Re: 4.0.0 stable version release plan

Hi everyone, All issues has been resolved, I will release round 2 soon. -- Liang Zhang (John) Apache ShardingSphere & Dubbo Raigor Jiang 于2019年12月26日周四 下午6:32写道： > Agree +1 > > > | | > raigor_dev > | > | > raigor_...@163.com > | > 签名由网易邮箱大师定制 > > > On 12/26/2019 18:29，Sion

Re:4.0.0 stable version release plan

Agree +1 | | raigor_dev | | raigor_...@163.com | 签名由网易邮箱大师定制 On 12/26/2019 18:29，Sion Yang wrote： I think issue #3770[1] need to be fixed before 4.0.0 stable version. The issue is caused by PR#3663[2]. If we revert PR#3663[2], the encrypt can't only work in JPA with auto-ddl on, and users

Re:4.0.0 stable version release plan

I think issue #3770[1] need to be fixed before 4.0.0 stable version. The issue is caused by PR#3663[2]. If we revert PR#3663[2], the encrypt can't only work in JPA with auto-ddl on, and users can avoid this problem by create tables manually. But issue #3770[1] may cause encrypt can't work

Re: 4.0.0 stable version release plan

> Is RC3 production environment stable? No, but the API is same, you can try to study the API first. -- Liang Zhang (John) Apache ShardingSphere & Dubbo Rimaljit Kaur 于2019年12月25日周三 上午11:55写道： > Is RC3 production environment stable? > > On Wed, Dec 25, 2019, 8:19 AM

Re: 4.0.0 stable version release plan

Is RC3 production environment stable? On Wed, Dec 25, 2019, 8:19 AM zhangli...@apache.org wrote: > Hi Rimaljit, > > Thank you for pay attention for us. Maybe you can try to use 4.0.0-RC3. > > We have some API changes from 3.x to 4.x > > -- > > Liang Zhang (John) > Apache

Re: 4.0.0 stable version release plan

Hey, I have been using v 3.1.0 in my production as of now. I assume that v 4.0.0 is production stable. I intend to upgrade my production to v 4.0.0 once it is available. On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 5:57 PM zhangli...@apache.org wrote: > All issues are fine now. > We are not plan to release a

Re: 4.0.0 stable version release plan

All issues are fine now. We are not plan to release a perfect version, but just release a basic available version, and we can release 4.0.1, 4.0.2 ... continuously. I will prepare to release version 4.0.0 soon. Thank you. -- Liang Zhang (John) Apache ShardingSphere & Dubbo

Re: 4.0.0 stable version release plan

This is a LOCAL Transaction scenario, maybe @ zhaojun could help. linzesi 于2019年12月13日周五 上午6:01写道： > sharding-proxy query different results of data when > 'max.connections.size.per.query' is diffetent for server.yaml > > Sharding-Proxy Version: dev > >

Re: 4.0.0 stable version release plan

sharding-proxy query different results of data when 'max.connections.size.per.query' is diffetent for server.yaml Sharding-Proxy Version: dev mysql-version: 5.7 java-version:jdk8 OS: window10 I've set up this issue#3732(https://github.com/apache/incubator-shardingsphere/issues/3732)

Re: 4.0.0 stable version release plan

Thank you for find bugs. we need to repair this issue before release. -- Liang Zhang (John) Apache ShardingSphere & Dubbo linzesi 于2019年12月12日周四 下午5:21写道： > When I write shardingsphere-acceptance-test cases. I find a problem as > follow: > sharding-proxy cannot query data

Re: 4.0.0 stable version release plan

When I write shardingsphere-acceptance-test cases. I find a problem as follow: sharding-proxy cannot query data when 'max.connections.size.per.query=1' for server.yaml using springboot and mybatis framework. sharding-proxy version: dev mysql-version: 5.7 java-version:jdk8 OS: window10 I've

Re: 4.0.0 stable version release plan

Liang, You are right. I'll create a schedule for performance test. Zhang Yonglun Apache ShardingSphere zhangli...@apache.org 于2019年12月9日周一 上午11:34写道： > Acceptance test framework will be established soon. > The proposal is to assert the project is OK basically. we don't expect it > can

