[jira] [Resolved] (STORM-2045) NPE in SpoutExecutor in 2.0 branch

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jungtaek Lim resolved STORM-2045. - Resolution: Fixed Thanks [~Cody], I merged into master. > NPE in SpoutExecutor in 2.0 bra

[jira] [Commented] (STORM-1985) Provide a tool for showing and killing corrupted topology

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1985?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15430399#comment-15430399 ] Jungtaek Lim commented on STORM-1985: - [~bkamal] Thanks for working on this. Since Storm already has

[jira] [Resolved] (STORM-1994) Add table with per-topology & worker resource usage and components in (new) supervisor and topology pages

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jungtaek Lim resolved STORM-1994. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 1.1.0 2.0.0 Thanks [~abellina

[jira] [Created] (STORM-2050) [storm-sql] Support User Defined Aggregate Function for Trident mode

Jungtaek Lim created STORM-2050: --- Summary: [storm-sql] Support User Defined Aggregate Function for Trident mode Key: STORM-2050 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2050 Project: Apache

Re: Website update

) 오후 3:55, Satish Duggana <satish.dugg...@gmail.com>님이 작성: > Hi Jungtaek, > Thanks for adding Videos. It may be better to add respective slides in > slideshows section. > > ~Satish. > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Jungtaek Lim <kabh...@gmail.com> wrote: >

[jira] [Resolved] (STORM-2042) Nimbus client connections not closed properly causing connection leaks

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2042?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jungtaek Lim resolved STORM-2042. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: (was: 1.x) 1.0.3

Re: Website update

Thanks guys. I updated the page. http://storm.apache.org/talksAndVideos.html - Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVIoR) 2016년 8월 12일 (금) 오후 6:12, Harsha <st...@harsha.io>님이 작성: > Jungtaek, > Some of the recent slides in hadoop summit san jose > > > http://www.slides

[jira] [Commented] (STORM-2048) Refactor code blocks which are ported to for-loop to Java Stream API

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2048?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15427487#comment-15427487 ] Jungtaek Lim commented on STORM-2048: - We might have multiple pull requests for this issue, so please

[jira] [Created] (STORM-2048) Refactor code blocks which are ported to for-loop to Java Stream API

Jungtaek Lim created STORM-2048: --- Summary: Refactor code blocks which are ported to for-loop to Java Stream API Key: STORM-2048 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2048 Project: Apache

[jira] [Resolved] (STORM-2041) Make Java 8 as minimum requirement for 2.0 release

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2041?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jungtaek Lim resolved STORM-2041. - Resolution: Fixed Thanks [~sriharsha] for taking care of this. I merged into master. > Make J

Re: [Vote] Make Java 8 as minimum requirement for Storm 2.0

Before stalling, whether this should need VOTE or not, we confirmed our consensus regarding this and all positive. I'll go on merging the pull request. Please let me know if you feel it's inappropriate so that I can revert. - Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) On Wednesday, August 17, 2016, Bobby Evans

Fwd: Too many machine mails

o many machine mails To: 임정택 <kabh...@gmail.com> I’m on it. it might take a while (up to a week or more) depending on INFRA’s workload. -Taylor On Aug 18, 2016, at 12:18 PM, Jungtaek Lim <kabh...@gmail.com <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','kabh...@gmail.com');>> wrote: INFRA-12453 i

Re: Too many machine mails

INFRA-12453 is done. Following Github comment should be written to work log and notification from JIRA shouldn't be sent. Please let me know if it's not. 2016년 8월 19일 (금) 오전 1:10, Jungtaek Lim <kabh...@gmail.com>님이 작성: > I filed a new issue for creating mailing list for issues@

Re: Too many machine mails

tps://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-12453 Thanks, Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 2016년 8월 16일 (화) 오후 3:53, Erik Weathers <eweath...@groupon.com.invalid>님이 작성: > The "Work Log" archival sounds good to me too! > > On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 11:27 PM, Jungtaek Lim <kabh...@gmail.co

Re: [Discussion] Stopping feature development for storm-core on 1.x-branch

I agree with you Alessandro. Makes perfect sense for me, and that would be more realistic way to handle the issues. - Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 2016년 8월 18일 (목) 오전 11:46, Alessandro Bellina <abell...@yahoo-inc.com.invalid>님이 작성: > Just a contributors point of view.. > I th

[jira] [Commented] (STORM-1446) Compile the Calcite logical plan to Storm physical plan

