Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 2.0.0 RC7

2019-05-05 Thread Roshan Naik
Ooops... just missed it...  my +1 as well Just finished verifying the foll:- spun up local cluster with binary dist- checked single a 2 worker modes. with and without ackers in each mode- ran SimplifiedWordCountTopo- did some quick perf verifications with ConstSpoutNullBolt- basic checking of

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 2.0.0 RC7

2019-05-05 Thread P. Taylor Goetz
Wow. This is a special occasion… The 2.0 release has been a very long time in the making, I can’t begin to thank all those who helped shepherd this branch to release quality. To me this is an Apache project at it’s finest. We’ve seen core contributors come and go. And when they go, we’ve seen

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 2.0.0 RC7

2019-05-04 Thread P. Taylor Goetz
Yeah, I had an expiration date on now of my keys. I’ve sorted it out, but need to wait for propagation of myyl keys. This is currently blocking the 1.2.x. and 1.1.x releases. But it looks like we can move forward with the 2.0.0 release. -Taylor > On May 2, 2019, at 4:51 PM, Ethan Li wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 2.0.0 RC7

2019-05-02 Thread Ethan Li
+1 1. Checked *.asc, *.md5, *.sha512 2. Built from the source code and ran unit tests; created a storm distribution based on it 3. set up a standalone cluster (based on apache-storm-2.0.0.zip, apache-storm-2.0.0.tar.gz, the storm distribution created above, separately) 4. Launched

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 2.0.0 RC7

2019-05-01 Thread Stig Rohde Døssing
Subscription has been replaced with TopicFilter. Subscription isn't deprecated in 1.x because it is not possible to backport TopicFilter without breaking changes. The replacement is the TopicFilter and ManualPartitioner classes. getKey/ValueDeserializer is deprecated in the latest 1.x release,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 2.0.0 RC7

2019-05-01 Thread Alexandre Vermeerbergen
Hello, Thanks, and my step issue with Storm 2.0.0 is with some Storm Kafka Client breaking changes in KafkaSpoutConfig class. See attached source for our homebrewed BasicKafkaSpout, I have at least the following compilation errors:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 2.0.0 RC7

2019-05-01 Thread Derek Dagit
> we can just bump it to something like 3.5.0. I'll raise an issue for it. +1 and Thanks Alexandre for finding this, it is a help. On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 2:18 PM Stig Rohde Døssing wrote: > Yes, we already have a check that the Maven version is above 3.0.0 ( >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 2.0.0 RC7

2019-05-01 Thread Stig Rohde Døssing
Yes, we already have a check that the Maven version is above 3.0.0 ( https://github.com/apache/storm/blob/master/pom.xml#L1439), IMO we can just bump it to something like 3.5.0. I'll raise an issue for it. Den ons. 1. maj 2019 kl. 20.59 skrev Alexandre Vermeerbergen < avermeerber...@gmail.com>:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 2.0.0 RC7

2019-05-01 Thread Alexandre Vermeerbergen
Hello Stig, Good catch: I upgraded Maven to version 3.6.1 and I rebuilt everything from source tar.gz without any trouble. So I delay my vote and I'm no longer blocked since I have storm-kafka-client-2.0.0.jar allowing me to rebuilt my topologies. Just a question: since my experience showed

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 2.0.0 RC7

2019-05-01 Thread Stig Rohde Døssing
I haven't seen the error you're getting before, but it looks like it's a Maven issue, not a Storm issue. Could you try updating to the latest Maven version? Den ons. 1. maj 2019 kl. 19.30 skrev Alexandre Vermeerbergen < avermeerber...@gmail.com>: > Hello, > > I don't know if this is worth a -1

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 2.0.0 RC7

2019-05-01 Thread Stig Rohde Døssing
Alexandre, I think we tend to assume people use a dependency management tool: https://storm.apache.org/releases/2.0.0-SNAPSHOT/Maven.html The easiest way for you to get a list of the jars that need to be on the classpath is to make a dummy Maven project, add the snippet I linked to the POM, and

