Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating

If it passed then it's fine. There have been quite a few that already failed in the first step. Julian Feinauer schrieb am Do., 7. Nov. 2019, 13:36: > Hi Werner, > > for podlings there are two votes. > First the PPMC Vote (where you voted) and then if that passes an IPMC Vote. > The second one

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating

Hi Werner, for podlings there are two votes. First the PPMC Vote (where you voted) and then if that passes an IPMC Vote. The second one is a formally binding vote for an Apache Release. A PPMC Vote alone is not (as its formally not an Apache PMC). Thus, two votes and the second one just finished

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating

I recall I voted on that already Anatole Tresch schrieb am Do., 7. Nov. 2019, 11:53: > Great, thanks to all. > > I assume I will push out everything tomorrow or the WE. I will close the > vote in the next minutes... > > J Anatole > > > Am Do., 7. Nov. 2019 um 08:05 Uhr schrieb Julian Feinauer <

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating

Great, thanks to all. I assume I will push out everything tomorrow or the WE. I will close the vote in the next minutes... J Anatole Am Do., 7. Nov. 2019 um 08:05 Uhr schrieb Julian Feinauer < j.feina...@pragmaticminds.de>: > and release to maven central via nexus : ) > > Julian > > Am

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating

and release to maven central via nexus : ) Julian Am 07.11.19, 06:53 schrieb "P. Ottlinger" : Am 06.11.19 um 08:39 schrieb Julian Feinauer: > Hi, we just got the final 2 IPMC Votes, so you can finally finish of the Release Anatole! @Julian, thanks :-) I did

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating

Am 06.11.19 um 08:39 schrieb Julian Feinauer: > Hi, we just got the final 2 IPMC Votes, so you can finally finish of the > Release Anatole! @Julian, thanks :-) I did not change the board report but this gives us the chance to report something in the next cycle. @Anatole: I'm on a trade

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating

Hi, we just got the final 2 IPMC Votes, so you can finally finish of the Release Anatole! Good job! Julian Am 23.10.19, 09:09 schrieb "Anatole Tresch" : Hi, The Tamaya team was running the needed tasks to get the 0.4-incubating release of Tamaya out. The artifacts

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating-RC5

Hi Anatole, thanks and gratz! As I am IPMC member my vote carries over to the incubator vote, so you can already state in your vote mail my +1 (so only 2 more needed). Best Julian Am 08.10.19, 09:02 schrieb "Anatole Tresch" : I am happy to close thiis vote with an overall YES result, in

[RESULT][VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating-RC5

I am happy to close thiis vote with an overall YES result, in detail: 4 binding +1 votes (PPMC): Julian Feinauer Anatole Tresch Werner Keil Phil Ottlinger 2 non-binding +1 votes: William Lieurance Aaaron Coburn 0 -1 votes. I will open the incubator vote within next days. J Anatole

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating-RC5

Obviously also +1 from my side. Am Mi., 2. Okt. 2019 um 13:40 Uhr schrieb Julian Feinauer < j.feina...@pragmaticminds.de>: > Hi all, > > sorry for being late to the party, my vote is > > +1 (binding, carries over to IPMC Vote also) > > great Job Anatole! > > I checked: > - Hashes and Signature

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating-RC5

Hi all, sorry for being late to the party, my vote is +1 (binding, carries over to IPMC Vote also) great Job Anatole! I checked: - Hashes and Signature is are okay for apicore and extension (now with sha512 and asc) - NOTICE, LICENCE and DISCLAIMER look good - Checked instructions in readme -

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating-RC5

+1 Werner P. Ottlinger schrieb am Mi., 2. Okt. 2019, 07:48: > Am 25.09.19 um 14:41 schrieb Anatole Tresch: > > The tag for this release candidate is available at [3] and [4]. It will > be > > renamed > > once the vote passed. > > Please take a look at the artifacts and vote! > > +1 > > Works

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating-RC5

Am 25.09.19 um 14:41 schrieb Anatole Tresch: > The tag for this release candidate is available at [3] and [4]. It will be > renamed > once the vote passed. > Please take a look at the artifacts and vote! +1 Works fine in my pet project. Cheers, Phil

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating-RC5

From: Aaron Coburn Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2019 11:18 AM To: dev@tamaya.incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating-RC5 +1 I verified the signatures and hashes for API/Core and Extensions artifacts (Note: in the future, you don't

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating-RC4

Ah, thanks fort he clarification, didnt know that.. so I would go with asc and sha512 : ) Am 26.09.19, 01:39 schrieb "Justin Mclean" : Hi, > we use asc for signing and sha256 or 512 is common for checksum, I think. > This is used in many projects and should be fine and up to

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating-RC4

Hi, > we use asc for signing and sha256 or 512 is common for checksum, I think. > This is used in many projects and should be fine and up to date. That correct but you also have sha1 and md5s. > @Justin Mclean or is there any official rule or policy about that? Yes see [1] note the "and SHOULD

