Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/548
VOTE +1.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user okram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/548#discussion_r98931140
--- Diff:
gremlin-core/src/main/java/org/apache/tinkerpop/gremlin/process/traversal/step/map/GraphStep.java
---
@@ -164,13 +164,13 @@ public int hashCode
Github user okram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/548#discussion_r98930854
--- Diff:
gremlin-core/src/main/java/org/apache/tinkerpop/gremlin/process/traversal/step/map/FlatMapStep.java
---
@@ -44,6 +45,7 @@ public FlatMapStep
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/551
VOTE +1.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/553
VOTE +1.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/546
I just tested the `PathRetractionStrategy` code in the GraphActors branch
and the `akka-gremlin/` test suite passes.
*** Sidenote: can you finalize your variables if possible?
VOTE
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/548
Yes. That makes sense to me.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
GitHub user okram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/549
TINKERPOP-1617: Create a SingleIterationStrategy which will do its best to
rewrite OLAP traversals to not message pass.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1617
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/546
So the problem I was having was related to the interplay between
`PathRetractionStrategy` and `MatchPredicateStrategy`. You can't have
`PathRetractionStrategy` without `MatchPredicateStrategy
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/537
Actually, can you add a test case for this so we know it doesn't break
again in the future?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/539
Just realized that the `GroupStep` work fixed:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1261
```
gremlin> m = ["marko":['blah']]
==>marko=[b
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/538
So `MultiComparator` is internal to a `Traversal`. The way in which
GraphSON serializes traversals is via their Bytecode. Thus, when the bytecode
gets recompiled on the deserializing end
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/539
```
[INFO]
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
[INFO
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/538
```
[INFO]
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
[INFO
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/539
Whoa. Because I branched from `master/` the rebase looked insane
nevermind. I will twiddle to `tp32/` upon merge.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
GitHub user okram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/539
TINKERPOP-1606: Refactor GroupStep to not have the reduction traversal
included in its BiOperator.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1606
This is huge. With this PR
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/538
Decided to not touch `GroupStep` till the next release as it is more
complicated to handle than `OrderGlobalStep` and `SampleGlobalStep`. Thus, for
this PR:
VOTE +1.
---
If your project
GitHub user okram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/538
TINKERPOP-1248: OrderGlobalStep should use local star graph to compute
sorts, prior to reduction.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1248
We now support having the projected
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/535
This is not the way that this should be done. We shouldn't remove any
strategies. What we should do is generalize the `ProfileTests` so they are not
so specific about step indexes and the like
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/531
VOTE +1.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/535
I was thinking more about this specific problem. The real problem is
`ProfileTest`, not `LazyBarrierStrategy`. We need to generalize all the
`ProfileTest` test cases such that they not be concerned
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/535
There are numerous areas where `is.testing` is used for strategies. We
shouldn't just do this for one of them and push a PR. We should overhaul the
entire system so we don't have some parts
Github user okram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/531#discussion_r95562174
--- Diff: docs/src/recipes/appendix.asciidoc ---
@@ -0,0 +1,226 @@
+
+Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
Github user okram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/531#discussion_r95563597
--- Diff: docs/src/recipes/appendix.asciidoc ---
@@ -0,0 +1,226 @@
+
+Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
Github user okram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/531#discussion_r95565322
--- Diff: docs/src/recipes/duplicate-edge.asciidoc ---
@@ -0,0 +1,142 @@
+
+Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/529
VOTE +1.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
GitHub user okram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/530
TINKERPOP-1531:
DedupTest.g_V_asXaX_repeatXbothX_timesX3X_emit_asXbX_group_byXselectXaXX_byXselectXbX_dedup_order_byXidX_foldX_selectXvaluesX_unfold_dedup
assumes id implements Comparable
https
Github user okram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/529#discussion_r95350852
--- Diff:
gremlin-groovy-test/src/main/groovy/org/apache/tinkerpop/gremlin/process/traversal/step/filter/GroovyRangeTest.groovy
---
@@ -108,5 +108,15
Github user okram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/529#discussion_r95351351
--- Diff:
gremlin-core/src/main/java/org/apache/tinkerpop/gremlin/process/traversal/dsl/graph/__.java
---
@@ -810,6 +810,20 @@ protected
Github user okram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/529#discussion_r95351178
--- Diff: docs/src/reference/the-traversal.asciidoc ---
@@ -1916,6 +1916,35 @@ g.V(1).both().both().simplePath()
g.V(1).both().both().simplePath().path
GitHub user okram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/528
TINKERPOP-1116: Some anonymous traversal steps can be hard typed.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1116
Tweaked the typing of various `__` anonymous traversal steps
GitHub user okram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/527
TINKERPOP-1521: Mutating steps don't recognize side-effects
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1521
`AddVertexStartStep` was using an `EmptyTraverser` to compute
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/526
VOTE +1.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/525
VOTE +1.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user okram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/524#discussion_r95010996
--- Diff:
spark-gremlin/src/test/java/org/apache/tinkerpop/gremlin/spark/process/computer/traversal/strategy/optimization/SparkInterceptorStrategyTest.java
Github user okram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/524#discussion_r95001231
--- Diff:
spark-gremlin/src/test/java/org/apache/tinkerpop/gremlin/spark/process/computer/traversal/strategy/optimization/SparkInterceptorStrategyTest.java
Github user okram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/524#discussion_r95000938
--- Diff:
gremlin-core/src/main/java/org/apache/tinkerpop/gremlin/process/traversal/step/filter/DedupGlobalStep.java
---
@@ -89,6 +92,17 @@ public
GitHub user okram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/524
TINKERPOP-1585 & TINKERPOP-1590: DedupGlobalStep and Distributed
TinkerMemory
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1585
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-
GitHub user okram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/522
TINKERPOP-1588: Added Terminal Steps section to the docs
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1588
Added a "Terminal Steps" section to the documentation that include
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/521
VOTE +1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/515
VOTE +1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user okram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/521#discussion_r94776952
--- Diff:
gremlin-core/src/main/java/org/apache/tinkerpop/gremlin/process/traversal/Traversal.java
---
@@ -254,9 +254,14 @@ public default void
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/520
VOTE +1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/521
Nice. Clean backwards compatible `GraphStep.close()` method which uses
`instanceof`.
Are you looking for a VOTE now or are you still building on this PR? --
e.g. integrating
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/520
First off, thank you for doing this -- what an undertaking. Getting I/O
solid for 3.3.0 is crucial given the versioning push and the desired
serialization changes for GLVs. Before officially voting
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/486
This is a good find. However, the implementation is a bit gimpy.
`Step.getRequirements()` is already a recursive process as
`TraversalParents` will check their children for requirements. I
Github user okram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/506#discussion_r94413881
--- Diff: CHANGELOG.asciidoc ---
@@ -46,6 +46,10 @@ TinkerPop 3.3.0 (Release Date: NOT OFFICIALLY RELEASED
YET)
* Removed all performance tests
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/518
Yea, I would put the null check into `ElementHelper.areEqual()` so all
providers have the same semantics. Then I would add a structure test to
verifies that null is okay for `equals()` for every
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/516
VOTE +1.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/478
VOTE +1.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/510
VOTE +1.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user okram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/510#discussion_r91200131
--- Diff:
hadoop-gremlin/src/main/java/org/apache/tinkerpop/gremlin/hadoop/jsr223/HadoopGremlinPlugin.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,153 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/509
Sorry. I thought we had 3 VOTEs and I merged. I just asked @dkuppitz to
VOTE.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/511
This is great. We should really be diligent to keep growing the tests here.
As our strategies get more complex (and are working in recursive fashions) we
really need to have complex, nasty nested
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/509
I would actually remove `start()` from static imports. Its never used as
its more of a "helper method" and then less chance for naming collisions.
---
If your project is set up for i
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/509
Perfect. VOTE +1.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/507
I know it sucks. I don't like this any more than you do. Here is the saving
grace -- if someone comes up with a better solution, there are only two classes
we need to tweak (`Bytecode
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/509
In Gremlin-Java, those methods do the following:
```
public static GraphTraversal<A, A> start() {
return new DefaultGraphTraversal<>();
}
GitHub user okram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/506
TINKERPOP-1389: Support Spark 2.0.0
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1389
This was a crazy rollercoaster ride, but we now have three good things:
1. A more
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/494
I would ignore sub-packages right now. Again, lets start off small, get
things passing, and over time, add more packages to check.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user okram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/446#discussion_r89875249
--- Diff:
gremlin-test/src/main/java/org/apache/tinkerpop/gremlin/process/traversal/step/map/ValueMapTest.java
---
@@ -125,6 +131,30 @@ public void
Github user okram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/446#discussion_r89875173
--- Diff:
gremlin-groovy-test/src/main/groovy/org/apache/tinkerpop/gremlin/process/traversal/step/map/GroovyValueMapTest.groovy
---
@@ -42,5 +42,10
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/446
I just realized that `valueMap()` is `Map<String,Object>`, but
`valueMap(boolean)` is `Map<Object,Object>`. We should maintain that level of
explicitness as I suspect in the futu
Github user okram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/446#discussion_r89863961
--- Diff: CHANGELOG.asciidoc ---
@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ TinkerPop 3.3.0 (Release Date: NOT OFFICIALLY RELEASED
YET)
* Removed `tryRandomCommit()` from
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/446
@dkuppitz -- will you handle merge and thus, do the CHANGELOG and update
the upgrade docs on merge?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/505
I have no way of checking Python 3.x, but note that everything is good for
Python 2.x.
```
[INFO]
[INFO
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/446
Yea, `Map<Object,Object>` is the thing. :| ... I really don't like
`valueMap()`. For this reason and for the `boolean` argument overload ...
fuggly.
VOTE +1.
---
If your project
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/494
I think we should start this merge off by having only the following
packages be analyzed:
```
org.apache.tinkerpop.gremlin.structure
org.apache.tinkerpop.gremlin.structure.io
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/499
You are a bad person @dkuppitz.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/499
Integration tests ran against `master/` (the new target branch).
```
[INFO]
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
[INFO
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/499
No GraphSON will change in this branch but we will solve TINKERPOP-1562 in
the same release as this branch. Thus, this branch is like a "half-ticket" with
TINKERPOP-1562's comple
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/499
This ticket doesn't address a "bug" as much as a consistency issue. The
primary issue is that Bytecode and GraphTraversal are not in one-to-one
correspondence. You get the sa
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/499
Another thing we can do that I think would be best is target this to
`master/`. Why?
1. There are changes to Gryo we will need to make so ensure
"attach-ability."
2. This giv
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/499
@spmallette --- we simply can't abandon the GraphSON 2.0 changes I made
cause we need to be able to "attach properties" (vertex properties and element
properties). However, there are
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/499
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1565
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/499
Talking with @spmallette. There are lots of issues with GraphSON 2.0 that
both you and I notice. Lets do this. Lets get this ticket merged as there are
lots of other work in here and start up a new
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/499
Please put it in a form like:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/blob/e09309c1210ad5d7d5f33440d4d8d1470bd3f0e2/docs/src/dev/io/graphson.asciidoc
.. What you mean by "data" doesn't make s
Github user okram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/499#discussion_r89010633
--- Diff:
gremlin-core/src/main/java/org/apache/tinkerpop/gremlin/structure/io/graphson/GraphSONSerializersV2d0.java
---
@@ -153,13 +152,16 @@ public void
Github user okram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/499#discussion_r89010296
--- Diff:
gremlin-core/src/main/java/org/apache/tinkerpop/gremlin/structure/io/graphson/GraphSONSerializersV2d0.java
---
@@ -459,9 +486,33 @@ public
Github user okram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/499#discussion_r88915459
--- Diff:
gremlin-core/src/main/java/org/apache/tinkerpop/gremlin/structure/io/graphson/GraphSONSerializersV2d0.java
---
@@ -175,8 +177,30 @@ public
Github user okram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/499#discussion_r88914949
--- Diff:
gremlin-core/src/main/java/org/apache/tinkerpop/gremlin/structure/io/graphson/GraphSONSerializersV2d0.java
---
@@ -175,8 +177,30 @@ public
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/501
Can you please make corresponding JIRA tickets and use the PR naming
convention for your PRs? Also, this PR will need documentation as well as an
update to the CHANGELOG. Finally, I don't know why
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/499
Yea. I will do the upgrade and io docs. Integration testing Giraph is
running right now :| ... once that completes, I will push doc updates.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user okram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/499#discussion_r88708851
--- Diff:
gremlin-groovy/src/main/java/org/apache/tinkerpop/gremlin/groovy/jsr223/GroovyTranslator.java
---
@@ -47,8 +49,6 @@
*/
public final
Github user okram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/499#discussion_r88708033
--- Diff:
gremlin-core/src/test/java/org/apache/tinkerpop/gremlin/process/traversal/dsl/graph/GraphTraversalTest.java
---
@@ -71,4 +80,89 @@ public void
Github user okram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/499#discussion_r88707852
--- Diff: CHANGELOG.asciidoc ---
@@ -26,6 +26,12 @@
image::https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apache/tinkerpop/master/docs/static/ima
TinkerPop 3.2.4
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/499
Oh -- and I forgot. Gremlin-Python now has serializers for Vertex, Edge,
Property, VertexProperty... Thus, you can `g.V(v[1])` from Gremlin-Python to
Gremlin-Java.
---
If your project is set up
GitHub user okram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/499
TINKERPOP-1520: Difference between 'has' step generated graphson2.0 in java
and python glv implementation
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1520
This branch has done alot
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/498
Question -- I don't use docker. Does this "just work" with standard `mvn
clean install`? If not, can we make it default?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this emai
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/490
Dah. I didn't see this ticket. I'm doing this (along with other things) in
TINKERPOP-1520. Hmm... perhaps you can provide a PR to that branch ... In
particular your test cases.
---
If your
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/485
I do like `Traversal.metadata()`. However, I think that metadata should be
stored at the root traversal only. Thus, its a global blackboard. Next, given
that its an `Admin` method, it should just
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/485
```
gremlin> g.V().barrier().store('a').sideEffect(select('a')).explain()
==>Traversal Expla
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/494
I think we will need to decide what is considered NOT subject to change and
what is subject to change. For example, the `ImmutablePath` method changes are
internal changes that are "okay.&quo
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/495
We could. However, its such a rare situation too much
optimization?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
GitHub user okram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/495
TINKERPOP-1502 & TINKERPOP-1482: Chained has-containers and AndP stringency
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1502
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/493
VOTE +1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/491
VOTE +1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user okram closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/482
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/492
VOTE +1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/485
Thats fine, just assume that `sideEffect(access a)` is never "the final."
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as wel
201 - 300 of 450 matches
Mail list logo
