On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 8:27 AM, Amitesh Pathak wrote:
> Hi all
> I subscribed to the tomcat dev mailing list sometime ago to help me getting
> to start contributing, but haven't figured out how to start yet.
Hello and welcome!
> Can I please get a mentor to guide me
Hi all
I subscribed to the tomcat dev mailing list sometime ago to help me getting
to start contributing, but haven't figured out how to start yet.
Can I please get a mentor to guide me through and help me start developing
for the projects.
Any help will be really appreciated.
Thanks,
On Aug 20, 2013, at 7:42 AM, Nick Williams nicho...@nicholaswilliams.net
wrote:
Well, yea. I had figured that part out. :-) I just didn't articulate my
question well enough.
The first step is obviously loading the class through the WACL through the
unit test (so this has to be a class
On 21/08/2013 01:24, Nick Williams wrote:
My backup idea is slightly less clean but, IMO, still more clean than adding
ASM as a test-time dependency and trying to figure all of that out. I locally
compiled fake weaved versions of the UnweavedClass (with the modified
behavior) and then
On Aug 21, 2013, at 2:58 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 21/08/2013 01:24, Nick Williams wrote:
My backup idea is slightly less clean but, IMO, still more clean than adding
ASM as a test-time dependency and trying to figure all of that out. I
locally compiled fake weaved versions of the
Nick,
On 8/20/13 8:24 PM, Nick Williams wrote:
I ran in to a roadblock with this idea. Part of the byte code of a
class includes the fully-qualified class name. If I create a class,
say UnweavedClass, and replace its byte code in my fake transformer
with that of another class, the FQCN
On 21 August 2013 14:48, Christopher Schultz
ch...@christopherschultz.net wrote:
Nick,
On 8/20/13 8:24 PM, Nick Williams wrote:
I ran in to a roadblock with this idea. Part of the byte code of a
class includes the fully-qualified class name. If I create a class,
say UnweavedClass, and
Sebb,
On 8/21/13 1:46 PM, sebb wrote:
On 21 August 2013 14:48, Christopher Schultz
ch...@christopherschultz.net wrote:
Nick,
On 8/20/13 8:24 PM, Nick Williams wrote:
I ran in to a roadblock with this idea. Part of the byte code of a
class includes the fully-qualified class name. If I
On Aug 21, 2013, at 12:46 PM, sebb wrote:
On 21 August 2013 14:48, Christopher Schultz
ch...@christopherschultz.net wrote:
Nick,
On 8/20/13 8:24 PM, Nick Williams wrote:
I ran in to a roadblock with this idea. Part of the byte code of a
class includes the fully-qualified class name. If I
On 21 August 2013 20:21, Christopher Schultz
ch...@christopherschultz.net wrote:
Sebb,
On 8/21/13 1:46 PM, sebb wrote:
On 21 August 2013 14:48, Christopher Schultz
ch...@christopherschultz.net wrote:
Nick,
On 8/20/13 8:24 PM, Nick Williams wrote:
I ran in to a roadblock with this idea.
I'm working on implementing bugzilla 55317. It's a pretty important change
(weaving) to a pretty import class (WebappClassLoader), so it obviously needs
some unit tests. However, I need some guidance:
1) I've never gotten all the existing tests to pass on my machine. Last time I
ran them it
On 20/08/2013 14:13, Nick Williams wrote:
I'm working on implementing bugzilla 55317. It's a pretty important
change (weaving) to a pretty import class (WebappClassLoader), so it
obviously needs some unit tests. However, I need some guidance:
1) I've never gotten all the existing tests to
2013/8/20 Nick Williams wrote:
I'm working on implementing bugzilla 55317. It's a pretty important
change (weaving) to a pretty import class (WebappClassLoader), so it
obviously needs some unit tests. However, I need some guidance:
1) I've never gotten all the existing tests to pass on my
On 20/08/13 14:32, Violeta Georgieva wrote:
2013/8/20 Nick Williams wrote:
I'm working on implementing bugzilla 55317. It's a pretty important
change (weaving) to a pretty import class (WebappClassLoader), so it
obviously needs some unit tests. However, I need some guidance:
1) I've never
On Aug 20, 2013, at 8:25 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 20/08/2013 14:13, Nick Williams wrote:
I'm working on implementing bugzilla 55317. It's a pretty important
change (weaving) to a pretty import class (WebappClassLoader), so it
obviously needs some unit tests. However, I need some guidance:
Mark,
On 8/20/13 9:25 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 20/08/2013 14:13, Nick Williams wrote:
I'm working on implementing bugzilla 55317. It's a pretty important
change (weaving) to a pretty import class (WebappClassLoader), so it
obviously needs some unit tests. However, I need some guidance:
1)
On Aug 20, 2013, at 10:12 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Mark,
On 8/20/13 9:25 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 20/08/2013 14:13, Nick Williams wrote:
I'm working on implementing bugzilla 55317. It's a pretty important
change (weaving) to a pretty import class (WebappClassLoader), so it
Nick,
On 8/20/13 11:15 AM, Nick Williams wrote:
On Aug 20, 2013, at 10:12 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Mark,
On 8/20/13 9:25 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 20/08/2013 14:13, Nick Williams wrote:
I'm working on implementing bugzilla 55317. It's a pretty important
change (weaving) to a
Nick,
On 8/20/13 1:25 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
tcnative can be built on Max OS X like this:
$ cd $CATALINA_HOME/bin
$ tar xzf tomcat-native.tar.gz
$ cd tomcat-native-*-src/jni/native
$ ./configure --with-apr=/usr/bin/apr-1-config --with-ssl
--with-java-home=`/usr/libexec/java_home`
Nick,
On 8/20/13 1:41 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Nick,
On 8/20/13 1:25 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
tcnative can be built on Max OS X like this:
$ cd $CATALINA_HOME/bin
$ tar xzf tomcat-native.tar.gz
$ cd tomcat-native-*-src/jni/native
$ ./configure
Nick,
On 8/20/13 1:47 PM, Nick Williams wrote:
On Aug 20, 2013, at 12:41 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Nick,
On 8/20/13 1:25 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
tcnative can be built on Max OS X like this:
$ cd $CATALINA_HOME/bin
$ tar xzf tomcat-native.tar.gz
$ cd
On 20/08/2013 18:58, Christopher Schultz wrote:
In case you want to run the entire test suite but don't want to get
APR failures, you can also set -Dexecute.test.apr=false and it will
skip all the APR tests.
The unit tests are smart enough that even with that set to true, the
tests will be
On 20/08/2013 18:47, Nick Williams wrote:
My remaining original concern was the best approach for weaving byte
code in Tomcat's unit tests, which I detailed in an earlier message.
Use the Weaver to completely replace the byte code of the weaved class
with the byte code from another class? That
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 20/08/2013 18:47, Nick Williams wrote:
My remaining original concern was the best approach for weaving byte
code in Tomcat's unit tests, which I detailed in an earlier message.
Use the Weaver to completely replace the
On Aug 20, 2013, at 1:10 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 20/08/2013 18:47, Nick Williams wrote:
My remaining original concern was the best approach for weaving byte
code in Tomcat's unit tests, which I detailed in an earlier message.
Use the Weaver to completely replace the byte code of the
25 matches
Mail list logo