Expected behavior of Tomcat under load

2011-05-26 Thread Asankha C. Perera
Hi All First of all, this is a repost from the user@ list from yesterday, as I think this requires a reply from a developer instead of a user. During some performance tests, we've seen that Tomcat resets TCP connections under high load. To reproduce this rather consistently, a thread pool

mod_jk 1.2.32 [was: Re: svn commit: r1127315 - /tomcat/jk/trunk/xdocs/reference/apache.xml]

2011-05-26 Thread Rainer Jung
On 25.05.2011 00:15, Christopher Schultz wrote: All, I'm not sure what the policy is on documentation changes and back-porting to already-released versions of mod_jk, but this clarifies how mod_jk works and would be beneficial to have on the web site without having to wait for a new release

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43968] [patch] support ipv6 with mod_jk

2011-05-26 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43968 --- Comment #5 from qingkang xu xuqingka...@163.com 2011-05-26 09:19:16 UTC --- I used ipv6_for_1230.patch on 64bit's linux OS, But it also failed when workers.properties file's host is ipv6 address. my works.properties is like following:

Re: [PROPOSAL] Move to svnpubsub for /dist/tomcat

2011-05-26 Thread Rainer Jung
On 24.05.2011 22:19, Mark Thomas wrote: On 24/05/2011 20:24, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: 2011/5/24 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org: 1. In what repository will the artifacts go? IIRC, there is some additional repository. I think it wouldn't be good to have them in /repos/asf/ There is a separate

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43968] [patch] support ipv6 with mod_jk

2011-05-26 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43968 --- Comment #6 from Eiji Takahashi mashm...@gmail.com 2011-05-26 10:26:10 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) (snip) I patched the ipv6_for_1230.patch and rebuilded jk $patch -p1 ipv6_for_1230.patch $cd

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51269] New: Enhancement: Allow Alias to support wildcards

2011-05-26 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51269 Bug #: 51269 Summary: Enhancement: Allow Alias to support wildcards Product: Tomcat 5 Version: Unknown Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18500] Host aliases to match by regular expression (trivial)

2011-05-26 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18500 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51269] Enhancement: Allow Alias to support wildcards

2011-05-26 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51269 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

Re: mod_jk 1.2.32 [was: Re: svn commit: r1127315 - /tomcat/jk/trunk/xdocs/reference/apache.xml]

2011-05-26 Thread Christopher Schultz
Rainer, On 5/26/2011 5:06 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: There are enough changes for a 1.2.32 anyhow, so I would propose we start a new release cycle in about 2 weeks. Sounds great. -chris signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Expected behavior of Tomcat under load

2011-05-26 Thread Christopher Schultz
Asankha, On 5/26/2011 5:01 AM, Asankha C. Perera wrote: First of all, this is a repost from the user@ list from yesterday, as I think this requires a reply from a developer instead of a user. The dev@ list shouldn't be used as a support forum. The user@ list is the appropriate place to post

Re: mod_jk 1.2.32 [was: Re: svn commit: r1127315 - /tomcat/jk/trunk/xdocs/reference/apache.xml]

2011-05-26 Thread Rainer Jung
On 26.05.2011 15:36, Christopher Schultz wrote: Rainer, On 5/26/2011 5:06 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: There are enough changes for a 1.2.32 anyhow, so I would propose we start a new release cycle in about 2 weeks. Sounds great. Someone looking at the IPV6 patch (BZ 43968)? Rainer

Re: mod_jk 1.2.32 [was: Re: svn commit: r1127315 - /tomcat/jk/trunk/xdocs/reference/apache.xml]

2011-05-26 Thread Mladen Turk
On 05/26/2011 04:22 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: On 26.05.2011 15:36, Christopher Schultz wrote: Rainer, On 5/26/2011 5:06 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: There are enough changes for a 1.2.32 anyhow, so I would propose we start a new release cycle in about 2 weeks. Sounds great. Someone looking at the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51240] maxConnections not honors config when acceptorThreadCount 1

2011-05-26 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51240 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

svn commit: r1127962 - in /tomcat/trunk: java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/ java/org/apache/tomcat/util/threads/ test/org/apache/tomcat/util/threads/ webapps/docs/

2011-05-26 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Thu May 26 15:27:52 2011 New Revision: 1127962 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1127962view=rev Log: Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51240 Replace the more generic CounterLatch (that has concurrency issues) with a more specific LimitLatch that

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51181] Add support for Web Sockets

2011-05-26 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 --- Comment #11 from Antoine Roux antoine.r...@net-vitesse.com 2011-05-26 20:07:48 UTC --- Hi, This is definitely something I would love to see in Tomcat! Websockets will allow to build richer web application and all major browsers already