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 2.0.0 RC7

2019-05-01 Thread Alexandre Vermeerbergen
Hello, I tried to rebuild my topologies with 2.0, but I hit a first trivial issue: I used to rely on storm-core-.jar in our classpath to resolve Storm API dependencies, but storm-core-2.0.0.jar doesn't seem to contain anymore classes like org.apache.storm.task.OutputCollector which is used in our

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 2.0.0 RC7

2019-04-30 Thread Arun Mahadevan
+1 - Downloaded binaries - Brought up a local cluster - Ran a few topologies and checked the output and logs. If I just click on the "Owner" link from the UI, it displays a red banner with a warning. "This user's topologies are in danger of being unscheduled due to the owner's over-use of cluster

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 2.0.0 RC7

2019-04-30 Thread Roshan Naik
Yes, you need to rebuild your topology jars against 2.0.  If you have some settings to tweak perf with 1.x,  refer to https://github.com/apache/storm/blob/master/docs/Performance.md for the 2.x configs. On Tuesday, April 30, 2019, 2:41:49 PM PDT, Alexandre Vermeerbergen wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 2.0.0 RC7

2019-04-30 Thread Alexandre Vermeerbergen
Hello, I'm eager to test Storm 2.0.0 with my complex topologies, but first of all: do I need to rebuild all my topologies' Big Jars with Storm 2.0.0, or may I try my existing Storm 1.2.3 (recent snapshot)-based Big Jars ? Kind regards, Alexandre Vermeerbergen Le mar. 30 avr. 2019 à 00:49, P.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 2.0.0 RC7

2019-04-30 Thread Jungtaek Lim
+1 (binding) > source - verify file (MD5, SHA) -- source, tar.gz : OK -- source, zip : OK - extract file -- source, tar.gz : OK -- source, zip : OK - diff-ing extracted files between tar.gz and zip : OK - build source with JDK 8 -- source, tar.gz : OK - build source dist -- source, tar.gz :

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 2.0.0 RC7

2019-04-30 Thread Kishorkumar Patil
Built from the source code. All Unit tests passed. Ran some basic tests with WordCountTopology, BasicDRPCTopology. Run ThroughputVsLatency for comparison and it looks good- with 99.9% of events processed within 5.4ms. +1 On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 2:16 PM Derek Dagit wrote: > OK ran the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 2.0.0 RC7

2019-04-30 Thread Stig Rohde Døssing
+1 Ran tests from source zip Installed and ran ExclamationTopology on single-node cluster from binary zip Verified no unexpected error logs. Clicked around a bit in UI, verified that logviewer works. Checked out tag and ran the license check plugin to generate DEPENDENCY-LICENSES. Verified that

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 2.0.0 RC7

2019-04-30 Thread Derek Dagit
OK ran the distribution from the tarball, and built and ran from the src tarball on macOS with JDK8. Tested WordCountTopology on both and it seemed fine. +1 On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 11:55 AM Derek Dagit wrote: > Sent too soon: > > - I verified sigs and sums > - Built the source from the tarball

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 2.0.0 RC7

2019-04-30 Thread Derek Dagit
Sent too soon: - I verified sigs and sums - Built the source from the tarball on macOS - I saw a couple of test errors because the local stormconf.ser was gone when the supervisor tried to open it, and this resulted in a crash. I re-ran the tests and they passed. - I do not think this is a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 2.0.0 RC7

2019-04-30 Thread Derek Dagit
- I verified sigs and sums On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 5:49 PM P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 2.0.0 (rc7) > > Full list of changes in this release: > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc7/RELEASE_NOTES.html > > The

[VOTE] Release Apache Storm 2.0.0 RC7

2019-04-29 Thread P. Taylor Goetz
This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 2.0.0 (rc7) Full list of changes in this release: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc7/RELEASE_NOTES.html The tag/commit to be voted upon is v2.0.0: