Connor Lane Smith:
On 15 January 2012 10:55, Bastien Dejean nihilh...@gmail.com wrote:
Solution: add a separation border between the window boundary and the
focus border. The contrast between the separation border and the focus
border should be high and constant.
My solution is
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 11:11:09AM +0100, Bastien Dejean wrote:
Connor Lane Smith:
On 15 January 2012 10:55, Bastien Dejean nihilh...@gmail.com wrote:
Solution: add a separation border between the window boundary and the
focus border. The contrast between the separation border and the
Hi,
There's a problem with the current single border logic of all the
minimal tiling X wm I'm aware of:
It might happen that the background color of the active window is very
close to the color of the active border. In so, the active border become
nearly invisible and useless.
Solution: add a
Hello Bastien,
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 11:55:34 +0100, Bastien Dejean wrote:
It might happen that the background color of the active window is
very
close to the color of the active border. In so, the active border
become
nearly invisible and useless.
This is more likely a problem of your
This could be implemented as a gap between windows in tile(). Just offset
windows a few pixels more than {wh,ww} + 2*borderpx. Dwm.c is probably
more readable than the previous sentence.
--
-,Bjartur
Bjartur Thorlacius svartma...@gmail.com writes:
This could be implemented as a gap between windows in tile(). Just
offset windows a few pixels more than {wh,ww} + 2*borderpx. Dwm.c is
probably more readable than the previous sentence.
You'd also need to construct a border pixmap rather than
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 12:02:01 -, Troels Henriksen at...@sigkill.dk
wrote:
Bjartur Thorlacius svartma...@gmail.com writes:
This could be implemented as a gap between windows in tile(). Just
offset windows a few pixels more than {wh,ww} + 2*borderpx. Dwm.c is
probably more readable than the
Bjartur Thorlacius:
Just draw the second border on the root window.
Will it work with floating windows?
--
b.d
(| |)
^ ^
Florian Limberger:
This is more likely a problem of your colorscheme, for example my
active border is #ff9900, which is very unlikely to be the background
color of any window.
No: this is more likely a general design problem as stated in my
original message. I don't want to choose my active
Bastien Dejean nihilh...@gmail.com writes:
Bjartur Thorlacius:
Just draw the second border on the root window.
Will it work with floating windows?
No.
--
\ Troels
/\ Henriksen
On 1/15/12, Bastien Dejean nihilh...@gmail.com wrote:
Florian Limberger:
This is more likely a problem of your colorscheme, for example my
active border is #ff9900, which is very unlikely to be the background
color of any window.
No: this is more likely a general design problem as stated in
On 15 January 2012 10:55, Bastien Dejean nihilh...@gmail.com wrote:
Solution: add a separation border between the window boundary and the
focus border. The contrast between the separation border and the focus
border should be high and constant.
This is only solvable in the general case by
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 11:55:34AM +0100, Bastien Dejean wrote:
Solution: add a separation border between the window boundary and the
focus border. The contrast between the separation border and the focus
border should be high and constant.
Another pretty easily implemented approach would be
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 01:29:59PM +0100, Bastien Dejean wrote:
No: this is more likely a general design problem as stated in my
original message. I don't want to choose my active border color based on
some design flaw and very unlikely is not enough.
your unwarranted sense of
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 13:08:55 -, Connor Lane Smith c...@lubutu.com
wrote:
Your work is so mission critical that mistaking window focus being
very unlikely is not enough? Well then, the only way to avoid such a
mistake is to maximise every window (i.e., monocle mode);
or more generally always
15 matches
Mail list logo
