Re: Time to organise svn - Take 4

2007-11-09 Thread Mark Thomas
Mark Thomas wrote: > Rémy Maucherat wrote: >> On Sun, 2007-11-04 at 16:10 +, Mark Thomas wrote: >>> Do the (unless there is a pressing need - eg a major security issue) final >>> stable release of 6.0.x. >>> Freeze development of the 6.0.x branch. >> -1. Branches should continue to be open as l

Re: Time to organise svn - Take 4

2007-11-07 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Nov 6, 2007, at 7:37 PM, Rémy Maucherat wrote: On Sun, 2007-11-04 at 16:10 +, Mark Thomas wrote: Do the (unless there is a pressing need - eg a major security issue) final stable release of 6.0.x. Freeze development of the 6.0.x branch. -1. Branches should continue to be open as lon

Re: Time to organise svn - Take 4

2007-11-06 Thread Mark Thomas
Rémy Maucherat wrote: > On Sun, 2007-11-04 at 16:10 +, Mark Thomas wrote: >> Do the (unless there is a pressing need - eg a major security issue) final >> stable release of 6.0.x. >> Freeze development of the 6.0.x branch. > > -1. Branches should continue to be open as long as committers want

Re: Time to organise svn - Take 4

2007-11-06 Thread Rémy Maucherat
On Sun, 2007-11-04 at 16:10 +, Mark Thomas wrote: > Do the (unless there is a pressing need - eg a major security issue) final > stable release of 6.0.x. > Freeze development of the 6.0.x branch. -1. Branches should continue to be open as long as committers want to propose patches and make rel

Re: Time to organise svn - Take 3

2007-11-04 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Mark Thomas wrote: William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Contrawise, why wait, and why a tag? Usually most efforts (in order to preserve history) branch from trunk or branches, whereas tags/* reflect an endpoint (end of history). Simply branch from 6.0.x unless there are dirty secrets buried in there :)

Re: Time to organise svn - Take 3

2007-11-04 Thread Mark Thomas
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > jean-frederic clere wrote: >> Mark Thomas wrote: >>> Mark Thomas wrote: svn cp https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_6_0_15 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.1.0/trunk https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.

Time to organise svn - Take 4

2007-11-04 Thread Mark Thomas
After some more refinements, the plan to get us from where we are (RTC on a stable 6.0.x branch) to where we want to be (6.0.x frozen, RTC on a stable 6.2.x branch, and a CTR dev branch) is: Stage 1 === Create a CTR dev branch now. svn cp https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk h

Re: Time to organise svn - Take 3

2007-11-04 Thread Mark Thomas
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: > Mark Thomas wrote: >> jean-frederic clere wrote: >> >>> Why Friday? Shouldn't we wait until 6.0.15 (or 6.0.15 + n) is voted >>> stable? >>> >>s >> We can do if that is the preference. My motivation is that I am keen >> to get >> back to a CTR codebase asap as

Re: Time to organise svn - Take 3

2007-11-01 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: jean-frederic clere wrote: Mark Thomas wrote: Mark Thomas wrote: svn cp https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_6_0_15 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.1.0/trunk https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_6_0_15 https

Re: Time to organise svn - Take 3

2007-11-01 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
jean-frederic clere wrote: Mark Thomas wrote: Mark Thomas wrote: svn cp https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_6_0_15 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.1.0/trunk https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_6_0_15 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/t

Re: Time to organise svn - Take 3

2007-11-01 Thread Rémy Maucherat
On Thu, 2007-11-01 at 10:03 +, Mark Thomas wrote: > jean-frederic clere wrote: > > Why Friday? Shouldn't we wait until 6.0.15 (or 6.0.15 + n) is voted > stable? > > We can do if that is the preference. My motivation is that I am keen > to get > back to a CTR codebase asap as I find only having

Re: Time to organise svn - Take 3

2007-11-01 Thread jean-frederic clere
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: > Mark Thomas wrote: >> jean-frederic clere wrote: >> >>> Why Friday? Shouldn't we wait until 6.0.15 (or 6.0.15 + n) is voted >>> stable? >>> >> >> We can do if that is the preference. My motivation is that I am keen >> to get >> back to a CTR codebase asap as

