Re: Cleaning Up Old Pull Requests STORM-3250

2018-10-08 Thread Hugo Louro
+1 to remove old PRs. If any PRs still warrant any value we could try reaching out to the creator to see if he wants to follow up with it. Is the idea to remove them all in one batch, or have the removal process through phases ? On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 3:26 PM Jungtaek Lim wrote: > +1 It doesn't

Re: Cleaning Up Old Pull Requests STORM-3250

2018-10-08 Thread Jungtaek Lim
+1 It doesn't look like there're any critical PRs in the list, and it is pretty less chance we could connect with PR authors. -Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 2018년 10월 9일 (화) 오전 5:08, Kishorkumar Patil 님이 작성: > +1. > It would be nice to clean up old clutter while we are getting ready for > days

Re: Cleaning Up Old Pull Requests STORM-3250

2018-10-08 Thread Kishorkumar Patil
+1. It would be nice to clean up old clutter while we are getting ready for days past 2.x -Kishor On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 3:52 PM Bobby Evans wrote: > +1 > > Sounds good to me > > On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 2:50 PM Derek Dagit > wrote: > > > Currently there are over 150 open pull requests on the

Re: Cleaning Up Old Pull Requests STORM-3250

2018-10-08 Thread Bobby Evans
+1 Sounds good to me On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 2:50 PM Derek Dagit wrote: > Currently there are over 150 open pull requests on the Apache Storm GitHub > project. Over 100 of these have not been modified in 2018. > > It seems we are unlikely to handle each one of these without significant > effort

Cleaning Up Old Pull Requests STORM-3250

2018-10-08 Thread Derek Dagit
Currently there are over 150 open pull requests on the Apache Storm GitHub project. Over 100 of these have not been modified in 2018. It seems we are unlikely to handle each one of these without significant effort and time. Looking at many of them, they seem to be abandoned by the requester. I

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 2.0.0 (rc1)

2018-10-08 Thread Bobby Evans
Sounds good, I'll move them all over to 2.0.0 for this. On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 2:36 PM P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > If we can keep the JIRA fix version for this release 2.0.0 it will keep > the release notes cleaner. > > I can put together a release candidate tomorrow. > > -Taylor > > > On Oct 8,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 2.0.0 (rc1)

2018-10-08 Thread P. Taylor Goetz
If we can keep the JIRA fix version for this release 2.0.0 it will keep the release notes cleaner. I can put together a release candidate tomorrow. -Taylor > On Oct 8, 2018, at 9:44 AM, Bobby Evans wrote: > > Taylor, > > All of the blockers are now merged into master. I think we are ready

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 2.0.0 (rc1)

2018-10-08 Thread Bobby Evans
Taylor, All of the blockers are now merged into master. I think we are ready to do another release. Just so you know I marked all of the JIRAs that were merged into master since this vote with 2.0.1 release version. Not sure if we just want to fast forward to 2.0.1, or if you want it to stay

[GitHub] storm pull request #2867: STORM-3249: Make sure times shut down and so does ...

2018-10-08 Thread revans2
GitHub user revans2 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2867 STORM-3249: Make sure times shut down and so does shut down thread Turns out there are two things blocking nimbus from shutting down. 1) some timer (that turns out to be from the local fs

[GitHub] storm pull request #2865: STORM-3247 remove BLOBSTORE_SUPERUSER

2018-10-08 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2865 ---