http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4351
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-23 00:09 ---
Subject: Re: spamc broken in trunk on win32
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> I see no reason to use uint instead of the completely portable uns
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4153
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-23 00:10 ---
Michael, thanks!
John, nice benchmarking ;)
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sidney -- the weekly tag was r171201 according to Theo's mail:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/spamassassin-dev/200505.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Your fix that should have made that impossible was
- ---
Justin Mason said:
> mystery solved ;)
Aww, I was looking forward to tracking down a really mysterious bug :)
-- sidney
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4355
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-23 01:30 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> There are snapshots of the 3.1 development tree here:
> http://svn.apache.org/snapshots/spamassassin/
>
> Moving to 3.0.4 -- this shoul
2005:
T_MC_MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER_b4342_c6 = MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER from bug 4342
comment 6
full freqs:
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/ruleqa?rule=T_MC_MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER_b4342_c6&date=20050523
__MSGID_BEFORE_RECEIVED_b4342_c6 = __MSGID_BEFORE_RECEIVED from bug 4342
comment 6
full freqs:
http://
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4355
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-23 03:12 ---
Subject: Re: Spam detect bug
> Ok, i have install SA 3.1.0-r170109 and problem with "@" gone, but...
skipping: rewrite_subject 1
skipping: lang ru
skipping: ok_l
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4355
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-23 03:57 ---
Hm, i think that migrate to 3.1 is no good yet, because 3.1 detects 30 precent
of spam (3.0.x detect
~95% and detects ham right with my configuration)
and not al
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4351
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4338
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-23 05:13 ---
I looked at the code on the trunk but the change seemed to overarching for
3.0.x. I'm not sure I understand the context of Daniel's change.
Anyway, just for the r
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4350
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-23 05:20 ---
I already left a comment for bug 4338 but just to recap here, I was proposing to
take just Theo's original quick fix for bug 3968#comment 2 instead of the whole
pa
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4338
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-23 06:21 ---
Created an attachment (id=2892)
--> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2892&action=view)
Simple patch
For 3.04, keep it simple. To do it the 3.
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4351
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-23 06:12 ---
WIN32 uses code in configure.pl instead of the autoconf stuff, so there has to
be something added there for spamc.h that corresponds to what was added to
spamc/con
Does anyone know if we should be able to use the latest version of
Buildbot, 0.6.5 with buildbot.spamassassin.org? I know that I could just
try it, but I don't want to spend time trying to get it to work only to
find that the master has to be upgraded first.
-- sidney
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sidney Markowitz writes:
> Does anyone know if we should be able to use the latest version of
> Buildbot, 0.6.5 with buildbot.spamassassin.org? I know that I could just
> try it, but I don't want to spend time trying to get it to work only to
> find t
Justin Mason said:
> yep, should be possible -- create a t/config file that enables it in
> the buildbot slave's checkout ;)
I thought that's under the control of the master. Doesn't the script
recreate the entire trunk every time? Oh, of course that would be too
expensive. Ok, I'll edit the t/con
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sidney Markowitz writes:
> Justin Mason said:
> > afaik you can.
>
> Ok, I'll try it. First I'll confirm that I can get the 0.6.2 that I have
> installed running again, as I've had it down for a while.
>
> Another question -- Can we have a way of en
Justin Mason said:
> afaik you can.
Ok, I'll try it. First I'll confirm that I can get the 0.6.2 that I have
installed running again, as I've had it down for a while.
Another question -- Can we have a way of enabling network test for the
buildbot runs? I can see how it should be an option, as som
I got past the setuid problem but now I don't see my slave appearing in
http://buildbot.spamassassin.org:8010/
I'm trying to run trunk-sidney-cygwin
It got the "message from master: attached" and then said it was doing a
keepalive, but nothing else.
-- sidney
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sidney Markowitz writes:
> I got past the setuid problem but now I don't see my slave appearing in
> http://buildbot.spamassassin.org:8010/
>
> I'm trying to run trunk-sidney-cygwin
>
> It got the "message from master: attached" and then said it was
I'd like to contribute some research I've done on spam that doesn't use
traditional bayes filters or other scoring methods nor traditional DNS BLs. Its
either spam or its not, but I'd like to see this technique in spamassasin,
possibly with really high scores for things that this method says are "s
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 06:45:12PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Here's the algorithm:
>
> 1 Decode any URL-encoding in the message
> 2 Un-MIME the message
Wrong order?
