Hi,
I've dowloaded the 1.3.4 snapshot and executed the steps in the
StrutsActionRelease134 wiki page. Everything built fine 8-) Using Java
1.5.0_06-b05 on linux.
This StrutsMaintenanceMaven wiki page does explain how to build struts
when checking it out from the repository, I suggest to add a s
On 5/9/06, Michael Jouravlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/9/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In the documentation, we've been referring to "Struts Action Framework
> 2" to correlate with the common acronym SAF2.
>
> I would agreed that there's no obvious reason to retrofit the numer
Michael Jouravlev wrote:
Don't we want to learn on others' mistakes? Or this *is* a plan for
Struts, to rename SAF2 to SAF sometime?
I agree with our historical approach to this: let time decide. If Struts Action
2 is widely accepted and supplants 1 in terms of usage and developer activity,
On 5/9/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In the documentation, we've been referring to "Struts Action Framework
2" to correlate with the common acronym SAF2.
I would agreed that there's no obvious reason to retrofit the numeral to SAF.
Based on this logic, term "Java" should correspond
Well, I still think the Framework part is redundant, as WebWork, Wicket, JSF, or
any others that are frameworks don't feel the need to include it in their name,
but if that is what we are already doing, we might as well be consistent.
Therefore, we have Struts Action Framework and Struts Action
In the documentation, we've been referring to "Struts Action Framework
2" to correlate with the common acronym SAF2.
I would agreed that there's no obvious reason to retrofit the numeral to SAF.
-Ted.
On 5/9/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Wendy Smoak wrote:
> The jar manifests now ha
On 5/9/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Wendy Smoak wrote:
> The jar manifests now have 'Apache Struts Action 1 Framework' as the
> Specification-Title. (Change struts/action/pom.xml if you prefer
> something else.)
The more I think about it, the more I don't like this title.
Me too.
Wendy Smoak wrote:
The jar manifests now have 'Apache Struts Action 1 Framework' as the
Specification-Title. (Change struts/action/pom.xml if you prefer
something else.)
The more I think about it, the more I don't like this title. I think it
should be: Apache Struts Action. Action 2 should
On 5/8/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tonight I'll review the issues and changes since 1.3.3 and deploy
snapshots of 1.3.4. Assuming there are no major issues outstanding,
I'm planning on rolling the 1.3.4 test build on Tuesday evening.
The snapshots are available:
http://cvs.ap
#1) There are some problems with the release notes:
Compare "What's New" in the 1.2.4 docs to how it's listed in 1.3.4:
http://struts.apache.org/struts-doc-1.2.4/userGuide/release-notes.html
http://struts.apache.org/struts-action/userGuide/release-notes-1.2.4.html
Notice how the separate paragrap
On 5/8/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please continue reviewing the 1.3.3 test build and reporting issues:
* http://cvs.apache.org/dist/struts/action/v1.3.3/
Are there any comments on the included website docs?
Did you mean docs included with the distro, or docs on live website?
J
Please continue reviewing the 1.3.3 test build and reporting issues:
* http://cvs.apache.org/dist/struts/action/v1.3.3/
Are there any comments on the included website docs?
I've posted a release plan for 1.3.4:
* http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsActionRelease134
Tonight I'll review the issu
12 matches
Mail list logo