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1446?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15426095#comment-15426095 ] Jungtaek Lim commented on STORM-1446: - [~wheat9] STORM-1433 is introducing the change, so please let

[jira] [Updated] (STORM-2043) Nimbus should not make assignments crazy when Pacemaker down

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2043?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jungtaek Lim updated STORM-2043: Fix Version/s: (was: 1.0.2) > Nimbus should not make assignments crazy when Pacemaker d

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.9.7 (RC1)

necessary, and initiate a release. > > > >> 2. We start discussion defining EOL, deprecated, stable, unstable > version > >> lines. I saw HBase community was discussed about this but can't find it. > > > > I started a poll on user@ to get a better idea of what versions t

Re: [Discussion] Stopping feature development for storm-core on 1.x-branch

oiding to copy libraries (and its transitive dependencies) to extlib directory when it's necessary for only some of topologies. Clear example is STORM-1881 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1881>. - This will give great flexibility to configure user topology jar and submit topology. Than

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Storm 0.10.2

I haven't seen user requests for backporting fixes for master/1.x to 0.10 so we maybe good to go, but I could miss some spots. (I found an user backporting specific issue manually, and you backported that to 0.10.2.) For me I'm +1 to start release process for 0.10.2. Thanks, Jungtaek Lim

[jira] [Commented] (STORM-1446) Compile the Calcite logical plan to Storm physical plan

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1446?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15425530#comment-15425530 ] Jungtaek Lim commented on STORM-1446: - [~wheat9] Could you clarify more on this issue: what's Storm

[jira] [Resolved] (STORM-1915) Supervisor keeps restarting forever

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1915?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jungtaek Lim resolved STORM-1915. - Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Jungtaek Lim Fix Version/s: 1.1.0

[jira] [Commented] (STORM-1915) Supervisor keeps restarting forever

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1915?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15425463#comment-15425463 ] Jungtaek Lim commented on STORM-1915: - STORM-1934 is applied to 1.0.2 but I just forgot to close

[jira] [Resolved] (STORM-1879) Supervisor may not shut down workers cleanly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1879?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jungtaek Lim resolved STORM-1879. - Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Jungtaek Lim Fix Version/s: 1.1.0

[jira] [Commented] (STORM-1879) Supervisor may not shut down workers cleanly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1879?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15425457#comment-15425457 ] Jungtaek Lim commented on STORM-1879: - [~kevinconaway] I guess yes, since STORM-1934 is applied

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.9.7 (RC1)

> EOL. I really don't like the idea of this, but without changing the bylaws > I don't think we can technically stop it. > On a side note to me if a bug fix is critical enough to trigger a release > by itself, we really should talk to the community about doing a release for > other lines that ha

Re: [Vote] Make Java 8 as minimum requirement for Storm 2.0

ect should pass VOTE for making effect on project", but we implicitly allowed general consensus. I just thought this is beyond the thing which can be handled with general consensus, but I'm also fine if we all agree this can be handled as a code change. - Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) [1] htt

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.9.7 (RC1)

this with some proposals: 1. 0.10.2 has this change and released prior to or at the same time 2. We start discussion defining EOL, deprecated, stable, unstable version lines. I saw HBase community was discussed about this but can't find it. - Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 2016년 8월 17일 (수) 오후 12:42, P

Re: [Vote] Make Java 8 as minimum requirement for Storm 2.0

+1 (binding) Thanks, Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 2016년 8월 17일 (수) 오전 10:25, Satish Duggana <satish.dugg...@gmail.com>님이 작성: > +1 > > Thanks, > Satish. > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 6:48 AM, Harsha Chintalapani <st...@harsha.io> > wrote: > > > Hi A

[jira] [Commented] (STORM-1434) Support the GROUP BY clause in StormSQL

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1434?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15422771#comment-15422771 ] Jungtaek Lim commented on STORM-1434: - Yeah while I open the possibility for persistentAggregate, we

[jira] [Resolved] (STORM-1234) port backtype.storm.security.auth.DefaultHttpCredentialsPlugin-test to java

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jungtaek Lim resolved STORM-1234. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.0.0 Thanks [~abhishek.agarwal], I merged into master

[jira] [Resolved] (STORM-1256) port backtype.storm.utils.ZookeeperServerCnxnFactory-test to java

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1256?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jungtaek Lim resolved STORM-1256. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.0.0 Thanks [~abhishek.agarwal], I merged into master

