Re: New connector sandbox

2011-04-27 Thread Henri Gomez
Now that HTTP connector is as fast as AJP connector, is it still required ? Ie, is there any mod_proxy for IIS ? Le 26 avr. 2011 à 17:12, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de a écrit : On 11.04.2011 11:34, Mladen Turk wrote: On 04/11/2011 09:00 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: 2011/4/11 Mladen

Re: New connector sandbox

2011-04-27 Thread Mladen Turk
On 04/27/2011 08:53 AM, Henri Gomez wrote: Ie, is there any mod_proxy for IIS ? Not inside ASF. Regards -- ^TM - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: New connector sandbox

2011-04-27 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 4/27/2011 1:53 AM, Henri Gomez wrote: Now that HTTP connector is as fast as AJP connector, is it still required ? Ie, is there any mod_proxy for IIS ? You mean... http://blogs.msdn.com/b/carlosag/archive/2010/04/02/setting-up-a-reverse-proxy-using-iis-url-rewrite-and-arr.aspx ?

Re: New connector sandbox

2011-04-27 Thread Rainer Jung
On 27.04.2011 08:53, Henri Gomez wrote: Now that HTTP connector is as fast as AJP connector, is it still required ? Performance isn't a reasion for AJP in the last say 5 or more years. The major benefits of AJP are - smooth integration of a reverse proxy The connector patches the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51124] New: ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException after setting org.apache.jasper.runtime.BodyContentImpl.LIMIT_BUFFER=true

2011-04-27 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51124 Summary: ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException after setting org.apache.jasper.runtime.BodyContentImpl.LIMIT_BUFFER =true Product: Tomcat 6 Version: 6.0.32

Re: svn commit: r1094069 - in /tomcat/trunk: java/org/apache/catalina/ java/org/apache/catalina/ha/session/ java/org/apache/catalina/manager/ java/org/apache/catalina/session/ webapps/docs/

2011-04-27 Thread Mark Thomas
On 26/04/2011 23:24, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: On 4/21/2011 8:00 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: On 19/04/2011 16:27, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: On 4/18/2011 4:39 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: On 18/04/2011 10:13, Remy Maucherat wrote: On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 22:25 +, ma...@apache.org wrote:

JNDI, resource and LDAP Trouble

2011-04-27 Thread Kornmod
Hi, I'm trying to create a simple resource for my web-app. My web-app has to connect to a ldap server to maintain users. I have created a context.xml in my META-INF folder - with the following content: ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8? Context antiJARLocking=true path=/LDAP Resource

Re: JNDI, resource and LDAP Trouble

2011-04-27 Thread Mark Thomas
On 27/04/2011 15:42, Kornmod wrote: Hi, I'm trying to create a simple resource for my web-app. My web-app has to connect to a ldap server to maintain users. I have created a context.xml in my META-INF folder - with the following content: This question belongs on the users mailing list,

Re: JNDI, resource and LDAP Trouble

2011-04-27 Thread Chris Beckey
You need to create the resource in your server.xml and then create a resource reference in the web app's context.xml. Sorry I don't have an example in front of me but the basics are: 1.) the resource element in the server.xml creates the resource 2.) the web.xml references the resource by an

Re: JNDI, resource and LDAP Trouble

2011-04-27 Thread Ian Darwin
If you are going to answer questions that are asked in the wrong list, rather than waiting until they are re-posted on the users list, please do so privately, or on the user list. Answering them on the wrong list leads to search engines finding the answer in the wrong list's archive and this leads

Re: JNDI, resource and LDAP Trouble

2011-04-27 Thread Kornmod
Sorry - I was too fast with the mouse not verifying that I was in the correct group. /Poul markt-2 wrote: On 27/04/2011 15:42, Kornmod wrote: Hi, I'm trying to create a simple resource for my web-app. My web-app has to connect to a ldap server to maintain users. I have created a

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51120] Nullpointer exception in CoyoteAdapter when the Client disconnects the socket abruptly.

2011-04-27 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51120 --- Comment #2 from Darryl Miles dar...@darrylmiles.org 2011-04-27 12:28:35 EDT --- Possible candidate, notice the if(ctxt != null) check in other code that does the same thing. From the 1st hunk in the patch. Line 320 (as shown in the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51106] Error page handling serves most general exeptions first

2011-04-27 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51106 --- Comment #1 from Karl San Gabriel karl.sangabr...@gmail.com 2011-04-27 12:54:03 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=26937) -- (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26937) Proposed fix bug 51106 -- Configure bugmail:

Re: New connector sandbox

2011-04-27 Thread Henri Gomez
Performance isn't a reasion for AJP in the last say 5 or more years. The major benefits of AJP are - smooth integration of a reverse proxy  The connector patches the communication data of the web server  into the webapp environment, i.e. client IP, protocol, server IP etc. - connection