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating-RC5

+1 I verified the signatures and hashes for API/Core and Extensions artifacts (Note: in the future, you don't need to include *all of* md5, sha1, sha256 and sha512; just including one of sha512 or sha256 will suffice) The core and ext code builds and all the tests pass. I have some downstream

[VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating-RC5

Hi, I was running the needed tasks to get the 0.4-incubating release of Tamaya out. The artifacts available via the Apache distribution repository [1] and also via Apache's Nexus [2]. The tag for this release candidate is available at [3] and [4]. It will be renamed once the vote passed. Please

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating-RC4

Hi, we use asc for signing and sha256 or 512 is common for checksum, I think. This is used in many projects and should be fine and up to date. @Justin Mclean or is there any official rule or policy about that? Julian Am 25.09.19, 12:49 schrieb "Anatole Tresch" : Found: - .asc

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating-RC4

Found: - .asc for a (ASCII-armored) PGP signature - .md5 for a MD5 checksum - .sha1 for a SHA-1 checksum - .sha256 for a SHA-256 checksum, will be added - .sha512 for a SHA-512 checksum, will be added Am Mi., 25. Sept. 2019 um 12:42 Uhr schrieb Anatole Tresch <

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating-RC4

Does anybody see what are the correct hashes now needed? sha1 and md5 are still there in most projects in https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release Some also have sha512 which I can easily add, I think. What is the exact requirement? J Anatole

[RESULT][VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating-RC4

Since there are still minor issues with some checksums I close this vote with a NO result. Lets go for RC5 and keep fingers crossed! -- *Anatole Tresch* PPMC Member Apache Tamaya JCP Star Spec Lead *Switzerland, Europe Zurich, GMT+1* *maketechsimple.wordpress.com

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating-RC4

Hi , Julian contacted me off-list and asked me to take a look at your release. I suggest you create a checklist for the release (see the one of the incubator wiki page for a good example). I'm about to board a flight and had a chance to take a quick look. I can see only a couple of minor

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating-RC4

Hi all, +1 (binding, carries over to IPMC Vote also) I checked: - Hashes and Signature is are okay for apicore and extension - NOTICE, LICENCE and DISCLAIMER look good - Checked instructions in readme - License headers on source codes look fine - No unexpected binaries - Able to compile both

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating-RC4

Cool, then also +1 from my side. Hope it all works this time? Werner On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 1:06 PM Aaron Coburn wrote: > +1 > > I verified the signatures and hashes for the api/core release as well as > for the extensions. > The code built correctly for me using Java 11 on a Mac: > > $

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating-RC4

+1 I verified the signatures and hashes for the api/core release as well as for the extensions. The code built correctly for me using Java 11 on a Mac: $ java -version java version "11.0.3" 2019-04-16 LTS Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment 18.9 (build 11.0.3+12-LTS) Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server

[VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating-RC4

Hi, I was running the needed tasks to get the 0.4-incubating release of Tamaya out. The artifacts available via the Apache distribution repository [1] and also via Apache's Nexus [2]. The tag for this release candidate is available at [3] and will be renamed once the vote passed. Please take a

[Result][VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating-RC3

I will close this vote again with a NO result, let's do another try - stay tuned and happy ;-) Am Do., 5. Sept. 2019 um 09:35 Uhr schrieb Julian Feinauer < j.feina...@pragmaticminds.de>: > Hi all, > > sorry for the late reply. > I just checked the release. > > Sadly, I have to vote > > -1

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating-RC3

Hi all thanks. Interesting so much things still pop up since it is not our first release, but basically all issues found are good, do lets fix them and bundle another release. I will may clean my complete setup here so definitively no old key is laying around ;-) If all works fine, I can do the

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating-RC3

Hi Phil, Its not a question about what we think.. its about the ASF policy : ) Policy [1] says "Source files consisting of works submitted directly to the ASF by the copyright owner or owner's agent must contain the appropriate ASF license header." Thus, I would prefer to have it in if we

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating-RC3

Am 05.09.19 um 21:00 schrieb Julian Feinauer: > yeah I think we should have another RC... : / Should we exclude bnd files and markdown from RAT scans? I think it does not make sense to pollute the bnd files with license heeaders. Cheers, Phil

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating-RC3

Hi, yeah I think we should have another RC... : / Julian Am 05.09.19, 20:04 schrieb "Werner Keil" : All, Thanks everyone for checking it. I also saw, the link 2) was not working at least not in the way my email client rendered it. However, if there are other more

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating-RC3

Hi all, sorry for the late reply. I just checked the release. Sadly, I have to vote -1 (binding) as the Signatures that were used to sign the artefacts in extensions module are NOT in the keys file and thus cant be checked : / Furthermore, if trying to build apiandcore (as explained in

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating-RC3

Am 28.08.19 um 03:00 schrieb Anatole Tresch: > [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits +1 I played with the core artifacts and checked the homepage changes. Did not look into much detail into sandbox and extensions, but core looks fine. Cheers, Phil