[jira] [Resolved] (STORM-1240) port backtype.storm.security.auth.authorizer.DRPCSimpleACLAuthorizer-test to java

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1240?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jungtaek Lim resolved STORM-1240. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.0.0 Thanks [~abhishek.agarwal], I merged into master

[jira] [Resolved] (STORM-1251) port backtype.storm.serialization.SerializationFactory-test to java

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jungtaek Lim resolved STORM-1251. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.0.0 Thanks [~abhishek.agarwal], I merged into master

[jira] [Commented] (STORM-1434) Support the GROUP BY clause in StormSQL

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1434?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15422731#comment-15422731 ] Jungtaek Lim commented on STORM-1434: - Currently Storm SQL is relying on Trident so I'm thinking about

Re: Too many machine mails

We seem to meet general consensus. Do we need to just file issues for Apache INFRA? Or do we need to do other things? (excluding updating website and announce to dev@ for new arrival of issue@) Thanks, Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 2016년 8월 13일 (토) 오전 2:11, Kyle Nusbaum <knusb...@ya

[jira] [Commented] (STORM-1434) Support the GROUP BY clause in StormSQL

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1434?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15422281#comment-15422281 ] Jungtaek Lim commented on STORM-1434: - This feature depends on the boundary of aggregation. Do we want

[jira] [Updated] (STORM-1833) Add simple equi-join support in storm-sql standalone mode

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1833?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jungtaek Lim updated STORM-1833: Component/s: storm-sql > Add simple equi-join support in storm-sql standalone m

[jira] [Resolved] (STORM-1570) Support nested field lookup in Storm sql

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1570?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jungtaek Lim resolved STORM-1570. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.0.0 1.0.0 > Support nested fi

[jira] [Updated] (STORM-1570) Support nested field lookup in Storm sql

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1570?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jungtaek Lim updated STORM-1570: Component/s: storm-sql > Support nested field lookup in Storm

[jira] [Updated] (STORM-1586) ExprCompiler support for UDFs in Storm-sql

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jungtaek Lim updated STORM-1586: Component/s: storm-sql > ExprCompiler support for UDFs in Storm-

[jira] [Resolved] (STORM-1833) Add simple equi-join support in storm-sql standalone mode

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1833?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jungtaek Lim resolved STORM-1833. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 1.1.0 2.0.0 > Add simple equi-j

[jira] [Updated] (STORM-1585) Add DDL support for UDFs in Storm-sql

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1585?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jungtaek Lim updated STORM-1585: Component/s: storm-sql > Add DDL support for UDFs in Storm-

[jira] [Updated] (STORM-1709) Add group by support in storm-sql standalone mode

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jungtaek Lim updated STORM-1709: Component/s: storm-sql > Add group by support in storm-sql standalone m

[jira] [Updated] (STORM-1443) Support customizing parallelism in StormSQL

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jungtaek Lim updated STORM-1443: Component/s: storm-sql > Support customizing parallelism in Storm

[jira] [Updated] (STORM-1446) Compile the Calcite logical plan to Storm physical plan

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1446?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jungtaek Lim updated STORM-1446: Component/s: storm-sql > Compile the Calcite logical plan to Storm physical p

[jira] [Updated] (STORM-1435) Build a single jar with dependency for StormSQL dependency

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1435?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jungtaek Lim updated STORM-1435: Component/s: storm-sql > Build a single jar with dependency for StormSQL depende

[jira] [Updated] (STORM-1434) Support the GROUP BY clause in StormSQL

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1434?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jungtaek Lim updated STORM-1434: Component/s: storm-sql > Support the GROUP BY clause in Storm

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.9.7 (RC1)

the best effort for 0.x line users to move on 1.x), but if we really want to ship this bugfix to 0.x version line, for me it's more making sense to release 0.10.2. Thanks, Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 2016년 8월 16일 (화) 오전 5:10, P. Taylor Goetz <ptgo...@gmail.com>님이 작성: > This is a call to vote on

[jira] [Updated] (STORM-1766) A better algorithm server rack selection for RAS

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1766?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jungtaek Lim updated STORM-1766: Fix Version/s: 1.1.0 > A better algorithm server rack selection for

[jira] [Commented] (STORM-1913) Additions and Improvements for Trident RAS API

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1913?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15420346#comment-15420346 ] Jungtaek Lim commented on STORM-1913: - Also merged into 1.x-branch. > Additions and Improveme

