http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160
Summary: slf4j throw NullPointerException in singed applet
Product: SLF4J
Version: 1.5.x
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: critical
Priority: P1
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31
--- Comment #68 from Joern Huxhorn jo...@huxhorn.de 2009-11-23 19:59:25 ---
(In reply to comment #65)
Janos (boci.b...@gmail.com),
Even if everyone on the planet was using JDK 1.7, SLF4J would still need to
ensure binary compatibility with
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152
Ceki Gulcu lis...@qos.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159
--- Comment #1 from Ceki Gulcu lis...@qos.ch 2009-11-22 00:09:26 ---
I started working this issue. Unfortunately, the required changes are more
extensive than I had expected. I am going it to leave it as is for the time
being.
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75
Hugues Malphettes hmalphet...@intalio.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #63 is|0 |1
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31
Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen r...@runjva.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||r...@runjva.com
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31
--- Comment #63 from Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen r...@runjva.com 2009-11-16
09:26:55 ---
(In reply to comment #61)
Bug #133 is one such issue, something that I would have needed on several
occasions, one of which was the bridging of XSLT messages
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31
--- Comment #64 from boci boci.b...@gmail.com 2009-11-16 09:38:18 ---
(In reply to comment #62)
(In reply to comment #58)
Disagree. Runtime compatibility is not required. Java 1.4 is dead. I think
only
bugfix release need for 1.4
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31
--- Comment #67 from Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen r...@runjva.com 2009-11-16
19:56:00 ---
(In reply to comment #64)
Please be aware that slf4j serves many people with many different needs, and
that Java is the new Cobol. Literally :)
Some
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31
--- Comment #54 from Ceki Gulcu lis...@qos.ch 2009-11-14 12:41:26 ---
Any migration to from the current API to a new API must be transparent. Just
keep in mind that for some users, having to install a binding, such as
slf4j-jdk14.jar or
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31
--- Comment #55 from Joern Huxhorn jo...@huxhorn.de 2009-11-14 17:45:22 ---
No, no, no, nobody *has* to change their slf4j-imports, It's entirely optional.
The original SLF4J-API would be left untouched.
The same is the case for binding. They
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31
--- Comment #56 from Ceki Gulcu lis...@qos.ch 2009-11-14 18:44:45 ---
Sorry, I was not clear in my previous response. I had understood that
the use of the new logger was optional which is the point of keeping
the old one untouched.
The issue is
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31
--- Comment #58 from boci boci.b...@gmail.com 2009-11-14 20:08:06 ---
(In reply to comment #56)
Sorry, I was not clear in my previous response. I had understood that
the use of the new logger was optional which is the point of keeping
the old
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31
--- Comment #60 from Mark A. Ziesemer b...@mark.ziesemer.com 2009-11-15
03:05:50 ---
In response to comment #58 and comment #59:
How is Runtime compatibility is not required a disagreement to comment #56,
as stated? It seems that maybe everyone
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148
--- Comment #7 from Joern Huxhorn jo...@huxhorn.de 2009-11-13 11:24:01 ---
This all sounds quite reasonable now.
The only (small) inconsistency that could be an issue is the following line in
your sample code in
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148
--- Comment #8 from Ralph Goers rgo...@apache.org 2009-11-13 15:46:58 ---
There is little point in specifying logger.debug({}, data); the structured
data object contains a message field so when structured data is present the
normal message text
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148
--- Comment #6 from Ralph Goers rgo...@apache.org 2009-11-12 02:29:48 ---
I've made the updates to make the Map unmodifiable and to expose the new
methods. I still have a few changes to make to enforce the 32 character
limitations.
--
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31
--- Comment #46 from boci boci.b...@gmail.com 2009-11-10 11:57:41 ---
Nice, i hope the new slf4j released asap (which include these bugfix/feature).
I don't understand why want fully backward (binary) compatible the next (2.0 or
5.0 ;) slf4j
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31
--- Comment #47 from Joern Huxhorn jo...@huxhorn.de 2009-11-10 12:31:38 ---
I guess this won't be included in the very near future ;)
SLF4J 2.0 must stay compatible with 1.5.x because there can be only one version
of SLF4J on the classpath and
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31
--- Comment #48 from boci boci.b...@gmail.com 2009-11-10 12:46:19 ---
(In reply to comment #47)
I guess this won't be included in the very near future ;)
SLF4J 2.0 must stay compatible with 1.5.x because there can be only one
version
of
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31
--- Comment #49 from Joern Huxhorn jo...@huxhorn.de 2009-11-10 13:58:46 ---
Alternatively, you could also give my implementation a try.
