To: dev@tika.apache.org dev@tika.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Tika 1.8 or 1.7.1
I just remembered TIKA-1509 and TIKA-1558 -- testing now for blacklist
functionality through TIKA-1509. If that works, I'll back out TIKA-1558.
Tim, I think you should run govdocs from the RC, in case something
++
-Original Message-
From: Tyler Palsulich tpalsul...@gmail.com
Reply-To: dev@tika.apache.org dev@tika.apache.org
Date: Monday, March 30, 2015 at 3:22 PM
To: dev@tika.apache.org dev@tika.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Tika 1.8 or 1.7.1
I just remembered TIKA
. [mailto:talli...@mitre.org]
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 7:03 AM
To: dev@tika.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Tika 1.8 or 1.7.1
Unless there are objections, I'd like these to be resolved before 1.8:
TIKA-1584 -- I'll fix
TIKA-1575 -- Resolved by Konstantin Gribov (thank you!)
TIKA-1512 -- I'll
: Tyler Palsulich [mailto:tpalsul...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 29, 2015 9:13 AM
To: dev@tika.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Tika 1.8 or 1.7.1
Once TIKA-1584 and TIKA-1575 are resolved, I'll work up an RC (unless
something else pops up).
Thank you everyone.
Tyler
On Mar 29, 2015 4:43 AM, Hong
-Original Message-
From: Allison, Timothy B. [mailto:talli...@mitre.org]
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 7:03 AM
To: dev@tika.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Tika 1.8 or 1.7.1
Unless there are objections, I'd like these to be resolved before 1.8:
TIKA-1584 -- I'll fix
TIKA-1575 -- Resolved
Once TIKA-1584 and TIKA-1575 are resolved, I'll work up an RC (unless
something else pops up).
Thank you everyone.
Tyler
On Mar 29, 2015 4:43 AM, Hong-Thai Nguyen thaicha...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 for 1.8
Hong-Thai
On 28 Mar 2015, at 16:01, Tyler Palsulich tpalsul...@apache.org wrote:
Hi
+1 for 1.8
On 28 Mar 2015, at 15:01, Tyler Palsulich tpalsul...@apache.org wrote:
Should we release this as 1.8 or 1.7.1?
+1 for 1.8 release.
On 29 Mar 2015 02:04, Konstantin Gribov gros...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, I think, we should resolve TIKA-1575 (upgrade to pdfbox 1.8.9) since
pdfbox 1.8.8 hangs on some pdf forms.
--
Best regards,
Konstantin Gribov
сб, 28 марта 2015 г. в 23:22, Konstantin Gribov
+1 for 1.8
Hong-Thai
On 28 Mar 2015, at 16:01, Tyler Palsulich tpalsul...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Folks,
Now that TIKA-1581 (JHighlight licensing issues) is resolved, we need to
release a new version of Tika. I'll volunteer to be the release manager
again.
Should we release this as 1.8
Also, I think, we should resolve TIKA-1575 (upgrade to pdfbox 1.8.9) since
pdfbox 1.8.8 hangs on some pdf forms.
--
Best regards,
Konstantin Gribov
сб, 28 марта 2015 г. в 23:22, Konstantin Gribov gros...@gmail.com:
+1 to releasing 1.8.
--
Best regards,
Konstantin Gribov
сб, 28 марта
!
From: Mattmann, Chris A (3980) chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov
Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2015 11:41 AM
To: dev@tika.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Tika 1.8 or 1.7.1
Hi Tyler - I would VOTE for 1.8. Given the stuff associated
with releasing (updating the website; sending emails
I'm also leaning toward 1.8. Especially given the newly identified
regression in TIKA-1584.
Tyler
On Mar 28, 2015 11:47 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Hi Tyler - I would VOTE for 1.8. Given the stuff associated
with releasing (updating the website; sending
Given how recently we did a 1.7 release, my vote would be for 1.7.1
And to keep this release as simple as possible, just cherry-pick the fix for
TIKA-1581 into the 1.7 code base.
-- Ken
From: Tyler Palsulich
Sent: March 28, 2015 8:01:03am PDT
To: dev@tika.apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSS] Tika
Hi Tyler - I would VOTE for 1.8. Given the stuff associated
with releasing (updating the website; sending emails; waiting
periods, etc.) let’s ship all the updates we have too along
with the jhighlight fix.
Cheers,
Chris
++
Chris
14 matches
Mail list logo
