Hi,
I'm confused: with win-tests.py, is it necessary to start svnserve
yourself, before running the tests with --url=svn://localhost; or does
win-tests.py take care of starting and stopping svnserve itself?
I just started running the testsuite with --url=svn://localhost. But
first I started svnse
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 12:58 AM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm confused: with win-tests.py, is it necessary to start svnserve
> yourself, before running the tests with --url=svn://localhost; or does
> win-tests.py take care of starting and stopping svnserve itself
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 7:44 PM, Hyrum K Wright
wrote:
> I've rolled 1.7.0-rc4, what is expected to be the last release
> candidate, the magic rev is r1176462, and you can find it here:
> http://people.apache.org/~hwright/svn/1.7.0-rc4/
>
> After testing this on svn.apache.org, I expect the final
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 12:24:04PM +0100, Julian Foad wrote:
>> I've been thinking about a bunch of issues related to merging and how to
>> help users to avoid some of the common pitfalls. One subset of my
>> thoughts is on how we can pres
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Kyle Leber wrote:
> I've encountered what I think is a problem with subversion, but I'm not
> completely sure (and according to the online instructions I should bring it
> up here prior to filing a bug).
Actually, the instructions on
http://subversion.apache.org/i
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 5:37 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 30.09.2011 16:03, Julian Foad wrote:
>> On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 17:27 +0400, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 17:20, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yes, please keep the old output (one
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Hyrum K Wright
wrote:
> At the risk of jinxing the proposed Oct. 11 release date for 1.7.0,
> I'm posting the proposed tarballs for signing and testing:
> http://people.apache.org/~hwright/svn/1.7.0/
>
> These are cut from the same magic rev as 1.7.0-rc4, meaning th
Can someone give me wiki access please?
My username is JohanCorveleyn
--
Johan
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Neels J Hofmeyr [mailto:ne...@elego.de]
>> Sent: zaterdag 8 oktober 2011 7:58
>> To: Bert Huijben
>> Cc: 'Subversion Development'
>> Subject: Re: EXTERNALS table -- good or bad?
>>
>> On 10/07/2011 02:1
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Julian Foad wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-10-11 at 10:20 +0200, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >> -Original Message-
>> >> From: Neels J Hofmeyr [ma
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 3:38 AM, Neels J Hofmeyr wrote:
> On 10/11/2011 01:29 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>>>> AFAIUI, the EXTERNALS table is indeed not a cache, but it notes the
>>>> externals "as rolled out by the last svn update", i.e. the externals
>&
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Julian Foad
[...]
>> IDENTIFYING BRANCH ROOTS
>>
>> [[[
>> $ svn mergeinfo ^/subversion/trunk ^/subversion/branches/1.6.x
>> Branch marker: 'subversion-source-tree' (found on both source and target)
>> [...]
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 1:33 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Johan Corveleyn wrote on Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 22:24:19 +0200:
>> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
>> > On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Julian Foad
>> [...]
>> >> IDENTIFYING BRAN
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 10:21 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Johan Corveleyn wrote on Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 09:38:57 +0200:
>> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 1:33 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> > Johan Corveleyn wrote on Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 22:24:19 +0200:
>> >> On Thu, Oct 27,
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 4:40 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 11/10/2011 10:29 AM, Neels J Hofmeyr wrote:
>> It seems to me that excluding only those externals (dir & file) that are
>> fixed to a specific revision is the best solution. My only worry are all
>> those users out there expecting dir
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Neels J Hofmeyr wrote:
> On 11/11/2011 11:41 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
>>
>> Neels J Hofmeyr wrote:
>>>
>>> I think there is general agreement (to the degree of common
>>> sense?) that file and dir externals should behave the same
>>> way.
>>
>> +1 to that.
>>
>>> I w
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Apache Wiki wrote:
> Dear Wiki user,
>
> You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Subversion Wiki" for
> change notification.
>
> The "RepetitiveResolvingOfTheSameRename" page has been changed by
> PhilipMartin:
> http://wiki.apache.org/subversion/
Hi all,
I'm wondering if it would be feasible to (make it possible to)
alter/add copyfrom information in an SVN repository. And if so, would
this be a desirable feature?
