On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 06:52:07AM -, hwri...@apache.org wrote:
==
--- subversion/trunk/subversion/include/svn_string.h (original)
+++ subversion/trunk/subversion/include/svn_string.h Wed Sep 15 06:52:06 2010
@@
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 03:32:14PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 10:58:06PM -, stef...@apache.org wrote:
Author: stefan2
Date: Thu Sep 9 22:58:06 2010
New Revision: 995603
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=995603view=rev
Log:
Try really hard to help
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de wrote:
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 06:52:07AM -, hwri...@apache.org wrote:
==
--- subversion/trunk/subversion/include/svn_string.h (original)
+++
On 15.09.2010 09:46, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 03:32:14PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 10:58:06PM -, stef...@apache.org wrote:
Author: stefan2
Date: Thu Sep 9 22:58:06 2010
New Revision: 995603
URL:
I've been thinking about ways that our API documentation could be made
a bit cleaner.
Currently, we use a lot of prose to describe APIs, their parameters,
and other nuances. I find this approach rather unique, and in some
ways obfuscating. We have great documentation in that we cover a lot
of
-Original Message-
From: cmpil...@apache.org [mailto:cmpil...@apache.org]
Sent: dinsdag 14 september 2010 20:09
To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
Subject: svn commit: r997026 -
/subversion/trunk/subversion/mod_dav_svn/repos.c
Author: cmpilato
Date: Tue Sep 14 18:08:59 2010
New
-Original Message-
From: hwri...@apache.org [mailto:hwri...@apache.org]
Sent: woensdag 15 september 2010 11:18
To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
Subject: svn commit: r997237 - in
/subversion/trunk/subversion/bindings/javahl/native: ClientContext.cpp
ClientContext.h SVNClient.cpp
Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
I've been thinking about ways that our API documentation could be made
a bit cleaner.
Currently, we use a lot of prose to describe APIs, their parameters,
and other nuances. I find this approach rather unique, and in some
ways obfuscating. We have great
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Julian Foad julian.f...@wandisco.com wrote:
Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
I've been thinking about ways that our API documentation could be made
a bit cleaner.
Currently, we use a lot of prose to describe APIs, their parameters,
and other nuances. I find this
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Bert Huijben b...@qqmail.nl wrote:
-Original Message-
From: hwri...@apache.org [mailto:hwri...@apache.org]
Sent: woensdag 15 september 2010 11:18
To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
Subject: svn commit: r997237 - in
Julian Foad julian.f...@wandisco.com writes:
On Tue, 2010-09-14, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 00:02:16 +0200:
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 11:45 PM, joha...@tigris.org wrote:
http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3474
--- Additional
It's been 3 months since the last 1.6.x release, and we've got a few
items in STATUS or CHANGES which could warrant a release. I'd like to
roll in 1 or 2 weeks, so please go through STATUS and do some review.
If folks have thoughts on the timeliness of this release, or other
changes which ought
-Original Message-
From: Philip Martin [mailto:philip.mar...@wandisco.com]
Sent: woensdag 15 september 2010 12:08
To: Julian Foad
Cc: Daniel Shahaf; Johan Corveleyn; Subversion Development
Subject: Re: [Issue 3474] making a new subdir, moving files into it and
then renaming the
Bert Huijben b...@qqmail.nl writes:
-Original Message-
From: Philip Martin [mailto:philip.mar...@wandisco.com]
Perhaps we should simply notify for all nodes? Perhaps each
individual client should be deciding which notifications to suppress?
+1 on moving the choice to the clients.
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 02:33:28PM +0700, Victor Sudakov wrote:
This time it has compiled, but does not work.
svn list svn://admin/test/ works OK (IMHO because the ANONYMOUS
mechanism is sufficient for that) but svn co svn://admin/test/
dumps core immediately.
Hi Victor,
I hope I have
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 1:53 AM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Philip Martin
philip.mar...@wandisco.com wrote:
Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com writes:
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Branko Čibej br...@xbc.nu wrote:
svn_diff uses basically the
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 02:20:05PM +0200, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
Just to know how hard/fast I should pursue this: is there any chance
that a change like this could still make it into 1.7 (maybe even
backported to 1.6?), provided that the patch is of good quality and
all... ?
Depending on how
On Tue, 2010-09-07, s...@apache.org wrote:
Author: stsp
Date: Tue Sep 7 00:09:46 2010
New Revision: 993183
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=993183view=rev
Log:
Introduce a new family of functions to parse numbers from strings.
