The vote is now closed. This vote passes with 4 IPMC +1's and no 0 or -1 votes.
+1 (4 Total)
Marvin Humphrey
Henry Saputra
Chris Mattmann
Roman Shaposhnik
0 (0 Total)
-1 (0 Total)
* = Binding Vote
Thanks to everyone who helped vet this release.
- Patrick
cember 16, 2013 10:48 AM
> >>> To: dev@spark.incubator.apache.org
> >>> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 0.8.1-incubating (rc4)
> >>>
> >>> Hi Azuryy
> >>>
> >>> Please Check https://spark-project.atlassian.net/browse/SPARK-
gt;> problem, you might need to build mesos against 2.5.0, I don't test that, if
>> you got time, mind take a test?
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>> Raymond Liu
>>>
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Liu, Raymond [mailt
> > Best Regards,
> > Raymond Liu
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Liu, Raymond [mailto:raymond....@intel.com]
> > Sent: Monday, December 16, 2013 10:48 AM
> > To: dev@spark.incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache
;
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Liu, Raymond [mailto:raymond@intel.com]
> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2013 10:48 AM
> To: dev@spark.incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 0.8.1-incubating (rc4)
>
> Hi Azuryy
>
> Please Check https
0:48 AM
To: dev@spark.incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 0.8.1-incubating (rc4)
Hi Azuryy
Please Check https://spark-project.atlassian.net/browse/SPARK-995 for this
protobuf version issue
Best Regards,
Raymond Liu
-Original Message-
From: Azuryy Yu [ma
: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 0.8.1-incubating (rc4)
Hi here,
Do we have plan to upgrade protobuf from 2.4.1 to 2.5.0? PB has some
uncompatable API between these two versions.
Hadoop-2.x using protobuf-2.5.0
but if some guys want to run Spark on mesos, then mesos using
protobuf-2.4.1 currently
Hi here,
Do we have plan to upgrade protobuf from 2.4.1 to 2.5.0? PB has some
uncompatable API between these two versions.
Hadoop-2.x using protobuf-2.5.0
but if some guys want to run Spark on mesos, then mesos using
protobuf-2.4.1 currently. so we may discuss here for a better solution.
On Mo
Thanks Patrick.
On 16 Dec 2013 02:43, "Patrick Wendell" wrote:
> You can checkout the docs mentioned in the vote thread. There is also
> a pre-build binary for hadoop2 that is compiled for YARN 2.2
>
> - Patrick
>
> On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 4:31 AM, Azuryy Yu wrote:
> > yarn 2.2, not yarn 0.22, I
You can checkout the docs mentioned in the vote thread. There is also
a pre-build binary for hadoop2 that is compiled for YARN 2.2
- Patrick
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 4:31 AM, Azuryy Yu wrote:
> yarn 2.2, not yarn 0.22, I am so sorry.
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 8:31 PM, Azuryy Yu wrote:
>
>> H
Hi,
Spark-0.8.1 supports yarn 0.22 right? where to find the release note?
Thanks.
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 3:20 AM, Henry Saputra wrote:
> Yeah seems like it. He was ok with our prev release.
> Let's wait for his reply
>
> On Saturday, December 14, 2013, Patrick Wendell wrote:
>
> > Henry - from
yarn 2.2, not yarn 0.22, I am so sorry.
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 8:31 PM, Azuryy Yu wrote:
> Hi,
> Spark-0.8.1 supports yarn 0.22 right? where to find the release note?
> Thanks.
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 3:20 AM, Henry Saputra wrote:
>
>> Yeah seems like it. He was ok with our prev release.
Yeah seems like it. He was ok with our prev release.
Let's wait for his reply
On Saturday, December 14, 2013, Patrick Wendell wrote:
> Henry - from that thread it looks like sebb's concern was something
> different than this.
>
> On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Henry Saputra
> wrote:
> > Hi Pa
Henry - from that thread it looks like sebb's concern was something
different than this.
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Henry Saputra wrote:
> Hi Patrick,
>
> Yeap I agree, but technically ASF VOTE release on source only, there
> even debate about it =), so putting it in the vote staging artif
Hi Patrick,
Yeap I agree, but technically ASF VOTE release on source only, there
even debate about it =), so putting it in the vote staging artifact
could confuse people because in our case we do package 3rd party
libraries in the binary jars.
I have sent email to sebb asking clarification about
Hey Henry,
One thing a lot of people do during the vote is test the binaries and
make sure they work. This is really valuable. If you'd like I could
add a caveat to the vote thread explaining that we are only voting on
the source.
- Patrick
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Henry Saputra wrote:
Actually we should be fine putting the binaries there as long as the
VOTE is for the source.
Let's verify with sebb in the general@ list about his concern.
- Henry
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Henry Saputra wrote:
> Hi Patrick, as sebb has mentioned let's move the binaries from the
> votin
Hi Patrick, as sebb has mentioned let's move the binaries from the
voting directory in your people.apache.org directory.
ASF release voting is for source code and not binaries, and
technically we provide binaries for convenience.
And add link to the KEYS location in the dist[1] to let verify signa
The vote is now closed. This vote passes with 5 PPMC +1's and no 0 or -1
votes.
+1 (5 Total)
Matei Zaharia*
Nick Pentreath*
Patrick Wendell*
Prashant Sharma*
Tom Graves*
0 (0 Total)
-1 (0 Total)
* = Binding Vote
As per the incubator release guide [1] I'll be sending this to the
general incubat
I'd be personally fine with a standard workflow of assemble-deps +
packaging just the Spark files as separate packages, if it speeds up
everyone's development time.