[jira] [Updated] (STORM-1913) Additions and Improvements for Trident RAS API

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1913?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jungtaek Lim updated STORM-1913: Fix Version/s: 1.1.0 > Additions and Improvements for Trident RAS

[jira] [Resolved] (STORM-2037) debug operation should be whitelisted in SimpleAclAuthorizer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2037?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jungtaek Lim resolved STORM-2037. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 1.1.0 2.0.0 > debug operation sho

[jira] [Commented] (STORM-1435) Build a single jar with dependency for StormSQL dependency

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1435?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15420162#comment-15420162 ] Jungtaek Lim commented on STORM-1435: - Yes right. I asked this to Calcite dev@ list for just copying

Re: Too many machine mails

@ list. I assume that adding JIRA work log doesn't send notification. If it is, that's enough for me. Separating list is optional. - Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 2016년 8월 12일 (금) 오전 6:20, Kyle Nusbaum <knusb...@yahoo-inc.com.invalid>님이 작성: > If this other mailing list gets notified of a

Re: [Discussion] Dropping Java 7 support on master

at Java 8, but I think the time has come. Let's go for that. Thanks, Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 2016년 8월 12일 (금) 오후 6:10, Harsha Chintalapani <st...@harsha.io>님이 작성: > Hi All, > Dropping java 7 support on master will allow us to use the new api in > Java 8 and since the

[jira] [Resolved] (STORM-841) Thread-safeness of OutputCollector has documented contrary to two official doc.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-841?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jungtaek Lim resolved STORM-841. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.10.1 0.9.6 0.10.0

[jira] [Resolved] (STORM-1999) Update docs with OutputCollector's threadsafety

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1999?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jungtaek Lim resolved STORM-1999. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 1.0.2 1.0.1 2.0.0

Re: Too many machine mails

mirrored to Jira. Only opening and closing a PR adds a JIRA comment. > > > > This can be configured by Infra team AFAIK. I guess it would help to > > reduce duplicate mails. > > > > > > -Matthias > > > >> On 08/12/2016 01:19 AM, Jungtaek Lim wrote: >

[jira] [Resolved] (STORM-2023) Add calcite-core to dependency of storm-sql-runtime

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2023?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jungtaek Lim resolved STORM-2023. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 1.1.0 2.0.0 I merged into master and 1

Website update

Hi dev, Along with taking care of some documentation issues, I also add some missing committer/PMCs into people page. I feel that it would be better to update 'Talks and slideshows' to topic of recent Hadoop summit or others. Any ideas or recommendations? Thanks, Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)

[jira] [Commented] (STORM-1999) Update docs with OutputCollector's threadsafety

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1999?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15418274#comment-15418274 ] Jungtaek Lim commented on STORM-1999: - Merged to codebase, now building the docs to publish

[jira] [Commented] (STORM-841) Thread-safeness of OutputCollector has documented contrary to two official doc.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-841?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15418273#comment-15418273 ] Jungtaek Lim commented on STORM-841: Merged to codebase, now building the docs to publish... > Thr

[jira] [Resolved] (STORM-2032) "not fast enough" metrics WARN message in netty client can be misinterpreted

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2032?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jungtaek Lim resolved STORM-2032. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 1.0.3 1.1.0 2.0.0

Re: Too many machine mails

Forget one thing, if separating list can keep active discussions and votes on top page, it would be valuable for me. 2016년 8월 12일 (금) 오전 8:16, Jungtaek Lim <kabh...@gmail.com>님이 작성: > IMHO, all committers/PMCs need to be noticed for JIRA and Github > activities. > (Sometime

Re: Too many machine mails

ing status of issue - we can have 'patch available' status for that) c. no we should receive all of comments (just need to reduce duplicated things) - Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 2016년 8월 11일 (목) 오후 10:52, Bobby Evans <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.invalid>님이 작성: > Yes lets have a separate fire

Re: Too many machine mails

most of Storm dev. mails so I'm fine to keep mailing as it is (with some annoying 'empty' notification), but it can also be done with watching Github project. This is not raised for the first time, and I would like to discuss seriously and see the changes. Thanks, Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 2016년

[jira] [Created] (STORM-2031) Multilang: support distribute cache API a.k.a BlobStore

Jungtaek Lim created STORM-2031: --- Summary: Multilang: support distribute cache API a.k.a BlobStore Key: STORM-2031 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2031 Project: Apache Storm

