On 27.10.2012 07:25, Peter Samuelson wrote:
[Branko Čibej]
On 26.10.2012 21:04, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
Just felt like painting.
The only problem I see with this is that, in many monospaced fonts, '
and ` glyphs are not mirror images; whereas / and \ almost always are.
Well, note that his
On 30.10.2012 21:25, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 10:42 PM, C. Michael Pilato cmpil...@collab.net
wrote:
On 10/30/2012 02:15 PM, Julian Foad wrote:
Ivan Zhakov wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
I
On 02.11.2012 04:34, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 02:59:10AM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
I went ahead and disabled auto-upgrades in r1404856.
During the SVN Live conferences I asked people, privately, about their
opinion on automatic vs. manual upgrades. The overwhelming
On 02.11.2012 12:36, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 2:04 AM, Branko Čibej br...@wandisco.com wrote:
[..]
The sysinfo bits have static (build-time) info and dynamic (runtime)
info. Presumably the only difference will be noticing when you're
running the program on a different size
On 02.11.2012 14:21, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Branko Čibej br...@wandisco.com wrote:
On 02.11.2012 12:36, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 2:04 AM, Branko Čibej br...@wandisco.com wrote:
[..]
The sysinfo bits have static (build-time) info and dynamic
On 02.11.2012 17:30, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Branko Čibej br...@wandisco.com wrote:
On 02.11.2012 12:36, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 2:04 AM, Branko Čibej br...@wandisco.com wrote:
[..]
The sysinfo bits have static (build-time) info and dynamic
On 02.11.2012 15:25, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
On 11/02/2012 09:50 AM, Mark Phippard wrote:
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 4:13 AM, Ivan Zhakov i...@visualsvn.com wrote:
Looking forward for your review. Thanks!
+ /* Build a Public Resource uri representing repository root. */
+ uri =
On 02.11.2012 15:15, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
On 11/02/2012 09:07 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 02.11.2012 04:34, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 02:59:10AM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
I went ahead and disabled auto-upgrades in r1404856.
During the SVN Live conferences I asked
Cool. We have an official hackathon at the Apachecon on Monday.
-- Brane
On 03.11.2012 17:19, Ben Reser wrote:
Just a reminder to please +1 the list if you're going to be there.
The count is only at 3 and I suspect that more people will be there.
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Ben Reser
On 04.11.2012 12:37, Blair Zajac wrote:
On Nov 4, 2012, at 2:14 AM, stef...@apache.org wrote:
Author: stefan2
Date: Sun Nov 4 10:14:56 2012
New Revision: 1405517
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1405517view=rev
Log:
Silence integer size conversion warnings in JavaHL under Win64 by
On 05.11.2012 00:21, Thomas Åkesson wrote:
I did some tests with curl --head just as a sanity check. It seems to be a
good choice for access control. I primarily wanted to see that HEAD requests
were not allowed in situations where GET is not (e.g. when user has access in
directories
On 05.11.2012 12:02, Mark Phippard wrote:
On Nov 5, 2012, at 3:11 AM, Branko Čibej br...@wandisco.com wrote:
On 05.11.2012 00:21, Thomas Åkesson wrote:
I did some tests with curl --head just as a sanity check. It seems to be a
good choice for access control. I primarily wanted to see
On 05.11.2012 12:07, Greg Stein wrote:
This is good stuff.
In a following commit, you added a package in here... do you actually
intend to modify it?
I would posit we do not need vendor branches unless we specifically intend
to make local changes.
Yes, I intend to modify it (slightly) so
On 05.11.2012 15:10, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
Here is updated patch:
[[[
Add target platform information to user agent string.
* subversion/libsvn_ra_serf/ra_serf.h
(USER_AGENT): Add target platform information.
* subversion/libsvn_ra_serf/ra_svn.h
(SVN_RA_SVN__DEFAULT_USERAGENT): Add target
On 05.11.2012 15:19, Paul Burba wrote:
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de wrote:
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 10:40:41AM -0400, Mark Phippard wrote:
Guess I just do not see big benefit from using the existing property.
