On 25.08.2015 17:31, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Branko Čibej br...@wandisco.com wrote:
On 25.08.2015 13:49, br...@apache.org wrote:
Author: brane
Date: Tue Aug 25 11:49:09 2015
New Revision: 1697654
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1697654
Log:
*
On 25.08.2015 14:10, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 06.08.2015 18:10, stef...@apache.org wrote:
Author: stefan2
Date: Thu Aug 6 16:10:39 2015
New Revision: 1694533
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1694533
Log:
Fix an alignment problem on machines with 32 bit pointers but atomic 64
data access that
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 12:47 AM, Evgeny Kotkov evgeny.kot...@visualsvn.com
wrote:
Stefan Fuhrmann stefan.fuhrm...@wandisco.com writes:
My current hypothesis is that the server did not get restarted after
replacing the repository. Because we decided not to make the instance ID
part of
The fix is alread on the 1.9.x branch and will be
part of the 1.9.1 release
Perfect, I can confirm that it is working now. Thanks.
--
Tom
On 25.08.2015 12:39, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 25.08.2015 12:36, Thomas Singer wrote:
Is this bug already reported in the issue tracker? I've searched but
Hi,
The code actually detects if the definition is in the old or new format and
uses the same format to apply the pegging.
See ‘make_external_description’ which uses
‘svn_wc__external_description_format_1’ and
‘svn_wc__external_description_format_2’ to handle the different
On 24.08.2015 15:32, stef...@apache.org wrote:
Author: stefan2
Date: Mon Aug 24 13:32:41 2015
New Revision: 1697390
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1697390
Log:
* STATUS: Add svnfsfs load-index fixes (r1697381, r1697384, r1697387).
Modified:
subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS
Modified:
I was reading up on the new 'svn cp --pin-externals' feature in the 1.9
release notes. Great addition, by the way, and one that I hope to use
myself with ViewVC's release tags.
One question came to mind, though. The use of the feature appears to
result in pegged externals definitions (as in,
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 7:15 AM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name
wrote:
Evgeny Kotkov wrote on Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 02:47:16 +0300:
Stefan Fuhrmann stefan.fuhrm...@wandisco.com writes:
My current hypothesis is that the server did not get restarted after
replacing the repository.
Nice! Thanks for the info, Bert.
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 11:30 AM, Bert Huijben b...@qqmail.nl wrote:
Hi,
The code actually detects if the definition is in the old or new format
and uses the same format to apply the pegging.
See ‘make_external_description’ which uses ‘
On 25.08.2015 23:12, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Branko Čibej br...@wandisco.com wrote:
On 25.08.2015 17:31, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Branko Čibej br...@wandisco.com
wrote:
On 25.08.2015 13:49, br...@apache.org wrote:
Author: brane
(abbreviating instance ID to IID)
Stefan Fuhrmann wrote on Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 15:13:04 +0100:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 7:15 AM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name
wrote:
Evgeny Kotkov wrote on Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 02:47:16 +0300:
Stefan Fuhrmann stefan.fuhrm...@wandisco.com writes:
Branko Čibej wrote on Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 07:26:47 +0200:
On 25.08.2015 23:12, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Branko Čibej br...@wandisco.com wrote:
Daniel suggested inserting a dummy handler if we don't have the GPG
agent support. I think that may be the only
Evgeny Kotkov wrote on Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 02:47:16 +0300:
Stefan Fuhrmann stefan.fuhrm...@wandisco.com writes:
My current hypothesis is that the server did not get restarted after
replacing the repository. Because we decided not to make the instance ID
part of the cache key, we could
On 25.08.2015 12:36, Thomas Singer wrote:
Is this bug already reported in the issue tracker? I've searched but
could not found. Should I report it?
We don't need that. The fix is alread on the 1.9.x branch and will be
part of the 1.9.1 release, which we'll probably expedite precisely
because
Is this bug already reported in the issue tracker? I've searched but
could not found. Should I report it?
--
Best regards,
Thomas Singer
=
syntevo GmbH
http://www.syntevo.com
http://www.syntevo.com/blog
On 20.08.2015 09:28, b...@qqmail.nl wrote:
Hi Thomas,
The Subversion version
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 12:40 AM, Stefan Fuhrmann
stefan.fuhrm...@wandisco.com mailto:stefan.fuhrm...@wandisco.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Stefan Hett ste...@egosoft.com
mailto:ste...@egosoft.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm dealing with one remaining case
On 25.08.2015 13:49, br...@apache.org wrote:
Author: brane
Date: Tue Aug 25 11:49:09 2015
New Revision: 1697654
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1697654
Log:
* branches/1.9.x/STATUS:
- Approve r1693886.
- Temporarily veto r1694481; the change looks broken.
[...]
@@ -98,5 +84,22 @@
./subversion/svnserve/svnserve -Tdr
/media/stefan/033c7ee9-9980-45a8-b9c6-f911dc2ac664/f7-test/ -M 1000 -c 0
--client-speed 10
stefan@macbook:~/develop/trunk$ time ./subversion/svn/svn diff --summarize
svn://localhost/ruby-f6-packed -r0:HEAD /dev/null
real0m2.150s
user0m1.964s
sys
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 10:08 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann
stefan.fuhrm...@wandisco.com wrote:
./subversion/svnserve/svnserve -Tdr
/media/stefan/033c7ee9-9980-45a8-b9c6-f911dc2ac664/f7-test/ -M 1000 -c 0
--client-speed 10
stefan@macbook:~/develop/trunk$ time ./subversion/svn/svn diff
--summarize
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Branko Čibej br...@wandisco.com wrote:
On 25.08.2015 17:31, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Branko Čibej br...@wandisco.com
wrote:
On 25.08.2015 13:49, br...@apache.org wrote:
Author: brane
Date: Tue Aug 25 11:49:09 2015
New
On 06.08.2015 18:10, stef...@apache.org wrote:
Author: stefan2
Date: Thu Aug 6 16:10:39 2015
New Revision: 1694533
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1694533
Log:
Fix an alignment problem on machines with 32 bit pointers but atomic 64
data access that may not be misaligned.
*
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 6:08 PM, Stefan Hett ste...@egosoft.com
mailto:ste...@egosoft.com wrote:
Hi,
(sending to dev rather than to user since it's still an unreleased
tool)
I just tried to do a test-run on another checked-out path from the
same repository I already
Hi,
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 6:08 PM, Stefan Hett ste...@egosoft.com
mailto:ste...@egosoft.com wrote:
Hi,
(sending to dev rather than to user since it's still an
unreleased tool)
I just tried to do a test-run on another checked-out path from
the same repository I
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Stefan Hett ste...@egosoft.com
mailto:ste...@egosoft.com wrote:
Hi,
I came across a case where svn-normalizer did remove mergeinfo for
a branch which was still present but got renamed in one revision.
I understand why it behaves the
24 matches
Mail list logo
