Konstantin, I was always curious if you have an example (not quite
basic) about how Pico container is used.
TIA,
./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.
On 10/31/06, Konstantin Priblouda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--- Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I believe the Pico stuff had to be pulled
--- Alexandru Popescu
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Konstantin, I was always curious if you have an
> example (not quite
> basic) about how Pico container is used.
Well, there is one in nanocontainer demos:
http://svn.picocontainer.codehaus.org/browse/picocontainer/java/demos/trunk/jtec
( this m
Hi
The Java Web User Group is looking for speakers to talk about
Java Web Enterprise Edition technology in London next year in 2007.
(http://jroller.com/page/javawug)
So if you are coming over to England and are willing to give a
presentation
to us then in the first instance contact me
On 10/31/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Not sure where you are looking, but here's what I see...
> cd /www/people.apache.org/builds/struts/
> ll
total 8
drwxrwxr-x 2 apbackup apcvs 1024 Aug 5 19:01 1.3.5
drwxrwxr-x 2 apbackup apcvs 512 Aug 20 20:00 2.0.0
drwxrwxr-x 2 hu
Not sure where you are looking, but here's what I see...
> cd /www/people.apache.org/builds/struts/
> ll
total 8
drwxrwxr-x 2 apbackup apcvs 1024 Aug 5 19:01 1.3.5
drwxrwxr-x 2 apbackup apcvs 512 Aug 20 20:00 2.0.0
drwxrwxr-x 2 hustedapcvs 1024 Oct 30 09:43 2.0.1
drwxrwxr-x 6 apbac
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
I'm sorry, but I'm behind in my reading and haven't been paying close
enough attention to the messages on Tiles 2.
You had to do it :-) All discussions on these kind of things have been
made in the mailing list.
Could you explain the
reasoning behind this cha
David H. DeWolf ha scritto:
I don't see these factory implementations changing much.
...
You've been very clear, thank you :-)
Ciao
Antonio
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL P
Antonio Petrelli wrote:
> In the Struts Users and Shale Users mailing lists we (Greg and I)
> encountered several people confused by the different meaning of
> , so we decided to specialize this tag in
> different tags,
> I chose only the names.
> And I don't think that anyone used to insert a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
Antonio Petrelli wrote:
In the Struts Users and Shale Users mailing lists we (Greg and I)
encountered several people confused by the different meaning of
, so we decided to specialize this tag in
different tags,
I chose only the names.
And I don't think that a
I'm sorry, but I'm behind in my reading and haven't been paying close
enough attention to the messages on Tiles 2. Could you explain the
reasoning behind this change and ramifications of it? At first glance,
this just sounds like more places to change as the application evolves.
I checked http://
Antonio Petrelli asked:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
> > Antonio Petrelli wrote:
> >
> >> In the Struts Users and Shale Users mailing lists we (Greg and I)
> >> encountered several people confused by the different meaning of
> >> , so we decided to specialize this tag in
> >> different t
David H. DeWolf ha scritto:
Tiles currently uses both commons-logging and jdk1.4 logging. I'd
like to make this consistent. Which one is preferred?
If I don't hear otherwise, I'll go with commons-logging so that it's
consistent with Struts2.
There was just a similar discussion in Struts 1:
Does anyone know how to fix this? I can't rename it back to
'FrontPage' because
"A page with the name 'FrontPage' already exists. Try a different name."
Next idea, just copy and paste the content to the existing, now empty
'FrontPage'.
--
Wendy
On 10/31/06, Apache Wiki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
On Oct 31, 2006, at 9:59 AM, Martin Cooper wrote:
On 10/31/06, David H. DeWolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tiles currently uses both commons-logging and jdk1.4 logging. I'd
like
to make this consistent. Which one is preferred?
IMO, Commons Logging. That way, people can have one coheren
On 10/31/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does anyone know how to fix this?
I think you need access to the wiki's file system. Unfortunately, I believe
the wiki is mastered on ajax and rsync'd to minotaur (?), so you'd need an
account on ajax. If you don't have one, you'll probably
On 10/31/06, David H. DeWolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Since tiles2 is a revolution, is there any reason why we shouldn't
upgrade to Java1.5 and provide a 1.4 compatibility distribution like
Struts2 does?
Makes sense to me. If we do that, we should probably use the same tool that
S2 uses, wh
David H. DeWolf ha scritto:
There are probably two types of people that will need to port:
1) Those that use tile. They register the listener and use the tags.
(probably mostly Struts1 users)
...
