On 4/23/24 14:47, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Jean-Frederic,
On 4/23/24 08:27, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 4/23/24 09:47, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 23/04/2024 06:35, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 4/17/24 12:00, Mark Thomas wrote:
Build is reproducible.
My tests here complain about examples, d
On 4/23/24 14:44, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Jean-Frederic,
On 4/23/24 08:27, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 4/23/24 09:47, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 23/04/2024 06:35, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 4/17/24 12:00, Mark Thomas wrote:
Build is reproducible.
My tests here complain about examples, d
Jean-Frederic,
On 4/23/24 08:27, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 4/23/24 09:47, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 23/04/2024 06:35, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 4/17/24 12:00, Mark Thomas wrote:
Build is reproducible.
My tests here complain about examples, did I miss something.
No idea. You'd need to
Jean-Frederic,
On 4/23/24 08:27, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 4/23/24 09:47, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 23/04/2024 06:35, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 4/17/24 12:00, Mark Thomas wrote:
Build is reproducible.
My tests here complain about examples, did I miss something.
No idea. You'd need to
On 4/23/24 09:47, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 23/04/2024 06:35, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 4/17/24 12:00, Mark Thomas wrote:
Build is reproducible.
My tests here complain about examples, did I miss something.
No idea. You'd need to do a diff to see what didn't match and that will
(hopefully)
On 4/16/24 15:11, Christopher Schultz wrote:
[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 10.1.23
Tested on fedora39 with tc-native 2.0.7 looks OK, TCK passes.
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomca
On 23/04/2024 06:35, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 4/17/24 12:00, Mark Thomas wrote:
Build is reproducible.
My tests here complain about examples, did I miss something.
No idea. You'd need to do a diff to see what didn't match and that will
(hopefully) point you towards the root cause.
Ma
On 4/17/24 12:00, Mark Thomas wrote:
Build is reproducible.
My tests here complain about examples, did I miss something.
TCK tests are still running...
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tom
Am 21.04.24 um 17:15 schrieb Rémy Maucherat:
On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 11:52 AM Rainer Jung wrote:
Am 16.04.24 um 15:11 schrieb Christopher Schultz:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 10.1.23 release is now available for
voting. Apache Tomcat 10.1.21 was canceled due to a release-build
mistake and Apac
On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 11:52 AM Rainer Jung wrote:
>
> Am 16.04.24 um 15:11 schrieb Christopher Schultz:
> > The proposed Apache Tomcat 10.1.23 release is now available for
> > voting. Apache Tomcat 10.1.21 was canceled due to a release-build
> > mistake and Apache Tomcat 10.1.22 was cancelled du
Am 16.04.24 um 15:11 schrieb Christopher Schultz:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 10.1.23 release is now available for
voting. Apache Tomcat 10.1.21 was canceled due to a release-build
mistake and Apache Tomcat 10.1.22 was cancelled due to an option in
startup scripts which would have caused Java 11
On 16/04/2024 14:11, Christopher Schultz wrote:
The proposed 10.1.23 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 10.1.23
Unit tests pass on Linux, Windows and MacOS (M1).
Build is reproducible.
Mark
PS I am still unable to test on MacOS (Intel) as it is a $da
Rémy,
On 4/16/24 14:34, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 3:11 PM Christopher Schultz
wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 10.1.23 release is now available for
voting. Apache Tomcat 10.1.21 was canceled due to a release-build
mistake and Apache Tomcat 10.1.22 was cancelled due to an
On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 3:11 PM Christopher Schultz
wrote:
>
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 10.1.23 release is now available for
> voting. Apache Tomcat 10.1.21 was canceled due to a release-build
> mistake and Apache Tomcat 10.1.22 was cancelled due to an option in
> startup scripts which would hav
+1 All tests pass on Fedora 38 with Java 21, tcnative-2.0.7, openssl-3.0.13.
On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 4:19 PM Christopher Schultz <
ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 10.1.23 release is now available for
> voting. Apache Tomcat 10.1.21 was canceled due to a release-b
All,
On 4/16/24 09:11, Christopher Schultz wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 10.1.23 release is now available for
voting. Apache Tomcat 10.1.21 was canceled due to a release-build
mistake and Apache Tomcat 10.1.22 was cancelled due to an option in
startup scripts which would have caused Java 1
The proposed Apache Tomcat 10.1.23 release is now available for
voting. Apache Tomcat 10.1.21 was canceled due to a release-build
mistake and Apache Tomcat 10.1.22 was cancelled due to an option in
startup scripts which would have caused Java 11 environments to fail to
start.
The notable chan
17 matches
Mail list logo
