[PATCH] Follow-up to r1138830. Fix comment in test.

2011-06-24 Thread Noorul Islam K M
Log [[[ Follow-up to r1138830. Remove comment in test which became absolute after r1138830. Add new comment related to issue #3936. * subversion/tests/cmdline/log_tests.py (log_with_unrelated_peg_and_operative_revs): Fix absolute comment and add new relevant one. Patch by: Noorul Islam

Re: [PATCH] Follow-up to r1138830. Fix comment in test.

2011-06-24 Thread Noorul Islam K M
Noorul Islam K M noo...@collab.net writes: Log [[[ Follow-up to r1138830. Remove comment in test which became absolute after r1138830. Add new comment related to issue #3936. * subversion/tests/cmdline/log_tests.py (log_with_unrelated_peg_and_operative_revs): Fix absolute comment and

RE: svn commit: r1139080 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db.c

2011-06-24 Thread Bert Huijben
-Original Message- From: Greg Stein [mailto:gst...@gmail.com] Sent: vrijdag 24 juni 2011 2:10 To: dev@subversion.apache.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r1139080 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db.c On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 17:20, rhuij...@apache.org wrote: ... +++

Re: [RFC] Rename 'svn_error_return' to 'svn_error_trace'?

2011-06-24 Thread Julian Foad
Committed in r1139195. - Julian On Thu, 2011-06-23, Hyrum K Wright wrote: On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Julian Foad julian.f...@wandisco.com wrote: Greg Stein wrote: Thanks for taking the time to do thus. Only recently did I realize that I named the function incorrectly when I came up

Re: Apache's APR version doesn't match configure's

2011-06-24 Thread Philip Martin
Hyrum K Wright hy...@hyrumwright.org writes: moving forward, not backward. One possible solution is to just not build mod_dav_svn, rather than torpedoing the entire build, if Apache's APR doesn't match configure's. In any case, I think the current situation is not viable long term. I made

Re: Implement support for 'make check' variants

2011-06-24 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Noorul Islam K M wrote on Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 10:11:50 +0530: Daniel came up with idea of extending Makefile.in to support 'make check' variants. 1. 'make check' with svnserve -T 2. 'make check' with svnadmin create --pre-1.x-compatible (where x in (1.4, 1.5, 1.6, 1.7)) 3. 'make

Dropped attachments Fwd: [Gavin (JIRA): [jira] [Commented] (INFRA-3724) attachments sent get dropped without notification to either sender or receiving list]

2011-06-24 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Rejecting to the OP doesn't seem to be an option. (Rejecting to a constant address /is/ an option, but it'd be all rejections, not just 'bad attachment' rejections.) Seems the option we do have is to ask for some more filename extensions to be allowed. So, can we compile a list of extensions

Re: Dropped attachments Fwd: [Gavin (JIRA): [jira] [Commented] (INFRA-3724) attachments sent get dropped without notification to either sender or receiving list]

2011-06-24 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 13:44:03 +0300: Rejecting to the OP doesn't seem to be an option. (Rejecting to a constant address /is/ an option, but it'd be all rejections, not just 'bad attachment' rejections.) Seems the option we do have is to ask for some more filename

Re: Implement support for 'make check' variants

2011-06-24 Thread Philip Martin
Noorul Islam K M noo...@collab.net writes: Daniel came up with idea of extending Makefile.in to support 'make check' variants. 1. 'make check' with svnserve -T 2. 'make check' with svnadmin create --pre-1.x-compatible (where x in (1.4, 1.5, 1.6, 1.7)) 3. 'make check' with SVNPathAuthz

Re: Implement support for 'make check' variants

2011-06-24 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Philip Martin wrote on Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 11:47:44 +0100: Noorul Islam K M noo...@collab.net writes: Daniel came up with idea of extending Makefile.in to support 'make check' variants. 1. 'make check' with svnserve -T 2. 'make check' with svnadmin create --pre-1.x-compatible

Re: Implement support for 'make check' variants

2011-06-24 Thread Daniel Shahaf
For THREADED, no I don't plan to change it, I simply forgot that I had already added it. Philip Martin wrote on Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 11:47:44 +0100: Noorul Islam K M noo...@collab.net writes: Daniel came up with idea of extending Makefile.in to support 'make check' variants. 1. 'make

RE: svn commit: r1139080 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db.c

2011-06-24 Thread Greg Stein
On Jun 24, 2011 3:23 AM, Bert Huijben b...@qqmail.nl wrote: -Original Message- From: Greg Stein [mailto:gst...@gmail.com] Sent: vrijdag 24 juni 2011 2:10 To: dev@subversion.apache.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r1139080 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db.c On