I am not vetoing the idea or anything, just do not
On 05.11.2012 15:43, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 6:30 PM, Branko Čibej br...@wandisco.com wrote:
On 05.11.2012 15:10, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
Here is updated patch:
[[[
Add target platform information to user agent string.
* subversion/libsvn_ra_serf/ra_serf.h
(USER_AGENT): Add
On 07.11.2012 08:40, Markus Schaber wrote:
In my eyes, ignored != forbidden.
Precisely. ignored has /never/ meant that you couldn't svn add a
file that matches the ignore pattern. Therefore, --no-ignores should
always ignore all ignores.
-- Brane
On 08.11.2012 03:19, Philip Martin wrote:
phi...@apache.org writes:
Author: philip
Date: Wed Nov 7 23:49:06 2012
New Revision: 1406870
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1406870view=rev
Log:
Fix issue 4091, symlink-ness change causes spurious tree-conflict.
*
On 08.11.2012 05:26, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 04:13:52 +0100:
I believe that the correct approach would be to always treat a changed
node kind (that's either the appearance/disappearance of the svn:symlink
property, or a change of the initial keyword
.
It'll take a while, but I hope to be able to finish the work in time for
1.8. If not ... well then, it'll be in 1.9.
-- Brane
--
Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
of file
]
expected_output = [
-'U %s\n' % os.path.join(wc_dir, 'A/mu'),
+'U %s\n' % os.path.join(wc_dir, 'A', 'mu'),
'U %s\n' % os.path.join(wc_dir, 'iota'),
]
+1
--
Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
On 09.11.2012 14:28, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
On 11/09/2012 07:49 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 09.11.2012 12:28, Thomas Åkesson wrote:
I'm currently doing the grunt work of implementing the collation (done)
and the LIKE and GLOB operators that we'll need (in progress). The next,
and biggest
and .dsw files, line endings are definitely no
longer an issue.
-- Brane
--
Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
on windows
than tar+gunzip, then we can do the same as with tar.gz and tar.bz2 --
just package the same tree in a different archive format.
-- Brane
--
Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
inefficient.
--
Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
. Weird checks like that go there, and it's
already platform-specific enough that we won't pollute the Unix version..
--
Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
and even fewer core subversion developers would dare touch these layers.
I'm glad somebody is finally looking into these issues, but I think we should
look at the full picture before we can talk about getting this back on trunk.
Bert
--
Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion
use indexes in some cases?
Do we still use LIKE and GLOB, or did we already replace all invocations for
performance reasons?
(I know I removed a lot of them to get queries to use indexes properly)
Please don't jump up and down on a half-finished implementation. :)
-- Brane
--
Branko Čibej
On 12.11.2012 18:34, Bert Huijben wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Branko Čibej [mailto:br...@wandisco.com]
Sent: maandag 12 november 2012 17:49
To: dev@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r1408325 - /subversion/branches/wc-collate-
path/subversion/libsvn_subr/sqlite.c
of stream compression.
-- Brane
--
Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
On 15.11.2012 13:38, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Branko Čibej br...@wandisco.com wrote:
On 12.11.2012 19:46, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:27 PM, Bert Huijben b...@qqmail.nl wrote:
Any idea why a 1.8 client would use more than twice the amount
that
they can be filtered out of a normal access.log for higher-granularity
debugging?
-- Brane
--
Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
On 15.11.2012 15:49, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
On 11/15/2012 08:08 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
You may have a point there. The next question is, why would anyone want
to base64-encode a response to a simple GET? Seems like unnecessary work
for no good reason.
I'm pretty sure we don't base64 our
issue such requests for 'svn cat' as well.
Still, I can't think of any reason why administrators couldn't rotate
logs of specifically that kind of GET of versioned resources more often
than other access logs.
-- Brane
--
Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
properties set:\n
svn:ignore - A newline separated list of file glob patterns to
ignore.\n
+ svn:global-ignore - Like svn:ignore, but inheritable.\n
...s :)
-- Brane
--
Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
?
Sorry, can't help you here. We don't maintain SVNKit, you'll have to ask
at svnkit.com.
-- Brane
--
Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
the no-trailing-eoln state. The text itself can be localized,
or absent.
I'm pretty sure we should mark the No newline at end of file for
translation -- but /not/ the \\ .
