I'd like to release Apache Standard Taglib 1.2.1. This is an update to the
withdrawn 1.2.0, built with JDK 1.7.0_45 to address JavaDoc issues and
incorporating feedback on the documentation.
Maven Staging Repository:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomcat-132/
Source
On Nov 12, 2013, at 8:53 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 12/11/2013 15:27, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
>> On Nov 12, 2013, at 5:00 AM, ma...@apache.org wrote:
>>
>>> Author: markt Date: Tue Nov 12 13:00:03 2013 New Revision:
>>> 1541041
>>>
>>&g
On Nov 10, 2013, at 11:47 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 10.11.2013 00:56, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
>> I'd like to release Apache Tomcat Standard Taglib 1.2.0.
>>
>> This would be the first release in many years, and the first release of an
>> implementation o
On Nov 12, 2013, at 5:00 AM, ma...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: markt
> Date: Tue Nov 12 13:00:03 2013
> New Revision: 1541041
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1541041
> Log:
> Replace TldLocationsCache with the new TldCache that also caches the contents
> of the TLDs. This is the next step in the
On Nov 10, 2013, at 11:47 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 10.11.2013 00:56, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
>> I'd like to release Apache Tomcat Standard Taglib 1.2.0.
>>
>> This would be the first release in many years, and the first release of an
>> implementation o
On Nov 9, 2013, at 3:56 PM Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> I'd like to release Apache Tomcat Standard Taglib 1.2.0.
>
> The proposed 1.2.0 release is"
> [ ] Broken - do not release
> [X] OK - release as 1.2.0 (non-binding)
RAT report looked OK.
JSTL 1.2 TCK passed (ru
I'd like to release Apache Tomcat Standard Taglib 1.2.0.
This would be the first release in many years, and the first release of an
implementation of JSTL 1.2.
Maven Staging Repository:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomcat-110
Source Distribution:
https://repositor
I believe I have addressed all the issues raised during the vote for 1.2.0-RC1
so I am planning on tagging 1.2.0 soon (hopefully this weekend). If any has any
other issues before then please speak up :)
Thanks
Jeremy
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
On Nov 1, 2013, at 6:23 AM, Scott Severtson
wrote:
> All,
>
> We've noticed that our Tomcat 6.0.37 instances have increasing overhead the
> longer they stay up. We've captured some heap dumps, expecting to find memory
> leaks within our code, but found something different instead.
>
> Jasper
On Oct 10, 2013, at 12:46 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 10/10/2013 20:40, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
>> On Oct 10, 2013, at 7:48 AM, bugzi...@apache.org wrote:
>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55249
>>>
>>> Mark
On Oct 9, 2013, at 3:11 AM, Pavel Cibulka wrote:
> Hello, both jetty and glassfish have genStringAsByteArray set to "true" by
> default. Would it be possible to change this in jasper? I know
> that genStringAsByteArray is not implemented yet, what about
> making genStringAsCharArray default "true
On Oct 10, 2013, at 7:48 AM, bugzi...@apache.org wrote:
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55249
>
> Mark Thomas changed:
>
> What|Removed |Added
>
> Stat
On Sep 24, 2013, at 3:20 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On behalf of the Tomcat committers I am pleased to announce that
> Konstantin Preißer has been voted in as a new Tomcat committer.