The dependency is
dependency
groupIdde.huxhorn.lilith/groupId
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148
--- Comment #3 from Joern Huxhorn jo...@huxhorn.de 2009-11-10 21:50:47 ---
Concerning 1.):
Ah, I think I understand.
I guess that Hello ${Name} would reference Name in the StructuredData,
right, and the actually logged message would be Hello
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148
--- Comment #4 from Ralph Goers rgo...@apache.org 2009-11-10 22:35:19 ---
Thanks.
Yes, the placeholders work as you noted. That was actually an afterthought I
had. It was pretty cool that Logback already had the code to do it.
I had forgotten
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148
--- Comment #5 from Ralph Goers rgo...@apache.org 2009-11-10 22:39:54 ---
I should have also mentioned that it was necessary to add StructuredData to api
instead of ext because Logback classic has no dependency on slfj-ext currently.
Adding that
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152
Hugues Malphettes hmalphet...@intalio.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75
--- Comment #9 from Hugues Malphettes hmalphet...@intalio.com 2009-11-10
23:35:23 ---
Created an attachment (id=63)
-- (http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/attachment.cgi?id=63)
patch to the slf4j.api pom to support logback-classic in osgi (equinox)
Hi
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152
--- Comment #2 from Eddy ecorb...@gmail.com 2009-11-10 23:40:45 ---
Yes, this has been addressed by the fix for (duplicate?) bug #157
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157
It is fixed in
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152
--- Comment #3 from Hugues Malphettes hmalphet...@intalio.com 2009-11-10
23:50:40 ---
In a similar situation I used
http://mojo.codehaus.org/build-helper-maven-plugin/parse-version-mojo.html
1- invoke it (in the parent pom to not copy-paste it
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152
--- Comment #4 from Hugues Malphettes hmalphet...@intalio.com 2009-11-11
00:40:34 ---
Created an attachment (id=64)
-- (http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/attachment.cgi?id=64)
generate osgi compliant Bundle-Version when version ends with -SNAPSHOT
It
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31
boci boci.b...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||boci.b...@gmail.com
--- Comment
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31
--- Comment #44 from boci boci.b...@gmail.com 2009-11-09 14:02:45 ---
(In reply to comment #43)
(In reply to comment #40)
The problem is not in the implementation but the change in the
org.slf4j.Logger
interface. Adding methods to an
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157
--- Comment #4 from Pete Muir pm...@redhat.com 2009-10-29 11:21:48 ---
Roger Kitain confirmed this fix works.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158
Summary: Placeholder resolution for logger method varargs
Product: SLF4J
Version: 1.5.x
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P1
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158
--- Comment #1 from Ceki Gulcu lis...@qos.ch 2009-10-29 12:32:03 ---
Hello Marci,
Try the following syntax:
logger.debug(Bla bla {}, new Object[] {stringArray});
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158
--- Comment #2 from Marco Behler m...@bwso.de 2009-10-29 13:21:57 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Hello Marci,
Try the following syntax:
logger.debug(Bla bla {}, new Object[] {stringArray});
Hi Ceki,
this works almost as expected. Just a
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156
--- Comment #2 from Pete Muir pm...@redhat.com 2009-10-29 13:34:00 ---
Created an attachment (id=62)
-- (http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/attachment.cgi?id=62)
Fix exports, add import on cal10n, use property in POM
I believe that slf4j-ext should be
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156
Pete Muir pm...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #62|Fix exports, add import on |Add export on org.slf4j.ext
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156
--- Comment #4 from Ceki Gulcu lis...@qos.ch 2009-10-29 14:55:39 ---
Patch applied [1]. The export and import clauses now actually makes sense.
Sorry about the 0.7 version declaration instead of ${cal10n.version}.
