Re: Discussion mod_jk and mod_dir interaction

2007-01-30 Thread Rainer Jung
Hi Mladen, Mladen Turk wrote: Rainer Jung wrote: Hi, I want to find out how to correctly fix BZ 41430 and 36121. They have to do with the way mod_dir and mod_jk interact. Before fixing the code I find it necessary to define the correct behaviour, which seems to be non-trivial. It is

Re: Discussion mod_jk and mod_dir interaction

2007-01-30 Thread Mladen Turk
Rainer Jung wrote: Hi Mladen, Things like DirectoryIndex are completely useless and further more breaks the security, because the Tomcat must serve the default content. I simply don't understand, what this means functionally, i.e. how DirectoryIndex and ForwardDirectories should work with

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41493] - odd characters in admin webapp, inconfigurable connectors

2007-01-30 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41493. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41496] New: - set a security provider for jsse in a connector configuration in server.xml

2007-01-30 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41496. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41337] - Display an error page if no cert is available on CLIENT-CERT login

2007-01-30 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41337. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41337] - Display an error page if no cert is available on CLIENT-CERT login

2007-01-30 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41337. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

RE: Discussion mod_jk and mod_dir interaction

2007-01-30 Thread Giampaolo Tomassoni
Hi, I want to find out how to correctly fix BZ 41430 and 36121. They have to do with the way mod_dir and mod_jk interact. Before fixing the code I find it necessary to define the correct behaviour, which seems to be non-trivial. The behaviour needs to be described depending on

Re: Discussion mod_jk and mod_dir interaction

2007-01-30 Thread Mladen Turk
Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote: Finally, it seems to me that mod_jk doesn't map a request to tomcat as a sub-request, but instead seems to tweek the req-main field, which may probably create the kind of problems reported in BZ 36121. I'm not an expert of the apache req structure nor of the mod_jk

RE: Discussion mod_jk and mod_dir interaction

2007-01-30 Thread Giampaolo Tomassoni
From: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote: Finally, it seems to me that mod_jk doesn't map a request to tomcat as a sub-request, but instead seems to tweek the req-main field, which may probably create the kind of problems reported in BZ 36121. I'm not an

Re: Discussion mod_jk and mod_dir interaction

2007-01-30 Thread Mladen Turk
Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote: Any other 'better' integration would probably require patching Apache core, and thats IMHO unfeasible by majority of users. Which one? Checking the 404 response? If mod_jk adopts sub-requests to Tomcat, why should Apache get patched? Or if you mean the JkMount

svn commit: r501400 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/xdocs/reference/workers.xml

2007-01-30 Thread rjung
Author: rjung Date: Tue Jan 30 06:03:46 2007 New Revision: 501400 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=501400 Log: Dropped misleading documentation remark on connection_pool_minsize. Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/xdocs/reference/workers.xml Modified:

RE: Discussion mod_jk and mod_dir interaction

2007-01-30 Thread Giampaolo Tomassoni
Look, I don't wish to go into discussion with you, because you obviously already have your perspective (IMHO wrong). ?!?! Well, of corse I have mine... Static content delivery by Apache requires thorough application design so that it can be served outside the application itself. No,

Re: 5.5.21?

2007-01-30 Thread Quartz
Hi, +1 vote for that. I'm desperately waiting for the fix on the setHeader(name, null) regression (cannot clear 1 header as before by calling httpresponse.setHeader(name, null)). IMHO, it is due, last version was september 30th...! Thanks.

Re: Discussion mod_jk and mod_dir interaction

2007-01-30 Thread Rainer Jung
I think we agree, that DirectoryIndex should not replace the welcome-file list on the Tomcat side. This means at least: if non of the entries in the DirectoryIndex list is visible by Apache, it should not try to prepend any of them to the URL and send to Tomcat, even if this would match a

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41491] - javascript error when I use tomcat 4.1.29 and working fime with tomcat 4.03

2007-01-30 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41491. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41337] - Display an error page if no cert is available on CLIENT-CERT login

2007-01-30 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41337. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41498] New: - allRolesMode Realm configuration option not documented

2007-01-30 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41498. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40719] - Tomcat 5.5.20 Internal error/crash

2007-01-30 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40719. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: New 6.0.x build

2007-01-30 Thread Remy Maucherat
Remy Maucherat wrote: Hi, I think it would be a good idea early next week (possibly late monday) to do a new build and integrate the client cert fix I did a little bit earlier. I have seen a possible fix to do for NIO as well (41466). Comments ? Ok, is it ok to create a new tag tomorrow

Re: New 6.0.x build

2007-01-30 Thread Martin Dubuc
+1 On 1/30/07, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: Hi, I think it would be a good idea early next week (possibly late monday) to do a new build and integrate the client cert fix I did a little bit earlier. I have seen a possible fix to do for NIO as well (41466).

Re: New 6.0.x build

2007-01-30 Thread Yoav Shapira
Hi, On 1/30/07, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, is it ok to create a new tag tomorrow evening ? +1 Yoav - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: New 6.0.x build

2007-01-30 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
yes Remy Maucherat wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: Hi, I think it would be a good idea early next week (possibly late monday) to do a new build and integrate the client cert fix I did a little bit earlier. I have seen a possible fix to do for NIO as well (41466). Comments ? Ok, is it ok

Re: 5.5.21?

2007-01-30 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
Quartz wrote: Hi, +1 vote for that. I'm desperately waiting for the fix on the setHeader(name, null) regression (cannot clear 1 header as before by calling httpresponse.setHeader(name, null)). IMHO, it is due, last version was september 30th...! thanks for your opinion :) we'll get the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38372] - tcnative-1.dll response overflow corruption, partial pages

2007-01-30 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38372. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39967] - mod_jk gives segmentation fault when apache is started as root

2007-01-30 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39967. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 131] - Session.invalidate() is not work properly. BugRat Report#146

2007-01-30 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=131. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 131] - Session.invalidate() is not work properly. BugRat Report#146

2007-01-30 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=131. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28039] - Cluster Support for SingleSignOn

2007-01-30 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28039. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29494] - No way to set PATH when running as a service on Windows

2007-01-30 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29494. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41491] - javascript error when I use tomcat 4.1.29 and working fime with tomcat 4.03

2007-01-30 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41491. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41498] - allRolesMode Realm configuration option not documented

2007-01-30 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41498. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: New 6.0.x build

2007-01-30 Thread Mark Thomas
Remy Maucherat wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: Hi, I think it would be a good idea early next week (possibly late monday) to do a new build and integrate the client cert fix I did a little bit earlier. I have seen a possible fix to do for NIO as well (41466). Comments ? Ok, is it ok to

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39967] - mod_jk gives segmentation fault when apache is started as root

2007-01-30 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39967. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39967] - mod_jk gives segmentation fault when apache is started as root

2007-01-30 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39967. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 131] - Session.invalidate() is not work properly. BugRat Report#146

2007-01-30 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=131. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 131] - Session.invalidate() is not work properly. BugRat Report#146

2007-01-30 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=131. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Bugzilla noise

2007-01-30 Thread Mark Thomas
Sorry for the noise. Some muppet has been randomly editing bugs. I believe I have corrected all their changes. I'll ping infra to let them know in case the damage has been more wide spread. Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29494] - No way to set PATH when running as a service on Windows

2007-01-30 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29494. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29494] - No way to set PATH when running as a service on Windows

2007-01-30 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29494. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41502] New: - WebappClassLoader concurrency problem defining packages

2007-01-30 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41502. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.