RE: svn commit: r1139080 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db.c

2011-06-24 Thread Greg Stein
[ sigh. virtual keyboard typo. inspection ] On Jun 24, 2011 7:24 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote: On Jun 24, 2011 3:23 AM, Bert Huijben b...@qqmail.nl wrote: -Original Message- From: Greg Stein [mailto:gst...@gmail.com] Sent: vrijdag 24 juni 2011 2:10 To:

[PATCH] Fix for issue #3938 - revert throws an error for unversioned targets

2011-06-24 Thread Noorul Islam K M
Log [[[ Fix for issue #3938. Make 'svn revert' to skip unversioned targets. * subversion/libsvn_client/revert.c (revert): Send 'skip' notification when svn_wc_revert4() returns SVN_ERR_WC_PATH_NOT_FOUND. Patch by: Noorul Islam K M noorul{_AT_}collab.net ]]] Thanks and Regards Noorul

Re: Dropped attachments Fwd: [Gavin (JIRA): [jira] [Commented] (INFRA-3724) attachments sent get dropped without notification to either sender or receiving list]

2011-06-24 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 01:46:50PM +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote: Daniel Shahaf wrote on Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 13:44:03 +0300: Rejecting to the OP doesn't seem to be an option. (Rejecting to a constant address /is/ an option, but it'd be all rejections, not just 'bad attachment' rejections.)

Re: Dropped attachments Fwd: [Gavin (JIRA): [jira] [Commented] (INFRA-3724) attachments sent get dropped without notification to either sender or receiving list]

2011-06-24 Thread Ivan Zhakov
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 14:46, Daniel Shahaf danie...@apache.org wrote: Daniel Shahaf wrote on Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 13:44:03 +0300: Rejecting to the OP doesn't seem to be an option.  (Rejecting to a constant address /is/ an option, but it'd be all rejections, not just 'bad attachment'

Re: Implement support for 'make check' variants

2011-06-24 Thread Philip Martin
Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name writes: SERVER_MINOR_VERSION is for testing a 1.7 client with a 1.6 server. I'm after testing a 1.7 client with a 1.7 server using a 1.6 filesystme. As discussed on IRC, SERVER_MINOR_VERSION should already cause a 1.6 filesystem to be used. However there

RE: Dropped attachments Fwd: [Gavin (JIRA): [jira] [Commented] (INFRA-3724) attachments sent get dropped without notification to either sender or receiving list]

2011-06-24 Thread Gavin McDonald
-Original Message- From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de] Sent: Friday, 24 June 2011 9:39 PM To: Daniel Shahaf Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org Subject: Re: Dropped attachments Fwd: [Gavin (JIRA): [jira] [Commented] (INFRA-3724) attachments sent get dropped without notification

Re: Implement support for 'make check' variants

2011-06-24 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Philip Martin wrote on Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 13:03:27 +0100: Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name writes: SERVER_MINOR_VERSION is for testing a 1.7 client with a 1.6 server. I'm after testing a 1.7 client with a 1.7 server using a 1.6 filesystme. As discussed on IRC,

Re: [PATCH] Fix for issue #3938 - revert throws an error for unversioned targets

2011-06-24 Thread Daniel Shahaf
r1139275, thanks. Noorul Islam K M wrote on Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 17:05:04 +0530: Log [[[ Fix for issue #3938. Make 'svn revert' to skip unversioned targets. * subversion/libsvn_client/revert.c (revert): Send 'skip' notification when svn_wc_revert4() returns

serf infinite loop in svn_ra_serf__handle_xml_parser()

2011-06-24 Thread Stefan Sperling
Trying to update my working copy I observed svn spinning on the CPU forever. Attaching with gdb showed that it was stuck in an endless loop inside svn_ra_serf__handle_xml_parser(). Below is the code. The problem was that serf_bucket_read() returned zero bytes but also indicated success. If that

Re: Dropped attachments Fwd: [Gavin (JIRA): [jira] [Commented] (INFRA-3724) attachments sent get dropped without notification to either sender or receiving list]

2011-06-24 Thread Hyrum K Wright
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 6:49 AM, Ivan Zhakov i...@visualsvn.com wrote: On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 14:46, Daniel Shahaf danie...@apache.org wrote: Daniel Shahaf wrote on Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 13:44:03 +0300: Rejecting to the OP doesn't seem to be an option.  (Rejecting to a constant address /is/ an

should we really ship serf as default for 1.7? (was: Re: serf and sourceforge.net don't get along)