[jira] [Created] (STORM-2030) Multilang: support stateful bolt

Jungtaek Lim created STORM-2030: --- Summary: Multilang: support stateful bolt Key: STORM-2030 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2030 Project: Apache Storm Issue Type: Improvement

[jira] [Created] (STORM-2029) Multilang: support windowing feature

Jungtaek Lim created STORM-2029: --- Summary: Multilang: support windowing feature Key: STORM-2029 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2029 Project: Apache Storm Issue Type

[jira] [Updated] (STORM-2026) Inconsistency between (SpoutExecutor, BoltExecutor) and (spout-transfer-fn, bolt-transfer-fn)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2026?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jungtaek Lim updated STORM-2026: Fix Version/s: 2.0.0 > Inconsistency between (SpoutExecutor, BoltExecutor) and (spout-transfer

Re: New Storm Commiter/PMC Member: Satish Duggana

Congrats Satish! Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) On Wednesday, August 10, 2016, Matthias J. Sax <mj...@apache.org> wrote: > Congrats Satish! > > -Matthias > > On 08/09/2016 10:21 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > > Please join me in welcoming Satish Duggana as a new Apach

[jira] [Resolved] (STORM-1586) ExprCompiler support for UDFs in Storm-sql

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jungtaek Lim resolved STORM-1586. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 1.0.1 2.0.0 This is resolved along

Re: storm-sql

area and would like to cooperate or share the load, please let me know. Thanks, Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 2016년 8월 8일 (월) 오후 5:32, Manu Zhang <owenzhang1...@gmail.com>님이 작성: > Hi all, > > We are interested in the storm-sql feature and plan to use it for some ETL > cases. However,

[jira] [Commented] (STORM-2027) Possible Race Condition issue in SlidingWindow

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2027?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15412735#comment-15412735 ] Jungtaek Lim commented on STORM-2027: - This is only on storm-starter, and created before Storm

[jira] [Commented] (STORM-1278) port backtype.storm.daemon.worker to java

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15412693#comment-15412693 ] Jungtaek Lim commented on STORM-1278: - I unassigned myself since I can't work on this for guaranteed

[jira] [Updated] (STORM-1278) port backtype.storm.daemon.worker to java

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jungtaek Lim updated STORM-1278: Assignee: (was: Jungtaek Lim) > port backtype.storm.daemon.worker to j

[jira] [Commented] (STORM-1278) port backtype.storm.daemon.worker to java

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15411626#comment-15411626 ] Jungtaek Lim commented on STORM-1278: - I just started working on this. I'm working on other things

[jira] [Created] (STORM-2026) Inconsistency between (SpoutExecutor, BoltExecutor) and (spout-transfer-fn, bolt-transfer-fn)

Jungtaek Lim created STORM-2026: --- Summary: Inconsistency between (SpoutExecutor, BoltExecutor) and (spout-transfer-fn, bolt-transfer-fn) Key: STORM-2026 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2026

[jira] [Commented] (STORM-2023) Add calcite-core to dependency of storm-sql-runtime

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2023?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15411344#comment-15411344 ] Jungtaek Lim commented on STORM-2023: - FYI: I'm talking with Julian Hyde to minimize the dependencies

[jira] [Resolved] (STORM-1839) Kinesis Spout

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1839?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jungtaek Lim resolved STORM-1839. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 1.1.0 2.0.0 > Kinesis Sp

[jira] [Updated] (STORM-2021) storm-kinesis missing licenses

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2021?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jungtaek Lim updated STORM-2021: Affects Version/s: 1.1.0 > storm-kinesis missing licen

[jira] [Updated] (STORM-2021) storm-kinesis missing licenses

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2021?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jungtaek Lim updated STORM-2021: Fix Version/s: 1.1.0 > storm-kinesis missing licen

Re: [PROPOSAL] submitting topology with adding jars and maven artifacts

Hi devs, Pull request for this proposal is now available. https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1608 It's only against 1.x-branch, and I need to update the doc. I'll take care of them accordingly. Please take a look at pull request and comment. Thanks, Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 2016년 8월 4일 (목

[jira] [Commented] (STORM-2023) Add calcite-core to dependency of storm-sql-runtime

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2023?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15409210#comment-15409210 ] Jungtaek Lim commented on STORM-2023: - It also needs to copy dependencies (sure transitive too

[jira] [Updated] (STORM-2023) Add calcite-core to dependency of storm-sql-runtime

