On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 18:57:30 +0100, Ian Dunlop wrote:
> Hello
>
> I think I created a tagged rc2 in GitHub that I was going to use as the
> basis for the release process. I also fixed most of the rc1 issues in it. I
> think one of the problems was the name of the folders inside the file. I
> was
uot;-RC1" in folder name inside (not ideal)
> > > >
> > > > Having RC1 in the folder name seems to agree with the instructions I
> > > follow at
> > >
> >
> https://taverna.incubator.apache.org/community/releasing#uploading-to-dist
gt; >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Ian
> >
> > Sent from Mail for Windows 10
> >
> > From: Ian Dunlop
> > Sent: 04 April 2019 13:40
> > To: dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Taverna Mobile 1.0-incubati
From: Ian Dunlop
> Sent: 04 April 2019 13:40
> To: dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Taverna Mobile 1.0-incubating-RC1
>
> Hello,
>
> @Stian I need a bit of clarification. Why did you say
> -1 "-RC1" in folder name inside (not ideal)
>
9
To: Sagar
Cc: dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org; Stian Soiland-Reyes
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Taverna Mobile 1.0-incubating-RC1
Hello,
Ok so I’m cancelling the current RC1 vote, merging the changes into master and
starting a vote on RC2.
Cheers,
Ian
Sent from Mail for Windows 1
an Soiland-Reyes
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Taverna Mobile 1.0-incubating-RC1
Hello,
Ok so I’m cancelling the current RC1 vote, merging the changes into master and
starting a vote on RC2.
Cheers,
Ian
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: Sagar
Sent: 03 April 2019 16:19
To: Ian Dunl
@taverna.incubator.apache.org; Stian Soiland-Reyes
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Taverna Mobile 1.0-incubating-RC1
Hello
The first answer on
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/42818269/is-gradlew-mandatory-for-travis-ci-to-work/43493907
suggests that you can get travis to create a gradle wrapper
inkId=550986> for
> Windows 10
>
>
>
> *From: *Ian Dunlop
> *Sent: *02 April 2019 18:10
> *To: *Sagar
> *Cc: *dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org; Stian Soiland-Reyes
>
> *Subject: *Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Taverna Mobile 1.0-incubating-RC1
>
>
>
> Hell
merge
back into master and go for RC2 without the binary.
Cheers,
Ian
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: Ian Dunlop
Sent: 02 April 2019 18:10
To: Sagar
Cc: dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org; Stian Soiland-Reyes
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Taverna Mobile 1.0-incubating-RC1
Hello
t;>> do I make the change?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 9:41 PM Ian Dunlop wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> The key fingerprint
t;
>>>> The key fingerprint is the same as listed in the KEYS file. Does that
>>>> mean the key is the same?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Ian
>>>>
>>>> Sent from Mail for Windows 10
>>>>
>
at 9:41 PM Ian Dunlop wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> The key fingerprint is the same as listed in the KEYS file. Does that
>>> mean the key is the same?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Ian
>>>
>>> Sent from Mail
m Mail for Windows 10
>
> From: Stian Soiland-Reyes
> Sent: 01 April 2019 16:43
> To: Ian Dunlop
> Cc: dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Taverna Mobile 1.0-incubating-RC1
>
> You'll also need to update the KEYS file in dist.
>
Taverna Mobile 1.0-incubating-RC1
You'll also need to update the KEYS file in dist.
On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 13:39:40 +0100, Ian Dunlop wrote:
> Hello,
>
> @Sagar don’t forget to give it a +1 on the [VOTE] thread if you think it
> passes all the Apache release criteria. I think I just po
On Fri, 29 Mar 2019 19:38:28 +, Ian Dunlop wrote:
> Please discuss the release of Apache Taverna Mobile 1.0-incubating-RC1 in
> this thread.
As I mentioned in my VOTE there were some files missing ASF headers.
If these files are not made by us then they will need to be
removed/replaced or
You'll also need to update the KEYS file in dist.
On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 13:39:40 +0100, Ian Dunlop wrote:
> Hello,
>
> @Sagar don’t forget to give it a +1 on the [VOTE] thread if you think it
> passes all the Apache release criteria. I think I just posted my VOTE to the
> DISCUSS thread – not
s 10
From: Ian Dunlop
Sent: 29 March 2019 19:41
To: dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Taverna Mobile 1.0-incubating-RC1
Hello,
Sagar noted that the gpg key I used to sign the release had expired. I need to
double check this and update it in the keyser
: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Taverna Mobile 1.0-incubating-RC1
Built successfully. md5 & sha1 checksums all match and also verified the
GPG keys but your key has expired. does it make any issue?
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 9:53 PM Ian Dunlop wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Please discuss the
Hello,
Sagar noted that the gpg key I used to sign the release had expired. I need
to double check this and update it in the keyservers if necessary. I'm not
sure whether it matters or not for the purposes of checking the release but
something to fix for next time.
Cheers,
Ian
On Fri, 29 Mar
Built successfully. md5 & sha1 checksums all match and also verified the
GPG keys but your key has expired. does it make any issue?
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 9:53 PM Ian Dunlop wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Please discuss the release of Apache Taverna Mobile 1.0-incubating-RC1 in
> this thread.
>
>
20 matches
Mail list logo