2011-06-24 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 09:17:37PM -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote: On 06/22/2011 07:30 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: Bolstridge, Andrew wrote on Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 14:51:37 +: Absolutely. The first thing to do is provide serf as a 2nd option, make a big song and dance about how great it

Re: Dropped attachments Fwd: [Gavin (JIRA): [jira] [Commented] (INFRA-3724) attachments sent get dropped without notification to either sender or receiving list]

2011-06-24 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Hyrum K Wright hy...@hyrumwright.org wrote: On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 6:49 AM, Ivan Zhakov i...@visualsvn.com wrote: On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 14:46, Daniel Shahaf danie...@apache.org wrote: Daniel Shahaf wrote on Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 13:44:03 +0300: Rejecting to

Re: Dropped attachments Fwd: [Gavin (JIRA): [jira] [Commented] (INFRA-3724) attachments sent get dropped without notification to either sender or receiving list]

2011-06-24 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 15:10:16 +0200: On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Hyrum K Wright hy...@hyrumwright.org wrote: On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 6:49 AM, Ivan Zhakov i...@visualsvn.com wrote: On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 14:46, Daniel Shahaf danie...@apache.org wrote: Daniel

Re: should we really ship serf as default for 1.7? (was: Re: serf and sourceforge.net don't get along)

2011-06-24 Thread Mark Phippard
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de wrote: I am still uneasy about this. Same here. Given the number of issues that have been filed against ra_serf recently, and issues that I've personally been running into when using it (all reported to dev@), I am still not

Re: serf infinite loop in svn_ra_serf__handle_xml_parser()

2011-06-24 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 02:44:45PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote: Trying to update my working copy I observed svn spinning on the CPU forever. Attaching with gdb showed that it was stuck in an endless loop inside svn_ra_serf__handle_xml_parser(). Forgot to mention that I have on reliable way to

RE: Dropped attachments Fwd: [Gavin (JIRA): [jira] [Commented] (INFRA-3724) attachments sent get dropped without notification to either sender or receiving list]

2011-06-24 Thread Bert Huijben
-Original Message- From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:danie...@apache.org] Sent: vrijdag 24 juni 2011 15:16 To: Johan Corveleyn Cc: Hyrum K Wright; Ivan Zhakov; dev@subversion.apache.org Subject: Re: Dropped attachments Fwd: [Gavin (JIRA): [jira] [Commented] (INFRA-3724) attachments sent

Re: Dropped attachments Fwd: [Gavin (JIRA): [jira] [Commented] (INFRA-3724) attachments sent get dropped without notification to either sender or receiving list]

2011-06-24 Thread Daniel Shahaf
.zip .tar .gz .bz2 .7z

Re: Dropped attachments Fwd: [Gavin (JIRA): [jira] [Commented] (INFRA-3724) attachments sent get dropped without notification to either sender or receiving list]

2011-06-24 Thread Daniel Shahaf
.tgz .tbz

Re: [PATCH] possible improvement to svn log with forward revision range (issue 3830)

2011-06-24 Thread C. Michael Pilato
On 06/23/2011 07:18 PM, Dirk Thomas wrote: Well, since issue 3931 was fixed today ('svn log' is returning log of unrelated path when peg revision is not related to operative revision) i revisited my patch for issue 3830. + /* try fetching ra_session again + * this time with modified

Re: should we really ship serf as default for 1.7? (was: Re: serf and sourceforge.net don't get along)

2011-06-24 Thread kmradke
Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de wrote on 06/24/2011 08:06:28 AM: Subject: should we really ship serf as default for 1.7? (was: Re: serf and sourceforge.net don't get along) On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 09:17:37PM -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote: On 06/22/2011 07:30 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:

Re: should we really ship serf as default for 1.7? (was: Re: serf and sourceforge.net don't get along)

2011-06-24 Thread Mark Phippard
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 9:48 AM, kmra...@rockwellcollins.com wrote: Is anybody using serf with negotiate authentication?  I can't get it to work with a 1.6.5 server using mod_auth_kerb and negotiate. The server sends the 401: WWW-Authenticate: Negotiate WWW-Authenticate: Basic realm=my

Re: should we really ship serf as default for 1.7? (was: Re: serf and sourceforge.net don't get along)