Looks useful. Thanks.
The goal is to replace direct
Also printf formatting type mismatches:
subversion/libsvn_subr/svn_string.c: In function
'svn_cstring_strtoui64':
subversion/libsvn_subr/svn_string.c:662: format '%lu' expects type 'long
unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'apr_uint64_t'
subversion/libsvn_subr/svn_string.c:662: format '%lu'
On Mi, 2010-09-15 at 10:35 +0100, Julian Foad wrote:
Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
I've been thinking about ways that our API documentation could be made
a bit cleaner.
...
Thoughts?
-Hyrum
+1.
You know what, I've been a bit skeptical of the list-of-params style of
documentation, as
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 14:20:05 +0200:
The patch is still very crude, with lots of code duplication, and
everything stuffed in one big function (and I may have overlooked some
edge conditions), so I don't feel it's ready to post yet (don't want
to waste people's time
s...@apache.org wrote on Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:05:15 -:
Author: stsp
Date: Wed Sep 15 10:05:14 2010
New Revision: 997249
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=997249view=rev
Log:
Add an --old-patch-target-names option to svn patch.
This option is useful in two cases:
1) A patch
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 02:14:36PM +0100, Julian Foad wrote:
On Tue, 2010-09-07, s...@apache.org wrote:
Author: stsp
Date: Tue Sep 7 00:09:46 2010
New Revision: 993183
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=993183view=rev
Log:
Introduce a new family of functions to parse numbers
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 02:27:21PM +0100, Julian Foad wrote:
Also printf formatting type mismatches:
subversion/libsvn_subr/svn_string.c: In function
'svn_cstring_strtoui64':
subversion/libsvn_subr/svn_string.c:662: format '%lu' expects type 'long
unsigned int', but argument 5 has type
On 09/15/2010 05:35 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
I've been thinking about ways that our API documentation could be made
a bit cleaner.
[...]
It's is really difficult to determine what each parameter does or what
possible errors are returned, without reading the entire
Hyrum K. Wright hyrum_wright at mail.utexas.edu writes:
Thanks. Though I'll probably wait a day or two, to let any dissenters
make themselves known. :)
-1/2. There are parts of your idea that I like, such as linking to common
documentation, enumerating all of the errors that can be returned,
Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de writes:
The translation issues is why I didn't use the APR_[U]INT64_T_FMT.
It's either using it and make life hard for translators, or have these
warnings... neither solution is perfect. Or is there a better solution?
Have two format strings and pick the right
C. Michael Pilato wrote on Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 10:58:20 -0400:
On 09/14/2010 10:25 AM, rhuij...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rhuijben
Date: Tue Sep 14 14:25:52 2010
New Revision: 996914
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=996914view=rev
Log:
When mixing the two major hacks of the
Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 02:14:36PM +0100, Julian Foad wrote:
On Tue, 2010-09-07, s...@apache.org wrote:
* subversion/include/svn_string.h
(svn_cstring_strtoi64, svn_cstring_atoi64, svn_cstring_atoi,
svn_cstring_strtoui64, svn_cstring_atoui64,
Stefan Sperling wrote on Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 21:18:26 +0200:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:49:06PM +0100, Julian Foad wrote:
Right. The issue seems to be How do I determine what path I should
apply the patch to? If the patch style is
--- wc/file
+++ wc/file
or
--- old_wc/file
On 09/15/2010 12:01 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
C. Michael Pilato wrote on Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 10:58:20 -0400:
On 09/14/2010 10:25 AM, rhuij...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rhuijben
Date: Tue Sep 14 14:25:52 2010
New Revision: 996914
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=996914view=rev
Log:
Bert, Erik, Greg...
I think the schema should not disallow the 'excluded' presence in NODES
table where op_depth 0 (which corresponds roughly to old
WORKING_NODE). There are already 'copy' cases where it is used, and
seems useful and right.
I also think the schema should not disallow 'absent'.