>
> In addition to a number of high quality bug reports and patches,
> Konstantin is also responsible for the makeo
On Sep 22, 2013, at 10:55 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> On Sep 22, 2013, at 1:44 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>> On 22/09/2013 00:27, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
>>
>>> As a concrete example of how this impacts the behaviour, consider the case
>>> where the applicati
On Sep 22, 2013, at 1:44 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 22/09/2013 00:27, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
>
>> As a concrete example of how this impacts the behaviour, consider the case
>> where the application includes its own JSP engine. With the RI's delegation
>> model, t
On Sep 20, 2013, at 2:43 PM, Nick Williams
wrote:
>
> On Sep 20, 2013, at 4:33 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 8:50 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>
>>> On 20/09/2013 16:02, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
>>>> The only ordering con
On Sep 20, 2013, at 8:50 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 20/09/2013 16:02, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
>> The only ordering concern for SCIs in the spec is that they are
>> "discovered" following the classloader delegation model. This will
>> typically be configured to
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 8:50 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 20/09/2013 16:02, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> > The only ordering concern for SCIs in the spec is that they are
> > "discovered" following the classloader delegation model. This will
> > typically be configured to
On Sep 20, 2013, at 12:38 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 20/09/2013 06:11, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
>> On Sep 19, 2013, at 8:31 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
>>
>>> On Sep 19, 2013, at 6:07 AM, ma...@apache.org wrote:
>>>
>>>> Author: markt
>>>>
On Sep 19, 2013, at 8:31 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> On Sep 19, 2013, at 6:07 AM, ma...@apache.org wrote:
>
>> Author: markt
>> Date: Thu Sep 19 13:07:02 2013
>> New Revision: 1524727
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1524727
>> Log:
>> Always l
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 19/09/2013 17:39, Nick Williams wrote:
> >
> > On Sep 19, 2013, at 11:32 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> >
>
> >> There's a clear model already without assumptions about SCI
> >> ordering:
On Sep 19, 2013, at 8:36 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 19/09/2013 16:31, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
>> On Sep 19, 2013, at 6:07 AM, ma...@apache.org wrote:
>>
>>> Author: markt Date: Thu Sep 19 13:07:02 2013 New Revision:
>>> 1524727
>>>
>>> U
On Sep 19, 2013, at 6:07 AM, ma...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: markt
> Date: Thu Sep 19 13:07:02 2013
> New Revision: 1524727
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1524727
> Log:
> Always load container SCIs first
This seems at odds with the requirement that "the order in which these services
are dis
On Sep 15, 2013, at 4:49 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 14 September 2013 17:09, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
>>
>> I think addressed those issues in the following changes:
>> http://svn.apache.org/r1512150
>> http://svn.apache.org/r1512151
>> http://svn.apache.org/r1512153
On Sep 17, 2013, at 11:10 PM, Violeta Georgieva wrote:
> Hi Jeremy,
>
> 2013/9/13
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55508
>>
>> Jeremy Boynes changed:
>>
>>
On Aug 7, 2013, at 4:41 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 2 August 2013 20:32, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
>> A proposed release candidate Apache Taglibs 1.2.0-RC1 is now available for
>> voting.
>>
>> This is release candidate for an implementation of JSTL 1.2 and can be
>>
On Aug 2, 2013, at 12:32 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> A proposed release candidate Apache Taglibs 1.2.0-RC1 is now available for
> voting.
>
> This is release candidate for an implementation of JSTL 1.2 and can be
> obtained from the staging repo at:
> https://repository.
On Aug 12, 2013, at 8:40 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 12/08/2013 16:20, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
>
> I'm wondering about adding enableWebSockets() and enableJSPs() methods
> to Tomcat which would automatically add the relevant SCI to any Context
> created via one of the add
On Aug 20, 2013, at 7:42 AM, Nick Williams
wrote:
>
> Well, yea. I had figured that part out. :-) I just didn't articulate my
> question well enough.
>
> The first step is obviously loading the class through the WACL through the
> unit test (so this has to be a class not already loaded). I as
On Aug 14, 2013, at 3:41 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> Summarising the response to this thread so far:
>
> There is a preference for not strictly enforcing whatever limit is
> selected. Rules need exceptions and committers can exercise judgement.
> It does create a grey area but the majority is OK w
On Aug 14, 2013, at 12:58 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 14/08/2013 03:20, jboy...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: jboynes
>> Date: Wed Aug 14 02:20:02 2013
>> New Revision: 1513714
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1513714
>> Log:
>> Deprecate TldConfig and TLD-related properties of Context as they h
On Aug 12, 2013, at 12:33 PM, Christopher Schultz
wrote:
> Jeremy,
>
> Will you be back-porting any of this to Tomcat 7? Or is the idea that so
> many things will be changing that it's unfair to surprise Tomcat 7 users
> with these changes?
As is, I think this would be too big a change for a 7
On Aug 12, 2013, at 8:16 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 09/08/2013 07:21, jboy...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: jboynes
>> Date: Fri Aug 9 06:21:56 2013
>> New Revision: 1512148
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1512148
>> Log:
>> Start adding model for loading complete TLDs using Digester.
>> This
On Aug 12, 2013, at 7:46 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 10/08/2013 23:20, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
>> On Jul 22, 2013, at 10:10 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>
>>> On 21/07/2013 18:36, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
>>> ...