IMHO we should do everything possible to keep migration for #1 simple.
...
The tag in question,
Martin Cooper wrote:
Makes sense to me. If we do that, we should probably use the same tool that
S2 uses, which I believe is RetroTranslator.
Agreed. Looks like there's a retro-translator-maven-plugin that struts2
is using. . .
-
On 10/31/06, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think you need access to the wiki's file system. Unfortunately, I believe
the wiki is mastered on ajax and rsync'd to minotaur (?), so you'd need an
account on ajax. If you don't have one, you'll probably need to ping infra
or raise a ticke
I don't think the 2.0.2-SNAPSHOT plugin has been deployed to the repo. I
wonder if you're building with the "apps" profile but not the "plugins"
profile.
Try:
mvn install -P apps,plugins
Musachy Barroso wrote:
showcase build fails, saying that it cannot find
org.apache.struts:struts2-tiles-p
showcase build fails, saying that it cannot find
org.apache.struts:struts2-tiles-plugin:jar:2.0.2-SNAPSHOT in the
repositories.
?? :)
musachy
Wendy Smoak wrote:
Looks like Struts 2 doesn't build against the latest Tiles 2...
[ERROR] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO]
On 10/31/06, David H. DeWolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tiles currently uses both commons-logging and jdk1.4 logging. I'd like
to make this consistent. Which one is preferred?
IMO, Commons Logging. That way, people can have one coherent log for their
entire application.
--
Martin Cooper
Tiles currently uses both commons-logging and jdk1.4 logging. I'd like
to make this consistent. Which one is preferred?
If I don't hear otherwise, I'll go with commons-logging so that it's
consistent with Struts2.
David
-
I wonder if it would be possible to provide the combined
tag as well for people who are porting applications.
There are two questions that come to mind: 1) Have we already made
porting to Tiles 2 a non-trivial task by all the changes we've made,
and 2) are we ready for the barrage of su
There are probably two types of people that will need to port:
1) Those that use tile. They register the listener and use the tags.
(probably mostly Struts1 users)
2) Those that integrate tiles into their framework. They access the api
and want to be able to customize it.
IMHO we should d
David H. DeWolf ha scritto:
Since tiles2 is a revolution, is there any reason why we shouldn't
upgrade to Java1.5 and provide a 1.4 compatibility distribution like
Struts2 does?
err... uhm... well... let me think.. no! :-) (IMHO)
About 1.4 compatibility, you are writing about RetroWeaver right
Since tiles2 is a revolution, is there any reason why we shouldn't
upgrade to Java1.5 and provide a 1.4 compatibility distribution like
Struts2 does?
David
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
Antonio Petrelli ha scritto:
David H. DeWolf ha scritto:
Tiles currently uses both commons-logging and jdk1.4 logging. I'd
like to make this consistent. Which one is preferred?
If I don't hear otherwise, I'll go with commons-logging so that it's
consistent with Struts2.
There was just a s
ok. . .
Let's go with commons-logging for now and revisit this if we decide that
Struts2 will go in a different direction.
David
Antonio Petrelli wrote:
Antonio Petrelli ha scritto:
David H. DeWolf ha scritto:
Tiles currently uses both commons-logging and jdk1.4 logging. I'd
like to make
yup, that worked. Thanks!
musachy
David H. DeWolf wrote:
I don't think the 2.0.2-SNAPSHOT plugin has been deployed to the repo.
I wonder if you're building with the "apps" profile but not the
"plugins" profile.
Try:
mvn install -P apps,plugins
Musachy Barroso wrote:
showcase build fails, s
On 10/31/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Author: ddewolf
Date: Tue Oct 31 10:55:25 2006
New Revision: 469609
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=469609
Log:
Adding files in lieu of externals. SVN won't let use externals for files
If duplication becomes a problem, w
Well, to get it through the Incubator, we simply removed any code who's
copyright couldn't be transfered to the ASF. However, it is my
understanding that an ASF project can include code with another
organizations' copyright and license, as long as we put the license in
the NOTICE.txt file or s
Excellent. Thanks!
I think we'll be ok for now since these files should remain static. In
reality, this second webapp is temporary. Having two test modules, one
which uses the old initialization procedures, and one that uses the new,
will only be useful while we support both approches. I ant
On 10/31/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, to get it through the Incubator, we simply removed any code who's
copyright couldn't be transfered to the ASF. However, it is my
understanding that an ASF project can include code with another
organizations' copyright and license, as long a
So...it should be resubmitted without copyright headers, which have been
moved to the NOTICE file? The other question is who exactly is the
copyright owner? The headers say the NanoContainer Organization, but is
that really a legal entity?
