somewhat stale, and I'd rather see MyFaces pickup the pieces than have the
code base atrophy
On 10/21/07, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is one class[1] and despite what the shale-tiles pom[2] declares,
it doesn't relate to/depend on any other parts of shale - just JSF and
Tiles. So it could just as easily be moved to the tiles TLP. Having
said that, I suggested this a
On 10/21/07, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Tiles Integration
See Clay.
+0 I'll abstain here and since I don't know much about the Tiles side of
things. Let's just say that I think Tiles integration should just work
in
MyFaces and Shale.
Likely relevant for
: Greg Reddin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 4:47 PM
To: dev@shale.apache.org
Subject: Re: Merging Shale into MyFaces
On 10/22/07, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
Tiles works with FreeMarker and Struts 2 too. And sincerely I think that
it
could be used
in the near furture like Remoting.
Bernhard
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Kito D. Mann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Montag, 22. Oktober 2007 17:49
An: dev@shale.apache.org
Betreff: RE: Merging Shale into MyFaces
I don't think that's a good idea, since JSF 2.0 is a year or
more
-Original Message-
From: Bernhard Slominski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 12:33 PM
To: 'dev@shale.apache.org'
Subject: AW: Merging Shale into MyFaces
The spec develops over the time so even it's not finsihed we roughly
know
what will be in it, it's
://www.JSFCentral.com - JavaServer Faces FAQ, news, and info
-Original Message-
From: Greg Reddin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 11:47 AM
To: dev@shale.apache.org
Subject: Re: Merging Shale into MyFaces
On 10/22/07, Antonio Petrelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tiles
-Original Message-
From: Pavel Savara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 12:15 PM
To: dev@shale.apache.org
Subject: RE: Merging Shale into MyFaces
but I'm having a hard time seeing benefits over Facelets and Clay.
What I see as benefit for tiles
Greg Reddin schrieb:
If this is turning into a vote we should specify what +1 and -1 means. Does
-1 mean no, don't port it or no we have to have this? :-)
I'd say a -1 means it will end up in an MyFaces dormant project. If we
agree having one at all.
Ciao,
Mario
,
I sent out an e-mail to the Shale mailing list a week or so ago about the
possibility of merging Shale with MyFaces. Development of Shale has become
somewhat stale, and I'd rather see MyFaces pickup the pieces than have the
code base atrophy The overwhelming consensus for the Shale list
A couple of notes embedded below.
On 10/21/07, Kito D. Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I sent out an e-mail to the Shale mailing list a week or so ago about
the
possibility of merging Shale with MyFaces. Development of Shale has
become
somewhat stale, and I'd rather see MyFaces
20 matches
Mail list logo
