Please ask this question on the struts-user mailing list. The struts-dev
list is for the development of Struts itself.
http://struts.apache.org/mail.html
Thanks,
Dave
Ritvars Rundza-ns wrote:
Hi!
I am wondering is this Struts2 ( *2.1.6* ) fw bug, or am i just
misunderstanding something :).
I understand and agree your way of thinking. Its true i tried struts 2 the
first time today.
But. This misconfiguration thing is doubtly possible, i think, because i
used struts2 blank app as a base of my "test". Just 1 filter @ web.xml
(struts filter), @ struts xml - 2 constansts were set:
I added "struts.class.reloading.acceptClasses", so now I can make the
reloading class loader handle only action classes, so I don't get
ClassCastException(s)
I also added support for the relative paths, @Dale, take it for a spin
and let me know how it works.
musachy
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 9:29
I agree with you in principle, but there is a good chance that it is
something not properly configured, like the static params interceptor
applied twice to the action vs a struts bug.
musachy
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 9:54 AM, Ritvars Rundzāns wrote:
> If you think this post is inappropriate @ this
If you think this post is inappropriate @ this mailing list, i disagree with
you. Despite of fact this (twice-triggering) is simple thing/fact, it is
more related to struts2 action handling implementation (dev thing) then my
lack of knowledge (user list).
Anyway, i will give it a try. Others are s
I am thinking about adding another constant which holds a list of
regex, which if set, will limit what classes can be loaded by the
reloading classloader. The reason for this, is that I would like to
limit the reloaded classes to just my actions. If the reloading class
loader loads something that i
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 9:16 AM, Wes Wannemacher wrote:
> And
> no, Musachy doesn't sleep.
well in fact, I sleep walk almost every night, so yeah I don't sleep much :)
musachy
--
"Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Lukasz
Lenart wrote:
> 2009/7/13 Dale Newfield :
>> Lately it seems like Struts is improving more due to the heroic effort of a
>> few individuals than as a result of a community effort. (I have a feeling
>> that this has fairly consistently been the case througho
2009/7/13 Dale Newfield :
> Lately it seems like Struts is improving more due to the heroic effort of a
> few individuals than as a result of a community effort. (I have a feeling
> that this has fairly consistently been the case throughout the lifetime of
> struts v1 and v2.) I'm happy that stru
please post this question on the user mailing list.
thanks
musachy
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 7:21 AM, Ritvars Rundzāns wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I am wondering is this Struts2 ( 2.1.6 ) fw bug, or am i just
> misunderstanding something :). I created action mapping witch maps to an
> action and passes two ar
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 7:10 AM, Dale Newfield wrote:
> Almost. The File interface can tell you whether or not a given instance
> (path) isAbsolute(). Clearly if the (absolute or relative) file does not
> exist it should not be loaded, but existence shouldn't help you decide which
> way to interp
Hi!
I am wondering is this Struts2 ( *2.1.6* ) fw bug, or am i just
misunderstanding something :). I created action mapping witch maps to an
action and passes two args to it from base url (not param part), like this:
{1}
{2}
/example/abc.jsp
Musachy Barroso wrote:
I could test the path as an absolute path, if it exist, use it,
otherwise try it as a relative path to context root, sounds good?
Almost. The File interface can tell you whether or not a given instance
(path) isAbsolute(). Clearly if the (absolute or relative) file doe
13 matches
Mail list logo