Don
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On 10/31/06, Don Brown <[
On 10/31/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So...it should be resubmitted without copyright headers, which have been
moved to the NOTICE file?
If the license headers were previously unclear (per your comments
below, I'm not aware of the specifics of this case), then having the
copyright
s2 is currently done with a shell script, but the Maven plugin works
fine as evidenced by the Shale build and tests I did during
ApacheCon. We would just need to add the Maven config and polish the
distribution to include the j4 bits.
--
James Mitchell
678.910.8017
On Oct 31, 2006, at
I'm wondering why the ComponentDefinitions interface has been exposed
outside of the DefinitionsFactory. To me, this class seems like an
implementation detail of the factory itself, and it should not be exposed.
Currently the interface is only used in three points outside of the
DefinitionsFa
The "table" section in typo.css(showcase) is making dojo's DatePicker
look weird (blank spaces inside the widget). I'm not sure how to fix
this without avoiding the decoration of the widgets page, where I'm
placing the example for DatePicker. Any idea?
musachy
Musachy Barroso wrote:
Hi all,
yes, I overwrote those bindXs with defineWidget. We are going to need
another bug for the actual upgrade from dojo 0.3 to 0.4(0.4 was released
today I think).
musachy
tm jee wrote:
I'm using defineWidget, and it is cool.
Yup. Is it that the bind, binddiv, bindanchor etc have been writt
Done, 2 jira ticket created
http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1484
- upgrading Struts2 dojo widget that might failed due to upgrading dojo to 0.4
http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1485
- upgrading Struts2 dojo to 0.4
Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: yes, I overwrote
Hi guys,
If its ok with everyone, I'd like to upgrade Struts2 dojo js to 0.4, sometime
today or tomorrow. (WW-1845). This will most likely breaks some existing
struts2 components. We will patch them up individually (WW-1844)
Cheers
tm jee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Done, 2 jira ticket create
By the way, Antonio, I've looked at multidimensions at a high level, and
realize that you're providing a unique implementation of this interface.
I meant to mention that I believe that you could accomplish the same
thing (if we were to perform the refactor suggested below), by providing
a cust
0 - Won't have a chance to look at it for another few weeks.
/Ian
Ted Husted wrote:
The Stuts 2.0.1 distribution has been available for over a week. We
have a dependency on XWork 2.0.0 beta 1, and it would not be
appropriate to mark the Core (and consequently any of the Plugins)
"General Avai
Sorry for the late reply - vacation.
Have we cut the 2.0.1 beta yet? If not, we should wait until then
before this update. My preference would also be to have the dojo 0.4
update, together with all the existing tags working with 0.4 available,
but to commit them separately. This way we only
Hi Ian,
> Have we cut the 2.0.1 beta yet?
I think we have the 2.0.1 release, its now open for quality voting. If we do
another release it would be 2.0.2. So i guess the answer would be "yes". Do
correct me if I am wrong, Ted, Don :-)
> My preference would also be to have the dojo 0.4
> update,
I just finished with DatePicker and DropdownDatePicker. The ones missing are
ToggleBindDiv.js, DynArchCalendar.js, and TimePicker, I think only
TimerPicker is important(I need to add DropDownTimePicker), which I could
get done by Wednesday or Thursday.
musachy
On 10/31/06, tm jee <[EMAIL PROTECT
I think ToggleBindDiv.js and DynArchCalendar.js are not used. We could update
them if we wish later once we got the main ones in (eg. BindDiv which
ToggleBindDiv extends from)
Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I just finished with DatePicker and
DropdownDatePicker. The ones missing ar
Hi guys,
What do you guys think about having a CompositeActionMapper that allows one of
the many ActionMapper it has to being used.
1 +-+
+| ActionMapper |
|+-+
|^
||
| +--
Hi,
Both filter, ActionContextCleanUp and FilterDispatcher contains some similar
logic which I think would be more appropriate if we move them to an abstract
superclass, maybe called AbstractFilterDispatcher.
Some of the logics are
- creation of a Dispatcher
- populating the created Dispatch
--- Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If the license headers were previously unclear (per
> your comments
> below, I'm not aware of the specifics of this case),
> then having the
> copyright owner(s) resubmit in line with current ASF
> header policy (if
> they're so inclined) is a goo
51 matches
Mail list logo
