On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 13:48:39 +0100, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>
> Has Struts Shale no relationship to (Struts/Commons)-Chain?
Technically, there only relationship between Struts and Shale is that they are
both standards-based web application frameworks originated by Craig McClanahan
:)
I saw y
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 12:03:48 -0500, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 07:56:02 -0800, Martin Cooper wrote:
> > Excellent! I will roll it today.
>
> The one thing might be a quick update of the release notes to catch us up. It
> should only be a couple of items. (I'd do i
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 07:56:02 -0800, Martin Cooper wrote:
> Excellent! I will roll it today.
The one thing might be a quick update of the release notes to catch us up. It
should only be a couple of items. (I'd do it myself, but I'm juggling other
responsibilities today.)
> BTW, I saw that you ch
o -ve feedback from anyone on Validator 1.1.4 so
> >> hopefully it will be voted GA in the next couple of days - can we
> >> really not delay a week for the 1.2.6 version and include this
> >> stuff?
> >>
> >> Niall
> >>
> >> --
ouple of days - can we
>> really not delay a week for the 1.2.6 version and include this
>> stuff?
>>
>> Niall
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: "Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROT
> - Original Message -
> From: "Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 11:52 PM
> Subject: Re: Release planning (was Re: Shale vs. Struts-Chain)
>
>
> If everyth
Niall Pemberton wrote:
to include this in the last 1.2 release.
It does not have to be last 1.2, still could have 1.27 :-).
(and maybeee 1.3 should be called 1.4, just in case, it is a big
change).
.V
-
To unsubscribe, e-ma
lay a week
for the 1.2.6 version and include this stuff?
Niall
- Original Message -
From: "Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 11:52 PM
Subject: Re: Release planning (was Re: Shale
At first, we were listing the ones that were going to held over to 1.3.x and
leaving out the JavaServer Faces ones (that don't apply to the core).
I just finished adding the others, so that the tallies match (13 each as of
now). There are four remaining that I'll try to resolve in the morning, w
On Tue, 1 Jun 2004 19:52:51 -0400, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If everything else is resolved, I don't think we need to wait on Validator
> 1.1.4. If it's ready when we are, fine. If not, #18169 does not seem like a
> "showstopper" issue to me, and we can finish implementing the feat
+1 and I'll assist in knocking the remaining bugs down or anything else
necessary.
Don
> If everything else is resolved, I don't think we need to wait on Validator
> 1.1.4. If it's ready when we are, fine. If not, #18169 does not seem like
> a "showstopper" issue to me, and we can finish impleme
On Tue, 1 Jun 2004 19:52:51 -0400, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [snip]
> I would be in favor of immediately branching at 1.2.6, regardless, so we can
> start on 1.3.x. If there are any straggling issues with the 1.2.x build, I'd
> be happy to cross-commit between the 1.2.x and 1.3.x br
If everything else is resolved, I don't think we need to wait on Validator
1.1.4. If it's ready when we are, fine. If not, #18169 does not seem like a
"showstopper" issue to me, and we can finish implementing the feature in the
1.3.x series.
I'm trying to resolve the issues not listed as "outs
Miscellaneous comments inline.
On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 13:48:39 +0100, Matthias Wessendorf
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I read the docs on subversion about Shale.
> Well, a very interessting point.
> However, I asked myself how it is related
> to Struts/Commons - Chain. (The Proposal aka
If there has been no negative feedback on Commons Validator 1.1.4 by Monday
(2004-11-22) I was planning to call for a Vote to release it as "GA" quality
then.
I don't think we should vote on 1.2.5 since 1.2.6 is coming soon.
Niall
- Original Message -
From: "Joe Germuska" <[EMAIL PROTEC
> Looking at http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsRelease126, is it true
> that we are just waiting for commons-validator 1.1.4 to be marked
> "GA"?
read in commons-dev that 1.1.4 is now alpha
and available for Testing
-Matthias
---
Seams that Chain is only for Struts 1.2 ?
or 1.3, which is based on Servlet2.2
I believe that we reached consensus that it would be ok to move
Struts 1.3 to depend on Servlet 2.3. Work on Struts 1.3 is blocked
on the release of a GA 1.2.x Struts so as to minimize any need to
apply patches acros
Hi all,
I read the docs on subversion about Shale.
Well, a very interessting point.
However, I asked myself how it is related
to Struts/Commons - Chain. (The Proposal aka Jericho)
Has Struts Shale no relationship to (Struts/Commons)-Chain?
Seams that Chain is only for Struts 1.2 ?
or 1.3, which
18 matches
Mail list logo
