[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1447?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16312251#comment-16312251
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1447:
---
Github user spmallette commente
Github user spmallette commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/766
i deleted both when i did it, but i didn't rebuild from master - i built
from this branch i guess
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1844?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16312234#comment-16312234
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1844:
---
Github user davebshow commented
Github user davebshow commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/769
VOTE +1
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1447?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16312230#comment-16312230
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1447:
---
Github user robertdale commente
Github user robertdale commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/766
Hmm.. there doesn't seem to be much difference. Are you deleting both the
hadoop and base images?
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1447?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=1631#comment-1631
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1447:
---
Github user robertdale commente
Github user robertdale commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/766
Try rebuilding the docker images using master.
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1447?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16312209#comment-16312209
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1447:
---
Github user spmallette commente
Github user spmallette commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/766
I saw some problems using docker above to generate docsis that still an
issue? I'm getting this:
```text
* source: /usr/src/tinkerpop/docs/src/reference/gremlin-variants.asci
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1844?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16311872#comment-16311872
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1844:
---
Github user dkuppitz commented
Github user dkuppitz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/769
VOTE: +1
---
GitHub user PBGraff opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/770
TINKERPOP-1862 TinkerMessenger proper handling of Direction.BOTH
This PR presents a fix for `TinkerMessenger` that handled `Direction.BOTH`
by identifying the `Vertex` that is not the one receivi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1862?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16311831#comment-16311831
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1862:
---
GitHub user PBGraff opened a pu
I've been trying to figure out why the GLV test suite won't pass for
gremlin-python in GraphSON 3.0 on this issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1844
The answer turns out to be related to the g:Set. Numbers of mixed types
returned from a Set in java aren't recognized as distinct
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1844?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16311591#comment-16311591
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1844:
---
GitHub user spmallette opened a
GitHub user spmallette opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/769
TINKERPOP-1844 Default GraphSON 3.0 for GLV tests in gremlin-python
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1844
This is a breaking change because `g:Set` no longer returns a `
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1858?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16311544#comment-16311544
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1858:
---
Github user spmallette commente
Github user spmallette commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/767
Ok - thanks for your thoughts. I can't say we have a release date for 3.3.2
in mind yet. I'd say it was a couple of months away at least based on how we
typically do releases.
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1861?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16311541#comment-16311541
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1861:
---
Github user PBGraff commented o
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1858?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16311540#comment-16311540
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1858:
---
Github user robertdale commente
Github user PBGraff commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/768
@spmallette We can apply this to the TP 3.2.x line as well. Should I modify
the PR to apply to the tp32 branch instead?
---
Github user robertdale commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/767
VOTE +1
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1858?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16311536#comment-16311536
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1858:
---
Github user krlohnes commented
Github user krlohnes commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/767
@spmallette As far as criticality, that's fairly dependent on the usage of
custom authentication handlers in the wild. It's not impacting my current work
or any of the work I did at IBM Compose r
Github user spmallette commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/695#discussion_r159677279
--- Diff: gremlin-javascript/pom.xml ---
@@ -0,0 +1,366 @@
+
+http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0";
+ xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/200
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16311484#comment-16311484
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1489:
---
Github user spmallette commente
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16311469#comment-16311469
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1489:
---
Github user spmallette commente
Github user spmallette commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/695#discussion_r159676150
--- Diff: gremlin-javascript/pom.xml ---
@@ -0,0 +1,366 @@
+
+http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0";
+ xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/200
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16311465#comment-16311465
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1489:
---
Github user spmallette commente
Github user spmallette commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/695#discussion_r159675592
--- Diff: gremlin-javascript/pom.xml ---
@@ -0,0 +1,366 @@
+
+http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0";
+ xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/200
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16311459#comment-16311459
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1489:
---
Github user spmallette commente
Github user spmallette commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/695#discussion_r159674939
--- Diff:
gremlin-javascript/src/main/javascript/gremlin-javascript/package.json ---
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+{
+ "name": "gremlin-javascript",
+
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1858?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16311446#comment-16311446
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1858:
---
Github user spmallette commente
Github user spmallette commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/767
a bad merge - thanks. how bad/critical do you rate this problem?
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-781?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stephen mallette closed TINKERPOP-781.
--
Resolution: Won't Do
I think that this issue is well past scope at this point given i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1858?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16311433#comment-16311433
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1858:
---
Github user krlohnes commented
Github user krlohnes commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/767
@spmallette Yeah, it looks like it happened with the `Merge branch TP32`
commit. If you look
[here](https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/commit/960fdc11399590280522189b08727e90cd9b629a#diff-822877
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1844?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stephen mallette updated TINKERPOP-1844:
Labels: breaking (was: )
> Python GLV test should run for GraphSON 3.0
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1858?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16311310#comment-16311310
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1858:
---
Github user spmallette commente
Github user spmallette commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/767
Hi @krlohnes - thanks for this. Did you happen to research the point where
this regression occurred?
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1844?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16311307#comment-16311307
]
stephen mallette commented on TINKERPOP-1844:
-
Yes - I opted to begin atte
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1861?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16311285#comment-16311285
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1861:
---
Github user spmallette commente
Github user spmallette commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/768
Please rename the pull request to be prefixed by the JIRA number:
TINKERPOP-1861 (that way it will tie into the JIRA integration)
Also, is there any reason to not deprecate this back al
Github user robertdale commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/768
I don't think we should break the interface. I think these should be new
methods and `@deprecate` the old ones. The old methods can call the new methods.
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16311187#comment-16311187
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1489:
---
Github user jorgebay commented
Github user jorgebay commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/695
What a great time of the year to review this pr! ð
---
47 matches
Mail list logo