It would certainly be useful (although I can't fully estimate the
ramifications) for the following use case:
- User commits a
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 8:26 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 22, 2011 12:23 AM, "Johan Corveleyn"
> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm wondering if it would be feasible to (make it possible to)
>> alter/add copyfrom information in an
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Talden wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 3:04 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 01:32:02PM +0100, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>>>
>>> Having a way to do this with svnsync and svndumptool would already be
>>> very
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 22.11.2011 14:57, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>> On 11/22/2011 02:26 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, November 22, 2011 12:23 AM, "Johan Corveleyn"
>>> wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>&g
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> On Sunday, November 27, 2011 11:16 PM, "Johan Corveleyn"
> wrote:
>>
>> What if we could 'svnadmin (re)load' a single revision $REV in a
>> repository, which would then automatically fix up ever
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Julian Foad wrote:
> Hi Johan. See below...
Hi Julian. Thanks for your insights. You've obviously thought a lot
more about this stuff than I have :-). Some more below ...
> On 28 November 2011, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 a
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 8:16 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> C. Michael Pilato wrote on Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 14:01:45 -0500:
>> On 12/13/2011 01:25 PM, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
>> > C. Michael Pilato :
>> >>> Does a file replace differ in any way from a delete plus add of the new
>> >>> text?
>> >>
>> >
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 11:52 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Johan Corveleyn wrote on Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 22:04:33 +0100:
[...]
>> And even:
>>
>> $ svn mv some/file.txt some/otherfile.txt
>> $ svn mv some/otherfile.txt some/file.txt
>> $ svn ci -m "Repla
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 7:30 PM, Paul Burba wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012, at 17:58, Paul Burba wrote:
>>> Mike Pilato and I have been kicking around some ideas on server
>>> dictated configuration recently and have put our thoughts into a wik
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 1:56 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Johan Corveleyn wrote on Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 01:40:40 +0100:
>> Another question: is the server-dictated config still "extendable" by
>> the client? I.e.: if the server already defines a global svn:ignore
>> v
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 7:42 PM, Julian Foad wrote:
[ ... ]
> SERVER DESIGN
> Any time the server is about to send a set of revision properties to
> the client, the server looks up the extended author fields and adds
> corresponding properties to the set of revision properties that it
> reports
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 7:04 PM, wrote:
> Author: hwright
> Date: Fri Dec 2 18:04:14 2011
> New Revision: 1209610
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1209610&view=rev
> Log:
> Fix builds where SVN_DEBUG is not defined.
>
> * subversion/libsvn_subr/debug.c:
> Don't build any of this file if
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 8:27 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 00:03, Mark Phippard wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 02:58, Paul Burba wrote:
Mike Pilato and I have been kicking around some ideas on server
dictated co
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 2:45 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Johan Corveleyn wrote on Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 02:12:15 +0100:
>> On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 7:04 PM, wrote:
>> > Author: hwright
>> > Date: Fri Dec 2 18:04:14 2011
>> > New Revision: 1209610
>> &g
> From: Johan Corveleyn
> Sent: 6-1-2012 23:50
> To: Daniel Shahaf
> Cc: Subversion Development; Hyrum Wright
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1209610
> - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_subr/debug.c
> On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 2:45 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> Johan Cor
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 7:14 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>
> On Jan 7, 2012 8:39 AM, "Johan Corveleyn" wrote:
>>...
>
>> BTW, I noticed that, before r1209610, my release build was failing for
>> another reason:
>>
>> ..\..\..\subversion\libsvn_subr\
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 10:57 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 7:14 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>>
>> On Jan 7, 2012 8:39 AM, "Johan Corveleyn" wrote:
>>>...
>>
>>> BTW, I noticed that, before r1209610, my release build was failing fo
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Sebastian Esponda wrote:
> (Note: I'm "almost" sure this is something to be fixed for 1.7, being
> the reason why I'm also addressing this to the Dev list... feel free
> to correct me if I'm wrong.. Thanks)
Please don't crosspost to both lists, try to pick the cor
Hi,
I'm looking into fixing issue #4023. I'd like to have some feedback on
a possible solution, and some hints on how to best implement it.
The problem
---
- 'svn rm missingItem' (while there is a 'MissingItem' on disk, and
not a 'missingItem') will eventually call
adm.ops.c#svn_wc__delet
HOME}/.subversion/*)
> The per-user Registry values (Windows Only)
> Per-machine runtime configuration (/etc/subversion/*)
> The system-wide Registry values (Windows Only)
>
> * Yes Johan, your arguments for making CL options have the highest
> priority did sway me :-)
>
> On
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 10:14 PM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-----
>> From: Johan Corveleyn [mailto:jcor...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: zondag 15 januari 2012 21:26
>> To: Subversion Development
>> Subject: How to fix issue #4023 (on Windows,
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Paul Burba wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 8:28 PM, Hyrum K Wright
> wrote:
[...]
