Hi Mladen,
Mladen Turk wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi,
I want to find out how to correctly fix BZ 41430 and 36121. They have
to do with the way mod_dir and mod_jk interact. Before fixing the code
I find it necessary to define the correct behaviour, which seems to be
non-trivial.
It is
Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi Mladen,
Things like DirectoryIndex are completely
useless and further more breaks the security,
because the Tomcat must serve the default content.
I simply don't understand, what this means functionally, i.e. how
DirectoryIndex and ForwardDirectories should work with
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41493.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41496.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41337.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41337.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
I want to find out how to correctly fix BZ 41430 and 36121. They have to
do with the way mod_dir and mod_jk interact. Before fixing the code I
find it necessary to define the correct behaviour, which seems to be
non-trivial.
The behaviour needs to be described depending on
Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
Finally, it seems to me that mod_jk doesn't map a request to tomcat as a sub-request, but
instead seems to tweek the req-main field, which may probably create the kind of
problems reported in BZ 36121. I'm not an expert of the apache req structure nor of the
mod_jk
From: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
Finally, it seems to me that mod_jk doesn't map a request to
tomcat as a sub-request, but instead seems to tweek the req-main
field, which may probably create the kind of problems reported in
BZ 36121. I'm not an
Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
Any other 'better' integration would probably require patching
Apache core, and thats IMHO unfeasible by majority of users.
Which one? Checking the 404 response? If mod_jk adopts sub-requests to Tomcat,
why should Apache get patched?
Or if you mean the JkMount
Author: rjung
Date: Tue Jan 30 06:03:46 2007
New Revision: 501400
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=501400
Log:
Dropped misleading documentation remark on connection_pool_minsize.
Modified:
tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/xdocs/reference/workers.xml
Modified:
Look, I don't wish to go into discussion with you, because
you obviously already have your perspective (IMHO wrong).
?!?! Well, of corse I have mine...
Static content delivery by Apache requires thorough application
design so that it can be served outside the application itself.
No,
Hi,
+1 vote for that.
I'm desperately waiting for the fix on the setHeader(name, null) regression
(cannot clear 1 header as before by calling httpresponse.setHeader(name, null)).
IMHO, it is due, last version was september 30th...!
Thanks.
I think we agree, that DirectoryIndex should not replace the
welcome-file list on the Tomcat side.
This means at least: if non of the entries in the DirectoryIndex list is
visible by Apache, it should not try to prepend any of them to the URL
and send to Tomcat, even if this would match a
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41491.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41337.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41498.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40719.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Hi,
I think it would be a good idea early next week (possibly late monday)
to do a new build and integrate the client cert fix I did a little bit
earlier. I have seen a possible fix to do for NIO as well (41466).
Comments ?
Ok, is it ok to create a new tag tomorrow
+1
On 1/30/07, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Hi,
I think it would be a good idea early next week (possibly late monday)
to do a new build and integrate the client cert fix I did a little bit
earlier. I have seen a possible fix to do for NIO as well (41466).
Hi,
On 1/30/07, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, is it ok to create a new tag tomorrow evening ?
+1
Yoav
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
yes
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Hi,
I think it would be a good idea early next week (possibly late
monday) to do a new build and integrate the client cert fix I did a
little bit earlier. I have seen a possible fix to do for NIO as well
(41466).
Comments ?
Ok, is it ok
Quartz wrote:
Hi,
+1 vote for that.
I'm desperately waiting for the fix on the setHeader(name, null) regression
(cannot clear 1 header as before by calling httpresponse.setHeader(name, null)).
IMHO, it is due, last version was september 30th...!
thanks for your opinion :)
we'll get the
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38372.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39967.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=131.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=131.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28039.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29494.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41491.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41498.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Hi,
I think it would be a good idea early next week (possibly late monday)
to do a new build and integrate the client cert fix I did a little bit
earlier. I have seen a possible fix to do for NIO as well (41466).
Comments ?
Ok, is it ok to
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39967.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39967.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=131.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=131.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Sorry for the noise. Some muppet has been randomly editing bugs. I
believe I have corrected all their changes. I'll ping infra to let
them know in case the damage has been more wide spread.
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29494.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29494.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41502.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
40 matches
Mail list logo