Anyone know if we can we use photos and descriptions from the
wikipedia for the petstore example?
Sean
On 8/3/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone know if we can we use photos and descriptions from the
wikipedia for the petstore example?
Looks like it depends on the image:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Image_copyright_tags
--
Wendy
Most of the images seem to be: GNU Free Documentation License, Version
1.2. What about the text? Any ideas on that?
Sean
On 8/3/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/3/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone know if we can we use photos and descriptions from the
On 8/3/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Most of the images seem to be: GNU Free Documentation License, Version
1.2. What about the text? Any ideas on that?
Are you asking about the text on Wikipedia? There's a notice at the
bottom of every page: All text is available under the
On 8/3/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/3/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Most of the images seem to be: GNU Free Documentation License, Version
1.2. What about the text? Any ideas on that?
Are you asking about the text on Wikipedia? There's a notice at the
I'm considering an option that Craig mentioned earlier - moving this
to google's new open source area. While I understand the reasons for
the tight restrictions that ASF has, it makes it difficult to host a
fully functional sample app using several different technologies.
On google (and
What about just adding shale-petstore as part of shale-goodies? Was
that just a thing of getting wires crossed or did you intend for it
to be a separate project?
Greg
On Aug 3, 2006, at 2:26 PM, Sean Schofield wrote:
And I just set up a shale-petstore ;-)
Do you envision this being more
On 8/3/06, Greg Reddin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about just adding shale-petstore as part of shale-goodies? Was
that just a thing of getting wires crossed or did you intend for it
to be a separate project?
It was definitely great minds thinking alike at the same time ... :-)
I think
Mine is [EMAIL PROTECTED], but please don't make me the owner -- too
much responsibility. Unless 'owner' is the same as committer?
--
James Mitchell
678.910.8017
On Aug 3, 2006, at 3:08 PM, Craig McClanahan wrote:
On 8/3/06, Greg Reddin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1. I was wanting to
On 8/3/06, James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mine is [EMAIL PROTECTED], but please don't make me the owner -- too
much responsibility. Unless 'owner' is the same as committer?
The only difference between project owner and project member is access to
the admin screens for the project
On 8/3/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only difference between project owner and project member is access to
the admin screens for the project itself. Both have commit rights. I'll set
you as a member if you want just that.
I didn't know that was an option. Just 'member'
I'm ok with shale-goodies as long as we can release artifacts as
different versions, etc. I'm assuming that's the case. I think we're
all curious about the google option so lets go ahead with it. We can
always move it in a few months if it doesn't pan out. Right now
there;s just
Any reason why we can't use org.apache.shale for the package names
still? I can't really think of a better package name off hand.
Sean
On 8/3/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/3/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm ok with shale-goodies as long as we can release
Lets think on the package names a bit. I set up a google group for
us. I tried adding the svn commit messages to the group but I'm not
sure that's possible. Maybe we just add each commiter manually as
we go?
Sean
On 8/3/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/3/06, Sean Schofield
On 8/3/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lets think on the package names a bit.
OK.
I set up a google group for
us. I tried adding the svn commit messages to the group but I'm not
sure that's possible. Maybe we just add each commiter manually as
we go?
Hmm ... looks like
From: Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's probably worth noting that the infrastructure for native facelets
support in Tomahawk is being discussed right now on the MyFaces lists.
This would be a great time to jump in and get Clay support set up as
well. I don't think we have any
Well the email list is not public atm. That's probably the problem.
We could create a shell gmail account for the svn emails and have that
same account subscribed to the group. Then set up forwarding. That
should work.
Which brings us to the issue of the list permissions. One option is
to
gmail
mwessendorf @
gmail
DOT
com
:)
On 8/3/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well the email list is not public atm. That's probably the problem.
We could create a shell gmail account for the svn emails and have that
same account subscribed to the group. Then set up forwarding.
Added.
Craig
On 8/3/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gmail
mwessendorf @
gmail
DOT
com
:)
On 8/3/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well the email list is not public atm. That's probably the problem.
We could create a shell gmail account for the svn emails
19 matches
Mail list logo
