On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 03:25:55AM -0700, Jeff Chan wrote:
> > 4. SURBL query traffic
>
> > mostly good if you subtract the blacklisted ones
>
> But any big, as-yet-undetected spam domains can also generate
> much traffic.
What if you were to have a friendly ISP that would be willing to s
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3852
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-05 16:13 ---
' - Most scalar accesses to $conf->{config_item_name} become accesses to
$conf->get(ID). ID is a numeric constant exported by Constants.pm. (why use
numeric con
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-05 15:14 ---
Also, we have put in this...
/sbin/iptables -A INPUT -i lo -s 0.0.0.0/0 -d 0.0.0.0/0 -j ACCEPT
I don't know if it helped or hurt the issue.
--- You are re
On Tuesday, October 5, 2004, 11:27:04 AM, Daniel Quinlan wrote:
> Jeff Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Can anyone recommend software to crawl DMOZ, wikipedia, etc., to
>> grab the URIs?
> Gack!!! You don't want to crawl any of those to grab URLs. Just
> download a dump of the database.
Yep
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3873
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|LDAP user_scores_dsn|LDAP user_scores_dsn
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3873
Summary: LDAP user_scores_dsn template functionality expansion
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 3.0.0
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3776
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-05 13:14 ---
I am seeing this problem too. I run SA 3.0 on a Debian Woody system, with perl
5.8.5 ( installed from CPAN ). Also using exim 4.42 with exiscan 4.42-27 ( all
built
Jeff Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Can anyone recommend software to crawl DMOZ, wikipedia, etc., to
> grab the URIs?
Gack!!! You don't want to crawl any of those to grab URLs. Just
download a dump of the database.
Daniel
--
Daniel Quinlan ApacheCon! 13-17 November (3
andrew collier wrote:
i have the following problem when reporting spam
This mailing list is used by SpamAssassin developers to discuss ongoing
development work on SpamAssassin. Your question has nothing to do with that.
Your question is appropriate for the SpamAssassin users mailing list
(see th
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-05 10:31 ---
By the way, we normally start SpamAssassin by running "spamd -d".
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3841
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-05 10:27 ---
I have filed Perl bug #31851 on the underlying perl issue.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watchin
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3776
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-05 10:22 ---
Hi Florian,
Did you by chance have the SpamCopURI stuff installed?
Michael
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3870
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-05 09:19 ---
Subject: Re: New: Re-order header stripping so that rules can look at headers
before stripping
On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 10:49:37PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3806
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-05 08:54 ---
Hmm... How about
Skip the test if the user is root and the system is not linux.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for t
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3872
Summary: SA 3.0 creates randomly extreme big bayes_journal
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 3.0.0
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Prior
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3871
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-05 08:16 ---
Created an attachment (id=2419)
--> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2419&action=view)
patch to add -g
This patch adds a -g option to spamd to
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3871
Summary: spamd has option to specify user to run as, but no group
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 3.0.0
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3794
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3806
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-05 06:46 ---
Attachment 2415 only checks for solaris. The hostname command will also change
the hostname to --fqdn on HP-UX and on SunOS 4.* (pre Solaris). There may be
other
hello,
i have just upgraded to spamassassin-3.0.0 and run it on a linux platform.
i have the following problem when reporting spam using "spamassassin -D -r",
towards the end of the output there is a delay (a few seconds) the i get:
debug: Razor2 is not available
SpamCop -> report to vmx2.spamco
On Tuesday, October 5, 2004, 3:35:44 AM, Jeff Chan wrote:
> Can anyone recommend software to crawl DMOZ, wikipedia, etc., to
> grab the URIs?
Never mind. Looks like wget with appropriate recursion options
would work.
Jeff C.
On Monday, October 4, 2004, 4:50:48 PM, Daniel Quinlan wrote:
>> 6. Domain is listed in Yahoo (similar to DMOZ) = probably not spam
>>
>> 7. Domain appears in Wikipedia = probably not spam
> And these, especially #7 since you can download that, are good ways to
> get lists of good URLs.
Can
On Monday, October 4, 2004, 4:47:57 PM, Daniel Quinlan wrote:
> Lists of mostly good URLs:
> 1. http://dmoz.org/ - Open Directory Project
> huge human-edited list of URLs that are mostly good
Good suggestion; the human-edited part makes it useful.
> 2. http://www.google.com/ - Google
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3855
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-05 00:03 ---
Similar problem with the score threshold. Here are the first lines of X-Spam
headers from two consecutive spams:
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=27.2 required=4.0 tests
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3866
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-04 23:51 ---
Subject: Re: Empty rewrite_header doesn't remove rewrite_header setting
On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 14:41:29 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> --- Additional Com
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3870
Summary: Re-order header stripping so that rules can look at
headers before stripping
Product: Spamassassin
Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version)
Platform: Other
OS/Vers
> > (You do need at least {28,29} to make it work.)
>
> Hmm... the rule submission used {28}.
Huh. I was looking at my original code and didn't notice Bob had simplified
the SARE version. I thought I had seen {28,30} there. Have to go back and
look again, I guess.
> > This one is almost too e
27 matches
Mail list logo