Re: 4.0.0 stable version release plan

Acceptance test framework will be established soon. The proposal is to assert the project is OK basically. we don't expect it can assert all function details. We prefer using uint tests and integrated test engine to assert all function details, it is fine now. So, IMO, we can establish the

Re: 4.0.0 stable version release plan

It looks good to me, but it’s better we have a mechanism to verify whether 4.0.0 is stable or not. -- Zhao Jun (cherrylzhao) Apache Sharding-Sphere & ServiceComb > On Dec 9, 2019, at 10:53 AM, Sheng Wu wrote: > > zhaojun 于2019年12月9日周一 上午10:21写道： > >> @Sheng >> >> Maybe you

Re: 4.0.0 stable version release plan

zhaojun 于2019年12月9日周一 上午10:21写道： > @Sheng > > Maybe you have misunderstood what i have said. > I meant if we have not an acceptance-test framework, maybe we will spend > another several months to process release work. > This is a critical problems we should face with. > No very critical I think

Re: 4.0.0 stable version release plan

Finishing Acceptance-test framework is better, but not a block, IMO. As Liang said, a detailed schedule is necessary to makes everyone review all the tasks and their time costs. Juan Pan panj...@apache.org Juan Pan(Trista), Apache ShardingSphere On 12/8/2019 22:50，Sheng Wu wrote： zhaojun

Re: 4.0.0 stable version release plan

zhaojun 于2019年12月8日周日 下午9:50写道： > Acceptance-test framework will make release workflow more smoothly. > We will spend a lot of time (maybe months) to verify the function manually > on every release time. > Several months? Are you saying ShardingSphere will have no stable release in over 1.5

Re: 4.0.0 stable version release plan

Acceptance-test framework will make release workflow more smoothly. We will spend a lot of time (maybe months) to verify the function manually on every release time. In fact, we could not release a version ASAP now. -- Zhao Jun (cherrylzhao) Apache ShardingSphere & ServiceComb >

Re: 4.0.0 stable version release plan

Make sense to me. Sheng Wu 吴晟 Twitter, wusheng1108 zhangli...@apache.org 于2019年12月7日周六 下午6:47写道： > How about get the result of performance test at last? It is a good way to > confirm there are no performance issue for the stable version. > It should be ok soon, maybe next week. We can list a

Re: 4.0.0 stable version release plan

How about get the result of performance test at last? It is a good way to confirm there are no performance issue for the stable version. It should be ok soon, maybe next week. We can list a scheduler for the detail of performance test. -- Liang Zhang (John) Apache ShardingSphere

Re: 4.0.0 stable version release plan

Hi Sheng, Thanks for your clarification, i get your point. Juan Pan panj...@apache.org Juan Pan(Trista), Apache ShardingSphere On 12/7/2019 17:59，Sheng Wu wrote： Hi Actually, my point is those two even not source release :) Those are test frameworks. The user would feel they exist.

Re: 4.0.0 stable version release plan

Hi Actually, my point is those two even not source release :) Those are test frameworks. The user would feel they exist. Sheng Wu 吴晟 Twitter, wusheng1108 Juan Pan 于2019年12月7日周六 下午5:50写道： > Hi Sheng and Liang, > > > I totally agree to release a stable version for community ASAP, however i >

Re: 4.0.0 stable version release plan

Hi Sheng and Liang, I totally agree to release a stable version for community ASAP, however i am curious about the release note and the intending date of it. Is there any new for this release, or just hot bugfix? As Sheng said, ISSUE[1] and [2] seems not block, so Liang, would you like to

Re: 4.0.0 stable version release plan

zhangli...@apache.org 于2019年12月7日周六 下午5:18写道： > Hi, ShardingSphere community, > > I'd like to talk about the release plan of 4.0.0 stable version. > As you know, after enter Apache incubator, ShardingSphere had released 3 RC > versions during the past year. The features are stable more and more,