Re: Time to organise svn - Take 3

2007-11-01 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
Mark Thomas wrote: jean-frederic clere wrote: Why Friday? Shouldn't we wait until 6.0.15 (or 6.0.15 + n) is voted stable? We can do if that is the preference. My motivation is that I am keen to get back to a CTR codebase asap as I find only having RTC a real pain. he he, I think ev

Re: Time to organise svn - Take 3

2007-11-01 Thread Mark Thomas
jean-frederic clere wrote: > Why Friday? Shouldn't we wait until 6.0.15 (or 6.0.15 + n) is voted stable? We can do if that is the preference. My motivation is that I am keen to get back to a CTR codebase asap as I find only having RTC a real pain. Mark --

Re: Time to organise svn - Take 3

2007-11-01 Thread Peter Rossbach
Good point +1 Peter Am 01.11.2007 um 09:51 schrieb jean-frederic clere: Mark Thomas wrote: Mark Thomas wrote: svn cp https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_6_0_15 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.1.0/trunk https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/tags

Re: Time to organise svn - Take 3

2007-11-01 Thread jean-frederic clere
Mark Thomas wrote: > Mark Thomas wrote: >> svn cp >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_6_0_15 >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.1.0/trunk >> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_6_0_15 >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/trunk

Re: Time to organise svn - Take 3

2007-10-31 Thread Mark Thomas
Mark Thomas wrote: > svn cp > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_6_0_15 > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.1.0/trunk > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_6_0_15 > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/trunk > > Changes to .../trunk

Re: Time to organise svn

2007-10-06 Thread Peter Rossbach
HI, what I miss is the bundle of the following include The file is reference at web-jsptaglibrary_2_1.xsd and web-app_2_5.xsd. Can it be that schemaResolver at o.a.c.startup.DigesterFactory must be also registered all included xml schemas for standalone resolving? Original schema files at

Time to organise svn - Take 3

2007-10-06 Thread Mark Thomas
After the latest round of comments, the plan is: Tag 6.0.15 early next week. svn cp https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_6_0_15 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.1.0/trunk https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_6_0_15 https://svn.apache.org/r

Re: Time to organise svn

2007-10-06 Thread Mark Thomas
Remy Maucherat wrote: > Mark Thomas wrote: >> Next attempt. >> >> Taking account of the comments so far, a slightly modified proposal is >> below. >> >> svn cp https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/trunk >> >> svn cp https://svn.apache.org/

Re: Time to organise svn

2007-10-05 Thread Mark Thomas
jean-frederic clere wrote: > Remy Maucherat wrote: >> Mark Thomas wrote: >>> Next attempt. >>> >>> Taking account of the comments so far, a slightly modified proposal is >>> below. >>> >>> svn cp https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/trunk

Re: Time to organise svn

2007-10-05 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
jean-frederic clere wrote: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: jean-frederic clere wrote: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: jean-frederic clere wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: Mark Thomas wrote:

Re: Time to organise svn

2007-10-05 Thread Rainer Jung
Mark Thomas wrote: svn cp https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/trunk svn cp https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_6_0_14 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.1.0/trunk RTC on tc6.0.x/trunk RTC on .../6.1.x/

Re: Time to organise svn

2007-10-05 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Oct 5, 2007, at 8:07 AM, Remy Maucherat wrote: Mark Thomas wrote: Next attempt. Taking account of the comments so far, a slightly modified proposal is below. svn cp https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/trunk svn cp https://svn.apac

Re: Time to organise svn

2007-10-05 Thread jean-frederic clere
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: > jean-frederic clere wrote: >> Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: >> >>> Remy Maucherat wrote: >>> jean-frederic clere wrote: > Remy Maucherat wrote: > >> Mark Thomas wrote: >> >>> Next attempt. >>> >>>

Re: Time to organise svn

2007-10-05 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
jean-frederic clere wrote: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: jean-frederic clere wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: Mark Thomas wrote: Next attempt. Taking account of the comments so far, a slightly modified proposal is below. svn cp https://

Re: Time to organise svn

2007-10-05 Thread jean-frederic clere
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: > Remy Maucherat wrote: >> jean-frederic clere wrote: >>> Remy Maucherat wrote: Mark Thomas wrote: > Next attempt. > > Taking account of the comments so far, a slightly modified proposal is > below. > > svn cp https://svn.apache.org/repos/