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 04:51:15PM +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
s...@apache.org wrote on Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:05:15 -:
Author: stsp
Date: Wed Sep 15 10:05:14 2010
New Revision: 997249
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=997249view=rev
Log:
Add an --old-patch-target-names
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Daniel Trebbien dtrebb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hyrum K. Wright hyrum_wright at mail.utexas.edu writes:
Thanks. Though I'll probably wait a day or two, to let any dissenters
make themselves known. :)
-1/2. There are parts of your idea that I like, such as linking
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 8:42 PM, Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de wrote:
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 04:51:15PM +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
s...@apache.org wrote on Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:05:15 -:
Author: stsp
Date: Wed Sep 15 10:05:14 2010
New Revision: 997249
URL:
Forwarding to dev@ as this seems to me an obvious regression (unfortunately
I got no reply from users@)
-- Forwarded message --
From: Weirdan weir...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 2:50 PM
Subject: Regression for issue:2362 ?
To: us...@subversion.apache.org
Hello
I'm using
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 05:12:43PM +0100, Julian Foad wrote:
+ * @since New in 1.7.
+ */
+svn_error_t *
+svn_cstring_strtoi64(apr_int64_t *n, const char *str,
+ apr_int64_t minval, apr_int64_t maxval,
+ int base);
+/**
+ *
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 04:02:52PM +0200, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 10.09.2010 15:26, Stefan Sperling wrote:
I know we're using C89, but maybe it's time to move on and upgrade to C99
where the benefits are desirable? When Subversion was started, C89 was about
a decade old, and C99 is just as
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 9:03 PM, Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de wrote:
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 04:02:52PM +0200, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 10.09.2010 15:26, Stefan Sperling wrote:
I know we're using C89, but maybe it's time to move on and upgrade to C99
where the benefits are desirable? When
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 08:53:17PM +0200, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
How about just adding '--patch-left' and '--patch-right' or something.
The either both have to used, or neither, and if they are, use those
names as the once in the patch.
I don't like these names because it's not clear what
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 06:15:58PM +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Stefan Sperling wrote on Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 21:18:26 +0200:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:49:06PM +0100, Julian Foad wrote:
Right. The issue seems to be How do I determine what path I should
apply the patch to? If the patch
I've committed a bunch of changes for issue #3709 and related situations
(r996884, r997026, r997457, r997466, r997471, and r997474). I *do* plan to
propose them for backport to 1.6.x, but that work will have to wait until
tomorrow. Just letting folks know.
--
C. Michael Pilato
I've committed a bunch of changes for issue #3709 and related situations
(r996884, r997026, r997457, r997466, r997471, and r997474). I *do* plan to
propose them for backport to 1.6.x, but that work will have to wait until
tomorrow. Just letting folks now.
--
C. Michael Pilato
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 13:19, julianf...@apache.org wrote:
...
- - ### A comment on 'repos_id' and 'repos_relpath' says they may be null;
- is this true and wanted?
Yes. That meant use the parent's information, and extend it to
compute this node's value.
+ - The Node-Rev group
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 09:45, julianf...@apache.org wrote:
...
+++ subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc-metadata.sql Wed Sep 15 13:45:12
2010
@@ -618,6 +618,21 @@ PRAGMA user_version =
BASE nodes and on top of other WORKING nodes, due to nested tree structure
changes. The layers
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 06:08, rhuij...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rhuijben
Date: Tue Sep 14 10:08:35 2010
New Revision: 996811
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=996811view=rev
Log:
Move some defines that are only used on upgrades from wc.h to upgrade.c.
*
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 16:39, hwri...@apache.org wrote:
Author: hwright
Date: Wed Sep 15 20:39:44 2010
New Revision: 997493
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=997493view=rev
Log:
Create the object-model branch, wherein we will attempt to put into practice
some of the ideas defined in
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:43 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 16:39, hwri...@apache.org wrote:
Author: hwright
Date: Wed Sep 15 20:39:44 2010
New Revision: 997493
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=997493view=rev
Log:
Create the object-model branch,
Yesterday, I was talking to CMike about our long-standing issue with UTF-8
strings designating a certain path not neccessarily being equal to other
strings designating the same path. The issue has to do with NFC (composed)
and NFD (decomposed) representation of Unicode characters. CMike nicely
Erik Huelsmann wrote on Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 23:20:06 +0200:
Yesterday, I was talking to CMike about our long-standing issue with UTF-8
strings designating a certain path not neccessarily being equal to other
strings designating the same path. The issue has to do with NFC (composed)
and NFD
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 23:35, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
Erik Huelsmann wrote on Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 23:20:06 +0200:
Yesterday, I was talking to CMike about our long-standing issue with UTF-8
strings designating a certain path not neccessarily being equal to other
strings
51 matches
Mail list logo
