http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3850
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3776
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-09 07:04 ---
When I use create_lm(substr($input, 0, 1)) to limit the time there, the next
big delay in the debug output is between these two lines:
debug: rules: running
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3872
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-09 07:19 ---
Subject: Re: SA 3.0 creates randomly extreme big bayes_journal
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 12:02:32AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder if there is any
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3888
Summary: URIBL open redirector checking misses http-equiv
Refresh
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 3.0.0
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3888
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-09 07:45 ---
Created an attachment (id=2434)
-- (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2434action=view)
the page from Geocities
--- You are receiving
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3888
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-09 07:49 ---
Be sure to report these to the redirection sites. I'm sure Yahoo doesn't
particularly want to have their services used to redirect spam traffic.
--- You
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3872
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-09 07:54 ---
Sorry, I should have mentioned that I have copies of most of the occurences.
However, I don't know if the block usage remains the same when I make a cp -a
dir
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3889
Summary: Debug code is hard to use in third-party code
Product: Spamassassin
Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version)
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3776
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-09 08:27 ---
That makes sense given that the raw body message seems to include all of the
undecoded MIME parts.
sorta, but not really.
according to the check_language()
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3776
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-09 08:35 ---
I wonder if this would also apply to other
binary-in-the-body stuff, like old uuencoded
binaries in the body.
Hi Loren, the MIME decoder in SA3 should
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3872
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-09 08:54 ---
Subject: Re: SA 3.0 creates randomly extreme big bayes_journal
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 07:54:27AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, I don't know if the
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3776
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-09 08:57 ---
Subject: Re: massive memory consumption in spamd
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 08:35:02AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Loren, the MIME decoder in SA3 should
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3872
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-09 09:23 ---
Thanks for the hint. I had a look at the copied bayes_journal and
bayes_journal.old files. They seem to contain stuff the normal bayes_journal
doesn't have.
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3872
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-09 09:32 ---
In addition to my last comment, I only noticed that now. The vast amount of
those sa_generated lines seems to come in doubles. F.i. the file starts with
m h
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3872
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-09 10:28 ---
Subject: Re: SA 3.0 creates randomly extreme big bayes_journal
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 09:32:01AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
m h [EMAIL PROTECTED]
m h
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3872
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-09 10:38 ---
Subject: Re: SA 3.0 creates randomly extreme big bayes_journal
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 09:23:55AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
lines. Some of them look like
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3803
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-09 11:23 ---
Created an attachment (id=2435)
-- (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2435action=view)
SpamAssassin Web Button 1.0a
--- You are
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3803
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-09 11:24 ---
Created an attachment (id=2436)
-- (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2436action=view)
SpamAssassin Web Button 1.0b
--- You are
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3803
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-09 11:29 ---
I just uploaded two web buttons for SpamAssassin. I don't know it those would
work because I remember from the logo design that SpamAssassin is one word, but
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3872
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-09 11:39 ---
Subject: Re: SA 3.0 creates randomly extreme big bayes_journal
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 11:10:07AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
n (1 line)
c (many)
m (1
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3803
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-09 11:53 ---
Created an attachment (id=2437)
-- (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2437action=view)
SpamAssassin Logo (transparent bg and transparent
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3803
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-09 11:54 ---
Created an attachment (id=2438)
-- (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2438action=view)
SpamAssassin Logo Source (transparent bg and transparent
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3890
Summary: Change X-Spam-Level: character no longer supported in
3.0.0?
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 3.0.0
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3872
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-09 14:56 ---
Subject: Re: SA 3.0 creates randomly extreme big bayes_journal
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 01:38:56PM -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
I'd like to get the file if I
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3776
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-09 14:59 ---
Dallas, I know that you had said that the entire message was being sent to
create_lm. I thought from Thunderbird's rendering of the message that would not
be true
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3890
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3872
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dev@spamassassin.apache.org
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3872
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-09 15:11 ---
Created an attachment (id=2439)
-- (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2439action=view)
suggested patch
I'm still stunned about this! OMG!
