Re: s2 Code Behind bug?

2007-01-14 Thread Don Brown
I'm assuming you were calling the page with http://localhost/myapp/foo/bar.action? If so, I wonder if the plugin only works when there is at least one action class in a package. Try to create a different action like com.foo.action.foo.BazAction in that same package, and see if the plugin then

Re: [S2] Experimental Features

2007-01-14 Thread Don Brown
I got 90% of the way once moving the portlet support out to a plugin, but there were a couple hardcoded references in the URL component and another internal class that escapes me ATM, so I backed off. This could be revisited for 2.1. Don Tom Schneider wrote: Ted Husted whttp://www.netidenti

Re: [tiles2] Tiles TLP next steps

2007-01-14 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 1/14/07, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: How about moving > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/sandbox/trunk/tiles/ to > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tiles/tiles2/trunk ? Is there a need for the extra tiles2 directory in there? Why not just ...asf/tiles/trunk? I was thin

Re: [tiles2] Tiles TLP next steps

2007-01-14 Thread Martin Cooper
On 1/14/07, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 1/14/07, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The SVN repo is now set up, so you should be all set. When you send an > announcement is up to you, but now that everything else is in the Tiles > TLP's hands, I'd say now would be fine. W

Re: [tiles2] Tiles TLP next steps

2007-01-14 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 1/14/07, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The SVN repo is now set up, so you should be all set. When you send an announcement is up to you, but now that everything else is in the Tiles TLP's hands, I'd say now would be fine. We still need to move the code over to svn.apache.org/tile

Re: [S2] Experimental Features

2007-01-14 Thread Tom Schneider
Ted Husted wrote: It would be great if there were a portlet plugin. I have no idea how the support is implemented, but I expect it would not be that easy. :) Well, the PortletDispatcher (Jsr168Dispatcher.java) and related portlet request support classes would probably be easy to separate out. T

Re: [S2] Experimental Features

2007-01-14 Thread Ted Husted
Since we've put the Ajax theme on the experimental list, I'd like to do the same with portlet support. It's very possible that the code is solid, but since we seem to have so few people using it, it's hard to vouch for it. Right now, we have three open portlet tickets (one being new) * https://

Re: JSTL functions in *struts* JSP tags

2007-01-14 Thread Tom Schneider
+1 for having a seperate key attribute that automatically does a getText() lookup for the label. This was one thing that is annoying in WW since we tried to I18Nize our whole app. The url thing didn't bother me as much, but I'm all for a shorthand notation if it makes sense. (Url/Button link

s2 Code Behind bug?

2007-01-14 Thread Laurie Harper
I'm trying to get a project running with the Zero Config and Code Behind Plugin features of S2 and I'm seeing something which looks like a bug. I thought I'd raise it here before posting it to JIRA and/or trying to dig through the plugin code to track it down, in case this is 'by design' or som

Re: JSTL functions in *struts* JSP tags

2007-01-14 Thread Ted Husted
On 1/12/07, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Anyway, am I the only one who finds this syntax tedious? No, you are not. * https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1517 Just looking for a patch ... I don't see a problem with having one tag for the simplest (and most common case) of a

Re: mvn deployment best practices? (Re: Permissions problems deploying to snapshot repo)

2007-01-14 Thread Ted Husted
On 1/12/07, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Secondly, do we have any rules, or even guidelines, about when we should deploy SNAPSHOTs to the repo? I can't think of any particular reason, but I don't want to just bust off doing it whenever the whim strikes me, unless people think that's O

Re: [CONF] Confluence Changes in the last 24 hours

2007-01-14 Thread Ted Husted
On 1/10/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: |-- Struts 2 + GWT was last edited by musachy (11:51 AM). I appended this to the Plugin page, so as to keep everything in one place. -Ted. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [E

Re: [Struts Wiki] Update of "StrutsRelease136" by Paul Benedict

2007-01-14 Thread Paul Benedict
How do I get the assembly directory created? I deleted my local one and neither of these two commands created a new one: $ mvn install site-deploy -P apps,itest $ mvn deploy -P pre-assembly Paul - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAI

Re: [tiles2] Tiles TLP next steps

2007-01-14 Thread Martin Cooper
The SVN repo is now set up, so you should be all set. When you send an announcement is up to you, but now that everything else is in the Tiles TLP's hands, I'd say now would be fine. As for the web site, the usual process of uploading and expanding in place should be fine, and the current content

Re: [Struts Wiki] Update of "StrutsRelease136" by Paul Benedict

2007-01-14 Thread Paul Benedict
Okay. This issue is fixed. I generated the apps site by itself. And then ran the site goal on the top-level project without the apps profile. Paul Paul Benedict wrote: Because of the aggregated javadocs, all the API of the apps are getting included too: http://struts.apache.org/1.x/apidocs/

Re: Moving OverDrive to Apache Labs

2007-01-14 Thread Mitchell James
I'm guessing that Ted means moving the code to http://svn.apache.org/ repos/asf/struts/archive/ -- James Mitchell 678.910.8017 On Jan 14, 2007, at 12:18 AM, Martin Cooper wrote: On 1/12/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If no one minds, I'd like to go ahead and archive OverDrive