[Bug 6753] ruleqa is handling late/early masscheck data badly

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6753 --- Comment #2 from AXB --- If I understand the outcome of making it a range, not sure this would be wise as it could possibly not reflect changes on rule changes/revisions, etc. ,delay score changes and would be even harder to find out

[Bug 6753] ruleqa is handling late/early masscheck data badly

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6753 Kevin A. McGrail changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kmcgr...@pccc.com --- Commen

Jenkins build is back to normal : SpamAssassin-trunk #7933

See

Re: Script found that is aborting from insufficient ham

On 8/8/2012 6:24 PM, Jari Fredriksson wrote: 09.08.2012 00:52, John Hardin kirjoitti: On Wed, 8 Aug 2012, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: OK, so here's the issue: The script running RIGHT now is checking to see if the uploaded mass check log contains: # SVN revision: 1369288 N.B.: It's probably a v

[Bug 6821] Masscheck is not including logs for everyone who is uploading

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6821 --- Comment #3 from Kevin A. McGrail --- As noted on the list, we appear to have people with the wrong SVN version or SVN revisions like unknown. When this occurs, their logs are ignored. I also find that generate-new-scores runs for B

Re: Script found that is aborting from insufficient ham

1364050 does not look good? From what I can tell for the time period you were uploading, it was not the right version, no. Your newer uploads look better though and I think we are back on track. Regards, KAM

Re: masscheck corpus quality

On Thu, 9 Aug 2012, Jari Fredriksson wrote: How do you read this? This is from ruleqa page for today's corpus. I have lots more ham messages than 3119. And it shows no ham for this year. What? I have 11230 ham messages in my corpus... What numbers do you see when you hover over the hit % for

Re: Script found that is aborting from insufficient ham

09.08.2012 00:52, John Hardin kirjoitti: > On Wed, 8 Aug 2012, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > >> OK, so here's the issue: >> >> The script running RIGHT now is checking to see if the uploaded mass >> check log contains: >> >> # SVN revision: 1369288 > > N.B.: It's probably a very good idea to always do

Re: Script found that is aborting from insufficient ham

On 8/8/2012 5:23 PM, Jari Fredriksson wrote: My corpus came online today. Strange, if you have not done something. Or does it use my installed SA ? I had problems with that, but re-built SA from cpan... Maybe that's the key... I was in the impression that it downloads/rsyncs from development ve

Re: Script found that is aborting from insufficient ham

KAM needs chocolate: we're all "N'Sync" http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20120808-r1370707-n

Re: Script found that is aborting from insufficient ham

On Wed, 8 Aug 2012, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: OK, so here's the issue: The script running RIGHT now is checking to see if the uploaded mass check log contains: # SVN revision: 1369288 N.B.: It's probably a very good idea to always do a SVN UP and make before running a local masscheck for up

Re: Script found that is aborting from insufficient ham

09.08.2012 00:45, Kevin A. McGrail kirjoitti: > On 8/8/2012 5:38 PM, Jari Fredriksson wrote: >>> >> >> # mass-check results from jarif@whirlwind, on ke 8.8.2012 13.55.30 >> + # M:SA version 3.4.0-r1197259 # SVN revision: 1370707 # Date: >> 20120808T135530Z # Perl version: 5.014002 on >> x86_64

Re: Script found that is aborting from insufficient ham

On 8/8/2012 5:38 PM, Jari Fredriksson wrote: # mass-check results from jarif@whirlwind, on ke 8.8.2012 13.55.30 + # M:SA version 3.4.0-r1197259 # SVN revision: 1370707 # Date: 20120808T135530Z # Perl version: 5.014002 on x86_64-linux-gnu-thread-multi This is from my last log, generated late

Re: Script found that is aborting from insufficient ham

08.08.2012 23:58, Kevin A. McGrail kirjoitti: > On 8/7/2012 11:58 AM, Axb wrote: >> -1 but - it spit out even more high scores. >> >> > Or I tweak the days Ham is good for to include more ham? >> >> +1 This would probably cause less havoc. > Upped from 72 to 84 with very little change >> >> > Jari,

masscheck corpus quality

How do you read this? This is from ruleqa page for today's corpus. I have lots more ham messages than 3119. And it shows no ham for this year. What? I have 11230 ham messages in my corpus... jarifSpam messagesScore rangeHam messages Score range in 2005

Re: Script found that is aborting from insufficient ham

08.08.2012 23:58, Kevin A. McGrail kirjoitti: > On 8/7/2012 11:58 AM, Axb wrote: >> -1 but - it spit out even more high scores. >> >> > Or I tweak the days Ham is good for to include more ham? >> >> +1 This would probably cause less havoc. > Upped from 72 to 84 with very little change >> >> > Jari,

Re: Script found that is aborting from insufficient ham

On 8/7/2012 11:58 AM, Axb wrote: -1 but - it spit out even more high scores. > Or I tweak the days Ham is good for to include more ham? +1 This would probably cause less havoc. Upped from 72 to 84 with very little change > Jari, are you seeing your corpus? > > Anyone else seeing missing corp

[Bug 6821] Masscheck is not including logs for everyone who is uploading

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6821 --- Comment #2 from Kevin A. McGrail --- (In reply to comment #1) > svn commit -m 'adding some debug to generate-new-scores for bug 6821' > Sendingrule-update-score-gen/generate-new-scores > Transmitting file data . > Committed

Re: Script found that is aborting from insufficient ham

On Wed, 8 Aug 2012, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: On 8/8/2012 10:17 AM, John Hardin wrote: On Wed, 8 Aug 2012, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > > Can you point me out the masscheck page that you are seeing the > difference on? On any masscheck report, it's listed in two places: Thanks. Can you co

