Hi,
Am 19.07.2014 10:02, schrieb Lance Java:
I think having tapestry-ioc and tapestry (the web framework) is a bit
confusing. I also feel that it hinders the promotion / adoption of
tapestry-ioc as a standalone product.
I see your point. I don't really have a strong opinion about that
I don't think it's a good idea to resurrect old software product names,
because you bring with them all the old connotations. To the extent people
know about Hivemind, they think of the product as old, out of date dead.
Also, there were good reasons why Tapestry-IOC was not treated as a
distinct
As discussed, I'm not suggesting to move the project outside of the
tapestry build / release. I'm also not tied to the hivemind name.
I constantly find myself saying tapestry (the web framework) and
tapestry-ioc on the user's list. A rename would help remove this ambiguity.
On 21 Jul 2014 11:42,
On Sat, 19 Jul 2014 05:02:28 -0300, Lance Java lance.j...@googlemail.com
wrote:
I asked this question before I was a committer and generally got good
feedback but it never really went anywhere.
I think having tapestry-ioc and tapestry (the web framework) is a bit
confusing. I also feel that
How's about tapioca as a name suggestion? It has references to tapestry and
ioc. :)
On 21 Jul 2014 14:38, Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo thiag...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, 19 Jul 2014 05:02:28 -0300, Lance Java lance.j...@googlemail.com
wrote:
I asked this question before I was a committer and
Now with structured answers, leaving the explanations for that other
answer I've posted:
On Sat, 19 Jul 2014 05:02:28 -0300, Lance Java lance.j...@googlemail.com
wrote:
So, I have some questions to consider.
1. Do you agree that tapestry-ioc should be renamed?
No, as renames creates
On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 10:46:00 -0300, Lance Java lance.j...@googlemail.com
wrote:
How's about tapioca as a name suggestion? It has references to tapestry
and ioc. :)
That's making me hungry and it's not lunch time here yet! :D
A quick Google search for tapioca framework shows a number of
I think Thiago's summary ... that tapestry-ioc is five years old, so
renaming it will cause more confusion than good, is right on the money. I
would not support a rename.
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 6:51 AM, Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo
thiag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 10:46:00
Ok, I'll have to admit defeat and let the ambiguity continue...
;)
On 21 Jul 2014 17:08, Howard Lewis Ship hls...@gmail.com wrote:
I think Thiago's summary ... that tapestry-ioc is five years old, so
renaming it will cause more confusion than good, is right on the money. I
would not support
I asked this question before I was a committer and generally got good
feedback but it never really went anywhere.
I think having tapestry-ioc and tapestry (the web framework) is a bit
confusing. I also feel that it hinders the promotion / adoption of
tapestry-ioc as a standalone product.
So, I
I use tapestry-ioc in many projects outside of tapestry web framework.
I agree that it should be taken out of the tapestry-web and form its own
project.
On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Lance Java lance.j...@googlemail.com
wrote:
I asked this question before I was a committer and generally
Hi Dimitris, I'm not (at this stage) suggesting to move tapestry-ioc
outside of the tapestry build / release. I'm just suggesting a rename at
the moment and it can live inside the tapestry build, similar to plastic.
On 19 Jul 2014 09:11, Dimitris Zenios dimitris.zen...@gmail.com wrote:
I use
I like the idea of renaming the project.Maybe Hivemind 2 since the original
hivemind is retired as specified by its website.
In the end though if we want greater adoption it should separate its self
from the tapestry build / release
On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Lance Java
13 matches
Mail list logo
