M
> >To: Struts Developers List
> >Subject: Closing https://github.com/strutsathon
> >
> >Hi,
> >
> >I want to close this organisation, any objections?
> >
> >https://github.com/
LGTM. It seems it's not needed as it's not updated since long time ago.
Regards.
>-Original Message-
>From: Lukasz Lenart
>Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 11:58 PM
>To: Struts Developers List
>Subject: Closing https://github.com/strutsathon
>
>Hi,
>
Hi,
I want to close this organisation, any objections?
https://github.com/strutsathon
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional
find out if
the CMS can build Jekyll on its own or not. However it will be very
interesting to find out.
Currently it is hosted by GitHub if I see it correctly. If we use
Strutsathon as official Struts-resource, I believe we should host it
on ASF hardware. Or do you think different?
Cheers
Hi,
thanks Lukasz for putting up the domain! It think its a great to have
such a page.
I have a few ideas for the strutsathon page. I believe we should look at
it as a place
where we connect to the community. We could:
- give information how to organize a local Strutsathon
- provide a
Hi,
As you may have noticed, last time we have organised two hackathons -
called Strutsathon - one in Augsburg (thanks to Christian!) and one in
Warsaw (thanks to me :-)).
Anyway, we think it's a good idea to promote that kind of activity and
allow others to join. Right now we have a domai
trademark
protection guidelines.
So what happened here? Christian coined the term "Strutsathon", and it
proved to attract interest, at least by others re-using it. Being aware
of the issues raised by the board regarding trademarks, Christian found
the term being worth to protect. As t
2013/10/12 Christian Grobmeier :
>>> - Guice 3 instead internal DI
>>
>> That would definitely be a major improvement - so +1 for this.
>
> Actually I am not so sure any longer on this one. I mean, what are the real
> benefits of having Google Guice instead of what we have now?
> I think this shoul
I think I understand what Dave meant ... but anyway, I'm up to what
Christian proposed, thus will give clear signal and allows others
(Strutsathon organisers) use the trademark without embarrassment ;-)
Kind regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
2013/10/13 Chri
on.
If we generally allow the use of the term Strutsathon we can not ask for
respecting
our trademarks if a commercial entity abuses it (in our eyes).
I believe it should be in the hands of the PMC to keep control of
Strutsathons and protecting
the trademark of it is in my opinion a first step
Christian!". I supposed ask you first before I
>>>>
>>>>> have used the name Strutshaton. I'm really sorry, I thought about that
>>>>> but forget :(
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Don't worry!
>>>>
>>
Polski:
rozpórka-maratoński
no nie?
> Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2013 15:31:04 -0400
> Subject: Re: [trademark] The term "Strutsathon"
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
>
> Adding "-athon" is common, I'm not sure I understand w
ian!". I supposed ask you first before I
have used the name Strutshaton. I'm really sorry, I thought about
that
but forget :(
Don't worry!
I think it was great you have chosen the term and you should keep
it.
I see a good opportunity to improve our community work when we
manage
that
> >> but forget :(
> >>
> >
> > Don't worry!
> >
> > I think it was great you have chosen the term and you should keep it.
> > I see a good opportunity to improve our community work when we manage
> > to establish the term Strutsathon.
rst before I
>> have used the name Strutshaton. I'm really sorry, I thought about that
>> but forget :(
>>
>
> Don't worry!
>
> I think it was great you have chosen the term and you should keep it.
> I see a good opportunity to improve our community work when we mana
u should keep it.
I see a good opportunity to improve our community work when we manage
to establish the term Strutsathon.
I have to say "Thank you" for the good idea to organize another
Strutsathon
in Warsaw.
Thanks & kind regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.
lo folks,
>
> as you know I previously invented the term "Strutsathon" for the first
> Strutsathon in Augsburg:
> http://strutsathon.opensource.io/
>
> Now I saw Lukasz is using the term for one in Warsaw. I sense a pattern and
> hope there will be more Strutsat
; >> TW: http://www.twitter.com/**meruvian <http://www.twitter.com/meruvian>/
> @meruvian
> >> Website: http://www.meruvian.org
> >>
> >> "We grow because we share the same belief."
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 5:45 PM,
gt;>
>> "We grow because we share the same belief."
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 5:45 PM, Christian Grobmeier
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello folks,
>>>
>>> as you know I previously invented the term "Strutsathon" for t
**meruvian <http://www.facebook.com/meruvian>
>> TW: http://www.twitter.com/**meruvian <http://www.twitter.com/meruvian>/
>> @meruvian
>> Website: http://www.meruvian.org
>>
>> "We grow because we share the same belief."
>>
>>
>> O
an
TW: http://www.twitter.com/meruvian / @meruvian
Website: http://www.meruvian.org
"We grow because we share the same belief."
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 5:45 PM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
Hello folks,
as you know I previously invented the term "Strutsathon" for the
first
/ @meruvian
Website: http://www.meruvian.org
"We grow because we share the same belief."
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 5:45 PM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> as you know I previously invented the term "Strutsathon" for the first
>
Hello folks,
as you know I previously invented the term "Strutsathon" for the first
Strutsathon in Augsburg:
http://strutsathon.opensource.io/
Now I saw Lukasz is using the term for one in Warsaw. I sense a pattern
and hope there will be more Strutsathons to follow!
As I invente
? ;-)
This I consider more important. In general everything related to
security
Cheers!
Christian
PS: great to see the term Strutsathon is used :-)
-Phil
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl
2013/10/2 Philip Luppens :
>> It's a quite easy task - I did that sometime ago.
>>
>
> Err, seriously? I must have missed the ticket then - good job ;-)
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW-4027
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
--
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
> 2013/10/2 Philip Luppens :
> > Then what about getting Apache Commons OGNL in instead, just to see if we
> > can profit from the performance improvements?
>
> It's a quite easy task - I did that sometime ago.
>
Err, seriously? I must have mis
List of tasks
https://github.com/strutsathon/struts2/wiki/Strutsathon
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
2013/10/2 Lukasz Lenart :
> 2013/10/2 Philip Luppens :
>> Then what about getting Apache Commons OGNL in instead, just to see if we
>> can
2013/10/2 Philip Luppens :
> Then what about getting Apache Commons OGNL in instead, just to see if we
> can profit from the performance improvements?
It's a quite easy task - I did that sometime ago.
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
> 2013/10/2 Philip Luppens :
> > How about an MVEL implementation of the ValueStack? ;-)
>
> Main problem is with conversion - current conversion mechanism heavily
> depends on Ognl - but maybe we could extract it, I mean add another
> extension
2013/10/2 Philip Luppens :
> How about an MVEL implementation of the ValueStack? ;-)
Main problem is with conversion - current conversion mechanism heavily
depends on Ognl - but maybe we could extract it, I mean add another
extension point so you can replace the whole conversion logic - right
now
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Next saturday I will lead Strutshaton at Warsjawa workshops [1], do
> you have any ideas what we should work on? My ideas:
>
> - Java Validation JSR 303
> - JAX-RS
> - Guice 3 instead internal DI
>
That would definitely be a major im
Hi,
Next saturday I will lead Strutshaton at Warsjawa workshops [1], do
you have any ideas what we should work on? My ideas:
- Java Validation JSR 303
- JAX-RS
- Guice 3 instead internal DI
- Strict DMI
[1] http://warsjawa.pl/
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
32 matches
Mail list logo