Sounds good, I'll move them all over to 2.0.0 for this. On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 2:36 PM P. Taylor Goetz <[email protected]> wrote:
> If we can keep the JIRA fix version for this release 2.0.0 it will keep > the release notes cleaner. > > I can put together a release candidate tomorrow. > > -Taylor > > > On Oct 8, 2018, at 9:44 AM, Bobby Evans <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Taylor, > > > > All of the blockers are now merged into master. I think we are ready to > do > > another release. Just so you know I marked all of the JIRAs that were > > merged into master since this vote with 2.0.1 release version. Not sure > if > > we just want to fast forward to 2.0.1, or if you want it to stay as > 2.0.0. > > If it is the later let me know and I am happy to move all of the JIRA to > > 2.0.0 release version. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Bobby > > > > On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 2:55 AM Jungtaek Lim <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Just filed STORM-3238 [1] for topology log search error, and STORM-3239 > [2] > >> for worker profile. > >> > >> - Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) > >> > >> 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-3238 > >> 2. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-3239 > >> > >> 2018년 9월 28일 (금) 오전 12:13, Govind Menon <[email protected]>님이 작성: > >> > >>> I have a fix for the worker profiling that I'm testing now - I should > >> have > >>> a PR up today. > >>> > >>> On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 3:50 AM Jungtaek Lim <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> > >>>> Sorry I was in a long holidays in South Korea and am just back today. > >>> I'll > >>>> reproduce them and file JIRAs but it is pretty simple to reproduce, > >> basic > >>>> search in topology didn't work as well as operations in worker > >> profiling > >>>> didn't work. So if someone would like to tackle them it should be > >> pretty > >>>> easy to reproduce for someone as well. > >>>> > >>>> -Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) > >>>> > >>>> 2018년 9월 26일 (수) 오후 9:02, Kishorkumar Patil <[email protected] > >>> 님이 > >>>> 작성: > >>>> > >>>>> I have patch up for WorkerToken Auto renewal fix. I think this > >> should > >>> be > >>>>> added to 2.x RC. > >>>>> > >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-3235 > >>>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2850 > >>>>> > >>>>> -Kishor > >>>>> > >>>>> On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 8:04 PM P. Taylor Goetz <[email protected]> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Jungtaek, can you elaborate on the issues you ran into when testing > >>> the > >>>>> rc > >>>>>> and/or file JIRAs? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -Taylor > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Sep 25, 2018, at 4:02 PM, Bobby Evans <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Nope. I plan to start looking into them, unless someone else is > >>>>> already > >>>>>>> doing so. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Bobby > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 2:48 PM P. Taylor Goetz < > >> [email protected] > >>>> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Thanks for the update. I will cancel the vote. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Do the fixes you merged cover the bugs that Jungtaek pointed > >> out? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> -Taylor > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Sep 25, 2018, at 1:56 PM, Bobby Evans <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Just FYI Taylor I just merged in 3 JIRA to the master branch > >> and > >>>> will > >>>>>>>>> probably merge in the fix for the UI that Govind mentioned, but > >>> all > >>>>> of > >>>>>>>> them > >>>>>>>>> would be okay to go into 2.0.0 as well. Since this RC looks > >> like > >>>> it > >>>>> is > >>>>>>>> not > >>>>>>>>> going to pass if you want to move the tag up on the master > >>> branch, > >>>>> that > >>>>>>>>> would be fine, once we have the fixes in. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Bobby > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 9:31 AM Govind Menon > >>>> <[email protected] > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Hi all, > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> I introduced a bug with the visualization as part of the UI > >>>>> migration > >>>>>>>> with > >>>>>>>>>> the following fix - https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2849 > >> . > >>>> It's > >>>>>>>> not a > >>>>>>>>>> show stopper by any means and there's a workaround > >> (specifically > >>>>>> hiding > >>>>>>>>>> system stats on the UI). I think we should include this in the > >>> RC. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>>>>> Govind. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 3:09 PM Alexandre Vermeerbergen < > >>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Hello All, > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> I will need a little bit time to test this new release with > >> our > >>>> 15+ > >>>>>>>>>>> topologies, but it's definitely worth and exiting ! > >>>>>>>>>>> "stay tuned" :) > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Best regards, > >>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre Vermeerbergen > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Le ven. 21 sept. 2018 à 20:23, P. Taylor Goetz < > >>>> [email protected] > >>>>>> > >>>>>> a > >>>>>>>>>>> écrit : > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 2.0.0 (rc1) > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Full list of changes in this release: > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc1/RELEASE_NOTES.html > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> The tag/commit to be voted upon is v2.0.0: > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=062bb2f158a66b802a3ad7bdda14fb8f70cf9b88;hb=062bb2f158a66b802a3ad7bdda14fb8f70cf9b88 > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> The source archive being voted upon can be found here: > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc1/apache-storm-2.0.0-src.tar.gz > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found > >> here: > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc1/ > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> The release artifacts are signed with the following key: > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> The Nexus staging repository for this release is: > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1070 > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 2.0.0. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the > >>>> release. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 2.0.0 > >>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] 0 No opinion > >>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> -Taylor > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > >