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3872
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-09 19:11 ---
+1 wow
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3891
Summary: Enhancement: do not pass urls from null a references
to SpamcopUri
Product: Spamassassin
Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version)
Platform: Other
OS/Version:
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3010
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3865
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-10 08:31 ---
Created an attachment (id=2440)
-- (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2440action=view)
the r53754 patch
same as what I put in 3.1 via r53754
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3575
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3872
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-10 09:16 ---
I applied the patch successfully to the 3.0 RTM source and installed it. I set
a low bayes_journal_max_size (I didn't have any before) and the next mail
called
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3872
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-10 09:48 ---
Yes, of course, I confused that. But if I set this to 0 I'm learning probably
a thousand times (depending on the system) each day directly to the db.
Learning
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3872
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-10 13:11 ---
Subject: Re: [review] SA 3.0 creates randomly extreme big bayes_journal
On Sun, Oct 10, 2004 at 09:48:55AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Learning to the
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3841
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-10 13:30 ---
daniel, are you working on this? if not, I'll take a look.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3865
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Config option w/o parameter |[review] conf option w/o
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3766
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dev@spamassassin.apache.org
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3806
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-10 20:15 ---
+1
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3831
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-10 20:18 ---
+1
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3865
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-10 20:19 ---
+1
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3766
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #2337 is|0 |1
obsolete|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3766
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|request sa-learn to have a -|[review] request sa-learn to
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3872
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-10 20:22 ---
+1
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3841
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-10 21:07 ---
John,
If you declare 'my %foo' in HTML.pm (line after %tested_colors)
and put '$foo{bar} = rand(1);' in html_text(),
does each thread share the same %foo object?
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3881
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-10 22:18 ---
Created an attachment (id=2443)
-- (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2443action=view)
patch which applies cleanly to trunk
modified patch
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3814
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- You
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3814
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-11 01:31 ---
I to am having a similar problem, below is one of the headers. I'm getting a
lot of spam with ALL_TRUSTED being fired. I'm running exim4.43+exiscan+sa3
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3814
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-11 02:09 ---
I would also like to mention that I am having Interscan Viruswall loading
exim. viruswall scans the msg and the exim handles the rest.
--- You are
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2597
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Platform|PC |Other
--- You are
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2597
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Platform|Other |PC
--- You are receiving
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3892
Summary: Double Subject
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 2.63
Platform: All
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component:
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3814
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-11 05:53 ---
Subject: Re: ALL_TRUSTED
On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 01:31:22AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I to am having a similar problem, below is one of the headers. I'm
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3831
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3865
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3806
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-11 06:15 ---
+1
stupid modules...
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3892
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-11 06:45 ---
Subject: Re: Double Subject
hi,
the same with V-3.0.0 (You should see attachment)
alex
At 05:46 11.10.2004 -0700, you wrote:
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3892
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-11 07:26 ---
Subject: Re: Double Subject
On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 06:45:34AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the same with V-3.0.0 (You should see attachment)
There was no
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3841
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-11 08:37 ---
Subject: Re: Crashes when run multithreaded
daniel, are you working on this? if not, I'll take a look.
I am working on this. I have a closure-less version
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3806
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-11 09:52 ---
Just now trying this out. I get the message:
t/dnsbl.Bareword found in conditional at t/dnsbl.t line 15.
I suspect that in t/dnsbl.t the line
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3806
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-11 10:06 ---
Seems to run ok with that change. Ran make test as both a normal user and
as root. The tests were skipped as expected when running as root.
--- You are
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3814
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-11 10:57 ---
Subject: RE: ALL_TRUSTED
Ray Dzek
Network Operations Supervisor
Specialized Bicycle Components
PH: 408-782-5420
FX: 408-782-5421
-Original
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3892
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-11 11:15 ---
If you really can make this happen in 3.0, then 1) Attach the original message
before it was sent through SpamAssassin, not the wrong results; Also either
attach
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3814
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-11 11:34 ---
This header should be preventing it from being ALL_TRUSTED. Whatever is adding
this header meeds to use a proper format for Received headers.
