Re: voting on 2.1.8.1

2009-10-09 Thread Wendy Smoak
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Wes Wannemacher wrote: > There was a recent discussion after 2.1.8 that we should post builds and > leave them available for a while before calling a vote... I could be > misremembering, but I think Martin indicated that a build should sit for a > few weeks while pe

Re: voting on 2.1.8.1

2009-10-09 Thread Musachy Barroso
I think we are good to go. musachy On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Wes Wannemacher wrote: > > Hey guys, > There was a recent discussion after 2.1.8 that we should post builds and > leave them available for a while before calling a vote... I could be > misremembering, but I think Martin indicated

voting on 2.1.8.1

2009-10-09 Thread Wes Wannemacher
Hey guys, There was a recent discussion after 2.1.8 that we should post builds and leave them available for a while before calling a vote... I could be misremembering, but I think Martin indicated that a build should sit for a few weeks while people test. In the case of 2.1.8.1, I only made change

Re: Someone turn that hudson build off!

2009-10-09 Thread Don Brown
Also, could you ensure only one email gets sent for the whole project? The is how Bamboo is currently configured, though it was blocked by the same infra issue, iirc. I remember continuum used to be used for numerous Apache projects, and it used to drive me nuts how some random maven failure caus

Re: Someone turn that hudson build off!

2009-10-09 Thread Wes Wannemacher
There is good news and bad news... The good news is that infra fixed up the [email protected] spamassassin settings to accept email from *.apache.org, which had been blocking posts from hudson in the past. The bad news is that apparently, it sends one email for each artifact, which as we witnessed

Someone turn that hudson build off!

2009-10-09 Thread Don Brown
Surely the build isn't meant to spam my inbox so? Don - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]