-- Brane
--
Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
On 20.11.2012 15:05, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 11:25:30AM +0100, Branko Čibej wrote:
I'm digging through libsvn_diff and found this snippet in diff_memory.c:
SVN_ERR(svn_utf_cstring_from_utf8_ex2
(out_str,
/* The string below
On 20.11.2012 17:15, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de wrote:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 03:40:20PM +0100, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 20.11.2012 15:05, Stefan Sperling wrote:
I just checked the UNIX patch code shipped with OpenBSD and it seems
you want to reference a different issue number here.
Nope, this is exactly what I'm laying the groundwork for. As will become
obvious in the next couple days.
--
Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
On 22.11.2012 15:19, Bert Huijben wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Branko Čibej [mailto:br...@wandisco.com]
Sent: donderdag 22 november 2012 11:04
To: dev@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r1412418 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion:
include/private/svn_string_private.h
On 22.11.2012 16:08, Julian Foad wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote:
+/** A self-contained memory buffer of known size.
+ *
+ * Intended to be used where a single variable-sized buffer is needed
+ * within an iteration, a scratch pool is available and we want to
+ * avoid the cost of creating another
to issue a warning.
Will fix.
-- Brane
--
Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
14 user-visible node props and 10 revision props. Surely you
don't want to see 10 lines of error message instead of 1 because of a typo?
-- Brane
--
Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
to have duplicate
tests than it is to miss one.
-- Brane
--
Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
On 22.11.2012 18:43, Mark Phippard wrote:
On Nov 22, 2012, at 12:27 PM, Branko Čibej br...@wandisco.com wrote:
On 22.11.2012 18:18, Mark Phippard wrote:
Just a thought. We do not have many svn: props. Couldn't we just list all
of them? If we knew they were setting on a folder or file we
On 22.11.2012 18:29, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 22.11.2012 17:01, Julian Foad wrote:
Just use 'float' and [0..1]? I'm thinking we may want to use this for
comparing diff hunks, and there may be more than 500 characters in each hunk
and it matters whether just one character has been changed
':
tools/client-side/svn-bench/null-log-cmd.c:137: warning: initializer element is
not computable at load time
--
Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
name; did you mean
'svn:ignore'?
(Use --force if you're sure about 'svn:ignores'.)
$ svn ps svn:local-ignore x .
svn: E195011: 'svn:local-ignore' is not a valid svn: property name; did you
mean 'svn:global-ignores'?
(Use --force if you're sure about 'svn:local-ignore'.)
-- Brane
--
Branko
On 23.11.2012 12:58, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 11:43:29 +0100:
$ svn ps svm:ignore x .
svn: E195011: 'svm:ignore' is not a valid svn: property name; did you mean
'svn:ignore'?
(Use --force if you're sure about 'svm:ignore'.)
To set the 'svm:ignore
On 23.11.2012 16:31, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 15:59:16 +0100:
On 23.11.2012 15:35, Julian Foad wrote:
In file included from subversion/libsvn_delta/compat.c:36:0:
./subversion/svn_private_config.h:236:7: SVN_QSORT_R_NORMAL_ARG_ORDER is
not defined
the line.
-- Brane
--
Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
is to implement the Ev2 editor in parallel
with the existing implementation, which should negatively impact 1.8
releasability.
I'm going to assume you meant should *not* in that last line.
-- Brane
--
Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
On 23.11.2012 18:09, Branko Čibej wrote:
I agree that looking at the prefix is dicey, ...
... so I've tightened up the prefix matching so that --force is required
only when:
* the prefix is exactly 3 letters long (propname[3] == ':');
* and the first three letters differ in only one change
On 24.11.2012 13:30, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 12:33:01 +0100:
I'm also considering requiring --force if one tries to use a revision
property name as a node property, and vice versa.
+0
$ svn ps svn:barfoo x .
svn: E195011: 'svn:barfoo' is not a valid
On 24.11.2012 15:20, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 13:38:39 +0100:
On 24.11.2012 13:30, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 12:33:01 +0100:
I'm also considering requiring --force if one tries to use a revision
property name
, is whether I should remove
svn:mergeinfo from
SVN_PROP_NODE_ALL_PROPS defined in svn_prop.h. I'm leaning towards yes
but would like to hear opinions from the merge(info) experts.