Received: from
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3814
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-11 12:06 ---
yeah, I don't know -- I can't repro Ray's bug. If I paste those into a file
and run
./spamassassin -D -Lt tst
I get these debug lines in the output:
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3814
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-11 12:33 ---
I do not have trusted or internal networks defined in my local.cf
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3814
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-11 12:40 ---
Here is the debug header output from spamassassin -D -Lt
debug: received-header: parsed as [ ip=10.1.0.22 rdns=mail2.specialized.com helo
=mail2.specialized.com
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3814
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-11 12:49 ---
that looks fine -- it identifies the correct trusted handover, and the correct
untrusted handover. did it hit ALL_TRUSTED that time?
--- You are receiving
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3814
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-11 13:42 ---
hmm, maybe some insight on this then.. here's a legit email I sent from my
yahoo account, below are the headers, received from localhost like the
previous
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3872
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-11 13:57 ---
after applying that patch, the sa-learn --force-expire doesnt really 'force
expiry'. at least to me it appears it is doing the same thing as --sync. i
looks
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3872
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-11 14:07 ---
And you applied it to 3.0.0? I just ran a --force-expire on the patched
machine and it gives me debug output and expires (well, it tries and fails,
but that's
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3872
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-11 14:20 ---
Subject: Re: [review] SA 3.0 creates randomly extreme big bayes_journal
On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 02:07:48PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And you applied it
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3872
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-11 14:31 ---
well.. see if you can explain this then.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] svn]# svn checkout
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/spamassassin/trunk
spamassassin
Checked out
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3814
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-11 14:36 ---
Lance, I think I see your problem. I thought that in your example in comment #1
the second Received header was added by the virus scanner and was the problem. I
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3747
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-11 14:44 ---
Hi,
I just encountered this behaviour on Solaris and NetBSD as well
(thanks to M. Parker for the pointer to this bug).
IMHO, port 9 is not a good choice since
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3814
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|Future |3.1.0
--- Additional
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3814
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|3.1.0 |Future
--- Additional
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3747
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|Future |3.1.0
--- Additional
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3894
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-11 15:30 ---
Subject: Re: New: expiry algorithm needs major overhaul
On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 03:08:01PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Problem 1 is that the normal expire
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3747
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|3.1.0 |3.0.1
--- Additional
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3826
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-11 18:46 ---
Jouni's suggestion seems to stop the problem. And it looks to me like this bug
and 3855 are very very similiar, if not completely the same thing.
--- You
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3893
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3747
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-12 06:24 ---
Not port 2. It is listed in the IANA list and is in the services file for
AIX. You should probably use one of the ones listed by Klaus Heinz. All of
the ones
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3747
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-12 14:29 ---
Created an attachment (id=2444)
-- (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2444action=view)
Patch File
Moves to port 8 and adds an onfail warning.
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3747
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|make test fails on spamc_l |[review] make test fails on
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3741
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3747
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-12 14:37 ---
+1
I think this is a good solution for now, but we may want to just do a 2-fer
test -- try connecting in perl
to random ports and use it if we get a connection
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3806
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3895
Summary: Mail::SA::Conf::Parser::finish() method is missing
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 3.0.0
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3895
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-12 17:41 ---
Created an attachment (id=2445)
-- (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2445action=view)
fix
trivial fix -- remove the call.
--- You are
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3806
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-12 18:36 ---
that's ok, took care of that when applying. thx!
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3747
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3766
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3747
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-12 20:51 ---
I can certainly change the message, but I don't know what it buys us.
I just wanted the message to say you can ignore this so people know without
having to look
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3822
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-12 22:17 ---
Created an attachment (id=2446)
-- (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2446action=view)
Patch File
Here is one possibility. It checks to see if
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3822
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-12 22:56 ---
Assume the user wants Bayes and network checks, check for modules required for
these options, and list the installation status and minimum version of modules,
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3776
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #2431 is|0 |1
obsolete|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3822
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-13 03:48 ---
Subject: Re: warn during make if module versions are too low
Apologies if this is a second reply. Webmail bombed while I was trying to
post.)
Question, do
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3776
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-13 11:30 ---
I like that. I did ask for someone with more perl chops to look at the code :-)
I have to test it for myself before I vote on it, though, to be responsible.
701 - 800 of 34458 matches
Mail list logo
