Github user jfenc91 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1696#discussion_r79973663
--- Diff:
external/storm-kafka-client/src/main/java/org/apache/storm/kafka/spout/KafkaSpout.java
---
@@ -145,6 +154,10 @@ private void initialize(Collection
Can you please let me know how to unsubscribe I have followed instructions
without success
On Sep 21, 2016 11:08 AM, "revans2" wrote:
> Github user revans2 commented on the issue:
>
> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1697
>
> I ran the same set of manual tests
Thank you for the analysis Jungtaek. I particularly appreciate your admitted
bias as a big contributor to storm-SQL.
It will take time for us to sort out how the merge will happen. Similar to what
we are discussing with Kafka and ES, we could support two versions of SQL, and
eventually
Meant to cc dev@ but missed it.
-Taylor
Begin forwarded message:
> From: "P. Taylor Goetz"
> Date: September 21, 2016 at 2:41:21 PM EDT
> To: Incubator
> Subject: [IP CLEARANCE] JWPlayer SQE (Streaming Query Engine)
>
> Apache Storm has
My apologies. I meant to cc dev@, but didn't. Will forward in a bit...
The vote (lazy consensus) is underway on general@incubator, and will close in
less than 72 hours. After that the code can be merged.
-Taylor
> On Sep 21, 2016, at 7:02 PM, Jungtaek Lim wrote:
>
> Hi
GitHub user raviperi opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1702
Update Eventhub-Client jar dependency to 1.0.1
Eventhub client library has few key fixes that need to be included in
storm-eventhub jar.
Fixes:
1. Fix for EventHubSender may throw
Github user jfenc91 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1679
@srdo Alright I think everything has been addressed here. I have actually
been running this merged with your other PR for the last 12 hours processing
100M tuples and its looked pretty good. Only
Github user jfenc91 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1679#discussion_r79956690
--- Diff:
external/storm-kafka-client/src/main/java/org/apache/storm/kafka/spout/KafkaSpout.java
---
@@ -266,26 +266,32 @@ private void
Github user jfenc91 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1679#discussion_r79956580
--- Diff:
external/storm-kafka-client/src/main/java/org/apache/storm/kafka/spout/KafkaSpout.java
---
@@ -266,26 +266,32 @@ private void
Hi dev,
While code contribution of SQE is in progress, I would like to continue
discussion how to merge SQE and Storm SQL.
I did an analysis of merging SQE and Storm SQL in both side, integrating
SQE to Storm SQL and vice versa.
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1691
@raghavgautam Thanks. It looks great to me. +1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user raghavgautam commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1691
@HeartSaVioR I have fixed the rat issue and I have put fast fail.
Yes, we will be contributing more tests to apache storm going forward.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
GitHub user aichow opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1701
Emit to _spoutConfig.outputStreamId
Even though KafkaSpout.declareOutputFields declaresStream using
outputStreamId (if present), the message gets emitted to a stream matching the
Kafka topic it was
Github user revans2 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1677#discussion_r79898972
--- Diff: storm-core/src/jvm/org/apache/storm/command/AdminCommands.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,133 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user revans2 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1677#discussion_r79898829
--- Diff: storm-core/src/jvm/org/apache/storm/command/AdminCommands.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,133 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user revans2 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1677#discussion_r79897811
--- Diff: storm-core/src/jvm/org/apache/storm/command/AdminCommands.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,133 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user revans2 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1677#discussion_r79897599
--- Diff: bin/storm.py ---
@@ -572,6 +572,22 @@ def kill_workers(*args):
jvmtype="-client",
extrajars=[USER_CONF_DIR,
Github user revans2 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1677#discussion_r79897541
--- Diff: bin/storm.py ---
@@ -572,6 +572,22 @@ def kill_workers(*args):
jvmtype="-client",
extrajars=[USER_CONF_DIR,
Github user revans2 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1677#discussion_r79898747
--- Diff: storm-core/src/jvm/org/apache/storm/command/AdminCommands.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,133 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user raghavgautam commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1691#discussion_r79893753
--- Diff: integration-test/src/test/resources/storm-conf/storm.yaml ---
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+
+storm.zookeeper.servers:
+- "node1"
+
Github user raghavgautam commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1691#discussion_r79893438
--- Diff:
integration-test/src/main/java/org/apache/storm/st/topology/window/TumblingTimeCorrectness.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,164 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user revans2 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1697
We also found #1700 so once that goes in I'll pull it in here too.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
GitHub user revans2 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1700
STORM-2110: strip out empty String in worker opts
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/revans2/incubator-storm STORM-2110
Thank you Aaron.
We use Kafka and JMS spouts and several bolts - Elastic-Search, Solr,
Cassandra, Couchbase and HDFS in different scenarios and need to have the
dead letter functionality for almost all these scenarios.
Locally we have this functionality almost ready for writing dead-letters to
Github user abellina commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1698
![screen shot 2016-09-21 at 10 49 23
am](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/1901059/18718441/238cb846-7fe9-11e6-9e3b-7c258ceeccd6.png)
Note the "Cluster Resources" table, and the
Github user revans2 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1697
I ran the same set of manual tests as before, but I now want to wait on
#1699 to go into master, and then I will pull it in here. We are in the
process of rolling essentially what is this same
Github user abellina commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1699
+1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
GitHub user revans2 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1699
STORM-2109: Treat Supervisor CPU/MEMORY Configs as Numbers
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/revans2/incubator-storm STORM-2109
GitHub user abellina opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1698
Storm 2105 cluster supervisor total and avail resources
Most of the work performed by @jerrypeng.
I added a few changes for consistency and issues with the tooltips in the
index page
You
Github user revans2 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1677
Looks good to me. I have a few tests that I want to run, but in general it
looks good.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user srdo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1209
I think this feature is too fiddly for the user, and it doesn't really seem
like there's any demand for it. Closing.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user srdo closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1209
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user srdo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1260
Nevermind this, the right mode is set when using the local cluster from
testing4j, so this is probably fine.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user srdo closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1260
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user srdo commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1679#discussion_r79809326
--- Diff:
external/storm-kafka-client/src/main/java/org/apache/storm/kafka/spout/KafkaSpout.java
---
@@ -266,26 +266,32 @@ private void
Github user hmcl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1679#discussion_r79795823
--- Diff:
external/storm-kafka-client/src/main/java/org/apache/storm/kafka/spout/KafkaSpout.java
---
@@ -277,7 +277,9 @@ private void emit() {
Github user hmcl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1679#discussion_r79794331
--- Diff:
external/storm-kafka-client/src/main/java/org/apache/storm/kafka/spout/KafkaSpout.java
---
@@ -479,16 +482,17 @@ public OffsetAndMetadata
Github user srdo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1696
The test failure is due to maven failing to download dependencies on
storm-core. !storm-core passed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
38 matches
Mail list logo