In case it wasn't obvious by the appearance of RC3, this vote failed.
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 4:09 PM, Michael Armbrust
wrote:
> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version
> 2.1.0. The vote is open until Sun, April 2nd, 2018 at 16:30 PST and
> passes if a majority o
I think this is Java 8 v Java 7, if you look at the previous build you see
a lot of the same missing classes but tagged as "warning" rather than
"error". I think all in all it makes sense to stick to JDK7 to build the
legacy build which have been built with it previously.
If there is consensus on
I don't think this is an example of Java 8 javadoc being more strict; it is
not finding classes, not complaining about syntax.
(Hyukjin cleaned up all of the javadoc 8 errors in master, and they're
different and much more extensive!)
It wouldn't necessarily break anything to build with Java 8 beca
canfly.ca>
>>>>>> >>>> wrote:
>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>> So the fix is installing pandoc on whichever machine is used for
>>>>>> >>>>> packaging. I
>>> the person
>>>>> >>>>> rolling the release so I wasn't sure it made sense as a JIRA,
>>>>> but from
>>>>> >>>>> chatting with Josh it sounds like that part might be on of the
>>>>> Jenkins
>
gt; chatting with Josh it sounds like that part might be on of the
>>>> Jenkins
>>>> >>>>> workers - is there a fixed one that is used?
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>> Regardless I'll file a JIRA for this when I get back in front of
>>>> m
(~1 hour or so).
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 2:35 PM Michael Armbrust
>>> >>>>> wrote:
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> Thanks for the comments everyone. This vote fails.
chael Armbrust
>> >>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Thanks for the comments everyone. This vote fails. Here's how I
>> >>>>>> think we should proceed:
>> >>>>>> - [SPARK-20197] - SparkR CRAN - app
; >>>>> On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 2:35 PM Michael Armbrust
>> >>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Thanks for the comments everyone. This vote fails. Here's how I
>> >>>>>> think we should proceed:
nk we should proceed:
> >>>>>> - [SPARK-20197] - SparkR CRAN - appears to be resolved
> >>>>>> - [SPARK-] - Python packaging - Holden, please file a JIRA and
> >>>>>> report if this is a regression and if there is an easy fix that we
> should
> >>>>>
;>>> JIRA and open an issue if one does not already exist so that we can
>>>>>> triage
>>>>>> if these are just environmental issues. If I don't hear any objections
>>>>>> I'm
>>>>>> going to go ahead wit
re just environmental issues. If I don't hear any objections
>>>>> I'm
>>>>> going to go ahead with RC3 tomorrow.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 1:16 PM, Felix Cheung <
>>>>> felixcheun...@hotmail.com>
;>>
>>>> On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 1:16 PM, Felix Cheung >>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>> -1
>>>> sorry, found an issue with SparkR CRAN check.
>>>> Opened SPARK-20197 and working on fix.
>>>>
>>>> --
017 at 1:16 PM, Felix Cheung
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> -1
>>> sorry, found an issue with SparkR CRAN check.
>>> Opened SPARK-20197 and working on fix.
>>>
>>> --
>>> *From:* holden.ka...@gmail.com on beha
On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 1:16 PM, Felix Cheung
>> wrote:
>>
>> -1
>> sorry, found an issue with SparkR CRAN check.
>> Opened SPARK-20197 and working on fix.
>>
>> --
>> *From:* holden.ka...@gmail.com on behalf of
>> Ho
> sorry, found an issue with SparkR CRAN check.
> Opened SPARK-20197 and working on fix.
>
> --
> *From:* holden.ka...@gmail.com on behalf of
> Holden Karau
> *Sent:* Friday, March 31, 2017 6:25:20 PM
> *To:* Xiao Li
> *Cc:* Michael Armbrust; d
CRAN check.
> >> Opened SPARK-20197 and working on fix.
> >>
> >> ____
> >> From: holden.ka...@gmail.com on behalf of
> Holden
> >> Karau
> >> Sent: Friday, March 31, 2017 6:25:20 PM
> >> To: Xiao Li
>
___
>> From: holden.ka...@gmail.com on behalf of Holden
>> Karau
>> Sent: Friday, March 31, 2017 6:25:20 PM
>> To: Xiao Li
>> Cc: Michael Armbrust; dev@spark.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Spark 2.1.1 (RC2)
>>
>> -1 (non-binding)
>
To:* Xiao Li
> *Cc:* Michael Armbrust; dev@spark.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: [VOTE] Apache Spark 2.1.1 (RC2)
>
> -1 (non-binding)
>
> Python packaging doesn't seem to have quite worked out (looking
> at PKG-INFO the description is "Description: ! missing pandoc d
] Apache Spark 2.1.1 (RC2)
-1 (non-binding)
Python packaging doesn't seem to have quite worked out (looking at PKG-INFO the
description is "Description: ! missing pandoc do not upload to PyPI "),
ideally it would be nice to have this as a version we upgrade to PyPi.
Building
Thank you. Yes, it is not a regression. 2.1.0 would have this failure,
too.
Regards,
Kazuaki Ishizaki
From: Sean Owen
To: Kazuaki Ishizaki/Japan/IBM@IBMJP, Michael Armbrust
Cc: "dev@spark.apache.org"
Date: 2017/04/02 18:18
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Spark
That backport is fine, for another RC even in my opinion, but it's not a
regression. It's a JDK bug really. 2.1.0 would have failed too.
On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 8:20 AM Kazuaki Ishizaki wrote:
> -1 (non-binding)
>
> I tested it on Ubuntu 16.04 and openjdk8 on ppc64le. I got several errors.
> I ex
0.002 sec <<< ERROR!
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: requirement failed: No support for
unaligned Unsafe. Set spark.memory.offHeap.enabled to false.
...
Tests run: 207, Failures: 7, Errors: 16, Skipped: 0
Kazuaki Ishizaki
From: Michael Armbrust
To: "dev@spark.apache.org
On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 12:34 PM, Sean Owen wrote:
> LocalityPlacementStrategySuite:
> (... just hangs ...)
This test is very heavy on DNS requests... I tried to work around that
when I wrote it but couldn't, maybe I should try some more.
I wouldn't hold the release for that.
--
Marcelo
-
LocalityPlacementStrategySuite hangs -- definitely been seeing that one for
quite awhile, not just with 2.1.1-rc, also with Ubuntu 16.10, and not with
macOS Sierra.
On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 12:34 PM, Sean Owen wrote:
> (Tiny nits: first line says '2.1.0', just a note for next copy/paste of
> the e
(Tiny nits: first line says '2.1.0', just a note for next copy/paste of the
email if needed. Also can we point people to an HTTPS URL to download
artifacts in this boilerplate?
https://home.apache.org/~pwendell/spark-releases/spark-2.1.1-rc2-bin/ )
I'm testing on Ubuntu 16.10, with Java 8, with -P
-1 (non-binding)
Python packaging doesn't seem to have quite worked out (looking at PKG-INFO
the description is "Description: ! missing pandoc do not upload to PyPI
"), ideally it would be nice to have this as a version we upgrade to
PyPi.
Building this on my own machine results in a longe
+1
Xiao
2017-03-30 16:09 GMT-07:00 Michael Armbrust :
> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version
> 2.1.0. The vote is open until Sun, April 2nd, 2018 at 16:30 PST and
> passes if a majority of at least 3 +1 PMC votes are cast.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Ap
Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version
2.1.0. The vote is open until Sun, April 2nd, 2018 at 16:30 PST and passes
if a majority of at least 3 +1 PMC votes are cast.
[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 2.1.1
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
29 matches
Mail list logo