>> Another thing to note is that there have been some rumblings about
>> authz improvements, along the lines of an additional permission to say
>> "you can know about this directo
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Paul Burba wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 8:33 AM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 12:51 AM, Paul Burba wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> We could chose to make things simple and follow the svn:mergeinfo
>>&g
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Paul Burba wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Paul Burba wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 8:28 PM, Hyrum K Wright
>>> wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>&
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 12:23 AM, Paul Burba wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 5:02 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
[ ... ]
>> Which makes me wonder: how will we discern inheritable props from
>> normal ones? Merely saying that the svn:conf: namespace (for instance)
>> m
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 10:14 PM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>>
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Johan Corveleyn [mailto:jcor...@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: zondag 15 januari 2012 21:26
>>>
for
#4023 to only look at the after-wcroot-part to check for
case-clashes...
> We can never 100% emulate a case sensitive filesytem on a case
> insensitive one.
Heh. But we can still try to emulate it as good as possible :-).
--
Johan
> Bert Huijben (Cell phone)
> From: Johan Corveleyn
&g
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Julian Foad wrote:
> Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>> Ok, but in the svn working copy, even on Windows, we can have a valid
>> fILE.eXT in wc.db, while there is an unrelated file.ext present on the
>> filesystem. We should be able to do useful thi
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> Julian Foad writes:
>
>> We haven't chosen to behave like a case-insensitive Windows app, it
>> seems, and obviously(?) we can't be fully case-sensitive when the
>> underlying Windows APIs are not. The rules we choose must govern how
>> we
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> Johan Corveleyn writes:
>
>> The only criterion is: is there a case-exact match in wc.db somewhere.
>> Otherwise, go on and case-normalize to what's on disk.
>
> Even if the exact match is status=not-present
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Julian Foad wrote:
> Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>
>> Julian Foad wrote:
>>> Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>>>> Ok, but in the svn working copy, even on Windows, we can have a valid
>>>> fILE.eXT in wc.db, while
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> Johan Corveleyn writes:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Philip Martin
>> wrote:
>>> Is that sufficient? Given three files "foo", "FOO" and "Foo", one in
>>> wc.
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Hyrum K Wright wrote on Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 13:57:28 +:
>> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> > Philip Martin wrote on Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 13:45:49 +:
>> >> Johan Corveleyn wri
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 1:18 AM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
[ ... ]
> I'd like to note though that #4023 is also potentially an issue for
> svn < 1.7 (pre-wcng). At least if you're thinking about
> non-commandline usage. As of #3865, one can now also run into this
> situa
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 24.01.2012 15:15, Philip Martin wrote:
>> Daniel Shahaf writes:
>>
Given three files "foo", "FOO" and "Foo", one in
wc.db, one on disk and one on the command line, is that the same file?
My understanding is that a W
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-----
>> From: Johan Corveleyn [mailto:jcor...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: woensdag 25 januari 2012 1:48
>> To: Julian Foad
>> Cc: Subversion Development; Bert Huijben; Philip Martin
&g
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Bert Huijben wrote:
[ ... ]
> The 'svn rm' case that opened this thread was the first case where libsvn_wc
> would be involved and this opens the door to many other changes.
> If we change svn rm, then it no longer matches 'svn revert' for these cases.
Actually
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 7:18 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 22:05, Bert Huijben wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Hyrum K Wright
>>> wrote:
>>> > This mail is very non-committal, but from the looks of CHANGES and
>>> > STATUS there are number of items which could pot
Hi,
Is there any existing regexp matching functionality somewhere in de
svn codebase, in a way that is reusable for new functionality? If not,
does anyone know of a reusable third-party library that could be
easily intregrated (I know, it would be Yet Another Dependency, but
I'm just asking for op
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Johan Corveleyn [mailto:jcor...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: vrijdag 27 januari 2012 16:31
>> To: Subversion Development
>> Subject: regexp matching in svn?
>>
>> Hi,
&
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012, at 21:30, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>> >> -Original Message-----
>> >> From: Johan Corveleyn [mailto:jcor...@gmail.com]
>>
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 28.01.2012 10:44, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> Johan Corveleyn wrote on Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 10:10:05 +0100:
>>> Yes, it's an option. But it's a hassle. I'm investigating other options.
>> Installing GN
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
[ ... ]
> Other than that, there is something about GNU diff's -F option that I
> don't like: it doesn't trim leading whitespace from the matched
> "function line", unlike the -p option.