>>>> In the meantime, I'm going to loo
On Aug 10, 2013, at 2:59 PM, build...@apache.org wrote:
> The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder tomcat-trunk while
> building ASF Buildbot.
> Full details are available at:
> http://ci.apache.org/builders/tomcat-trunk/builds/4807
>
> Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
>
> Buildsla
On Jul 22, 2013, at 10:10 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 21/07/2013 18:36, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> ...
>> In the meantime, I'm going to look at refactoring the TLD support as
>> described above.
>
> Nice. See my note about TLD processing in the TOMCAT-NEXT.txt file
On Aug 7, 2013, at 2:14 PM, ma...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: markt
> Date: Wed Aug 7 21:14:55 2013
> New Revision: 1511501
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1511501
> Log:
> Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52092
> Switch to the AsyncLogWriter and OneLineFormatter by default
On Aug 6, 2013, at 10:13 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Slowly digging into this. Thus far I've confirmed the source builds :)
>
> Next up is working out how to deploy the examples.
Wondering here if it would be better to release the examples separately as they
can be decoupled.
IOW, we would expe
On Aug 8, 2013, at 10:50 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> Currently, Tomcat has an 'guide' of a maximum of 80 characters for line
> length. It has been a while since we reviewed this and as we are looking
> at style rules...
>
> As a starting point what do folks think of the following options:
>
> Line
On Aug 7, 2013, at 12:41 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> For trunk we have been running a policy of zero warnings in the code.
> This has helped to highlight issues as code is edited as any warnings
> are immediately clear. Obviously, this depends on what warnings are enabled.
>
> Currently, we use Ecl
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Christopher Schultz <
ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
> All,
>
> I just launched my primary webapp in an 8.0.0-RC1 and saw this message:
>
> Aug 06, 2013 3:48:13 PM org.apache.tomcat.util.descriptor.web.WebXml
> setVersion
> WARNING: Unknown version string [2.3
On Aug 4, 2013, at 11:55 AM, jboy...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: jboynes
> Date: Sun Aug 4 18:55:04 2013
> New Revision: 1510310
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1510310
This may also have broken a clean build which I didn't catch as my IDE had
copied service-config.txt to the output for me.
I'
On Aug 4, 2013, at 12:27 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 04/08/2013 21:02, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
>> On Aug 4, 2013, at 8:37 AM, ma...@apache.org wrote:
>>> Log:
>>> Treat javax.servlet.ServletContainerInitializer files as text in source
>>>
>>>
On Aug 4, 2013, at 8:37 AM, ma...@apache.org wrote:
> Log:
> Treat javax.servlet.ServletContainerInitializer files as text in source
>
>
> +
>
Would this work to catch all service config files not just SCIs?
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using G
On Aug 4, 2013, at 11:32 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 04/08/2013 20:00, jboy...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: jboynes
>> Date: Sun Aug 4 18:00:40 2013
>> New Revision: 1510282
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1510282
>> Log:
>> Tests for WebappServiceLoader (requires EasyMock)
>
> Please fix th
On Jul 31, 2013, at 10:21 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 31/07/2013 18:09, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
>> Any objection to adding a dependency on a mocking framework to aid unit
>> testing?
>> The one I have used most is EasyMock which is Apache License 2.0.
>
> To save repe
A proposed release candidate Apache Taglibs 1.2.0-RC1 is now available for
voting.
This is release candidate for an implementation of JSTL 1.2 and can be obtained
from the staging repo at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomcat-053/
The source distribution can be o
On Aug 1, 2013, at 1:53 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> [X ] Alpha - go ahead and release as 8.0.0-RC1 alpha
Ran JSTL TCK.
--
Jeremy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...
Any objection to adding a dependency on a mocking framework to aid unit testing?
The one I have used most is EasyMock which is Apache License 2.0.