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating-RC3

Thanks Anatole! I will try to check the release later on : ) Julian Am 28.08.19, 03:01 schrieb "Anatole Tresch" : Hi, I was running the needed tasks to get the 0.4-incubating release of Tamaya out. The artifacts available via the Apache distribution repository [1] and

[VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating-RC3

Hi, I was running the needed tasks to get the 0.4-incubating release of Tamaya out. The artifacts available via the Apache distribution repository [1] and also via Apache's Nexus [2]. The tag for this release candidate is available at [3] and will be renamed once the vote passed. Please take a

[RESULT][VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating, RC2

This vote has been closed with no. As mentioned earlier, we have to build a third RC due to outdated certs used. Stay tuned... Am Di., 27. Aug. 2019 um 20:46 Uhr schrieb Aaron Coburn < aaron.cob...@gmail.com>: > Thanks so much for cutting the second release candidate. The source looks > great

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating, RC2

Great, another showstopper - OMG. Well why does not any tool tell me on earth that the key on my windows account is outdated/revoked ... Next time I build things on my Linux box ... Am Di., 27. Aug. 2019 um 20:46 Uhr schrieb Aaron Coburn < aaron.cob...@gmail.com>: > Thanks so much for cutting

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating, RC2

Am 27.08.19 um 20:46 schrieb Aaron Coburn: > (That key is, in fact, older than the one listed in the KEYS file) > > Maybe Julian can advise on whether these are blockers for a release. As the KEYS are supposed to be the way to authenticate artifacts they should be correct .. @Anatole: can

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating, RC2

Thanks so much for cutting the second release candidate. The source looks great (no SNAPSHOT dependencies); I was able to successfully compile and test the code. And I was able to successfully use the CDI and Microprofile extensions in an external project. I'd give a +1, but there are two issues

[VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating, RC2

Hi, I was running the needed tasks to get the 0.4-incubating release of Tamaya out. The artifacts available via the Apache distribution repository [1] and also via Apache's Nexus [2]. The tag for this release candidate is available at [3] and will be renamed once the vote passed. Please take a

[RESULT][VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating

This vote has been closed since there were SNAPSHOT references in some POM files. So I will recreate the release after this has been fixed and restart a new vote (already happened). J Anatole -- *Anatole Tresch* PPMC Member Apache Tamaya JCP Star Spec Lead *Switzerland, Europe Zurich, GMT+1*

[VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating - Vote 02

Hi, I was running the needed tasks to get the 0.4-incubating release of Tamaya out. The artifacts available via the Apache's Nexus [1]. The tag for this release candidate is available at [2] and will be renamed once the vote passed. Please take a look at the artifacts and vote! Please note:

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating

Aaron, thanks very much for these points. The sandbox is not an issue since it is not part of the release. It can be updated after the release separately. Am Mo., 26. Aug. 2019 um 17:37 Uhr schrieb Aaron Coburn < aaron.cob...@gmail.com>: > -1 (non-binding) > > The microprofile extension depends

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating

Thanks for your efforts, Anatole! Am 26.08.19 um 19:22 schrieb Anatole Tresch: > its rather simple. We have to fix it, and rebuild everything. Takes round > about ab hour, so I try to do so later. +1 We must not depend on SNAPSHOTs. Apart from that the vote thread should have a definite end

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating

its rather simple. We have to fix it, and rebuild everything. Takes round about ab hour, so I try to do so later. J Anatole Werner Keil schrieb am Mo., 26. Aug. 2019, 19:06: > Could you point us/Anatole to how it can be addressed? > > Thanks, > > Werner > > > > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 6:08

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating

Could you point us/Anatole to how it can be addressed? Thanks, Werner On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 6:08 PM Aaron Coburn wrote: > The staging repository should be exactly the same as the eventual released > artifacts. You can see in the POM file for the microprofile artifact that > it depends on

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating

The staging repository should be exactly the same as the eventual released artifacts. You can see in the POM file for the microprofile artifact that it depends on a SNAPSHOT API:

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating

Wouldn't it be possible to change from snapshot only once 0.4 is released, or should it work without Snapshot in staging? Aaron Coburn schrieb am Mo., 26. Aug. 2019, 17:37: > -1 (non-binding) > > The microprofile extension depends on the tamaya-api > 0.4-incubating-SNAPSHOT artifact, which will

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating

-1 (non-binding) The microprofile extension depends on the tamaya-api 0.4-incubating-SNAPSHOT artifact, which will cause problems when trying to use that (and that is the artifact I am most interested in using)

[VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating

Hi, I was running the needed tasks to get the 0.4-incubating release of Tamaya out. The artifacts available via the Apache's Nexus [1]. The tag for this release candidate is available at [2] and will be renamed once the vote passed. Please take a look at the artifacts and vote! Please note: