Thanks Ted. I understand better now. I still think 1.3.5 is great!
Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 8/16/06, Paul Benedict
wrote:
> Wendy, I think there may be a mistake. I am a committer now :-) At least I
> thought I
>was ::scratches head::.
It's the PMC votes that are binding. I
On 8/16/06, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Wendy, I think there may be a mistake. I am a committer now :-) At least I
thought I
was ::scratches head::.
It's the PMC votes that are binding. In the normal course, we usually
invite a committer to join the PMC after six months or so.
Wendy, I think there may be a mistake. I am a committer now :-) At least I
thought I was ::scratches head::.
Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 8/5/06, Wendy Smoak wrote:
> A new build of Struts 1.3.5, including checksums and signatures, is
> available to evaluate for release quality
On 8/5/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A new build of Struts 1.3.5, including checksums and signatures, is
available to evaluate for release quality.
[RESULT]
This vote for Struts 1.3.5 quality resulted in:
Binding votes from PMC members:
GA: Don Brown, James Mitchell
Beta: Wend
I have successfully converted over a very large application to Struts 1.3.5.
The backwards compatibility is amazing, and I also had no problems using the
old request processor. Really, I am impressed and didn't expect it to go this
smooth, and I just want to say congratulations and good job for
+1 GA non-binding. Been using 1.3.5 successfully in my app.
\Anders
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Ted Husted
> Sent: 11. august 2006 15:07
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.3.5 Quality
Doh! I couldn't remember if I had sent that in.
--
James Mitchell
678.910.8017
On Aug 11, 2006, at 9:06 AM, Ted Husted wrote:
On 8/11/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 GA -- Looks great!!!
LOL. No fair voting twice, James :)
As it stands, we have two beta and two GA.
R
On 8/11/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 GA -- Looks great!!!
LOL. No fair voting twice, James :)
As it stands, we have two beta and two GA.
Remember, everyone who has tested the distribution is invited to vote,
binding or not.
-Ted.
-
+1 GA -- Looks great!!!
--
James Mitchell
678.910.8017
On Aug 6, 2006, at 12:59 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
A new build of Struts 1.3.5, including checksums and signatures, is
available to evaluate for release quality.
* http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/1.3.5/
It has also been deployed
+1 Beta
-Original Message-
From: Wendy Smoak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 07, 2006 3:48 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.3.5 Quality (re-vote)
On 8/5/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Once you have had a chance to review
Finally had a chance to go through this.
+1 for GA
--
James Mitchell
678.910.8017
On Aug 7, 2006, at 7:18 PM, Don Brown wrote:
+1 for GA
Don
Wendy Smoak wrote:
On 8/5/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Once you have had a chance to review this test build, please respond
with a
+1 for GA
Don
Wendy Smoak wrote:
On 8/5/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Once you have had a chance to review this test build, please respond
with a vote on its quality:
[ ] Alpha
[X] Beta
[ ] General Availability (GA)
Same reasons as before. :)
* http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@s
On 8/5/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Once you have had a chance to review this test build, please respond
with a vote on its quality:
[ ] Alpha
[X] Beta
[ ] General Availability (GA)
Same reasons as before. :)
* http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@struts.apache.org/msg23828.html
This
A new build of Struts 1.3.5, including checksums and signatures, is
available to evaluate for release quality.
* http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/1.3.5/
It has also been deployed to m2-snapshot-repository with signatures
for the jars and poms.
The release plan is available on the wiki:
*
Wendy Smoak wrote:
On 8/1/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My copy of mvn doesn't seem to think that download sources is an
option :(
You try it with -U to see if you've got the latest IDEA plugin. I
forget when that was added. If not, depending on how much time you
have to spend o
On 8/1/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My copy of mvn doesn't seem to think that download sources is an option :(
You try it with -U to see if you've got the latest IDEA plugin. I
forget when that was added. If not, depending on how much time you
have to spend on this, my next step
My copy of mvn doesn't seem to think that download sources is an option :(
-Ted.
On 7/31/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/31/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have POMs and JARs dated for Monday afternoon, which sounds like
> when we made the second pass, and I dont'
On 7/31/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just an idea... try running
mvn idea:idea -downloadSources=true -downloadJavadocs=true -Papps
which should download those files from the snapshot repo.
OK, will do. Though, I need to stay focused on updates to MailReader
for the rest of to
On 7/31/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have POMs and JARs dated for Monday afternoon, which sounds like
when we made the second pass, and I dont' remember running a 1.x build
since then. But the link mentions source JARS, and I don't see any
source JARs. If I didn't assemble this on
On 7/30/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
One of the links on the page I mentioned is to a script to sign
everything in a directory structure, which should work if you still
have the 'original' 1.3.5 build in your local repository:
http://gleamynode.net/wordpress/archives/129
I have PO
On 7/30/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OK, then, since we have two votes for beta and one vote for GA,
we can release this as a beta.
First, a huge thank you to Ted for getting 1.3.5 done, and to everyone
who helped get 1.3 to the point where it was possible.
Since we intend a bro
OK, then, since we have two votes for beta and one vote for GA, we can
release this as a beta. Since we intend a broader distribution,
mirroring seems appropriate.
Unfortunately, the private key that I used to sign prior releases is
no longer available, and I've totally forgotten how to do any of
+1 for GA quality
Don
Ted Husted wrote:
On 7/27/06, Michael Jouravlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just have glanced over distro files, so the nitpicks are minor. I
have no opinion on the grade yet.
As it stands, we have only two other votes as to grade. We need a
quorum of at least three po
On 7/27/06, Michael Jouravlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just have glanced over distro files, so the nitpicks are minor. I
have no opinion on the grade yet.
As it stands, we have only two other votes as to grade. We need a
quorum of at least three positive votes to proceed. (I'm abstraining
m
On 7/23/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The Struts 1.3.5 Test Build is available to evaluate for release quality.
The release plan is available on the wiki:
* http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsActionRelease135
The test build, including checksums and signatures, has been deployed t
Based on the issues Hubert Rabago and Wendy pointed out...
[ ] Alpha
[X] Beta
[ ] General Availability (GA)
James
-Original Message-
From: Wendy Smoak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 11:02 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.3.5 Quality
On
On 7/23/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Once you have had a chance to review this test build, please respond
with a vote on its quality:
[ ] Alpha
[X] Beta
[ ] General Availability (GA)
* The struts-faces examples will not deploy on Tomcat 4.1.31 / JDK
1.4.2. (I think web.xml is in
I found these issues:
1.) ForwardConfig inheritance doesn't work when trying to inherit
global forwards. There's code to handle it within the config objects,
but they're not being triggered at app startup.
2.) Arbitrary properties don't get copied when creating ActionRedirect
objects based on a
The Struts 1.3.5 Test Build is available to evaluate for release quality.
The release plan is available on the wiki:
* http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsActionRelease135
The test build, including checksums and signatures, has been deployed to:
* http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/1.3.5/
29 matches
Mail list logo