2011-06-24 Thread kmradke
Mark Phippard markp...@gmail.com wrote on 06/24/2011 08:50:22 AM: On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 9:48 AM, kmra...@rockwellcollins.com wrote: Is anybody using serf with negotiate authentication? I can't get it to work with a 1.6.5 server using mod_auth_kerb and negotiate. The server sends

Re: Apache's APR version doesn't match configure's

2011-06-24 Thread Hyrum K Wright
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 4:45 AM, Philip Martin philip.mar...@wandisco.com wrote: Hyrum K Wright hy...@hyrumwright.org writes: moving forward, not backward.  One possible solution is to just not build mod_dav_svn, rather than torpedoing the entire build, if Apache's APR doesn't match

Re: should we really ship serf as default for 1.7? (was: Re: serf and sourceforge.net don't get along)

2011-06-24 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 08:55:02AM -0500, kmra...@rockwellcollins.com wrote: Not sure, but I know serf shouldn't keep sending the same endless unauthenticated request until I control-C the command. No indication it was even doing anything until I put a proxy in between to sniff the traffic...

Re: should we really ship serf as default for 1.7?

2011-06-24 Thread Stefan Küng
On 24.06.2011 15:50, Mark Phippard wrote: On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 9:48 AM,kmra...@rockwellcollins.com wrote: Is anybody using serf with negotiate authentication? I can't get it to work with a 1.6.5 server using mod_auth_kerb and negotiate. The server sends the 401: WWW-Authenticate:

Re: should we really ship serf as default for 1.7? (was: Re: serf and sourceforge.net don't get along)

2011-06-24 Thread kmradke
Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de wrote on 06/24/2011 09:02:15 AM: On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 08:55:02AM -0500, kmra...@rockwellcollins.com wrote: Not sure, but I know serf shouldn't keep sending the same endless unauthenticated request until I control-C the command. No indication it was even

Re: should we really ship serf as default for 1.7?

2011-06-24 Thread kmradke
Stefan Küng tortoise...@gmail.com wrote on 06/24/2011 09:04:41 AM: On 24.06.2011 15:50, Mark Phippard wrote: On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 9:48 AM,kmra...@rockwellcollins.com wrote: Is anybody using serf with negotiate authentication? I can't get it to work with a 1.6.5 server using

Re: 'svn log --diff' foils log output parsers

2011-06-24 Thread C. Michael Pilato
Having read and considered the replies received thus far, I'm dubbing this a non-issue and moving on. Thanks for the feedback, all who provided it. On 06/23/2011 03:15 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote: When we designed 'svn log' many moons ago, we added the N lines header information to aid

Re: should we really ship serf as default for 1.7? (was: Re: serf and sourceforge.net don't get along)

2011-06-24 Thread Ivan Zhakov
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 17:50, Mark Phippard markp...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 9:48 AM,  kmra...@rockwellcollins.com wrote: Is anybody using serf with negotiate authentication?  I can't get it to work with a 1.6.5 server using mod_auth_kerb and negotiate. The server sends the

Re: should we really ship serf as default for 1.7? (was: Re: serf and sourceforge.net don't get along)

2011-06-24 Thread Mark Phippard
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Ivan Zhakov i...@visualsvn.com wrote: serf uses SSPI for Kerberos on Windows and it should be automatically enabled if your build serf 0.7 or later on Windows. I've tested Negotiate (Kerberos) authentication in TortoiseSVN using serf in our environment and it

Re: should we really ship serf as default for 1.7? (was: Re: serf and sourceforge.net don't get along)

2011-06-24 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 07:50:15PM +0400, Ivan Zhakov wrote: I've tested Negotiate (Kerberos) authentication in TortoiseSVN using serf in our environment and it works in simple cases. So... what happens in complex cases? :) Are there cases which neon can handle that serf cannot?

README in our dist mirrors

2011-06-24 Thread Daniel Shahaf
I've added the following README to our dist/ directory on people.apache.org: [[[ For stable releases visit http://subversion.apache.org/download/ or http://subversion.apache.org/packages. ]]] This is since currently only 1.7.0-alpha2 (but no 1.6.x or 1.5.x) is on the Apache mirrors.

Re: Dropped attachments Fwd: [Gavin (JIRA): [jira] [Commented] (INFRA-3724) attachments sent get dropped without notification to either sender or receiving list]

2011-06-24 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Update: MIME attachment removal has been disabled for this list. Thanks everyone for collecting extensions, and Gavin and Joe for addressing the issue.