[1]
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156
--- Comment #5 from Pete Muir pm...@redhat.com 2009-10-29 15:00:42 ---
The applied patch appears to be missing the export
org.slf4j.ext;version=${project.version} which allows people to use XLogger
Here is a patch.
diff --git
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156
--- Comment #6 from Ceki Gulcu lis...@qos.ch 2009-10-29 15:10:58 ---
applied
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156
--- Comment #7 from Ceki Gulcu lis...@qos.ch 2009-10-29 15:15:55 ---
removed cruft. should be fine now:
http://git.qos.ch/gitweb/?p=slf4j.git;a=commit;h=58e6b11530ab61312326b4d5f4bf43900797d650
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156
--- Comment #8 from Pete Muir pm...@redhat.com 2009-10-29 19:21:57 ---
Roger Kitain has verified these fixes in GlassFish.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because:
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156
--- Comment #9 from Ceki Gulcu lis...@qos.ch 2009-10-29 19:24:31 ---
Does this mean we are go for a public release of 1.5.9RC1 and cal10n 0.7.2?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156
--- Comment #10 from Pete Muir pm...@redhat.com 2009-10-29 19:25:39 ---
Yes, we have verified slf4j 156 and 157 and CAL-8 and CAL-9 are all fixed.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158
Joern Huxhorn jo...@huxhorn.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jo...@huxhorn.de
---
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156
Summary: slf4j-ext OSGi bundle headers need updating for cal10n
support
Product: SLF4J
Version: 1.5.x
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Mac OS X 10.3
Status: NEW
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157
Summary: slf4j-* uses invalid OSGi version in bundle headers
Product: SLF4J
Version: 1.5.x
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Mac OS X 10.3
Status: NEW
Severity: blocker
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157
Ralph Goers rgo...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rgo...@apache.org
---
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157
--- Comment #2 from Pete Muir pm...@redhat.com 2009-10-28 17:33:13 ---
In the interest of user-friendliness, and promoting community testing of
release candidates, I would argue that they should be usable in all places the
release is. But this is
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157
Ceki Gulcu lis...@qos.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156
Ceki Gulcu lis...@qos.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138
Joern Huxhorn jo...@huxhorn.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jo...@huxhorn.de
---
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155
Summary: Manage Multiple SLF4J-Implementations
Product: SLF4J
Version: 1.5.x
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P1
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154
Summary: slf4j-api reports an incompatibility problem
Product: SLF4J
Version: 1.5.x
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: blocker
Priority: P1
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153
--- Comment #2 from akuhtz andreas.ku...@siemens.com 2009-10-20 19:15:18 ---
This is the stacktrace that I can see in the logfile. Unfortunately I cannot
provide a testcase as I see this only during shutdown of a appserver instance
;-(
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121
Eddy ecorb...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ecorb...@gmail.com
--
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152
Summary: Bundle manifest headers have invalid version
specifications in SLF4J version 1.5.9-RC0
Product: SLF4J
Version: 1.5.x
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=150
Rick Beton rick.be...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138
--- Comment #8 from Matthew Teeter mrm...@gmail.com 2009-09-30 20:31:40 ---
I've encountered this same issue on Weblogic 9.1, 9.2, and 10.0, which does not
happen on Tomcat. I've filed a bug with Oracle on 9/2/2009 and they are
looking into it.
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31
Nicolas Lalevée nicolas.lale...@hibnet.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70
Nicolas Lalevée nicolas.lale...@hibnet.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151
Ceki Gulcu lis...@qos.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151
Ceki Gulcu lis...@qos.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lis...@qos.ch
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=150
Ceki Gulcu lis...@qos.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151
Summary: jcl104-over-slf4j should not be producing a jar file
Product: SLF4J
Version: 1.5.x
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Mac OS X 10.3
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority:
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110
Stephen Duncan Jr stephen.dun...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31
--- Comment #42 from Ralph Goers rgo...@apache.org 2009-09-17 08:15:53 ---
I have added support for varargs to LoggerWrapper on my fork at
git://github.com/rgoers/slf4j.git. This also contains changes in support of
bugs 127 and 148. To take
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=150
Summary: LogManager is needed but not implemented yet
Product: SLF4J
Version: 1.5.x
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31
Rick Beton rick.be...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rick.be...@gmail.com
---
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=150
Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen thorbjo...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=150
--- Comment #2 from Ceki Gulcu lis...@qos.ch 2009-09-15 17:36:04 ---
As Thorbjørn points out, it would be helpful if you could list the missing
methods in LogManager.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31
Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen thorbjo...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31
--- Comment #37 from Mark A. Ziesemer b...@mark.ziesemer.com 2009-09-15
18:28:27 ---
In response to comment #36, please don't add any additional arbitrary limits.