> 3 Scan all parts of the message for URLs and email addresses (this can be
> links, IMG tags, mailto:'s, or even
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Theo Van Dinter writes:
> On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 06:45:12PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Here's the algorithm:
> >
> > 1 Decode any URL-encoding in the message
> > 2 Un-MIME the message
>
> Wrong order?
>
> > 3 Scan all parts of th
Justin Mason said:
> t-sidney-fedora3 at least is showing up.
I'm not sure if I left the Cygwin one trying to run when I left home this
morning, and I know I didn't start the Win32 one since the spamc build is
still broken. I'll look at them again tonight, and also see if buildbot
0.65 works.
--
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4355
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|triage |
--- Additional Comments F
Quoting Justin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
- - if a spammer were to use a hostname like
"jm_at_jmason_dot_org.spamdomain.com", they get a free backchannel to
verify that I was (a) using SpamAssassin to filter to my mail, and (b)
that that address is valid. So blindly resolving the full ho
On Tue, 17 May 2005 14:01:09 +0100, Henry Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 3. Faster body scanning.
>
> Every body rule in SpamAssassin requires a separate pass through the
> message. The time complexity of this is O(n). If all of the rules
> are combined into one using a trie structure, the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
List Mail User writes:
> >Theo Van Dinter writes:
> >> On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 06:45:12PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> > Here's the algorithm:
> >> >
> >> > 1 Decode any URL-encoding in the message
> >> > 2 Un-MIME the message
> >>
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --- Forwarded Message
> Date:Mon, 23 May 2005 17:14:57 -0700
> From:Brian Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Buildbot-devel] buildbot-0.6.6 released
>
> I've just released buildbot-0.6.6, it's available
Quoting Justin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
A similar idea, without the "back-channel" flaw is to test the
domain for either 'CNAME' or 'A' record `wildcards' (as in the command
"dig '*.spammer_domain.tld' a" and "dig '*.spammer_domain.tld' cname").
This is an excellent spam sign (the host
List Mail User wrote:
Legitimate domains will use wildcards for 'NS', 'MX' and even
occasionally for some more obscure records, but an 'A' or 'CNAME'
record is nearly always a spammer.
Do you have any statistics for that? I administer plenty of domains
that have wildcard A records, and I'm n
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4263
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-23 20:06 ---
I will try that. When I reported the bug I was doing the install via CPAN.
Thank, I will let you know
(In reply to comment #2)
> Can you please test the current
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4361
Summary: Upgrade doc: Bayes restart clean
Product: Spamassassin
Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version)
Platform: All
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4361
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-23 20:17 ---
Created an attachment (id=2893)
--> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2893&action=view)
addition to UPGRADE file
--- You are receiving t
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4361
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|Undefined |3.1.0
--- You are receiv
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4355
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-23 21:28 ---
is there a sample message this issue is occuring with? I can't find a sample
in my corpus. Is this a
spammer trying to obfuscate, or just qmail/exim/whatever w
Quoting List Mail User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Looks like I slightly over estimated. I just checked the last
40 spams I received. After ignoring 419s, stock pumps and phishing I
found 14 without wildcards and 21 with - exactly 60% (only one had a
'CNAME' wildcard, the rest were all 'A' re
Quoting Keith Ivey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
List Mail User wrote:
Legitimate domains will use wildcards for 'NS', 'MX' and even
occasionally for some more obscure records, but an 'A' or 'CNAME'
record is nearly always a spammer.
Do you have any statistics for that? I administer plenty of domain
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4355
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-23 23:15 ---
It only happens when qmail gets an empty string from an ident lookup.
Justin fixed this in (trunk) r157208 -- bug 4180.
--- You are receiving this mail bec
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4355
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-23 23:54 ---
Created an attachment (id=2894)
--> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2894&action=view)
patch against 3.0
--- You are receiving this mai
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4355
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Spam detect bug |[review] qmail received-
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4353
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
42 matches
Mail list logo