Cheers
Jeremy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For add
On Jul 31, 2013, at 8:08 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> On Jul 31, 2013, at 7:31 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>> On 29/07/2013 20:48, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> On 29/07/2013 01:01, jboy...@apache.org wrote:
>>>> Author: jboynes
>>>> Date: Sun Jul 28 23:01:23 2
On Jul 31, 2013, at 7:31 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 29/07/2013 20:48, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 29/07/2013 01:01, jboy...@apache.org wrote:
>>> Author: jboynes
>>> Date: Sun Jul 28 23:01:23 2013
>>> New Revision: 1507870
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1507870
>>> Log:
>>> Fix for https://is
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 29/07/2013 22:56, Nick Williams wrote:
> >
> > On Jul 29, 2013, at 3:53 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> >
> >> This is what lies under the syntactic sugar, and causes no warnings in
> >> javac or IDEA (and
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 29/07/2013 01:01, jboy...@apache.org wrote:
> > Author: jboynes
> > Date: Sun Jul 28 23:01:23 2013
> > New Revision: 1507870
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1507870
>
> Generally, line lengths should be limited to 80 characters. I know
Thomas wrote:
> On 29/07/2013 21:04, Nick Williams wrote:
> > On Jul 29, 2013, at 2:02 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> >
> >> This flags as a warning for me in IDEA without the suppression. Isn't
> this
> >> an unchecked cast (Object to List)?
>
> It is an
This flags as a warning for me in IDEA without the suppression. Isn't this
an unchecked cast (Object to List)?
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 11:38 AM, wrote:
> Author: markt
> Date: Mon Jul 29 18:38:08 2013
> New Revision: 1508171
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1508171
> Log:
> Remove unnecessary @S
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
> Looking forward to the point where we use an SCI for JSPs, we don't want
> to / shouldn't have to do this for every test that uses JSPs.
>
> addWebapp() is the interface that provides the settings from the default
> web.xml and should be ju
On Jul 22, 2013, at 11:22 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 22/07/2013 19:09, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
>> This snippet from initClassLoader()
>>>// What is this ??
>>>urls.add(new File(
>>>clctxt.getRealPath("/")
This snippet from initClassLoader()
> // What is this ??
> urls.add(new File(
> clctxt.getRealPath("/")).getCanonicalFile().toURI().toURL());
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/jasper/JspC.java?view=markup#l1505
It's in the original import int
I'm confused by the spec saying:
> Implementations of the ServletContainerInitializer interface will be
> discovered by the runtime's service lookup mechanism or a container specific
> mechanism that is semantically equivalent to it. In either case,
> ServletContainerInitializer services from we
On Jul 8, 2013, at 12:23 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 08/07/2013 06:38, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
>>
>> Another area of convergence is in parsing TLDs: currently both
>> Catalina and Jasper do it, differently.
>
> A lot of the code is identical with large comments to keep t
On Jul 16, 2013, at 10:27 AM, Christopher Schultz
wrote:
> Jeremy,
>
> On 7/13/13 6:11 PM, bugzi...@apache.org wrote:
>> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55259
>>
>> Jeremy Boynes changed:
>>
>> What
On Jul 13, 2013, at 2:43 AM, bugzi...@apache.org wrote:
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55259
>
> --- Comment #2 from Mark Thomas ---
> Jeremy,
>
> Although you were originally granted commit karma due to your taglibs work,
> you
> have the necessary karma to commit to any
On Jul 12, 2013, at 1:46 AM, bugzi...@apache.org wrote:
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55245
>
> --- Comment #3 from Mark Thomas ---
> It is worth noting that this new test case fails and that this is expected as
> it highlights at least one bug (bug 55250) in the refactore
Is it worth adding one for tomcat-util to be distinct from Catalina and Jasper?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
On Jul 8, 2013, at 2:32 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 08/07/2013 16:02, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
>> On Jul 8, 2013, at 12:23 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> On 08/07/2013 06:38, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
>> ...
>>>
>>>> I'm planning on merging these two patc
On Jul 8, 2013, at 12:23 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 08/07/2013 06:38, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
...
>
>> I'm planning on merging these two patches and pressing on with a
>> converged solution, but probably won't be able to do much until next
>> weekend.
>
&g
On Jun 25, 2013, at 10:44 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> I have been thinking about improvements to Jasper as well around better
> support for Servlet 3.0 concepts. One area would be decoupling it from
> Tomcat, bootstrapping using an SCI as hinted in ContextConfig. I'd also be
&
On Jul 6, 2013, at 5:32 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 8:43 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> On Jul 2, 2013, at 9:41 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>>
>>> I wouldn't expect to deploy the site from tags - a site is a live/current
>>> thing.
