[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYNCOPE-231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jan Bernhardt updated SYNCOPE-231:
--
Attachment: TaskService.patch
I do not understand why this patch (TaskService) breaks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYNCOPE-275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Francesco Chicchiriccò updated SYNCOPE-275:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.2.0)
1.1.0
Upgrade
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYNCOPE-275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Francesco Chicchiriccò updated SYNCOPE-275:
---
Description:
Spring 3.2.0 has been out for a while now; this new release
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYNCOPE-275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Francesco Chicchiriccò updated SYNCOPE-275:
---
Issue Type: Improvement (was: Sub-task)
Parent: (was:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYNCOPE-231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13562588#comment-13562588
]
Hudson commented on SYNCOPE-231:
Integrated in Syncope-trunk #7 (See
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYNCOPE-289?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13562608#comment-13562608
]
Francesco Chicchiriccò commented on SYNCOPE-289:
Prior to latest
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYNCOPE-289?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13562611#comment-13562611
]
Andrei Shakirin commented on SYNCOPE-289:
-
I am afraid it cased by
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYNCOPE-135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13562618#comment-13562618
]
Massimiliano Perrone commented on SYNCOPE-135:
--
Hi guys,
this morning I have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYNCOPE-135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13562625#comment-13562625
]
Francesco Chicchiriccò commented on SYNCOPE-135:
Agree to move this issue
+1
M
On Jan 25, 2013, at 1:23 PM, Francesco Chicchiriccò (JIRA) wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYNCOPE-135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13562625#comment-13562625
]
Francesco Chicchiriccò commented on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYNCOPE-135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13562664#comment-13562664
]
Marco Di Sabatino Di Diodoro commented on SYNCOPE-135:
--
+1
M
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYNCOPE-135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Francesco Chicchiriccò updated SYNCOPE-135:
---
Issue Type: Sub-task (was: New Feature)
Parent: SYNCOPE-160
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYNCOPE-136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Francesco Chicchiriccò updated SYNCOPE-136:
---
Description:
Currently, cleartext password is always required when
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYNCOPE-136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Francesco Chicchiriccò updated SYNCOPE-136:
---
Description:
Currently, cleartext password is always required when
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYNCOPE-231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13562732#comment-13562732
]
Hudson commented on SYNCOPE-231:
Integrated in Syncope-trunk #9 (See
Francesco Chicchiriccò created SYNCOPE-290:
--
Summary: Typed SyncopeConf
Key: SYNCOPE-290
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYNCOPE-290
Project: Syncope
Issue Type:
When doing the CXF version of the UserRequestService I found that our
current UserRequestController does not really follow the rest ideas.
The problem is that it does follow the idea of doing CRUD operations on
resources. Some methods work with userId others with requestId. So for
example the are
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYNCOPE-122?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13562800#comment-13562800
]
Hudson commented on SYNCOPE-122:
Integrated in Syncope-trunk #10 (See
Hi all,
I was working on the admin console, saw the commit of revision 1438558,
updated and... completely locked out.
When starting the admin console via mvn -Pdev I have in the logs a long
stacktrace ending with:
Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException: null
at
On 25/01/2013 16:56, Christian Schneider wrote:
When doing the CXF version of the UserRequestService I found that our
current UserRequestController does not really follow the rest ideas.
The problem is that it does follow the idea of doing CRUD operations on
resources. Some methods work with
Hi Christian
On 25/01/13 15:56, Christian Schneider wrote:
When doing the CXF version of the UserRequestService I found that our
current UserRequestController does not really follow the rest ideas.
The problem is that it does follow the idea of doing CRUD operations on
resources. Some methods
On 25.01.2013 17:07, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
On 25/01/2013 16:56, Christian Schneider wrote:
When doing the CXF version of the UserRequestService I found that our
current UserRequestController does not really follow the rest ideas.
The problem is that it does follow the idea of doing
On 25.01.2013 17:11, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
Hi Christian
On 25/01/13 15:56, Christian Schneider wrote:
When doing the CXF version of the UserRequestService I found that our
current UserRequestController does not really follow the rest ideas.
The problem is that it does follow the idea of
On 25/01/13 16:18, Christian Schneider wrote:
On 25.01.2013 17:11, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
Hi Christian
On 25/01/13 15:56, Christian Schneider wrote:
When doing the CXF version of the UserRequestService I found that our
current UserRequestController does not really follow the rest ideas.
The
On 25.01.2013 17:18, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
I also thought about this and if I should rather wait. My change only
affects the new interface. So the old controller stays the same and
stays active. The change should not affect anyone who uses the current
spring based rest interface.
As
On 25/01/2013 17:28, Christian Schneider wrote:
On 25.01.2013 17:18, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
I also thought about this and if I should rather wait. My change only
affects the new interface. So the old controller stays the same and
stays active. The change should not affect anyone who
Hi,
One more topic to discuss:
Currently integration tests run using communication using JSON contentType only.
For new CXF-based tests we are going to run every tests twice: with XML and
JSON [1].
JUnit proposes elegant solution using parameterized tests:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYNCOPE-231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13562831#comment-13562831
]
Hudson commented on SYNCOPE-231:
Integrated in Syncope-trunk #11 (See
On 25/01/2013 17:39, Andrei Shakirin wrote:
Hi,
One more topic to discuss:
Currently integration tests run using communication using JSON contentType only.
For new CXF-based tests we are going to run every tests twice: with XML and
JSON [1].
JUnit proposes elegant solution using parameterized
29 matches
Mail list logo