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2023?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jungtaek Lim updated STORM-2023: Summary: Add calcite-core to dependency of storm-sql-runtime (was: Add calcite-core to storm-sql

[jira] [Commented] (STORM-2023) Add calcite-core to storm-sql-runtime

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2023?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15409073#comment-15409073 ] Jungtaek Lim commented on STORM-2023: - Compiled topology refers SqlFunctions on calcite-core which

[jira] [Created] (STORM-2023) Add calcite-core to storm-sql-runtime

Jungtaek Lim created STORM-2023: --- Summary: Add calcite-core to storm-sql-runtime Key: STORM-2023 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2023 Project: Apache Storm Issue Type: Bug

[jira] [Commented] (STORM-1435) Build a single jar with dependency for StormSQL dependency

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1435?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15407480#comment-15407480 ] Jungtaek Lim commented on STORM-1435: - Compiled topology needs calcite-core in runtime. I'll see if we

Re: [PROPOSAL] submitting topology with adding jars and maven artifacts

like to add kafka lib from submission step, exclusion should be supported. 2016년 8월 4일 (목) 오전 12:03, Jungtaek Lim <kabh...@gmail.com>님이 작성: > FYI: This proposal is filed to STORM-2016 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2016> and I've been working > on this. &g

Re: [PROPOSAL] submitting topology with adding jars and maven artifacts

module to outside of lib. cons. - StormSubmitter should handle dependencies when submitting topology. I've succeed with 2, and will try 3 to see it helps. Any other suggestions or opinions for existing options are much appreciated! Thanks, Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 2016년 8월 3일 (수) 오전 8:01, Jungta

[jira] [Updated] (STORM-1278) port backtype.storm.daemon.worker to java

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jungtaek Lim updated STORM-1278: Assignee: (was: Jark Wu) > port backtype.storm.daemon.worker to j

[jira] [Commented] (STORM-1278) port backtype.storm.daemon.worker to java

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15405328#comment-15405328 ] Jungtaek Lim commented on STORM-1278: - No worries. I'll make this issue unassigned. Please let me know

[jira] [Created] (STORM-2016) Topology submission improvement: support adding local jars and maven artifacts on submission

Jungtaek Lim created STORM-2016: --- Summary: Topology submission improvement: support adding local jars and maven artifacts on submission Key: STORM-2016 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2016

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 1.0.2 (rc4)

Reminder: vote was open for a week and has 1 binding and 2 non-binding. Please participate testing the 1.0.2 RC4 and vote to make releasing happen. Thanks, Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 2016년 7월 28일 (목) 오후 5:56, Xin Wang <data.xinw...@gmail.com>님이 작성: > +1 (non binding) > Deployed 3-

[jira] [Commented] (STORM-1278) port backtype.storm.daemon.worker to java

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15405028#comment-15405028 ] Jungtaek Lim commented on STORM-1278: - [~jark] Review for porting executor is in progress and I guess

Re: [PROPOSAL] submitting topology with adding jars and maven artifacts

clear on this. Thanks, Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 2016년 8월 3일 (수) 오전 7:43, Priyank Shah <ps...@hortonworks.com>님이 작성: > Hi Jungtaek, > > For adding jars and maven at submission, you have used the word Submitter. > Is Submitter the person running storm jar command or is Submitt

Re: [PROPOSAL] submitting topology with adding jars and maven artifacts

Ah, Satish you got the point. I meant copied version of files in supervisor, but itself can be isolated. I didn't think about removing blobs, and it seems not easy to do. Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVIoR) 2016년 8월 2일 (화) 오후 7:35, Satish Duggana <satish.dugg...@gmail.com>님이 작성: > Hi

Re: [PROPOSAL] submitting topology with adding jars and maven artifacts

with initial design. Thanks, Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 2016년 8월 2일 (화) 오후 6:58, Satish Duggana <satish.dugg...@gmail.com>님이 작성: > Hi Jungtaek, > Proposal looks good to me. Good that we are not going with other > alternative using mutable classloader etc. > > Good to have

Re: [DISCUSSION] Move out porting tests to after JStorm merger (Phase 3 or even 2.x)

l mode have to wait until all of > the > > daemons have been ported over. I really wish there were more hours in > the > > day for me to help out more on this. - Bobby > > > > On Sunday, July 31, 2016 6:51 PM, Jungtaek Lim <kabh...@gmail.com> > > wro

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >