[shale]: javascript validation function errors in Shale 1.0.3

2006-06-17 Thread jack . cheng
Hi, the callback functions generated by ValidatorScript component will cause the following javascript error on FireFox and IE: Error: missing ( before formal parameters Source File: http://localhost:8080/ebusiness/modules/account/create.jsf Line: 279, Column: 13 Source Code: function page:_id0:_i

[tiles] Version 2.0?

2006-06-17 Thread Wendy Smoak
In another thread, On 6/14/06, Greg Reddin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Jun 14, 2006, at 11:21 AM, Joe Germuska wrote: > However, I realize as I write this that saddling Standalone Tiles > with that kind of weight is wrong. SAT is essentially a 2.0 > release, and should clean up all these kind

Re: [tiles] Version 2.0?

2006-06-17 Thread Paul Benedict
Tiles 2.0 is fine. I like it alot. +2 :-) Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: In another thread, On 6/14/06, Greg Reddin wrote: > On Jun 14, 2006, at 11:21 AM, Joe Germuska wrote: > > > However, I realize as I write this that saddling Standalone Tiles > > with that kind of weight is wrong. SA

Re: [shale]: javascript validation function errors in Shale 1.0.3

2006-06-17 Thread Gary VanMatre
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Hi, > the callback functions generated by ValidatorScript component will > cause the following javascript error on FireFox and IE: > Error: missing ( before formal parameters > Source File: http://localhost:8080/ebusiness/modules/account/create.jsf > Line: 279, Co

Nice Maven 2 Tip

2006-06-17 Thread Paul Benedict
This may be old news -- especially to Wendy -- but I just discovered this after looking for this feature: How to prevent maven from including its generated files (pom.xml, etc.) in your production jar: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-1598 Paul

Re: [tiles] Version 2.0?

2006-06-17 Thread Gary VanMatre
>From: "Wendy Smoak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > In another thread, > On 6/14/06, Greg Reddin wrote: > > On Jun 14, 2006, at 11:21 AM, Joe Germuska wrote: > > > > > However, I realize as I write this that saddling Standalone Tiles > > > with that kind of weight is wrong. SAT is essentially a 2.0

Re: [tiles] Version 2.0?

2006-06-17 Thread Greg Reddin
+1. I think that solves a lot of things. Greg On Jun 17, 2006, at 6:14 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote: In another thread, On 6/14/06, Greg Reddin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Jun 14, 2006, at 11:21 AM, Joe Germuska wrote: > However, I realize as I write this that saddling Standalone Tiles > with th

[tiles] DTD version and cleanup

2006-06-17 Thread Wendy Smoak
In the sandbox, Tiles has tiles-config_1_1.dtd and tiles-config_1_2.dtd. After the "Tiles 2.0" thread, I'd suggest changing to just tiles-config_2_0.dtd. And along the lines of SB-21 cleaning up the TLD, it looks like a few things can be removed from the DTD: ContentType page (use template)

RE: [shale]: javascript validation function errors in Shale 1.0.3

2006-06-17 Thread jack . cheng
As requested, I've created Shale-194 in Jira. Thanks Jack > Original Message > Subject: Re: [shale]: javascript validation function errors in Shale > 1.0.3 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gary VanMatre) > Date: Sat, June 17, 2006 5:29 pm > To: "Struts Developers List" > > >From: [