Re: Dropped attachments Fwd: [Gavin (JIRA): [jira] [Commented] (INFRA-3724) attachments sent get dropped without notification to either sender or receiving list]

2011-06-24 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 07:27:55PM +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote: Update: MIME attachment removal has been disabled for this list. Thanks everyone for collecting extensions, and Gavin and Joe for addressing the issue. Thank you all!

[PATCH] svn 1.7 should ship with serf 1.0.x

2011-06-24 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Greg Stein] Just a heads up: the serf devs plan to bump serf from 0.7.x to 1.0.x on the next release (imminent). Speaking o' which, I think we need something like the following in Subversion. It is untested. Of course, if we really want to drop support for serf pre 1.0, the patch gets a lot

Re: another serf crash

2011-06-24 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 07:27:44PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote: I don't know if this is already known, so I am reporting it here to get confirmation. (From #svn-dev): stsp run svn log --diff -r1139384 for fun stsp with serf stsp Ctrl-C out in the middle when it prints diff text stsp -

Re: 'svn log --diff' foils log output parsers

2011-06-24 Thread Branko Čibej
On 24.06.2011 17:50, C. Michael Pilato wrote: Having read and considered the replies received thus far, I'm dubbing this a non-issue and moving on. Thanks for the feedback, all who provided it. Just for the record, this same issue has existed since svn log first accepted the --verbose flag.

Re: [PATCH] svn 1.7 should ship with serf 1.0.x

2011-06-24 Thread Greg Stein
For now, we should detect both. We can rip out the older support after a bit. IOW, please apply. The patch has serf/build/get-version.sh, but that is not in the serf release? Cheers, -g On Jun 24, 2011 12:35 PM, Peter Samuelson pe...@p12n.org wrote:

Re: another serf crash

2011-06-24 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Stefan Sperling wrote on Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 19:27:44 +0200: I don't know if this is already known, so I am reporting it here to get confirmation. (From #svn-dev): stsp run svn log --diff -r1139384 for fun stsp with serf stsp Ctrl-C out in the middle when it prints diff text stsp - core

Re: 'svn log --diff' foils log output parsers

2011-06-24 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Branko Čibej wrote on Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 19:35:14 +0200: On 24.06.2011 17:50, C. Michael Pilato wrote: Having read and considered the replies received thus far, I'm dubbing this a non-issue and moving on. Thanks for the feedback, all who provided it. Just for the record, this same issue

Re: serf infinite loop in svn_ra_serf__handle_xml_parser()

2011-06-24 Thread Greg Stein
On Jun 24, 2011 8:45 AM, Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de wrote: Trying to update my working copy I observed svn spinning on the CPU forever. Attaching with gdb showed that it was stuck in an endless loop inside svn_ra_serf__handle_xml_parser(). Below is the code. The problem was that

Re: serf infinite loop in svn_ra_serf__handle_xml_parser()

2011-06-24 Thread Lieven Govaerts
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de wrote: Trying to update my working copy I observed svn spinning on the CPU forever. Attaching with gdb showed that it was stuck in an endless loop inside svn_ra_serf__handle_xml_parser(). Below is the code. The problem was that

Re: another serf crash

2011-06-24 Thread Greg Stein
Yeah, that was fixed a week or two ago on trunk (I assume you're using 0.7.2?) On Jun 24, 2011 1:28 PM, Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de wrote: I don't know if this is already known, so I am reporting it here to get confirmation. (From #svn-dev): stsp run svn log --diff -r1139384 for fun stsp

Re: another serf crash

2011-06-24 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Philip Martin wrote on Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 18:50:59 +0100: Daniel Shahaf danie...@elego.de writes: ==15085== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) ==15085==at 0x4629A2E: inflateReset2 (in /usr/lib/libz.so.1.2.3.4) ==15085==by 0x4629B0C: inflateInit2_ (in

Re: another serf crash

2011-06-24 Thread Philip Martin
Daniel Shahaf danie...@elego.de writes: Philip Martin wrote on Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 18:50:59 +0100: zlib doesn't play well with valgrind, see for example: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=287603 so this may be a false positive. Can I disable all forms of compression that

Re: Dropped attachments Fwd: [Gavin (JIRA): [jira] [Commented] (INFRA-3724) attachments sent get dropped without notification to either sender or receiving list]

2011-06-24 Thread Greg Stein
To be clear: all attachments, regardless of extension or declared MIME type will get through? On Jun 24, 2011 12:28 PM, Daniel Shahaf danie...@apache.org wrote: Update: MIME attachment removal has been disabled for this list. Thanks everyone for collecting extensions, and Gavin and Joe for