>&g
On Jul 6, 2013, at 1:00 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 05/07/2013 23:10, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
>> On Jul 5, 2013, at 9:33 AM, ma...@apache.org wrote:
>>> +http://java.sun.com/JSP/Page"; version="2.0">
>>> +
>>> +
>>> + foo
>>>
On Jul 5, 2013, at 9:33 AM, ma...@apache.org wrote:
> +http://java.sun.com/JSP/Page"; version="2.0">
> +
> +
> + foo
> + bar
> +
> +
> +
I believe, strictly, can't have a sub-element like .
Wouldn't the test case still hold if the was removed?
On Jul 2, 2013, at 9:41 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>
> I wouldn't expect to deploy the site from tags - a site is a live/current
> thing.
The core site is a live/current thing, but there is also the
documentation/reports etc. that would be associated with a specific tag. IOW,
the site could cont
On Jun 26, 2013, at 12:58 PM, Christopher Schultz
wrote:
> On 6/26/13 2:57 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
>>
>> You wrote in the bug that "annotation's don't make sense" - could you
>> clarify that?
>
> Yes: I was thinking that generating classes t
On Jun 26, 2013, at 12:10 PM, Nick Williams
wrote:
>
> On Jun 26, 2013, at 1:57 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
>
>> On Jun 26, 2013, at 7:49 AM, Christopher Schultz
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Jeremy,
>>>
>>> On 6/26/13 1:44 AM, Jeremy Boynes
On Jun 26, 2013, at 7:49 AM, Christopher Schultz
wrote:
> Jeremy,
>
> On 6/26/13 1:44 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
>> On Jun 11, 2013, at 1:50 PM, Nick Williams
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Okay. One of many reasons I ask is that I still have it on my to-do
>>&g
On Jun 25, 2013, at 7:54 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Help much appreciated - but do we want all the content of all the modules
> to be there?
>
> It feels to me that the website does not map directly to the codebase. We
> want an overall site, and subsites for Standard and for RDC. We don't want
On Jun 11, 2013, at 1:50 PM, Nick Williams
wrote:
>
> Okay. One of many reasons I ask is that I still have it on my to-do to make
> some improvements on the JSP compiler to support things like 1) precompiling
> all JSPs on deploy and 2) a better Ant task. I don't know how much the EL
> change
In anticipation of a release of standard 1.2, I have deployed a new version to
Apache's snapshot Maven repository:
http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/
I have run this version through the TCK and it passes but have not had a chance
to test it against real-world applications. I'd like to ma
On Jun 15, 2013, at 10:09 AM, bugzi...@apache.org wrote:
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55102
> Summary: Add ability to report time taken to prepare response
>
> Created attachment 30438
> --> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30438&action=edit
After a recent post on taglibs-user a couple of people have pinged me off-list
expressing interest in an actual released version. I'd like to go ahead with
that if no-one sees any issues.
The code is ready, with no non-blocking issues and has previously passed the
TCK. I will update my TCK setu
On Apr 21, 2013, at 11:37 PM, David Jencks wrote:
> On Apr 21, 2013, at 3:56 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
>
>> On Apr 19, 2013, at 11:04 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>>> IMO you have misinterpreted roles in the ee specs. The specs including the
>>> servlet spec define
On Apr 19, 2013, at 11:04 PM, David Jencks wrote:
> IMO you have misinterpreted roles in the ee specs. The specs including the
> servlet spec define application roles and base the declarative security
> constraints on them. Then you can map strings that bits of the application
> like, at leas
On Jan 29, 2013, at 11:56 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
...
>
> My interpretation was that a product must pass the TCK in all its
> configurations. In other words, you can't claim compatibility on Java7 unless
> you've tested on Java7. If we test on Java7 and pass, we can claim
On Jan 29, 2013, at 11:56 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> On Jan 28, 2013, at 3:46 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 26/01/2013 21:51, Henri Yandell wrote:
...
>>
>> I've just checked the latest version of the TCK documentation for JSTL
>> 1.2 and while the TCK has been updated
On Jan 28, 2013, at 3:46 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 26/01/2013 21:51, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
>>> On Jan 18, 2013, at 1:34 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>>>
>>> There is also an issue with the I18N t
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 1:41 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> Votes were as follows:
>
> +1 (binding): kkolinko, rjung, yoavs, olamy, markt
>
> No other votes were cast.
