Re: [PROPOSAL] Struts 1.2.3 release

2004-09-07 Thread Ted Husted
On Tue, 07 Sep 2004 08:46:26 -0500, Joe Germuska wrote: > I don't know if there's a protocol about this, but actually, I > wasn't quite clear on why Martin was being tentative about > describing the release he cut as "officially" 1.2.3. The build was officially named "1.2.3", but, as Martin says,

Re: [PROPOSAL] Struts 1.2.3 release

2004-09-07 Thread Martin Cooper
On Tue, 7 Sep 2004 08:46:26 -0500, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 6:07 AM -0400 9/7/04, Ted Husted wrote: > >On Tue, 07 Sep 2004 04:11:42 +0100, Niall Pemberton wrote: > >> I have also committed a patch for Bug 31060 with the reasoning that > >> if we need to re-create the 1.2.3 relea

Re: [PROPOSAL] Struts 1.2.3 release

2004-09-07 Thread Joe Germuska
At 6:07 AM -0400 9/7/04, Ted Husted wrote: On Tue, 07 Sep 2004 04:11:42 +0100, Niall Pemberton wrote: I have also committed a patch for Bug 31060 with the reasoning that if we need to re-create the 1.2.3 release then we should also take the opportunity to fix this bug as well: If it were just a mat

Re: [PROPOSAL] Struts 1.2.3 release

2004-09-07 Thread Ted Husted
On Tue, 07 Sep 2004 04:11:42 +0100, Niall Pemberton wrote: > I have also committed a patch for Bug 31060 with the reasoning that > if we need to re-create the 1.2.3 release then we should also take > the opportunity to fix this bug as well: If it were just a matter of patching the DTD's on the Str

Re: [PROPOSAL] Struts 1.2.3 release

2004-09-06 Thread Niall Pemberton
t of a GA release of Struts the best thing is to simply change the method now (along with the new saveErrors() method also added in Struts 1.2.1). Niall - Original Message - From: "Vic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, September 06, 2004 9:

Re: [PROPOSAL] Struts 1.2.3 release

2004-09-06 Thread Vic
please patch as per user thread: "Struts 1.2.2/1.2.3 struts-examples.war not working" w/ a solution in there. .V -- Please post on Rich Internet Applications User Interface (RiA/SoA) - To unsubscribe, e-

Re: [PROPOSAL] Struts 1.2.3 release

2004-09-05 Thread Martin Cooper
On Sun, 05 Sep 2004 00:35:14 -0700, Michael McGrady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Martin Cooper wrote: > > >So much for being out of town for the long weekend. Thanks to my > >neighbours, I woke up to a waterlogged house, and am currently sitting > >amongst a fleet of industrial-grade dehumidifiers

Re: [PROPOSAL] Struts 1.2.3 release

2004-09-05 Thread Michael McGrady
Martin Cooper wrote: So much for being out of town for the long weekend. Thanks to my neighbours, I woke up to a waterlogged house, and am currently sitting amongst a fleet of industrial-grade dehumidifiers. This is not fun. My neighbours, of course, are away for the long weekend, no doubt having f

Re: [PROPOSAL] Struts 1.2.3 release

2004-09-04 Thread Martin Cooper
So much for being out of town for the long weekend. Thanks to my neighbours, I woke up to a waterlogged house, and am currently sitting amongst a fleet of industrial-grade dehumidifiers. This is not fun. My neighbours, of course, are away for the long weekend, no doubt having fun... Anyway, the po

Re: [PROPOSAL] Struts 1.2.3 release

2004-09-04 Thread Martin Cooper
The Struts 1.2.3 build is up and announced, as proposed below. As you will see from the wiki, I have not run unit tests. Unbelievably, just as I started to do so last night, my power went out, and stayed out. (I hope this isn't the start of another California power crisis...) Since we needed to

Re: [PROPOSAL] Struts 1.2.3 release

2004-09-02 Thread Martin Cooper
On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 22:20:33 -0700, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 21:49:17 -0700, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 13:50:30 -0700, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 08:13:21 -0400, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PR

Re: [PROPOSAL] Struts 1.2.3 release

2004-09-02 Thread Martin Cooper
On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 21:49:17 -0700, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 13:50:30 -0700, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 08:13:21 -0400, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, 01 Sep 2004 22:28:42 -0700 (PDT), Martin Cooper wro

Re: [PROPOSAL] Struts 1.2.3 release

2004-09-02 Thread Craig McClanahan
On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 13:50:30 -0700, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 08:13:21 -0400, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 01 Sep 2004 22:28:42 -0700 (PDT), Martin Cooper wrote: > > > * CVS freeze/tag date: Friday, September 3rd @ 6pm (Pacific time). > > > >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Struts 1.2.3 release

2004-09-02 Thread Ted Husted
On Thu, 02 Sep 2004 13:50:30 -0700, Martin Cooper wrote: > Do we want to call that 1.3.x or 2.0.x? I'm thinking that some > degree of revolution will happen in this next (2.3-based) version, > as well as some logical evolution. I haven't yet seen any proposed > advantages *to Struts future* listed

Re: [PROPOSAL] Struts 1.2.3 release

2004-09-02 Thread Martin Cooper
On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 08:13:21 -0400, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 01 Sep 2004 22:28:42 -0700 (PDT), Martin Cooper wrote: > > * CVS freeze/tag date: Friday, September 3rd @ 6pm (Pacific time). > > Following discussion on the list, did we want to make that the CVS freeze/tag/branch

Re: [PROPOSAL] Struts 1.2.3 release

2004-09-02 Thread Ted Husted
On Wed, 01 Sep 2004 22:28:42 -0700 (PDT), Martin Cooper wrote: > * CVS freeze/tag date: Friday, September 3rd @ 6pm (Pacific time). Following discussion on the list, did we want to make that the CVS freeze/tag/branch date? Of course, we could always branch on the tag later too. Once this release

[PROPOSAL] Struts 1.2.3 release

2004-09-01 Thread Martin Cooper
We need to get a follow-up 1.2.3 release out the door as soon as possible, due to the problems that have been identified with the 1.2.2 GA release. The ball is already in play for a 1.2.3 release, with a preliminary build available, and a release tracking page up on the wiki: http://wiki.apache