Is 10 any better than 2? Why not 20? I don't have the source code in front of
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31
--- Comment #39 from Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen thorbjo...@gmail.com 2009-09-15
20:56:32 ---
I was just thinking that
info(... Object o1, Object o2, Object o3)
could be implemented in slf4j itself by just calling
info( ... new Object[] {o1,
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31
--- Comment #40 from Ceki Gulcu lis...@qos.ch 2009-09-15 21:29:50 ---
The problem is not in the implementation but the change in the org.slf4j.Logger
interface. Adding methods to an interface is not backward compatible...
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31
--- Comment #41 from Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen thorbjo...@gmail.com 2009-09-15
21:53:11 ---
Ah, forgot that Logger is an interface and not a class. Bummer.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138
--- Comment #6 from Łukasz Rżanek lukasz.rza...@gmail.com 2009-09-15
23:54:54 ---
Created an attachment (id=61)
-- (http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/attachment.cgi?id=61)
Proposed solution?
The solution proposed in the discussion linked above
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138
Robert Elliot rob...@teviotia.co.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rob...@teviotia.co.uk
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149
Ceki Gulcu lis...@qos.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lis...@qos.ch
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149
Summary: Typo in version mismatch warning message documentation
Product: SLF4J
Version: 1.5.x
Platform: All
URL: http://www.slf4j.org/codes.html#version_mismatch
OS/Version: All
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127
--- Comment #3 from Ralph Goers rgo...@apache.org 2009-09-07 09:11:41 ---
I have created the fix for this at git://github.com/rgoers/slf4j.git. It also
includes support for StructuredData to support the new IETF Syslog format.
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148
Summary: Add support for Structured Data
Product: SLF4J
Version: 1.5.x
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Mac OS X 10.3
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P1
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147
Summary: Document the fact an LogLogger is a Logger
Product: SLF4J
Version: 1.5.x
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P1
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147
--- Comment #1 from Ceki Gulcu lis...@qos.ch 2009-09-05 14:58:23 ---
Two bits of information should answer your question.
1) A LocLogger *is* a Logger and can be used as such.
2) When you write
Logger lx = LoggerFactory.getLogger(X);
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117
Ceki Gulcu lis...@qos.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117
Ceki Gulcu lis...@qos.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|lis...@qos.ch |
Status|NEW
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146
Summary: NullPointerException when getILoggerFactory()
Product: SLF4J
Version: 1.5.x
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: blocker
Priority: P1
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127
Ceki Gulcu lis...@qos.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #2 from
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143
Ceki Gulcu li...@slf4j.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31
Thomas Timbul tho...@gtsquare.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tho...@gtsquare.com
--
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31
Ceki Gulcu lis...@qos.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|lis...@qos.ch |
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145
Summary: Typos in http://slf4j.org/legacy.html
Product: SLF4J
Version: 1.5.x
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P1
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145
--- Comment #1 from Ceki Gulcu lis...@qos.ch 2009-08-19 11:26:21 ---
If both are present *simulatenously* , slf4j calls will be delegated to log4j,
and log4j calls redirected to SLF4j, resulting in an endless recursion.
simulatenously is a typo
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31
David Rosenstrauch dar...@darose.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dar...@darose.net
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144
Summary: Logger Interface Should (Arguably) Extend Serializable
Product: SLF4J
Version: 1.5.x
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority:
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143
--- Comment #3 from Ceki Gulcu lis...@qos.ch 2009-07-30 11:19:51 ---
How is the contents of licences tag in pom.xml useful? Is it because it
provides a well-known and convenient place for licensing information or is
there another use?
--
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143
Joern Huxhorn jo...@huxhorn.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jo...@huxhorn.de
---
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143
--- Comment #5 from Joern Huxhorn jo...@huxhorn.de 2009-07-30 16:37:13 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
The licenses are inherited from the parent.
They are useful to visualize the licenses of all dependencies of a project.
See
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=142
Ceki Gulcu lis...@qos.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=142
--- Comment #1 from Ceki Gulcu lis...@qos.ch 2009-07-29 11:41:15 ---
Hello Mark,
Thank you for this report. I just started studying the problem. Which version
of slf4j-api and jcl-over-slf4j are you using? Which slf4j binding?
--
Configure
1 - 100 of 581 matches
Mail list logo