Sorry, I mad
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 01:42:21AM +0900, Hiroaki Nakamura wrote:
>> 2012/1/30 Stefan Sperling :
[ ... ]
> And mixing various unicode forms works fine today if the filesystem
> used by the client supports this. The use case Neels contrive
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 9:09 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 30.01.2012 21:00, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 01:42:21AM +0900, Hiroaki Nakamura wrote:
>>>> 2012/1/30 Stefan Sperling
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 01:12:39AM +0100, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> By the way, I read Stefan's description of why --reintegrate is
>> necessary, and after slogging through the unfortunate terminology (2-URL
>> merge doesn't mean a thing in CM
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:19 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 09:38:15PM +0100, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>> No, AFAIU, Brane's suggestion was not that we shouldn't use the
>> "reintegrate-way" for 3.2, but rather that we should *always* use
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 11:16 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:37:51PM +0100, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:19 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> > But you cannot use the last-synced revision as left anchor either:
>> > svn co
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>
> [ ... ]
>
>> Other than that, there is something about GNU diff's -F option that I
>> don't like: it doesn't trim leading whitespace from
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Julian Foad wrote:
> Hi Paul. Thanks for indulging my enquiries.
>
> Paul Burba wrote:
>
>> Julian Foad wrote:
>>> Overriding is done by setting a new value for the inheritable
>>> property svn:i:ignore, like this:
>>>
>>> /subversion svn:i:ignore
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 5:13 PM, wrote:
> Author: danielsh
> Date: Thu Feb 2 16:13:20 2012
> New Revision: 1239695
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1239695&view=rev
> Log:
> Merge the r1207555 group from trunk:
>
> * r1207555, r1207808
> mod_dontdothat: contrib/ -> tools/ and relicens
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Stephen Butler wrote:
>
> On Feb 2, 2012, at 23:18 , Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 5:13 PM, wrote:
>>> Author: danielsh
>>> Date: Thu Feb 2 16:13:20 2012
>>> New Revision: 1239695
>>>
>
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Hyrum K Wright
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 7:26 AM, Hyrum K Wright
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Hyrum K Wright
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Hyrum K Wright
>>> wrote:
This mail is very non-committal, but from the looks of
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> Johan Corveleyn writes:
>
>>> I'm hesitant to roll a release until the cause of this problem has
>>> been located, and a potential course of action identified.
>>
>> There is also the recent
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 7:16 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Philip Martin
> wrote:
>> Johan Corveleyn writes:
>>
>>>> I'm hesitant to roll a release until the cause of this problem has
>>>> been located, and a potentia
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Bert Huijben wrote:
> My scripts build both ways on the buildbots and don't fail, but I don't
> see a problem with the fix.
>
> Bert Huijben (Cell phone)
> From: Paul Burba
> Sent: 3-2-2012 9:01
> To: Bert Huijben
> Cc: Johan Co
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> Johan Corveleyn writes:
>
>> Doh, you obviously meant that I try it with serf, not with ra_local.
>> Yes, I can reproduce that: it fails in exactly the same way as the
>> svn-slik-w2k3-x64-ra buildbot. Sorry for any
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 9:16 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Hyrum K Wright wrote on Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 11:44:06 -0600:
>> The question I have, which is more 1.7.3-centric, is "what changed on
>> the 1.7.x branch to start this happening?" Perhaps answering that
>> will help us know what needs to be d
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 10:21 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 9:16 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> Hyrum K Wright wrote on Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 11:44:06 -0600:
>>> The question I have, which is more 1.7.3-centric, is "what changed on
>>> the 1.7.
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 12:08 AM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> Daniel Shahaf writes:
>
>> Does the test trigger the error message
>> 680 ap_log_rerror(APLOG_MARK, APLOG_ERR, serr->apr_err,
>> 681 resource->info->r,
>> 682 "Can't
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 12:49 AM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> Johan Corveleyn writes:
>
>> I actually don't see anything either in the Apache error log (except
>> the child process starting up etc). Or should I look somewhere else?
>
> The error log is the right place.
&g
Having another look at this failure ...
So far, we know (anyone, correct me if I'm wrong):
- 'svnrdump load' in this test fails with: "svnrdump: E140001:
Unrecognized record type in stream". It seems the dumpfile contents of
the file D/H/psi is split incorrectly (property content is dumped
early,
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 2:33 AM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> Having another look at this failure ...
>
> So far, we know (anyone, correct me if I'm wrong):
>
> - 'svnrdump load' in this test fails with: "svnrdump: E140001:
> Unrecognized record type in stream&quo
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> Johan Corveleyn writes:
>
>> DBG: dump_editor.c: 756: close_file 0112B188
>> DBG: dump_editor.c: 552: add_file trunk/D/H/psi
>> DBG: dump_editor.c: 725: apply_textdelta 0112B188
>> DBG: dump_editor.c: 633: c
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 12:26 PM, C. Michael Pilato
> wrote:
>
>> Bah. I'd be surprised if most of our editors supported postfix text deltas.