-- Brane
--
Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
On 25.11.2012 23:30, Julian Foad wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote:
The latest change takes account of property name similarity. So for example,
svn propset svn:foobar .
will emit an error but will not suggest an alternative spelling, whereas
svn propset svn:ignores .
will suggest two
:
subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_subr/string.c
I wouldn't mind having another pair of eyes take a look at this.
-- Brane
--
Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
often rather than less.
-- Brane
--
Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
, which is not
available
on some systems..
Maybe we should replace threading with multiprocess to run parallel
python tests. They'd block less in the GIL as well.
-- Brane
--
Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
of
code, so we may as well do it and see if anyone complains too loudly.
-- Brane
--
Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
to at least get the build
infrastructure in place.
-- Brane
--
Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
On 28.11.2012 17:15, Philip Martin wrote:
Branko Čibej br...@wandisco.com writes:
On 28.11.2012 15:39, br...@apache.org wrote:
Author: brane
Date: Wed Nov 28 14:39:42 2012
New Revision: 1414728
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1414728view=rev
Log:
Getting sidetracked for a bit
them.
--
Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
admins'
shenanigans) is pretty much cast in concrete.
I'm open to suggestions, up to and including breaking that assumption,
though obviously I'd prefer not to.
-- Brane
--
Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
On 29.11.2012 14:22, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Branko Čibej br...@wandisco.com wrote:
On 28.11.2012 17:15, Philip Martin wrote:
Branko Čibej br...@wandisco.com writes:
On 28.11.2012 15:39, br...@apache.org wrote:
Author: brane
Date: Wed Nov 28 14:39:42 2012
, there's no question that the
ra_serf design is superior to whatever we could do with Neon.
-- Brane
--
Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
scope)...
So you'd need to invent a new option?
And besides, username is the authentication token, which is usually
exactly what Eric doesn't want to put into svn:author. :)
-- Brane
--
Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
easy answer is to introduce a new reserved property name for
attribution, without changing the semantics of svn:author.
In retrospect it's unfortunate we didn't call that svn:committer-id or
some such, but there you have it.
-- Brane
--
Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion | WANdisco
of manipulating the svn:author
property.
Now that's not saying I'm categorically against letting the user set
some revision property automatically on commit. But the problem of
svn:author you're describing is simply what you assert it to be.
-- Brane
--
Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion
model.
-- Brane
P.S.: I find it fascinating that DVCS aficionados haven't noticed that
GitHub takes the D out of DVCS very effectively, thereby making git
actually useful for most normal people.
--
Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
design something akin to what the rsync protocol does, but for
repository-wide data storage. Could be quite tricky to achieve locality,
however.
There I go off on a tangent again.
-- Brane
--
Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
configuration etc.
Is your goal shipping without bugs?
-- Brane
--
Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
your use cases well enough. I can't think of a
reason /not/ to add both auto-revprops and a new reserved property to
Subversion for this purpose.
-- Brane
--
Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
On 05.12.2012 11:44, Markus Schaber wrote:
And I don't think that People like Linus Thorvalds will rebase the
Linux kernel when ...
All the Internet-scoped IDs in the world, unique or not, won't help
people tell the difference between Thorvalds and Torvalds. :)
-- Brane
--
Branko Čibej
that. :)
-- Brane
--
Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
/not/ properly normalize them regardless, that's a client bug.
Though of course the file would immediately show up as modified as soon
as it was updated.
-- Brane
--
Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
representation sharing have anything to
do with skip deltas? The two should be completely orthogonal.
This sounds like there's an interdependency between the two features
that shouldn't exist. Can you please elaborate on that?
-- Brane
--
Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion | WANdisco
too strong term when you talk about
corrupted files in this case. There's nothing corrupted about them.
-- Brane
[1] Not strictly true since mod_dav_svn will look at svn:mime-type when
serving the content at its default, unversioned URL; but it doesn't
actually interpret the value.
--
Branko
if it /was/ in libsvn_repos, it'd just get called at the
same time as the pre-commit hook; so you'd save a fork+exec and a few
open calls, but not that much more.)