Re: another serf crash

2011-06-24 Thread Greg Stein
On Jun 24, 2011 1:57 PM, Daniel Shahaf danie...@elego.de wrote: Philip Martin wrote on Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 18:50:59 +0100: Daniel Shahaf danie...@elego.de writes: ==15085== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) ==15085==at 0x4629A2E: inflateReset2 (in

Re: another serf crash

2011-06-24 Thread Greg Stein
On Jun 24, 2011 2:07 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote: On Jun 24, 2011 1:57 PM, Daniel Shahaf danie...@elego.de wrote: Philip Martin wrote on Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 18:50:59 +0100: Daniel Shahaf danie...@elego.de writes: ==15085== Conditional jump or move depends on

Re: [PATCH] svn 1.7 should ship with serf 1.0.x

2011-06-24 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Greg Stein] For now, we should detect both. We can rip out the older support after a bit. IOW, please apply. The patch has serf/build/get-version.sh, but that is not in the serf release? Looks like it's borrowed from apr, copied into the serf source tree by 'buildconf'. In any case, it's

Re: svn commit: r1131389 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_subr/magic.c

2011-06-24 Thread Daniel Shahaf
s...@apache.org wrote on Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 13:04:51 -: Author: stsp Date: Sat Jun 4 13:04:51 2011 New Revision: 1131389 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1131389view=rev Log: Work around older libmagic versions that don't define MAGIC_MIME_TYPE. This should fix the centos

Re: README in our dist mirrors

2011-06-24 Thread Hyrum K Wright
Good idea. However, this file will be mirrored to the archive, and read there isn't technically correct, since the 1.6.x releases are hosted on archive.apache.org. -Hyrum On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote: I've added the following README to our dist/

Re: README in our dist mirrors

2011-06-24 Thread Hyrum K Wright
True, but if somebody lands in http://archive.apache.org/dist/subversion/, they will see all the tarballs, and might naturally look for a README. Having found it, they would read the following text and be completely befuddled (are you telling me I can't download a release from here? It's the

Re: README in our dist mirrors

2011-06-24 Thread Daniel Shahaf
The file is chmod'd g+w, feel free to patch it. Hyrum K Wright wrote on Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 14:16:18 -0500: True, but if somebody lands in http://archive.apache.org/dist/subversion/, they will see all the tarballs, and might naturally look for a README. Having found it, they would read the

Re: 'svn log --diff' foils log output parsers

2011-06-24 Thread C. Michael Pilato
On 06/24/2011 01:35 PM, Branko Čibej wrote: On 24.06.2011 17:50, C. Michael Pilato wrote: Having read and considered the replies received thus far, I'm dubbing this a non-issue and moving on. Thanks for the feedback, all who provided it. Just for the record, this same issue has existed

Re: another serf crash

2011-06-24 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote: You can disable wire compression in your server config file. On the client side. http-compression = no HTH. -- justin

Re: serf infinite loop in svn_ra_serf__handle_xml_parser()

2011-06-24 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 01:46:42PM -0400, Greg Stein wrote: When you say success, you mean status==0? Yup. No, it would never block. The bucket should return EAGAIN when it has no more data. I see. Lieven explained this too and also pointed to a related (or the same) issue documented

Re: svn commit: r1131389 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_subr/magic.c

2011-06-24 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 09:49:31PM +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote: +#ifndef MAGIC_MIME_TYPE + char *p; + + /* Strip off trailing stuff like charset=ascii. */ + p = strchr(magic_mimetype, ' '); + if (p) + *p = '\0'; What is

Re: another serf crash

2011-06-24 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 01:55:13PM -0400, Greg Stein wrote: Yeah, that was fixed a week or two ago on trunk (I assume you're using 0.7.2?) I'm using 0.7.x from a few days ago. I'll try to update to serf trunk. I suppose serf trunk will become serf 1.0 and we should all be testing with trunk at

Re: another serf crash

2011-06-24 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Stefan Sperling] I'll try to update to serf trunk. I suppose serf trunk will become serf 1.0 and we should all be testing with trunk at this point rather than 0.7.x? Note if you do update to serf trunk, you'll need to patch build/ac-macros/serf.m4:

Re: another serf crash

2011-06-24 Thread Greg Stein
On Jun 24, 2011 5:02 PM, Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de wrote: On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 01:55:13PM -0400, Greg Stein wrote: Yeah, that was fixed a week or two ago on trunk (I assume you're using 0.7.2?) I'm using 0.7.x from a few days ago. I'll try to update to serf trunk. I suppose serf