If we can keep the JIRA fix version for this release 2.0.0 it will keep the 
release notes cleaner.

I can put together a release candidate tomorrow.

-Taylor

> On Oct 8, 2018, at 9:44 AM, Bobby Evans <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Taylor,
> 
> All of the blockers are now merged into master.  I think we are ready to do
> another release.  Just so you know I marked all of the JIRAs that were
> merged into master since this vote with 2.0.1 release version.  Not sure if
> we just want to fast forward to 2.0.1, or if you want it to stay as 2.0.0.
> If it is the later let me know and I am happy to move all of the JIRA to
> 2.0.0 release version.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bobby
> 
> On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 2:55 AM Jungtaek Lim <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Just filed STORM-3238 [1] for topology log search error, and STORM-3239 [2]
>> for worker profile.
>> 
>> - Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
>> 
>> 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-3238
>> 2. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-3239
>> 
>> 2018년 9월 28일 (금) 오전 12:13, Govind Menon <[email protected]>님이 작성:
>> 
>>> I have a fix for the worker profiling that I'm testing now - I should
>> have
>>> a PR up today.
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 3:50 AM Jungtaek Lim <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Sorry I was in a long holidays in South Korea and am just back today.
>>> I'll
>>>> reproduce them and file JIRAs but it is pretty simple to reproduce,
>> basic
>>>> search in topology didn't work as well as operations in worker
>> profiling
>>>> didn't work. So if someone would like to tackle them it should be
>> pretty
>>>> easy to reproduce for someone as well.
>>>> 
>>>> -Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
>>>> 
>>>> 2018년 9월 26일 (수) 오후 9:02, Kishorkumar Patil <[email protected]
>>> 님이
>>>> 작성:
>>>> 
>>>>> I have patch up for  WorkerToken Auto renewal fix. I think this
>> should
>>> be
>>>>> added to 2.x RC.
>>>>> 
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-3235
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2850
>>>>> 
>>>>> -Kishor
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 8:04 PM P. Taylor Goetz <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Jungtaek, can you elaborate on the issues you ran into when testing
>>> the
>>>>> rc
>>>>>> and/or file JIRAs?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -Taylor
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Sep 25, 2018, at 4:02 PM, Bobby Evans <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Nope.  I plan to start looking into them, unless someone else is
>>>>> already
>>>>>>> doing so.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Bobby
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 2:48 PM P. Taylor Goetz <
>> [email protected]
>>>> 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Thanks for the update. I will cancel the vote.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Do the fixes you merged cover the bugs that Jungtaek pointed
>> out?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> -Taylor
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Sep 25, 2018, at 1:56 PM, Bobby Evans <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Just FYI Taylor I just merged in 3 JIRA to the master branch
>> and
>>>> will
>>>>>>>>> probably merge in the fix for the UI that Govind mentioned, but
>>> all
>>>>> of
>>>>>>>> them
>>>>>>>>> would be okay to go into 2.0.0 as well.  Since this RC looks
>> like
>>>> it
>>>>> is
>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>> going to pass if you want to move the tag up on the master
>>> branch,
>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>> would be fine, once we have the fixes in.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Bobby
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 9:31 AM Govind Menon
>>>> <[email protected]
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> I introduced a bug with the visualization as part of the UI
>>>>> migration
>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>> the following fix - https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2849
>> .
>>>> It's
>>>>>>>> not a
>>>>>>>>>> show stopper by any means and there's a workaround
>> (specifically
>>>>>> hiding
>>>>>>>>>> system stats on the UI). I think we should include this in the
>>> RC.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>> Govind.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 3:09 PM Alexandre Vermeerbergen <
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Hello All,
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> I will need a little bit time to test this new release with
>> our
>>>> 15+
>>>>>>>>>>> topologies, but it's definitely worth and exiting !
>>>>>>>>>>> "stay tuned" :)
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre Vermeerbergen
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Le ven. 21 sept. 2018 à 20:23, P. Taylor Goetz <
>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>> écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 2.0.0 (rc1)
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Full list of changes in this release:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc1/RELEASE_NOTES.html
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> The tag/commit to be voted upon is v2.0.0:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=062bb2f158a66b802a3ad7bdda14fb8f70cf9b88;hb=062bb2f158a66b802a3ad7bdda14fb8f70cf9b88
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> The source archive being voted upon can be found here:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc1/apache-storm-2.0.0-src.tar.gz
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found
>> here:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc1/
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> The release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> The Nexus staging repository for this release is:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1070
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 2.0.0.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the
>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 2.0.0
>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ]  0 No opinion
>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> -Taylor
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

Reply via email to