-- Brane
--
Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
then be compared to the props
setting during commit time.
Premature optimization. We haven't even decided we want this in
libsvn_repos, let alone libsvn_fs_fs, which is the only place where
protorev file is even a meaningful term.
-- Brane
--
Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
* loudly out to the world about broken
git-svn then, if it doesn't honour our wire protocol. This might even
get me to lean towards rejecting these kinds of commits by default.
-- Brane
--
Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
file contents.
-- Brane
--
Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
On 10.12.2012 11:31, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 00:26:20 +0100:
On 10.12.2012 00:08, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 11:43 PM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name
wrote:
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Sun, Dec 09, 2012 at 21:15:24 +0100:
2) Am
for clang, since it's not set any more.
}}}
--
Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
Index: aclocal.m4
===
--- aclocal.m4 (revision 1421399)
+++ aclocal.m4 (working copy)
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
sinclude
On 14.12.2012 02:32, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Branko Čibej br...@wandisco.com wrote:
The attached patch makes several changes to how we discover compilers
and set flags on *nix:
* Search for clang as well as the default gcc/cc, and prefer clang(++)
over
On 14.12.2012 07:38, Miha Vitorovic wrote:
On 14.12.2012 4:21, Branko Čibej wrote:
The only reason for trying for C++11 is, as far as I'm concerned,
getting std::shared_ptr memory. The C++ bindings I'm slowly
wrapping my head around will need it, and I don't want to even
consider using
the different RA
layers?
We support passing error chains over svn:// and http://, and this is why we
have/had to use the strcmp().
Yes indeed, I'm beginning to realize that I shouldn't have tested only
ra-local. I'll put the strcmp back.
-- Brane
--
Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion | WANdisco
On 10.12.2012 23:07, Ben Reser wrote:
The 1.7.8 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
Please get the tarballs from
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
and add your signatures there.
Should .swig_checked be in the tarball?
--
Branko Čibej
Director
Is anyone else seeing this? Running with current trunk and
$ make davautocheck PARALLEL=1 TESTS=subversion/tests/cmdline/basic_tests.py
This is the only failure in the test suite.
-- Brane
--
Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
On 14.12.2012 20:38, Ben Reser wrote:
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Branko Čibej br...@wandisco.com wrote:
Is anyone else seeing this? Running with current trunk and
$ make davautocheck PARALLEL=1 TESTS=subversion/tests/cmdline/basic_tests.py
This is the only failure in the test suite
. Or rather it asks, but just answers yes to
itself. Digging ...
--
Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
part.
-- Brane
--
Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
On 14.12.2012 22:12, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 14.12.2012 21:28, Ben Reser wrote:
The odd part there is that it's actually the first --non-interactive
checkout that's failing in that test.
Sigh. I keep forgetting that I configure with
--disable-plaintext-password-storage.
The test
/rIMAg1cM5LTIsMGmnpIHegl2j253cmlnzLkSx+m42cYa
NTxfo79UrlgrJjn11zT/q1pAgorjxJX1PWEd/sSG+gYpi6CtyzQDC+tpn6fGGk95
qem8599QjXEczahaiu3xQdPfJZHEho0YGwjA+stdqlhDHF/m4WxoAsdi+ZYUaSY=
=oAZA
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
visisble on the buildbot log)
That's funny.
if not sys.stdout.isatty() or sys.platform == 'win32':
TextColors.disable()
They're unconditionally disabled on Windows, so if stdout.isatty()
returns True, I don't know /what/ the buildbot does.
-- Brane
--
Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion
is plainly
visisble on the buildbot log)
I agree that 'svn' shouldn't print colourised output.
I put it in for the simple reason that otherwise users will simply not
notice the warning, IMO.
But we can easily take it out.
--
Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
.
Eh. The morale of the story is, never commit when you're in a hurry.
Thanks for catching that!
-- Brane
--
Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
On 17.12.2012 15:03, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
On 12/17/2012 05:19 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 17.12.2012 09:47, Bert Huijben wrote:
I think we should suppress this warning on Windows when the CryptoAPI
encryption is enabled (read: +- always) to avoid unneeded user questions.
I rather think we
201 - 300 of 2677 matches
Mail list logo