>
> The vote therefore passes.
>
> I'll publish the binaries and announce later today once the mirrors have
> caught up.
Given the regr
On Jan 18, 2013, at 1:34 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> Regarding the two taglibs that are not yet in the attic, I have no
> interest in "RDC" taglib, but I am interested in JSTL one.
+1
>
> I think once we make the first release, things should go easier after that.
>
> A few notes after quic
+0
It's perhaps not surprising that there is not much activity as there has been
no update to the JSR in many years. The JSTL code in trunk does pass the 1.2
TCK and could be released if someone had the energy to fix the website and
rustle up votes.
On Oct 13, 2012, at 10:58 AM, Henri Yandell
From the log:
https://builds.apache.org/job/taglib-standard/2/consoleText
Parsing POMs
ERROR: Failed to parse POMs
hudson.util.IOException2: remote file operation failed:
/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/taglib-standard at
hudson.remoting.Channel@1c4071a9:ubuntu3
at hudson.FilePath.
WIth binding +1's from olamy, fhanik and mturk and my non-binding +1, I call
the vote passed and will deploy the staged artefacts.
Thanks
Jeremy
On Mar 29, 2012, at 4:55 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> +1
>
> Signatures and generic content OK
>
> On 03/26/2012 07:01 AM, Jeremy
On Mar 29, 2012, at 8:22 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> 2012/3/29 Jeremy Boynes :
...
>> However, we are also getting errors about the effective path of parent files
>> which I believe is caused because the aggregating pom in trunks is not
>> actually the parent of the modules
would also remove the aggregator stub
trunks.
On Mar 26, 2012, at 10:37 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> I setup the build on Jenkins long ago.
> Do you need some configuration change ?
>
> --
> Olivier
> Le 27 mars 2012 03:38, "Jeremy Boynes" a écrit :
>
>> Thank
My non-binding +1 but one more PMC vote is needed please.
Thanks
Jeremy
On Mar 28, 2012, at 8:35 AM, Filip Hanik (mailing lists) wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-----
>> From: Jeremy Boynes [mailto:jer...@boynes.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy
>> Boynes
>> Sent: Wed
Request for more votes please, we only have one binding vote so far.
Thanks
Jeremy
On Mar 27, 2012, at 12:35 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> +1
>
> 2012/3/26 Jeremy Boynes :
>> The proposed 3 release of Apache Taglibs Parent POM is now available for
>> voting.
>>
>&
Thanks, request sent to Mladen as per that page. Do we know who set this up?
On Mar 26, 2012, at 12:30 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Hello,
> See http://wiki.apache.org/general/Jenkins#How_do_I_get_an_account
>
>
>
> 2012/3/26 Jeremy Boynes :
>> Who controls permission
Who controls permissions in Jenkins (builds.a.o)? Please can you grant me build
rights for Taglibs-All?
Thanks
Jeremy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.
The proposed 3 release of Apache Taglibs Parent POM is now available for voting.
This release addresses issues found during the 1 release process including
duplicate LICENSE files and poor site configuration, and updates the copyright
date in the NOTICE file from release 2 (withdrawn).
The Mave
Withdrawing this to fix date in NOTICE.
On Mar 24, 2012, at 8:09 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 24 March 2012 14:45, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
>> The proposed 2 release of Apache Taglibs Parent POM is now available for
>> voting.
>>
>> This release addresses issues found d
The proposed 2 release of Apache Taglibs Parent POM is now available for voting.
This release addresses issues found during the 1 release process including
duplicate LICENSE files and poor site configuration.
The Maven staging repo is:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
:)
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Apache Jenkins Server
> Subject: Taglibs-All - Build # 15 - Fixed
> Date: March 18, 2012 4:07:11 PM PDT
> To: jboy...@gmail.com
>
> The Apache Jenkins build system has built Taglibs-All (build #15)
>
> Status: Fixed
>
> Check console output at https://build
On Mar 18, 2012, at 3:33 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> On Mar 18, 2012, at 10:42 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>
>> 2012/3/18 Jeremy Boynes :
>>> Since this release, I've updated the parent pom to move all the site
>>> information into the site module. I p
101 - 200 of 272 matches
Mail list logo