Rule updates are too old

SpamAssassin version 3.3.0 has not had a rule update since 2012-07-07. SpamAssassin version 3.3.1 has not had a rule update since 2012-07-07. SpamAssassin version 3.3.2 has not had a rule update since 2012-07-07. 20120807: Spam or ham is below threshold of 150,000: http://ruleqa.spamassassin.or

Re: Script found that is aborting from insufficient ham

On 8/8/2012 10:17 AM, John Hardin wrote: On Wed, 8 Aug 2012, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: On 8/7/2012 10:14 AM, John Hardin wrote: On Tue, 7 Aug 2012, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > Anyone else seeing missing corpora? > > Is this possibly a problem where corpora are not being included? My uploaded

[Bug 6703] sa-learn doesn't work with kmail 2 mbox format

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6703 Kevin A. McGrail changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|

[Bug 6821] Masscheck is not including logs for everyone who is uploading

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6821 Kevin A. McGrail changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kmcgr...@pccc.com --- Commen

[Bug 6821] New: Masscheck is not including logs for everyone who is uploading

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6821 Priority: P2 Bug ID: 6821 Assignee: dev@spamassassin.apache.org Summary: Masscheck is not including logs for everyone who is uploading Severity: normal Classific

[Bug 6820] listpromotable throwing an error

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6820 Kevin A. McGrail changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kmcgr...@pccc.com --- Commen

[Bug 6820] listpromotable throwing an error

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6820 John Hardin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jhar...@impsec.org --- Comment #3

Re: Script found that is aborting from insufficient ham

On Wed, 8 Aug 2012, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: On 8/7/2012 10:14 AM, John Hardin wrote: On Tue, 7 Aug 2012, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > Anyone else seeing missing corpora? > > Is this possibly a problem where corpora are not being included? My uploaded corpora are not _missing_, but the numb

[Bug 6820] listpromotable throwing an error

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6820 --- Comment #2 from Kevin A. McGrail --- Adding this: Index: /usr/src/Mail-SpamAssassin/trunk/build/mkupdates/listpromotable === --- /usr/src/Mail-SpamAssassin/trunk/build/

[Bug 6820] listpromotable throwing an error

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6820 --- Comment #1 from Mark Martinec --- > + /local/perl586/bin/perl ./build/mkupdates/listpromotable > Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at > ./build/mkupdates/listpromotable line 213. >if ($tfs =~ /\bpublish\b

[Bug 6820] New: listpromotable throwing an error

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6820 Priority: P2 Bug ID: 6820 Assignee: dev@spamassassin.apache.org Summary: listpromotable throwing an error Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified OS: Windows 7

Re: Script found that is aborting from insufficient ham

On 8/7/2012 10:14 AM, John Hardin wrote: On Tue, 7 Aug 2012, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: Anyone else seeing missing corpora? Is this possibly a problem where corpora are not being included? My uploaded corpora are not _missing_, but the number of messages reported for them in the corpora report

Re: Ruleqa denies I exist!

On 8/8/2012 7:57 AM, Jari Fredriksson wrote: OK - now we have a common denominator: the upload path. > >Are you using Warren Togami's "auto-mass-check" routine? or JM setup >from the Wiki? > Yes, warren recruited me, so that it is. I have no reason to believe it's the scripts on the senders s

Re: Ruleqa denies I exist!

On 8/8/2012 4:19 AM, Kevin Golding wrote: So I got asked if I could run a masscheck for ruleqa this morning, which puzzled me because I thought I had been... Sure enough, checking the ruleqa site shows no recent uploads from me, which was puzzling since I checked my cron email from yesterday a

Re: Ruleqa denies I exist!

08.08.2012 14:45, Axb kirjoitti: > On 08/08/2012 01:41 PM, Jari Fredriksson wrote: >> 08.08.2012 13:48, Axb kirjoitti: >>> On 08/08/2012 12:46 PM, Jari Fredriksson wrote: 08.08.2012 11:19, Kevin Golding kirjoitti: > So I got asked if I could run a masscheck for ruleqa this morning, > w

Re: Ruleqa denies I exist!

On 08/08/2012 01:41 PM, Jari Fredriksson wrote: 08.08.2012 13:48, Axb kirjoitti: On 08/08/2012 12:46 PM, Jari Fredriksson wrote: 08.08.2012 11:19, Kevin Golding kirjoitti: So I got asked if I could run a masscheck for ruleqa this morning, which puzzled me because I thought I had been... Sure

Re: Ruleqa denies I exist!

08.08.2012 13:48, Axb kirjoitti: > On 08/08/2012 12:46 PM, Jari Fredriksson wrote: >> 08.08.2012 11:19, Kevin Golding kirjoitti: >>> So I got asked if I could run a masscheck for ruleqa this morning, >>> which puzzled me because I thought I had been... >>> >>> Sure enough, checking the ruleqa site

Re: Ruleqa denies I exist!

On 08/08/2012 12:46 PM, Jari Fredriksson wrote: 08.08.2012 11:19, Kevin Golding kirjoitti: So I got asked if I could run a masscheck for ruleqa this morning, which puzzled me because I thought I had been... Sure enough, checking the ruleqa site shows no recent uploads from me, which was puzzl

Re: Ruleqa denies I exist!

08.08.2012 11:19, Kevin Golding kirjoitti: > So I got asked if I could run a masscheck for ruleqa this morning, which > puzzled me because I thought I had been... > > Sure enough, checking the ruleqa site shows no recent uploads from me, which > was puzzling since I checked my cron email from yes

Ruleqa denies I exist!

So I got asked if I could run a masscheck for ruleqa this morning, which puzzled me because I thought I had been... Sure enough, checking the ruleqa site shows no recent uploads from me, which was puzzling since I checked my cron email from yesterday and it ended with: ham-kgolding.log 1791