If you have a vim-like interface to Chrome, the best way to edit text
online is jsvi[0]. It need some improvement but works quite good. OTOH,
Chrome will *never* allow the extensions to run local binary code like
FireFox does. You'll have to use the NPAPI plugin to achieve this goal.
Regards,
On 11 April 2011 14:34, Bryan Bennett bbenn...@gmail.com wrote:
Your new version of the patch seems to work *MUCH* better. In the couple
tests I've run, the random line noise I was getting before is much improved.
There's still some issues with curses / ncurses / slang applications (I've
yet
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Rob robpill...@gmail.com wrote:
I usually use plain text mode and edit the email externally - I
use vimperator, which is a Firefox plugin, and it allows you to
edit text fields with a external editor.
Unfortunately the Chromium browser lacks an external editor
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 12:46:46PM -0700, Suraj Kurapati wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Rob robpill...@gmail.com wrote:
I usually use plain text mode and edit the email externally - I
use vimperator, which is a Firefox plugin, and it allows you to
edit text fields with a external
I've had a pop at tidying it up a bit, I'm not getting as many silly
characters filtered through, would you mind giving it a try with what
you were doing and seeing if it's any better?
Your new version of the patch seems to work *MUCH* better. In the couple
tests I've run, the random line noise I
On 5 April 2011 17:01, Bryan Bennett bbenn...@gmail.com wrote:
is causing a lot of additional characters to be placed on
newlines, making actually getting what I want out of it rather difficult.
I've had a pop at tidying it up a bit, I'm not getting as many silly
characters filtered through,
On 4/5/11, Bryan Bennett bbenn...@gmail.com wrote:
C knowledge is rather low (I'm a python programmer...) so it's going
Reading this line I felt an urge to reply with the words Die in hell
alone. I'm going to punching uriel in the face now, for infecting me
with mindless trölling. In especial
Ethan Grammatikidis dixit (2011-04-05, 02:11):
On 4 Apr 2011, at 7:53 pm, Antoni Grzymala wrote:
That's why I have the mod4-c shortcut – exactly for turning
opera-copied links into a shift-insert insertable selection.
Ah, you have mod4-c run something which copies clipboard to
On 4 April 2011 16:18, Bryan Bennett bbenn...@gmail.com wrote:
While I understand wanting applications to adhere to the Unix
Philosophy, it seems to me that inputting and outputting text
is what a terminal essentially does and copying pasting is
just a small extension of that role. I'd like
Ethan Grammatikidis dixit (2011-04-04, 02:34):
XFCE terminal binds ctrl-shift-C/V to clipboard copy/paste. They're
not great bindings but they're memorable. Someone mentioned shift-
insert, was that for clipboard or selection paste? Shift-insert
reminds me of DOS edit.exe which used that
3. I really like urxvt(1)s urlLauncher functionality. Copy+Pasting
URLs is a PITA, especially on laptops without a middle mouse button
for pasting. What do you all think about it?
Middle-button paste is (unfortunately) effectively brain-damaged for
at least half the hardware out
On 4/4/11, Peter John Hartman wrote:
If you use tmux, you don't need either a urlLauncher function built into
your xvt nor mouse cut-n-paste built into it. Just use their internal
buffers, on the one hand, and bind a key to urlview or whatever to get
the other functionality.
This is useless
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Peter John Hartman
peterjohnhart...@gmail.com wrote:
Not at all. Just make sure X forwarding is working properly and that tmux
cut places things in xclip or something like that associated with the right
host. Ditto with urlviewer.
You think that's a good idea?
While I understand wanting applications to adhere to the Unix
Philosophy, it seems to me that inputting and outputting text
is what a terminal essentially does and copying pasting is
just a small extension of that role. I'd like to see a sane
way of copying pasting with the keyboard, rather than
On 4 Apr 2011, at 2:02 pm, Kurt H Maier wrote:
If middlemouse paste sucks on your hardware, buy new hardware. I'm in
no hurry to change an efficient paradigm because someone got cheap
buying a mouse. (Looking at you here, Ethan!)
You were the one who said my laptops have their own pointing
On 4 Apr 2011, at 9:10 am, Antoni Grzymala wrote:
In my standard X environment most programs accept the convention, that
MMB *and* shift-insert insert the selection, while whichever program
supports the clipboard it has some clipboard shortcut (and those two
do not overlap).
I just tested
Ethan Grammatikidis dixit (2011-04-04, 17:23):
In my standard X environment most programs accept the convention,
that MMB *and* shift-insert insert the selection, while whichever
program supports the clipboard it has some clipboard shortcut (and
those two do not overlap).
I just tested
On 4 Apr 2011, at 7:53 pm, Antoni Grzymala wrote:
That's why I have the mod4-c shortcut – exactly for turning
opera-copied links into a shift-insert insertable selection.
Ah, you have mod4-c run something which copies clipboard to selection?
There's a little prog in p9p which automatically
On 04-03 02:06, Aurélien Aptel wrote:
I've tagged v0.1 to tip.
1. config.mk still sais VERSION = 0.0
2. alsamixer(1) behaves horribly.
3. I really like urxvt(1)s urlLauncher functionality. Copy+Pasting URLs
is a PITA, especially on laptops without a middle mouse button for
pasting. What do
I gave st a try again these days. Is pretty stable. cool.
* ilf i...@zeromail.org [2011-04-03 20:00]:
On 04-03 02:06, Aurélien Aptel wrote:
I've tagged v0.1 to tip.
2. alsamixer(1) behaves horribly.
same here. but I can live with the visual shit. Or you
experience other oddities?
3. I
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 7:59 PM, ilf i...@zeromail.org wrote:
1. config.mk still sais VERSION = 0.0
fuck.
I've also got mixed up while testing some stuff with Petr's BORDER
patch and commited the wrong thing...
Do I make a 0.1.1 fixed version or do I move the 0.1 tag to a fixed
version? I only
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 8:27 PM, Aurélien Aptel aurelien.ap...@gmail.com wrote:
I've also got mixed up while testing some stuff with Petr's BORDER
Sorry, I meant Petr's utf8 clipboard patch. The result is copy/paste
doesn't work...
On 04-03 20:27, Aurélien Aptel wrote:
2. alsamixer(1) behaves horribly.
Could you be more specific? Screenshots, stderr, etc. If you're using
TERM=st, make sure you've install the terminfo entry, as explained in
the faq.
It just renders horribly slow, like downloading a GIF in the Ninetees.
Ok, I've tagged a new 0.1.1 version, the clipboard/version should be fixed.
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 9:02 PM, ilf i...@zeromail.org wrote:
It just renders horribly slow, like downloading a GIF in the Ninetees.
oh so it's just slow, there's no gfx bug? In that case, I'm aware of this.
On 3 Apr 2011, at 6:59 pm, ilf wrote:
2. alsamixer(1) behaves horribly.
I dunno about anyone else, but alsamixer is one of only 2 curses
programs I still use. :} Well, 3 really, I still have to use vi
occasionally.
3. I really like urxvt(1)s urlLauncher functionality. Copy+Pasting
25 matches
Mail list logo