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Mark Hamstra wrote:
> I don't know how to make sense of the numbers, but here's what I've got
> fr
+1.
Built spark on yarn for both hadoop 0.23 and hadoop 2.2.0 on redhat linux using
maven. Ran some tests on both a secure Hadoop 0.23 cluster and a secure Hadoop
2.2.0 cluster. Verified signatures and md5.
Tom
On Tuesday, December 10, 2013 6:49 PM, Patrick Wendell
wrote:
Please vote
I re-downloaded the source tarball and it works now.
Tom
On Wednesday, December 11, 2013 6:27 PM, Patrick Wendell
wrote:
I also talked to a few people who got corrupted binaries when
downloading from the people.apache HTTP. In that case the checksum
failed but if they re-downloaded it worke
+1, built and tested on linux.
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 5:57 AM, Patrick Wendell wrote:
> I also talked to a few people who got corrupted binaries when
> downloading from the people.apache HTTP. In that case the checksum
> failed but if they re-downloaded it worked. So maybe just re-download
> a
I also talked to a few people who got corrupted binaries when
downloading from the people.apache HTTP. In that case the checksum
failed but if they re-downloaded it worked. So maybe just re-download
and try again?
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Patrick Wendell wrote:
> Hey Tom,
>
> I re-verifie
Hey Tom,
I re-verified the signatures and got someone else to do it. It seemed
fine. Here is what I did.
gpg --recv-key 9E4FE3AF
wget
http://people.apache.org/~pwendell/spark-0.8.1-incubating-rc4/spark-0.8.1-incubating.tgz.asc
wget
http://people.apache.org/~pwendell/spark-0.8.1-incubating-rc4/s
I don't know how to make sense of the numbers, but here's what I've got
from a very small sample size.
For both v0.8.0-incubating and v0.8.1-incubating, building separate
assemblies is faster than `./sbt/sbt assembly` and the times for building
separate assemblies for 0.8.0 and 0.8.1 are about the
Hey folks,
I'm trying to verify the signature on the rc4 but am getting a BAD signature,
is it working for others? Perhaps I messed up the import of the asc file.
$ gpg --verify spark-0.8.1-incubating.tgz.asc spark-0.8.1-incubating.tgz
gpg: Signature made Tue 10 Dec 2013 10:53:15 PM UTC using R
On my Core 2 Duo (slower) Mac, I'm having the same problem with building
v0.8.0-incubating as well.
I'm suspecting the slow build problem is caused by sbt-assembly as reported
here.
https://github.com/sbt/sbt-assembly/issues/68
I tried to upgrade sbt-assembly to version 0.10.1 (and sbt to 0.13.0)
I'll +1 myself also.
For anyone who has the slow build problem: does this issue happen when
building v0.8.0-incubating also? Trying to figure out whether it's
related to something we added in 0.8.1 or if it's a long standing
issue.
- Patrick
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Matei Zaharia wrote
Woah, weird, but definitely good to know.
If you’re doing Spark development, there’s also a more convenient option added
by Shivaram in the master branch. You can do sbt assemble-deps to package
*just* the dependencies of each project in a special assembly JAR, and then use
sbt compile to updat
- Successfully built via sbt/sbt assembly/assembly on Mac OS X, as well
as on a dev Ubuntu EC2 box
- Successfully tested via sbt/sbt test locally
- Successfully built and tested using mvn package locally
- I've tested my own Spark jobs (built against 0.8.0-incubating) on this
RC a
I hope this PR https://github.com/apache/incubator-spark/pull/252 can help.
Again this is not a blocker for the release from my side either.
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Mark Hamstra wrote:
> Interesting, and confirmed: On my machine where `./sbt/sbt assembly` takes
> a long, long, long
Interesting, and confirmed: On my machine where `./sbt/sbt assembly` takes
a long, long, long time to complete (a MBP, in my case), building three
separate assemblies (`./sbt/sbt assembly/assembly`, `./sbt/sbt
examples/assembly`, `./sbt/sbt tools/assembly`) takes much, much less time.
On Wed
That's a good point. Although it's definitely not a blocker for this
release, it would be more user friendly to mention sbt/sbt
assembly/assembly as well as Maven build instructions in the README and
quick-start files (at least until the time-consuming sbt assembly process
on a regular hardware get
forgot to mention, after running sbt/sbt assembly/assembly running sbt/sbt
examples/assembly takes just 37s. Not to mention my hardware is not really
great.
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Prashant Sharma wrote:
> Hi Patrick and Matei,
>
> Was trying out this and followed the quick start guide
Hi Patrick and Matei,
Was trying out this and followed the quick start guide which says do
sbt/sbt assembly, like few others I was also stuck for few minutes on
linux. On the other hand if I use sbt/sbt assembly/assembly it is much
faster.
Should we change the documentation to reflect this. It wi
+1
Built and tested it on Mac OS X.
Matei
On Dec 10, 2013, at 4:49 PM, Patrick Wendell wrote:
> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark
> (incubating) version 0.8.1.
>
> The tag to be voted on is v0.8.1-incubating (commit b87d31d):
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/rep
Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark
(incubating) version 0.8.1.
The tag to be voted on is v0.8.1-incubating (commit b87d31d):
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-spark/repo?p=incubator-spark.git;a=commit;h=b87d31dd8eb4b4e47c0138e9242d0dd6922c8c4e
The rel
38 matches
Mail list logo