Re: Time to organise svn

2007-10-05 Thread Remy Maucherat
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: Can we wait a bit, there are a few bug fixes that need to be caught up on , and I also think we can improve upon the server.xml invalid attribute implementation, the way I did the sandbox. I'll come up withe patches for the bug and the fixes for the invalid attrib

Re: Time to organise svn

2007-10-05 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
Remy Maucherat wrote: jean-frederic clere wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: Mark Thomas wrote: Next attempt. Taking account of the comments so far, a slightly modified proposal is below. svn cp https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/trunk sv

Re: Time to organise svn

2007-10-05 Thread Remy Maucherat
jean-frederic clere wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: Mark Thomas wrote: Next attempt. Taking account of the comments so far, a slightly modified proposal is below. svn cp https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/trunk svn cp https://svn.apache

Re: Time to organise svn

2007-10-05 Thread jean-frederic clere
Remy Maucherat wrote: > Mark Thomas wrote: >> Next attempt. >> >> Taking account of the comments so far, a slightly modified proposal is >> below. >> >> svn cp https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/trunk >> >> svn cp https://svn.apache.org/

Re: Time to organise svn

2007-10-05 Thread Peter Rossbach
++1 Am 05.10.2007 um 14:07 schrieb Remy Maucherat: Mark Thomas wrote: Next attempt. Taking account of the comments so far, a slightly modified proposal is below. svn cp https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/trunk svn cp https://svn.ap

Re: Time to organise svn

2007-10-05 Thread Remy Maucherat
Mark Thomas wrote: Next attempt. Taking account of the comments so far, a slightly modified proposal is below. svn cp https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/trunk svn cp https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_6_0_14 ht

Re: Time to organise svn

2007-10-05 Thread Mark Thomas
Next attempt. Taking account of the comments so far, a slightly modified proposal is below. svn cp https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/trunk svn cp https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_6_0_14 https://svn.apache.org/

Re: Time to organise svn

2007-10-05 Thread jean-frederic clere
Mark Thomas wrote: > William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: >> Actually, the way it typically works at httpd-space (which your new >> policy is based on) is that you would next create 6.1.0 as a forever >> development branch. Committers apply each patch they believe belongs >> to the 6.2.0 release, and thing

Re: Time to organise svn

2007-10-05 Thread jean-frederic clere
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > Mark Thomas wrote: >> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: >>> Actually, the way it typically works at httpd-space (which your new >>> policy is based on) is that you would next create 6.1.0 as a forever >>> development branch. Committers apply each patch they believe belongs

Re: Time to organise svn

2007-10-04 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Mark Thomas wrote: > William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: >> Actually, the way it typically works at httpd-space (which your new >> policy is based on) is that you would next create 6.1.0 as a forever >> development branch. Committers apply each patch they believe belongs >> to the 6.2.0 release, and thing

Re: Time to organise svn

2007-10-04 Thread Mark Thomas
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > Actually, the way it typically works at httpd-space (which your new > policy is based on) is that you would next create 6.1.0 as a forever > development branch. Committers apply each patch they believe belongs > to the 6.2.0 release, and things are removed and readded

Re: Time to organise svn

2007-10-04 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Mark Thomas wrote: > William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: >> Mark Thomas wrote: >>> In light of the recent vote, we need to make some changes to svn. In >>> short we need to add: >>> 6.2.x >> ? Where is 6.1.0, or in other words, why the skip? > > The idea was to use even numbers for stable releases, odd n

Re: Time to organise svn

2007-10-04 Thread Mark Thomas
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > Mark Thomas wrote: >> In light of the recent vote, we need to make some changes to svn. In >> short we need to add: >> 6.2.x > > ? Where is 6.1.0, or in other words, why the skip? The idea was to use even numbers for stable releases, odd numbers for alpha/beta. I wo

Re: Time to organise svn

2007-10-04 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Mark Thomas wrote: > In light of the recent vote, we need to make some changes to svn. In > short we need to add: > 6.2.x ? Where is 6.1.0, or in other words, why the skip? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additio

Time to organise svn

2007-10-04 Thread Mark Thomas
In light of the recent vote, we need to make some changes to svn. In short we need to add: 6.2.x trunk There are a number of ways we could do this. I suggest: svn cp https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.2.x svn cp https://svn.apache.org/repo