>> To my knowledge, there is exactly one driver which uses that approach in
>> our own codebase (t
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Paul Burba wrote:
[ ... ]
> However, if I let the test suite start up httpd, then I *do*
> consistently see the same failure:
Wow, I wouldn't have thought of that as a discriminating factor. I'm
running the server in a separate command window, just running httpd.
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 7:59 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>
> On Feb 9, 2012 1:23 PM, "Paul Burba" wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> >...
>
>> > It is suggested there that setting
>> > libsvn_ra_serf/update.c:MAX_NR_OF_CONNS
>> > to "2" will prevent ra_serf from drivi
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 9:55 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>
> On Feb 9, 2012 3:07 PM, "Paul Burba" wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>> > On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 7:59 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On F
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 2:03 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 3 March 2012 12:48, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> sebb wrote on Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 12:30:53 +:
>>> On 3 March 2012 09:29, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>>> > Greg Stein wrote on Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 04:20:33 -0500:
>>> >> On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 04:02, Dani
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
> I do not build with BDB. When running the tests, I had one test
> failure I have never had before. Anything to be concerned with?
>
> svn_tests: E160033: Failed to load module for FS type 'bdb'
> FAIL: client-test.exe 3: test svn_client_pat
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 7:42 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> Subversion-1.7.4 tarballs are now available for testing/signing by
> committers. To obtain them please check out a working copy from
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
> Please add your signatures to the .asc files there.
>
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Hyrum K Wright
> wrote:
>
>> The primary issue when I looked at this problem was that the streamy
>> abstraction is broken in several places, such as when we install the
>> new pristine file. There are also
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>
> On Mar 12, 2012 9:59 AM, "Johan Corveleyn" wrote:
>>...
>
>
>> (BTW: the pristine file (on Windows) only has LF line-endings when
>> svn:eol-style=native (or =LF). When it's svn:eol-style=CRLF, th
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>
> On Mar 16, 2012 8:32 AM, "Stefan Sperling" wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 07:58:18AM -0400, Greg Stein wrote:
>> > On Mar 16, 2012 5:30 AM, wrote:
>> > >...
>> > > +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/cmdline/update_tests.py Fri Mar
>
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 16.03.2012 15:50, Stephen Butler wrote:
>> Some users do want more control over update (i.e., they trust
>> Subversion less). Interactive resolution during or after update is an
>> interesting scenario.
>
> s/Some/Many/ :)
I seriously dou
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Stephen Butler wrote:
> On Mar 17, 2012, at 1:14 , Johan Corveleyn wrote:
[...]
>> Don't git and mercurial and others just apply the changes to wherever
>> the code moved to, regardless of the container? Do those users often
>> compla
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 2:52 AM, wrote:
> /home/neels/svnbench/20120319-002438
> Started at Mon Mar 19 00:24:38 UTC 2012
>
> *Disclaimer:* this tests only file://-URL access on a GNU/Linux VM.
> This is intended to measure changes in performance of the local working
> copy layer, *only*. These re
2012/3/22 Julian Foad :
> Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
>> Philip Martin wrote:
>>> Or you could rebuild the current APR with a
>>> one-line patch to set ht->seed to 0 in apr_hash.c:apr_hash_make.
>>
>> I think when subversion receive the result of this apr_function , we
>> should do the sort , ie , subv
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Ashod Nakashian
wrote:
[snip]
>> From: Hyrum K Wright
[snip]
>>In some respects, it looks like you're solving *two* problems:
>>compression and the internal fragmentation due to large FS block
>>sizes. How orthogonal are the problems? Could they be solved
>>inde
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> Subversion-1.6.18 tarballs are now available for testing/signing by
> committers. To obtain them please check out a working copy from
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
>
> Please add your signatures to the .asc files ther
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> Subversion-1.6.18 tarballs are now available for testing/signing by
> committers. To obtain them please check out a working copy from
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
>
> Please add your signatures to the .asc files ther
Hi,
I haven't built trunk for a while, and now that I'm catching up I get
the following build errors (with my release build):
libsvn_client.def : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol
svn_client__do_symmetric_merge
libsvn_client.def : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol
svn_client__find
Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>>
>> If that would be the problem here the windows ra buildbot would have
>> failed.
>>
>> I think the problem is that the extractor wasn't used, while public
>> APIs were added/removed.
>>
>> Bert Huijben (Cell phone)
401 - 500 of 1356 matches
Mail list logo
